at freshports [http://www.freshports.org/commits.php] regularly to see if
updates for vulnerable packages are available.
This is pretty obvious and I run portsnap from cron.
Generally I like to run 'portsnap fetch update' followed by 'portmaster -ai'
(after reading /usr/ports/UPDATING) every
tell portmaster to update
port x it would try to update all ports it depends on.
Does it often screw things up when updating dependencies (both
ascending and descending ones)? Do you recommend to always update the
ascending dependencies (portmaster -r) also?
I never faced any problems updating
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:49:05PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Generally I like to run 'portsnap fetch update' followed by 'portmaster -ai'
(after reading /usr/ports/UPDATING) every week. This keeps the number of
huge
compilefests (like gettext updates :-() to a minimum.
Has
Hello portmaster users,
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
Do you upgrade only the vulnerable packages, or vulnerable packages
and dependent packages (portmaster -r), or perhaps all packages
(portmaster -a)? Or do you pkg_delete -a all
Victor Sudakov wrote:
Hello portmaster users,
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
Greatly depend on where am I. All my systems are staying up-to-date
whereas when I'm visiting someones system I prefer to update only
required pieces
On 23 January 2012 05:32, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote:
Hello portmaster users,
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
Do you upgrade only the vulnerable packages, or vulnerable packages
and dependent packages (portmaster -r
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:32:33PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Hello portmaster users,
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
It depends on the vulnerability and what the package does. I will de-install
it if I think
Dear folks,
Running FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 on three machines, on all three the poppler
message appears everytime I issue
# portmaster -a
command to update ports. Message says
=== The following actions were performed:
Re-installation of poppler-glib-0.18.0
It has done this for quite a while
suggestions of how to proceed would be welcom=
e.
No, not a bug.
portmaster --list-origins | wc -l
58
pkg_info | wc -l
207
list-origins only lists packages that does not have any dependencies.
Ah, yes. I now see that I missed the part of the man page that says,
list directories from /usr
Scott Bennett wrote:
have quite a few windowmaker-related ports installed. Only one of those
related ports appeared in the portmaster output, and windowmaker itself was
absent, so I looked at the numbers next.
I think --list-origins lists only leaf packages and not dependencies
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
Did I misunderstand something about the --list-origins option? Or have
I run into a bug? Any suggestions of how to proceed would be welcome.
No, not a bug.
portmaster --list-origins | wc -l
58
pkg_info | wc -l
a possible problem. Following the portmaster man page's
suggestion to use portmaster's --list-origins option to produce a list of
installed ports in the form category-dir/port-name-dir, I got a list that
was much shorter than expected. I use windowmaker as a window manager and
have quite a few
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Mage m...@mage.hu wrote:
Hello,
why is that
pkg_add -r x11/kde4 could not install kde4 (404 not found) but portmaster
-P x11/kde4 did, however
portmaster -P xorg didn't install xorg (it just reinstalled some modules)
then pkg_add -r xorg installed
Hello,
why is that
pkg_add -r x11/kde4 could not install kde4 (404 not found) but
portmaster -P x11/kde4 did, however
portmaster -P xorg didn't install xorg (it just reinstalled some
modules) then pkg_add -r xorg installed it.
I am a bit confused with these.
I was reading
Is there any way to get portmaster to reinstall every port in the *EXACT*
same order they where installed in, preferably with out any knowledge of
what ports where installed after the current one was the reason for
asking is many times it seems that subtle incompatibilities solely due
Hi Mathew,
On 09/09/2011 15:13, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
I've been trying to update libnotify and libproxy following the
instructions in UPDATING, which is to do
portmaster -r libnotify-0
This trys to install ghostscript9, and fails. Apparently ghostscript9
conflicts
On 10/09/2011 16:12, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
gnome-art is peculiar. There is nothing in that directory but the work
directory, no makefile or anything. And nothing I can find in UPDATE
about alacarte or gnome-art.
Any further thoughts, if you have time?
That is an ex-port.
On 10/09/2011 16:12, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
gnome-art is peculiar. There is nothing in that directory but the work
directory, no makefile or anything. And nothing I can find in UPDATE
about alacarte or gnome-art.
