hi, I just installed stock FreeBSD 9.0 on a PowerEdge server with two network
cards:
bce0 is directly connected to isp's gateway
bce1~3 are connected to the inside port of a router configured as
192.168.1.0/24 network with 192.168.1.1 as gateway
If the ENTIRE content of /etc/rc.conf is:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.3.1
bound to 192.168.3.41 -- renewal in 1800 seconds.
'ifconfig em0' output is
em0:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.3.1
bound to 192.168.3.41 -- renewal in 1800 seconds.
'ifconfig em0' output is
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
New to me. Does the machine have any unusual settings, like a non-default
securelevel?
No. There are no unusual security settings.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on
Hi,
I upgraded from 8.0 stable to 8.2 stable today. Now I can't connect to the
network through the network adapter. I've set DCHP and SYNCDHCP in /etc/rc.conf
and it worked in 8.0. It seems the dhclient problem. The ip address can't be
obtained.
When I run 'dhclient em0' manually, it shows
On 11/17/11 17:56, Xihong Yin wrote:
The ip address can't be obtained.
Have you tried rebooting FreeBSD and letting it obtain the IP itself?
On some OSes that has actually worked.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I did reboot. It is the same thing.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/17/11 17:56, Xihong Yin wrote:
The ip address can't be obtained.
Have you tried rebooting FreeBSD and letting it obtain the IP itself?
On some OSes that has actually worked.
On 11/17/11 18:41, Xihong Yin wrote:
I did reboot. It is the same thing.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/17/11 17:56, Xihong Yin wrote:
The ip address can't be obtained.
Have you tried rebooting FreeBSD and letting it obtain the IP itself?
On some OSes that has
I think the driver that comes with 8.2 stable just works fine.
When I manually run dhclient em0, it says ip address obtained. but ifconfig
em0 shows ip address of 0.0.0.0. And there is no default route in the 'netstat
-r' output.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/17/11
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded from 8.0 stable to 8.2 stable today. Now I can't connect to the
network through the network adapter. I've set DCHP and SYNCDHCP in
/etc/rc.conf and it worked in 8.0. It seems the dhclient problem. The ip
address can't be obtained.
When
On 10/07/11 01:01, Aydın Demirel wrote:
Hi;
I installed FreeBSD 8.2 on Centos 5.7 via KVM. KVM version is 8.3 and
qemu version is 0.12.4
We have network problem. I set guest freebsd network as bridge mode
and Status seems active. Default gateway is defined..
When I see network packets
Hi;
I installed FreeBSD 8.2 on Centos 5.7 via KVM. KVM version is 8.3 and
qemu version is 0.12.4
We have network problem. I set guest freebsd network as bridge mode and
Status seems active. Default gateway is defined..
When I see network packets with tcpdump, packets are streaming
What can be the problem? Any suggestion?
Show us:
ifconfig -a
arp -an
netstat -rn
netstat -i
netstat -s
Are other KVM guests on this hypervisor working? Are you briding or
routing/NAT from your hypervisor?
~BAS
___
Hi,
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
The computer on wich I try to run this command is on my home LAN
that has a gateway/router.
What can I
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
The computer on wich I try to run this command is on my home LAN
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
The computer
2011-04-03 18:35 keltezéssel, Paul Chany írta:
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network
problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
The computer
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
The computer
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Le Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:18:26 -0400,
Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
[...]
I use ppp (wvdial does not seem ported to
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
(8-STABLE/i386)
Hi,
I've got some troubles with a 3G connection. I don't know which things
I should check to debug this:
I use ppp to connect and it works fine. But after a while (not a long
time), I don't
Le Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:18:26 -0400,
Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
I've got some troubles with a 3G connection. I don't know which
things I should check to debug this:
I use ppp to connect and it
restart your network card and voilà.
Alexandre.
--- En date de : Mer 31.3.10, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org a écrit :
De: Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org
Objet: Re: u3g network problem
À: Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mercredi 31 mars 2010
If your DNS are changed, I think that your network card is configured in DHCP
mode.
