I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:13:11 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 09/12/13 15:51, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
It is possible. The OS provides the newfs_msdos
On 09/12/13 15:51, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
Sure, it's possible. For maximum compatibility, I'd suggest
On 09/12/13 16:26, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:13:11 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 09/12/13 15:51, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick
a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
It is possible. The OS provides the newfs_msdos tool.
There is no need to deal with Windows for this task.
Great, thanks.
I checked the newfs manpage but didn't look too carefully when the summary
On 09/12/13 17:52, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages. I
need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system. Is
it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
Sure, it's possible
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 09/12/13 17:52, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages. I
need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system. Is
it possible, or do I have to find
On 09/12/13 20:58, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 09/12/13 17:52, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages. I
need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system
I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able to
mount and unmount it but i can't copy files into the stick. please see the
attached image for the commands I used and the results. If you have any
suggestions on what the problem might be I would sure like to know
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:34 AM, william benton weben...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able
to mount and unmount it but i can't copy files into the stick. please see
the attached image for the commands I used and the results. If you
(sorry for top post)
Heh, looks like the Alton Brown style of debugging ;D (for anyone that follows
his twitter feed)
--
Devin
On Aug 8, 2013, at 7:34 AM, william benton wrote:
I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able to
mount and unmount it but i can't
Is this message indicating I have a memory error? I'm seeing this
message across two systems, one below:
FreeBSD mc 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r252678: Thu Jul 4 03:47:52
PDT 2013 root@mc:/usr/obj/disk-1/src/sys/SMUNI amd64
Jul 4 15:11:10 mc kernel: MCA: Bank 2, Status
Dennis Glatting freebsd at pki2.com writes:
Is this message indicating I have a memory error? I'm seeing this
message across two systems, one below:
FreeBSD mc 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r252678: Thu Jul 4 03:47:52
PDT 2013 root at mc:/usr/obj/disk-1/src/sys/SMUNI amd64
Jul
When stopping vnet jails get message about lost memory pages.
What console commands show available memory pages so I can determine the
lost memory pages after 100 stopped jails?
Want to find out if that lost memory page message is bogus or not.
Thanks
On 05/14/2013 08:56 PM, Joe wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 05/14/2013 08:32 PM, Joe wrote:
When stopping vnet jails get message about lost memory pages.
What console commands show available memory pages so I can determine the lost
memory pages after 100 stopped jails?
Want to find out
The solution was given at revision 233760.
Link for description:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=233760
Thanks to all!
--
Respectfully,
Stanislav Putrya
System administrator
FotoStrana.Ru Ltd.
ICQ IM: 328585847
Jabber-GoogleTalk: root.vagner
mob.phone SPB: +79215788755
Hi all!
Tell me please, how may I remove shared memory segment like this:
T:m shmid:65537 shmkey:0 mode:--rw-rw-rw- owner:root group:wheel creator:root
cgroup:wheel
NATTCH:2 SEGSZ:1048576000 CPID:2982 LPID:54375 ATIME:10:29:12 DTIME:15:56:14
CTIME:10:51:00
Pid 2982 and pid 54375 is killed
On 03/19/2013 13:06, Vagner wrote:
Hi all!
Tell me please, how may I remove shared memory segment like this:
T:m shmid:65537 shmkey:0 mode:--rw-rw-rw- owner:root group:wheel creator:root
cgroup:wheel
NATTCH:2 SEGSZ:1048576000 CPID:2982 LPID:54375 ATIME:10:29:12 DTIME:15:56:14
CTIME:10:51:00
I have a process that eats up al memory,
in my case science/paraview if I try to
analyse a large model. What should FreeBSD
do when a process tries to use all RAM or more?
I my case I get a complete freeze, can't even
login from the console, and requiring a cold
reboot. I guess
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:01:03 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I have a process that eats up al memory,
in my case science/paraview if I try to
analyse a large model. What should FreeBSD
do when a process tries to use all RAM or more?
In this case, the swap space would be used, until the
system
On 7/3/2013 12:17 μμ, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:01:03 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I have a process that eats up al memory,
in my case science/paraview if I try to
analyse a large model. What should FreeBSD
do when a process tries to use all RAM or more?