=20
Any further thoughts, if you have time?
That is an ex-port.
Hi,
I've been trying to update libnotify and libproxy following the
instructions in UPDATING, which is to do
portmaster -r libnotify-0
This trys to install ghostscript9, and fails. Apparently ghostscript9
conflicts with ghostscript8-8.71_6, which presumably is the reason for
the failure.
Could
On 09/09/2011 15:13, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
I've been trying to update libnotify and libproxy following the
instructions in UPDATING, which is to do
portmaster -r libnotify-0
This trys to install ghostscript9, and fails. Apparently ghostscript9
conflicts with ghostscript8-8.71_6, which
2011-08-27 13:18, Antonio Olivares skrev:
I succeeded in updating like 5 packages out of 21, but now gnome-mount
does not compile :(
gnome-mount.c:44:30: error: libnotify/notify.h: No such file or directory
You don't seem to have libnotify installed which will get you notify.h.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2011-08-27 13:18, Antonio Olivares skrev:
I succeeded in updating like 5 packages out of 21, but now gnome-mount
does not compile :(
gnome-mount.c:44:30: error: libnotify/notify.h: No such file or directory
You
A few days back I did a portmaster -a -B -d but later on I found out
that one port (www/eAccelerator) complained about being compiled for
another version of PHP (which by then was updated by portmaster). I
expected portmaster to take care of these kind of dependencies. Where am
I wrong
2011-08-28 13:13, Antonio Olivares skrev:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2011-08-27 13:18, Antonio Olivares skrev:
I succeeded in updating like 5 packages out of 21, but now gnome-mount
does not compile :(
gnome-mount.c:44:30: error:
You don't seem to have libnotify installed which will get you notify.h.
It was there, but something could have been wrong? I cd'd to
/usr/ports/devel/libnotify and ran
make install clean, and it told me that it was already installed and
that I should run make deinstall reintstall again.
On 28/08/2011 13:38, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
A few days back I did a portmaster -a -B -d but later on I found out
that one port (www/eAccelerator) complained about being compiled for
another version of PHP (which by then was updated by portmaster). I
expected portmaster to take care
Op 28-8-2011 16:27, Matthew Seaman schreef:
Ideally ports committers should bump the
eaccelerator PORTREVISION to make ports management tools do that
automatically, but if not, you're going to have to remember to do it by
hand.
Thank you for your explanation. I enjoyed reading it and learned a
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Is there a way to update most packages except this one?
See
man portmaster | less +2/-x
Running
# portmaster -a -x libreoffice
does the trick :) Thanks very much. I ran
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 6:01 AM, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2011 00:56:20 Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I use:
portmaster -ai
I ask you if you want to install or not.
Mitja
Will it prompt me for every package? Or just for the ones that are failing?
@all
On Saturday 27 August 2011 00:56:20 Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I use:
portmaster -ai
I ask you if you want to install or not.
Mitja
http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Dear folks,
I am trying to update one of my machines and I ran portmaster -a and got errors:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=145268
I overcome most by unselecting GNUTLS from cups-image and cups-base,
and then comes
=== Launching child to update libreoffice-3.3.3_2 to libreoffice
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear folks,
I am trying to update one of my machines and I ran portmaster -a and got
errors:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=145268
I overcome most by unselecting GNUTLS from cups-image and cups
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Is there a way to update most packages except this one?
See
man portmaster | less +2/-x
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Ross == Ross basarev...@gmail.com writes:
Ross Maybe I spent to little time with portmaster, but I eventually
Ross switched to portupgrade. I'ts more mature in my opinion. And
Ross portupgrade -a doesn't have the problem you are referring to.
I started with portupgrade, and am now firmly
to rebuild all applications that depend on
gnutls. Do something like:
portupgrade -rf gnutls
portmaster -r gnutls
---
pkg_info -Rx gnutls shows that gnutls is required by 92 of my
installed ports so before running
Hi folks,
I see I have some ports that need to be updated, so I'm using
portmaster (portmaster -a to be specific), and it fails with the
following -
=== Starting check for build dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for textproc/docproj-nojadetex from ports
=== No dependencies for textproc
On 03/04/11 15:37, Ed Flecko wrote:
[Snips]
Given this:
===/usr/ports/textproc/docproj-nojadetex/work not writable, skipping
Any ideas on what my problem(s) is and how to solve it???