To dissallow DNS changes (in /etc/resolv.conf) by DHCP updates, you can add
this line to /etc/dhclient.conf :
prepend domain-name-servers
DNS_IP_adress_1,DNS_IP_adresse_2,DNS_IP_adresse_3;
After you must
(8-STABLE/i386)
Hi,
I've got some troubles with a 3G connection. I don't know which things
I should check to debug this:
I use ppp to connect and it works fine. But after a while (not a long
time), I don't have any reply to DNS requests, as far I can see with
wireshark...
Then if I use an IP,
A large number of ISPs block port 80 requests and do not inform you.
With Verizon, you need to redirect external http requests to a
different port that is not blocked or pay for the business connection.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
After a recent change of ISP and hence our external IP address I find
that our FreeBSD 6.1 apache http server appears to be invisible from
outside our site. Port 80 requests just seem to hang whether done via a
dns lookup or using the ip address. Checking the logs seems to indicate
that no
whats redirecting the requests to the apache server? is it on piublic or
private ip block ? whats it set to listen on IP wise ? what about a changed
netmask ?
On Saturday 16 August 2008 15:55:11 Robin Becker wrote:
After a recent change of ISP and hence our external IP address I find
that our
OutBackDingo wrote:
whats redirecting the requests to the apache server? is it on piublic or
private ip block ? whats it set to listen on IP wise ? what about a changed
netmask ?
The server is listening to a local ip address which hasn't changed eg
192.168.0.x
The external IP address was
Double check your network configuration. Double check your firewall
configuration.
Try to telnet the ip address from the outside on port 80. Try to nmap
from the outside the ip address and see what is the result.
--
paolo
The external IP address was changed as was the external name server and
I just installed 7.0 STABLE on a brand new Dell SC1435 (dual AMD 64bit dual
core processors), and I'm experiencing a very weird problem. If I try to
do anything with the network, I lose connectivy.
For example, if I run /etc/rc.d/netif restart, when the interface comes
back up, it says the
I have such a strange problem I cant even guess whats worng.
Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE amd64 and zfs.
When the machine starts everything works fine but after a while (the
only thing I noticed, when the free memory drops below 1700MB)
it starts to behave VERY strange when serving
Please don't top-post; I had to delete the earlier comments from this
message because it had become impossible to follow.
When you hit the connection limit, does anything appear in the logs?
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
ammm I don't have checked any log files.. just test with my portscan
program.. and too when I have blocked when used BitCommet..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Please don't top-post.
ExTaZyTi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the FreeBSD machine performing NAT for the Windows box?
extazyti: yes with PF firewall. (But I don't have this problem before
re-build my world+kernel (my last fbsd was fbsd6.2-STABLE. But this problem
exist again in fbsd6.2-STABLE
I've already checket with sockstat.
Yes net.inet.tcp.blackhole: 0 this is my net.inet.tcp.blackhole value
0..
I don't know how ti fix this.. I try to migrate to FreeBSD 5.5 but when
build the kernel of fbsd-5.5 I have some errors and back again to the
6.2...backup kernel..
2007/6/24, Lowell
[lists trimmed to just -questions]
ExTaZyTi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a serious problem with my network.
I have connected 2 PC's, 1 - FreeBSD, 2 - Windows XP.
The problem is follow - My FreeBSD limmiting connections , I cannot open
more 224 TCP4-Sockets in my Windows Box.
When I
Is the FreeBSD machine performing NAT for the Windows box?
extazyti: yes with PF firewall. (But I don't have this problem before
re-build my world+kernel (my last fbsd was fbsd6.2-STABLE. But this problem
exist again in fbsd6.2-STABLE when I have build option ot drop TCP+SYN and
have some bug..I
Hi,
I have a serious problem with my network.
I have connected 2 PC's, 1 - FreeBSD, 2 - Windows XP.
The problem is follow - My FreeBSD limmiting connections , I cannot open
more 224 TCP4-Sockets in my Windows Box.
When I downloading torrent file, I cannot create more connections to the
web, and
Craig
applying the patch should be easy enough. You could always use something
better than cpanel, I've always perferred directadmin myself.
