On 22/01/06, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> I have been playing around with make.conf and I see that it is possible to
> to use the "NO_OPENSSH" variable to not build openssh when updating fbsd
> from source. I also noticed in the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file that there
> is
> a
On Jan 21, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Adam Stroud wrote:
All:
I have been playing around with make.conf and I see that it is
possible to
to use the "NO_OPENSSH" variable to not build openssh when updating
fbsd
from source. I also noticed in the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file that
there is
a "sshd_pro
All:
I have been playing around with make.conf and I see that it is possible to
to use the "NO_OPENSSH" variable to not build openssh when updating fbsd
from source. I also noticed in the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file that there is
a "sshd_program" entry that can be used to adjust where the installa
At 01:53 AM 10/31/2005, Vladimir Dvorak wrote:
Hello,
where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For
example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but
man 5 make.conf
doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option.
Fortunatelly I found this page
http://www.gsp.com/cgi
On 10/31/05, Vladimir Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For
> example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but
>
> man 5 make.conf
>
> doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option.
>
> Fortunatelly I found this page
Hello,
where can I found ALL parameters suited for /etc/make.conf ? For
example, I wanted install some software from ports without X11, but
man 5 make.conf
doesn`t include WITHOUT_X11 option.
Fortunatelly I found this page
http://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=5&topic=make.conf
and inclu
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:05:00PM +0200, Piotr Gnyp wrote:
# certain code (currently only OpenSSL) as well as modifying the value
^^
It does exactly what it says it does. What is your confusion?
M
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:05:00PM +0200, Piotr Gnyp wrote:
> # The CPUTYPE variable controls which processor should be targeted for
> # generated code. This controls processor-specific optimizations in
> # certain code (currently only OpenSSL) as well as modifying the value
> # of CFLAGS to con
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The version of gcc that comes with FreeBSD 4.x can't do better than
this, i.e. it doesn't know about optimizations for newer CPUs. In
practise this isn't important.
Ok, so why this:
# The CPUTYPE variable controls which processor should
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:27:22AM +0200, Piotr Gnyp wrote:
> Hi.
> My 4.11 boxes:
> uname -r
> 4.11-RELEASE-p1
> CPU:
> 1. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.30-MHz 686-class CPU)
> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7
>
> Features=0xbfebfbff SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
> Hyperthre
Hi.
My 4.11 boxes:
uname -r
4.11-RELEASE-p1
CPU:
1. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.30-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7
Features=0xbfebfbff
Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs
2. CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2798.66-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:30:51 -0400, NetAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does one know what flags to use in /etc/make.conf? I thought I
> "had" the right ones.
The "right" "one" is very much relative to the user and the purpose of
the system. For example on a development system I would en
make.conf(5) has some info for you
Michael
On Oct 24, 2004, at 2:30 PM, NetAdmin wrote:
I have a P4 2.4G Intel proc on an Asus P4S533 motherboard running
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p17. /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh is showing
"Release" now and not "RC1" so I thought I'd give it a shot. I'm trying
to
I have a P4 2.4G Intel proc on an Asus P4S533 motherboard running
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p17. /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh is showing
"Release" now and not "RC1" so I thought I'd give it a shot. I'm trying
to figure out what are the best/appropriate flags to use in
/etc/make.conf I "had" the fol
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:54:25PM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 1) Can I put any make option into make.conf that can be applied
>to ports (like in make WITH_CALENDAR=yes install clean)
>or is this restricted to system ressources?
Yes, you can put ports spe
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:41:34 + (UTC) in lucky.freebsd.questions, "Peter Ulrich
Kruppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 1) Can I put any make option into make.conf that can be applied
> to ports (like inmake WITH_CALENDAR=yes install clean)
> or is this restricted to system re
Hi!
1) Can I put any make option into make.conf that can be applied
to ports (like inmake WITH_CALENDAR=yes install clean)
or is this restricted to system ressources?
2) If yes - would this be advisable? - Or is there a big chance
to produce some sort of mess?
3) Is make.conf also
17 matches
Mail list logo