In this case, the swap
I have a 512GB memory system that has a 480GB (or so) L2ARC, and a
raidz2 storage pool. No dedup or compression is enabled. Although, I
will enable compression in the future.
By default vfs.zfs.arc_max is about 300GB and the L2ARC is hardly touched.
I've seen a couple hints recently
.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reed A. Cartwright cartwri...@asu.eduwrote:
I have a 512GB memory system that has a 480GB (or so) L2ARC, and a
raidz2 storage pool. No dedup or compression is enabled. Although, I
will enable compression in the future.
By default vfs.zfs.arc_max is about
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU memory resources?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:38:05 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU memory resources?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:38:05 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU memory resources?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel.
Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system.
Such as a loadable kernel module.
Can not be
Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel.
Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system.
Such as a loadable kernel
Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost
dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed
and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with
video memory?
___
freebsd
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:15:06 +0700, Dima Naumov wrote:
Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost
dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed
and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with
video memory?
You
Dima Naumov clangbsd at gmail.com writes:
Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost
dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed
and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with
video memory?
- check in BIOS
Hi,
I recently had a discussion of PostgreSQLs memory usage on FreeBSD,
notably the display of the different memory types in top, on the
PostgreSQL mailing list [1]. My server has 32GB ram, of which approx.
8GB vanish from tops display after a while. My question was wether there
is a memory
very old laptop. I think you'll need to install more memory
or downgrade FreeBSD to an earlier version.
1998, I think (HP Omnibook 900). I use it for small network testing and
serial console access. It works well for this.
Well I've put 8-STABLE on it (two days to make buildworld/buildkernel
Hi,
I'm updating an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.1 with 64 MB ram (44MB
available) but now FreeBSD 9.1 panics at boot time:
panic: kmem_malloc(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated?
Any work-around?
Thanks regards.
___
very old laptop. I think you'll need to install more memory
or downgrade FreeBSD to an earlier version.
9.1-RELEASE isn't available yet, only 9.1-RC1 RC2. Given it's
prerelease code it's plausible the 9.1-RC2 kernel requires more memory
at boot than 9.1-REL will. Attempting to boot 9.0-REL from CD
(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated?
That's one very old laptop. I think you'll need to install more memory
or downgrade FreeBSD to an earlier version.
9.1-RELEASE isn't available yet, only 9.1-RC1 RC2. Given it's
prerelease code it's plausible the 9.1-RC2 kernel requires more
:
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
about 500MB of my 4GB swap partition was used before
by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
about 500MB of my 4GB swap partition was used before crashing. I was
wondering why it didn't take the whole 4GB up
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:03 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http
Mickaël Canévet cane...@embl.fr writes:
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
about 500MB of my 4GB swap partition was used before crashing
Hello,
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
about 500MB of my 4GB swap partition was used before crashing. I was
wondering why it didn't take
Trying to run a Linux app under 9-STABLE. I can start it once and stop
it once but all subsequent efforts produces a core dump.
I believe the reason being that this app stores licensing information in
shared memory and when it stops first time it fails to remove this info.
Is there a sysctl
On 08/12/12 11:12, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Trying to run a Linux app under 9-STABLE. I can start it once and stop
it once but all subsequent efforts produces a core dump.
I believe the reason being that this app stores licensing information in
shared memory and when it stops first time
in the configuration and being loaded
[Tue Aug 07 13:09:12 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
Thanks!
Chad
Since you manually installed apache22 and mod_fcgid from up-stream sources
maybe you missed something. As a test create
:09:12 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
Thanks!
Chad
Since you manually installed apache22 and mod_fcgid from up-stream
sources maybe you missed something. As a test create another jail and
install the package versions
2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
I did a search on this and found that I would probably need a system kernel
parameter changed from 0 - 1
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed
So I did that. (And restarted the jail). However, I
jail_sysvipc_allow=YES in rc.conf should do it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
Thanks!
