Fabian Keil wrote:
Oliver Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 09:45:29PM -0400, Vinny wrote:
...
[...]
I'm using ZFS on geli on my production server with 2 SATA2 disks.
Just create and attach the geli devices in /dev and then create
a zpool i.e. with
# zpool create
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 09:45:29PM -0400, Vinny wrote:
...
P.S. Anyone running ZFS on multiple geli providers?
as above.
Does that mean you are/aren't or have/haven't run
ZFS on top of, say, 3 geli encrypted disks? I'm curious
as to whether there are many people who have tried it,
Oliver Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 09:45:29PM -0400, Vinny wrote:
...
P.S. Anyone running ZFS on multiple geli providers?
as above.
Does that mean you are/aren't or have/haven't run
ZFS on top of, say, 3 geli encrypted disks? I'm curious
as to
I'm wondering if soft-updates on UFS2 should be enabled
on a geli provided disk, da1.eli, for example. That is,
same as without geli. geli device behaves like normal disk/partition, just
it's encrypted.
P.S. Anyone running ZFS on multiple geli providers?
as above.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I'm wondering if soft-updates on UFS2 should be enabled
on a geli provided disk, da1.eli, for example. That is,
same as without geli. geli device behaves like normal disk/partition,
just it's encrypted.
Wojciech,
Thanks for your answer. I was wondering what the
Hi,
I'm wondering if soft-updates on UFS2 should be enabled
on a geli provided disk, da1.eli, for example. That is,
should I use -U:
newfs -U /dev/da1.eli
or not use -U?
newfs /dev/da1.eli
Will -U help with crash corruption protection on a geli
provider? Does my question make sense?