--
martin
On 5/13/07, Craig Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have tried different cables, even different
physical ports (although same type of
Yes,
I could use something other than cpanel, and
directadmin was actually one of my choices but
unfortunately, that decision was not mine. I'm only
responsible for getting the software that was chosen
to work.
My issue with the patch was that it was written for
if_bge.c dated in March 2006 and
Criag
have you tried cables? Could be a duff network cable or even speed mismatch
between you and the router/switch.
-
martin
On 5/12/07, Craig Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a dell poweredge 6650 installed with freebsd
6.1 and on the local router, everything works great
(ie, a
Yes, I have tried different cables, even different
physical ports (although same type of port). There
was a bug filed against 6.1 for the bge interfaces
that maybe related, although the bug indicated
absolutely no network conductivity. There was a patch
released and I'm trying to recompile with
I have a dell poweredge 6650 installed with freebsd
6.1 and on the local router, everything works great
(ie, a computer on a different subnet off the same
router can access it fine) but coming from outside of
the network access is incredibly slow. My first
thought was that it must be a routing
Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using bt to download files and i know this is bad for netowrk...
Not particularly; just make sure it isn't grabbing all of your bandwidth.
sometimes my firefox returns the site not found on some popular sites,
such as yahoo and google, and it
hi people,
I am using bt to download files and i know this is bad for netowrk...
anyhow..
sometimes my firefox returns the site not found on some popular sites,
such as yahoo and google, and it looks like firefox didnt try hard enough
before it gave it up. i have to ask it to reload to get it
Background Information:
FreeBSD 5.4
-
Try to connect to internet (open Yahoo, mozilla), but there is no
response from browser (Mozilla), it looks like stuck
On Sunday 12 June 2005 19:58, the author Zousys Info contributed to the
dialogue on-
Network problem:
Background Information:
FreeBSD 5.4
-
Try to connect
Hi !
I am long time user of FreeBSD and for must updates so far I hadn't had
much to do (maybe option here and option there, but networking never
changes), but after upgrade from 5.1 to 5.3 everything stoped working.
Since I couldn't rebuild kernel (some internal problems), I decided to
delete
Hi !
I am long time user of FreeBSD and for must updates so far I hadn't had
much to do (maybe option here and option there, but networking never
changes), but after upgrade from 5.1 to 5.3 everything stoped working.
Since I couldn't rebuild kernel (some internal problems), I decided to
delete
I need to make linux (gentoo) run (emulated) under fbsd 5.3, I'm using QEMU
from ports. I get host and guest pinged ok, but I can't make guest get inet.
There's one thing that doesn't seem to match the info I googled (qemu-docs
says this too), when QEMU starts it doesn't says Connected to host
I need to make linux (gentoo) run (emulated) under fbsd 5.3, I'm using QEMU
from ports. I get host and guest pinged ok, but I can't make guest get inet.
There's one thing that doesn't seem to match the info I googled (qemu-docs
says this too), when QEMU starts it doesn't says Connected to host
Hi Guys,
I've been experiencing a strange problem with our FreeBSD web server:
FreeBSD www.piyeepress.com 4.8-RELEASE
Server version: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix)
When accessed via a web browser, it will return pages for a few minutes.
Eventually access is super super slow, as if some TCP state table
access is super super slow, as if some TCP state table is
filling up. I reboot the server and it returns web pages as it should,
but only for five or so minutes, when it won't return any more pages, or
it returns pages but very slowly.
It may not be a network problem.
The output of netstat -ap tcp
Please help me troubleshoot a network problem. In the past,
after installing, it has all just worked, so I'm not sure exactly
how to best proceed. When the PC was formatted as Win98
the network connection worked fine, and the cabling is on
my work bench and works fine on other test systems, so I
5.1 install network problem.
Please help me troubleshoot a network problem. In the past,
after installing, it has all just worked, so I'm not sure exactly
how to best proceed. When the PC was formatted as Win98
the network connection worked fine, and the cabling is on
my work bench and works fine
: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: new 5.1 install network problem.
You are correct, sure sounds like DNS time out problem.
Do you have hostname='gateway.fakeDOMAINname.com' in rc.conf
Do you have entry in /etc/hosts file for ip address of Nic card and
it's FQDN IE
]
To: Clarence Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: new 5.1 install network problem.