Chad
)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
I did a search on this and found that I would probably need a system kernel
parameter changed from 0 - 1
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed
So I did that. (And restarted the jail). However, I still get the same error
1083 root 1 210 99444K 11544K select 0 1:28 0.00% Xorg
doesn't take much, only 11.5MB is resident
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 4 July 2012 20:52, J B jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
It is in ports:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
jb
[10001 eitan@radar ~ ]%whereis xrestop
xrestop: /usr/ports/x11/xrestop
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
9716K 660K select 0 0:05 0.00% moused
...
Of course, opera is a big customer of RAM which i cannot decrease its memory
usage. then can i descrease the xorg's resident memory ?
Sincerely!
-
e^(π.i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-can-i
It is in ports:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/31801/what-is-in-wired-memory
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:35AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
top reports wired memory 128MB
WHERE it is used? below results of vmstat -m and vmstat -z
values does not sum up even to half of it
FreeBSD 9 - few days
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
anyway - who cares
Something is deeply broken in OS X memory management
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post
most importantly networking but certainly not memory subsystem.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% grep -ri
2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
needed for new programs. In practice, I?ve found that this isn?t the case, and
my system slows to a crawl and starts paging out to disk when free
problem
analysis, only a wild mix of stuff non-related to FreeBSD sprinkled with some
magic 'memory management' dust.
The fact that FreeBSD DOES NOT page excessively on the same workload
relative to other OS (linux, netbsd) is one of most important thing i
decided to use it.
If his system
is relatively new. My guess is that if there is a problem it's ZFS
specific. If it were a more general problem I think we'd see a lot more
complaints, whereas ZFS already has a reputation for needing lots of
memory.
you may precisely set up a limits of memory that ZFS would use at most. or
just
Wojciech Puchar wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
needed for new programs. In practice, I?ve found that this isn?t the case
Wojciech Puchar wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
anyway - who cares
Well, I quoted
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:04 AM, jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
If so, should FreeBSD adopt NetBSD's MM subsys, or just improve itself
surgically ?
You ought first establish there is a problem. What you have cited is
recently reinvigorated trend that has taken on the air of the BDS is
Adam Vande More amvandemore at gmail.com writes:
...
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/19036310553/two-things-that-really-helped-
speed-up-my-mac-and
http://dywypi.org/2012/02/back-on-linux.html
2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
longer) is supposed
and kernel being
out of sync would be operator error. In this case the values you are using
to somehow relate the symptom to memory management would be false.
As far as all the rest, such as something being deeply broken in OS X
memory management, mentions of NetBSD memory management, etc
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:32:39 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
Adam Vande More amvandemore at gmail.com writes:
...
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/19036310553/two-things-that-really-helped-
speed-up-my-mac-and
http://dywypi.org/2012/02/back-on-linux.html
2) Inactive memory (which
RW rwmaillists at googlemail.com writes:
...
...
2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but
is no longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by
the OS when needed for new programs. In practice, I’ve found that
this isn’t the case, and my
Hi,
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
Something is deeply broken in OS X memory management
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/20464780085/something-is-deeply-broken-in-os-x-
memory-management
One of the problems that caught my eyes was inactive
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% grep -ri freebsd xnu-1699.24.23 | wc -l
520
% grep -ril freebsd xnu-1699.24.23 | sort | uniq
% grep -ril freebsd
Chuck Swiger cswiger at mac.com writes:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% grep -ri freebsd xnu-1699.24.23 | wc -l
520
% grep -ril freebsd
jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
...
The related implementation in FreeBSD seems to have a similar problem:
NetBSD users have also reported that UVM’s im- provements have had a positive
effect on their applica- tions. This is most noticeable when physical memory
becomes scarce
if and only if it
corresponds to one or more of the pages accounted for in the
resident memory lists of all the processes on the system (as per
the output of 'top' and 'ps')
No.
The pages belonging to vnode vm object can be active or inactive or cached
but not mapped
if and only if it
corresponds to one or more of the pages accounted for in the
resident memory lists of all the processes on the system (as
per the output of 'top' and 'ps')
No.
The pages belonging to vnode vm object can be active or inactive or
cached but not mapped
:
a page is accounted for in active + inactive if and only if it
corresponds to one or more of the pages accounted for in the
resident memory lists of all the processes on the system (as
per the output of 'top' and 'ps')
No.
