On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Adam J Richardson wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another
Rakhesh Sasidharan writes:
Kind of related to this topic. Is there any way I can find installed
packages that are *not* required by any other packages?
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves ?
Robert Huff
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Robert Huff wrote:
Rakhesh Sasidharan writes:
Kind of related to this topic. Is there any way I can find installed
packages that are *not* required by any other packages?
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves ?
Man, I love the ports system!!
Pollywog wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another one etc.
It is perfectly safe to have all of them
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
autoconf-2.59_2needs updating (port has 2.59_3)
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another one etc.
It is perfectly safe to have all of them installed at
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 15:13 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