You are correct, sure sounds like DNS time out problem.
Do you have hostname='gateway.fakeDOMAINname.com' in rc.conf
Do you have entry in /etc/hosts file for ip
22, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: new 5.1 install network problem.
Clarence Brown wrote:
Thanks for the Reply:
I believe that the DNS timeout is a symptom rather than cause
of the problem, because I'm getting an 80% packet loss when
pinging the IP address of the DNS server. I'm running
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Clarence Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: new 5.1 install network problem.
Clarence Brown wrote:
Thanks for the Reply:
I believe that the DNS timeout is a symptom rather than cause
Hi Rus, looks like you added an alias beyond the usable range. inet
63.247.81.167 netmask 0x broadcast 63.247.81.167 is your
broadcast.
--WEs
On Oct 20, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Rus Foster wrote:
Hi All,
I've just tried to bring up a new IP alias and am having trouble using
it
Currently
You show 167 as a broadcast on the first IP line then try to use it also
as an available ip
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Rus Foster wrote:
Hi All,
I've just tried to bring up a new IP alias and am having trouble using it
Currently
ls512# ifconfig -a
vr0:
hi josh,
thanks for the advise. it's the FIREWALL thing that
don't allow my FreeBSD to access the Internet Sharing
in the Windows XP. Now, its ok already. I just
unchecked the option that Restricts IP hosts from
Internet (external) to access the Internet Sharing
Machine or something like that.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:04:15AM -0700, Edwin D. Vinas wrote:
hi josh,
see dmesg, ifconfig and netstat below... hope you can help me now. -edwin
IFCONFIG
dc0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.0.6 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
Hi,
I've stumbling with all the mailing lists about this problem and I hope somebody will
give a kind advise. Here's my LAN setup:
| | || |
WinXP1 WinXP2 WinXP3 WinXP4 FreeBSD
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:06:19AM -0700, Edwin D. Vinas wrote:
Hi,
I've stumbling with all the mailing lists about this problem and I hope somebody
will give a kind advise. Here's my LAN setup:
| | |
hi josh,
see dmesg, ifconfig and netstat below... hope you can help me now. -edwin
IFCONFIG
dc0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.0.6 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
inet6 fe80::280:adff:fe00:591a%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
ether
After I have had a lot of in/out bound traffic going through my NAT box, I begin
having problems with any getting any thing in or out. This problem only seems to
come up after I have been using p2p or listening to streaming music for awhile.
I can easily ping any box on my LAN with out any
Hi,
I'm new to freebsd. I'm using 4.6.2-RELEASE. After compiling a custom
kernel I'm getting problem in the network. When I try to ping any
machine I get message ping: sendto: No route to host I can't even
ping the localhost .
I guess my network interface is properly detected. ifconfig shows
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:31:36AM +0545 or thereabouts, Rohit Neupane seemed to write:
Hi,
I'm new to freebsd. I'm using 4.6.2-RELEASE. After compiling a custom
kernel I'm getting problem in the network. When I try to ping any
machine I get message ping: sendto: No route to host I can't
Hi all,
I have a DSL connection and a Intel EtherPro 10/100 network card running FreeBSD 4.8
pre-release.
I have noticed that sometimes when I'm downloading overnight, something like an iso
image or something large that make ppp load seems to overflow and stop working.
What happens is that
I have installed FreeBSD 4.6.2 on a system with a Realtek RTL8139
network card and I see a strange behaviour: I connect to the network,
and get my IP with DHCP, but when I start a connection, e.g. I open lynx
or a X browser, I download a few chilobytes and then the network stalls.
I have
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:27:02AM +0200, Michele Costabile wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 4.6.2 on a system with a Realtek RTL8139
network card and I see a strange behaviour: I connect to the network,
and get my IP with DHCP, but when I start a connection, e.g. I open lynx
or a X
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:27:02AM +0200, Michele Costabile wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 4.6.2 on a system with a Realtek RTL8139
network card and I see a strange behaviour: I connect to the network,
and get my IP with DHCP, but when I start a connection, e.g. I open lynx
or a X
74 matches
Mail list logo