The pages belonging to vnode vm
On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
[ ... ]
My current (probably quite simplistic) understanding of the FreeBSD
virtual memory system is that, for each process as reported by top:
* Size corresponds to the total size of all the text pages for the
process (those belonging
Thanks for your email, Chuck.
Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident
memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active +
inactive lists.
Hmm...if a process gets swapped out entirely, the pages for it will be moved
to the cache list, flushed
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:30:07 -0500
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
* Resident corresponds to a subset of the pages above: those
pages which actually occupy physical/core memory. Notably pages may
appear in size but not appear in resident
1312M uwait 0 18.3H 39.06%
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar JDownloade
...how can the size of the resident memory of pid 6913 be 512 megabytes?
this is wth a very recent HEAD on amd64.
cheers.
alex
___
freebsd-questions
UIDTHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND 6913 1001 32 200 4252M 1312M uwait 0 18.3H
39.06% /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar JDownloade
...how can the size of the resident memory of pid 6913 be 512
megabytes?
I don't know but you can
of the resident memory of pid 6913 be 512
megabytes?
I don't know but you can inspect the java application with the java
console (jconsole). There are several stats on memory usage.
jconsole doesn't seem to work for me. all i get is a blank white X window. :(
cheers.
alex
With JDownloader (doing
Hi,
I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only able
to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
I have tuned my sysctl on master host as follow :
kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
kern.ipc.shmall=409600
kern.ipc.semmap=256
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1
Le 5 janv. 2012 à 14:56, bsd a écrit :
Hi,
I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only
able to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
I have tuned my sysctl on master host as follow :
kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
kern.ipc.shmall=409600
the see something like the
example below, where there is still one Pg on uid 70 but from the
jail's perspective it's the pgsql user who now has uid of 70124
Message Queues:
T ID KEY MODEOWNERGROUP
Shared Memory:
T ID KEY MODEOWNER
I'm running Transmission (http://www.transmissionbt.com/), а BitTorrent
client on my FreeBSD 7.2 box. It requests large recieve buffers for its
network connections. This leaves my system with absolutely no free
memory. If some process frees a large amount of memory, it gets consumed
about 1.5
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dmitriy Kryuk kryukdmit...@rambler.ruwrote:
How do I make FreeBSD keep some memory free (and so avoid swapping) with
Transmission running?
Your top(1) output doesn't indicate to me that swapping is a problem.
There were some performance problems
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:57:52 +0700
Dmitriy Kryuk wrote:
I'm running Transmission (http://www.transmissionbt.com/), а
BitTorrent client on my FreeBSD 7.2 box. It requests large recieve
buffers for its network connections. This leaves my system with
absolutely no free memory. If some process
All:
Just got these messages in the log after installing FreeBSD 9.0-RC1
on an older machine. The system hasn't shown any glitches or
crashes, so the error wasn't fatal. I'm guessing that there was an
error in cache memory that was corrected by ECC; is this correct?
Nov 4 08:31:21 joe
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free' in Linux.
I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking if anyone
has a cleaner option.
I was always curious.
Thanks
Jon
___
freebsd
On 11/3/11 9:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
Hi Jon,
Check out the port /usr/ports/sysutils/sysinfo .
HTH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei bsdlis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free' in Linux.
I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:06:19 -0400
Jon Schipp jonsch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei bsdlis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free
Hello Jon,
Perhaps the port sysutils/freecolor.
Cheers ...
Mark
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free' in Linux.
I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking if
anyone
has a cleaner option.
I was always curious
Jon Schipp jonsch...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei bsdlis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free' in Linux.
I know you can check
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.comwrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Nov 3 08:17:46 2011
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:18:06 -0400
From: Jon Schipp jonsch...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Check Memory Usage
physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free' in Linux.
I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking if
anyone
has a cleaner option.
I was always curious.
Thanks
Jon
__**_
freebsd-questions
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jon Schipp jonsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm under the impression that virtual memory and physical memory usage are
very different.
e.g. vmstat and top report very different memory values.
If I assume this is an XY problem, and your true goal is find out what
1 - 100 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
