Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:44:29 -0800 Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:37:18 Nikola Lečić wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800 > > > > Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To cut down my email I

Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:44:29 -0800 Gary Kline wrote: > Can you > [[ or anyone else onlist ]] tell me of successes or snafus in building 2.3.1 > from src?? Yes, I do build openoffice.org (russian LANG) at my tinderbox and it fails rarely (may be once per ten times). WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam

Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

My personal choice is to run 32-bit Linux version of OO under linux emulation (2.4.x branch) First of all it survives FreeBSD base system/gcc/etc updates pretty well :) when using native one you should fiddle with compat libraries sometimes and so on. Second -- it runs faster than native one

Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:37:18 Nikola Lečić wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800 > > Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To cut down my email I unsub'd to the OOo mailing list, so I'll ask > > here if there is a new package of the latest or near-latest that I > > can set off at

Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800 Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To cut down my email I unsub'd to the OOo mailing list, so I'll ask > here if there is a new package of the latest or near-latest that I > can set off at night and have it

is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

To cut down my email I unsub'd to the OOo mailing list, so I'll ask here if there is a new package of the latest or near-latest that I can set off at night and have it installed by morning. Any exact URL's would be a great help. tia, people, gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.