Either you've got a read-only /usr/ports or you've forgotten to run as root.
[I will admit to doing
Thanks gentlemen; I was not running portmaster as root.
When I re-run portmaster -a as root, I get the following:
=== Starting check for runtime dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for devel/automake from ports
=== Dependency check complete for devel/automake
en-freebsd-doc
On 03/04/11 17:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks gentlemen; I was not running portmaster as root.
When I re-run portmaster -a as root, I get the following:
=== Starting check for runtime dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for devel/automake from ports
=== Dependency check complete
Thanks Aurthur.
:-)
It's funny...I DID what it asks and it still didn't work (make deinstall, etc.).
Apparently, I installed it from a package, so I did a pkg_delete
automake and then started my portmaster -a again and it seems to be
running fine.
:-)
Ed
actually wants for her birthday when all she says is oh, any
little thing will do. :-)
Apparently, I installed it from a package, so I did a pkg_delete
automake and then started my portmaster -a again and it seems to be
running fine.
Ah, the third option which I forgot to mention. It's always
these situations arise quite often where you have to delete a port before
portmaster will continue.
sometimes you can predict it by reading /usr/ports/UPDATING
not that this is the only reason to read UPDATING.
On 3/4/11 1:37 PM, Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
On 03/04/11 17:36, Ed
automake and then started my portmaster -a again and it seems to be
running fine.
Ah, the third option which I forgot to mention. It's always the
option one forgets to mention that works.
In theory package install and port install are supposed to be the
same (modulo config options
Hi folks,
I'm looking at using portmaster to rebuild my ports collection and I'm
wondering if using the command:
portmaster -afv --no-confirm --clean-distfiles-all
(-a - check all ports, update as necessary, -f - always rebuild ports,
-v - verbose output, --no-confirm - do not ask the user
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:57:14 -0800
Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think that's a little too much automation, or do you think that
would be pretty safe to run without screwing things up?
I think portmaster's documentation explicitly advises against using -af
to rebuild all ports. See
Hmmm...I'll check that out Bruce.
I saw the command listed on:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html
but it doesn't give any cautions against using it.
Thank you,
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 amd64
The command 'portmaster security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL' fails because the
module is not found in any archive. I've pasted the error output below.
The file /usr/ports/UPGRADING doesn't mention any problem with this module.
Thanks in advance for clues on getting
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:42:58 -0800
David Newman dnew...@networktest.com wrote:
DN FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 amd64
DN
DN The command 'portmaster security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL' fails because the
DN module is not found in any archive. I've pasted the error output
DN below.
I had this issue on 8.1
On 1/23/11 10:12 AM, Jens Jahnke wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:42:58 -0800
David Newman dnew...@networktest.com wrote:
DN FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 amd64
DN
DN The command 'portmaster security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL' fails because the
DN module is not found in any archive. I've pasted
Threads about portmaster and portupgrade status raise the question, what flags
for portmaster are comparable to -R and -r for portupgrade?
I might want to portupgrade a package and all its dependencies (-R), or less
frequently, all packages that depend on the package to be portupgraded (-r
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:59:49 +
Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Threads about portmaster and portupgrade status raise the question,
what flags for portmaster are comparable to -R and -r for portupgrade?
I might want to portupgrade a package and all its dependencies (-R
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:47:59 +0100
Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:59:49 +
Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Threads about portmaster and portupgrade status raise the question,
what flags for portmaster are comparable to -R and -r
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Threads about portmaster and portupgrade status raise the question, what flags
for portmaster are comparable to -R and -r for portupgrade?
I might want to portupgrade a package and all its dependencies (-R),
or less frequently, all packages
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Those look backwards to me. It's extremely rare for me to upgrade
everything that a given port depends on (-R), but common to upgrade a port
and everything that depends on it (-r).
I've used -R before to correct
I should also mention that I have an almost-identical server running
FreeBSD 7.3-release-p2 in backup production and did not experience
these problems when upgrading from php 5.3.3_2 to php 5.3.4. Something
in my 8.1-release development server is causing the problems with
upgrading PHP, so I'm
Hi there, I'm having problems upgrading my php installation using the
ports tree. I use the latest version of portmaster on FreeBSD
8.1-release inside a jail, with all patches. I'm trying to upgrade
from php 5.3.3_2 to the new php 5.3.4 to fix a security vulnerability.
Here is the problem. When
is causing the problems with
upgrading PHP, so I'm reluctant to upgrade my production servers as
they are absolutely identical until I find a fix.
Try running 'portmaster --check-depends', then retry the update.
If it still fails, then choose one or more of the php5 modules that
fails and do a forced
-versioned
locations since there is now only the concept of legacy and current
versions.
# portmaster -o devel/autoconf devel/autoconf268
# portmaster -o devel/automake devel/automake111
# portmaster -o devel/libtool devel/libtool22
# portmaster -o devel/libltdl devel/libltdl22
Awesome
FYI, I agree with most of what b.f. wrote, and I thank him for answering
this. I don't follow -questions anymore, so it's very helpful when I get
cc'ed on posts about portmaster.
A few additional thoughts ...
On 12/26/2010 21:13, b. f. wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong
I had been using portupgrade for several years and never had any
problems and upgrading ports was quick and simple process every week.
But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work
anymore, I have switched to using portmaster and am having nothing but
problems, so
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:39:58 -0800
Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
ok, so libltdl-2.2.10 is already installed? Why is that an issue?
Why doesn't portmaster just happily skip it since it's already
installed? What am I not understanding here? Or am I using
portmaster wrong?
That's
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:39:58 -0800
Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
ok, so libltdl-2.2.10 is already installed? Why is that an issue?
Why doesn't portmaster just happily skip it since it's already
installed? What
switched to using portmaster and am having nothing but problems, so much so
that I dread updating my ports.
I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong or what I don't understand
about portmaster. I've looked on google and can't find any documentation
that isn't just basic stuff or rehashes
that other people were maintaining it. The handbook continues
to list it ahead of portmanager and portmaster, with no mention that it
isn't being maintained. I've never stopped using portupgrade, and it has
always worked. Updates come through periodically, two in the past month.
For a port
is that an issue?
Why doesn't portmaster just happily skip it since it's already
installed? What am I not understanding here? Or am I using
portmaster wrong?
When a port gets built, the ports system looks for and installs any
missing dependencies. As several different ports may satisfy
stopped maintaining portupgrade, but I also saw things that
suggested that other people were maintaining it. The handbook continues
to list it ahead of portmanager and portmaster, with no mention that it
isn't being maintained. I've never stopped using portupgrade, and it has
always worked. Updates
On 12/26/10 11:45 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:39:58 -0800
Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
ok, so libltdl-2.2.10 is already installed? Why is that an issue?
Why doesn't portmaster just happily skip it since it's already
installed? What am I not understanding here
I had been using portupgrade for several years and never had any
problems and upgrading ports was quick and simple process every week.
But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work
anymore, I have switched to using portmaster and am having nothing but
problems, so
I recently switched from using portupgrade to portmaster and am having
an odd problem upgrading.
When I run 'portmaster apache' I get this recursion problem:
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/www/apache22
=== Starting check for build dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for www/apache22
On 19/12/2010 17:03, Ron (Lists) wrote:
=== Launching child to update devel/autoconf
devel/autoconf perl-5.8.9_3 apache-2.2.17 devel/autoconf
perl-5.8.9_3 apache-2.2.17 devel/autoconf perl-5.8.9_3
apache-2.2.17 devel/autoconf perl-5.8.9_3 apache-2.2.17
devel/autoconf
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in
conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as
through as the -u -p flags with 'portmanger', it
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com articulated:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in
conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as
through as the -u -p flags with 'portmanger',
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:22:55 -0500
Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
I don't see anything that specifically states the the -R or -r
flags are in included with the -a flag; although I might be
misinterpreting it. If it was implied i think it should have been
better documented.
-aRr
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote:
-aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former.
I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed
packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a package
that isn't in the set of all installed packages.
That sentence makes
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:50:21 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote:
-aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former.
I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed
packages with consistent dependecies isn't going
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that
need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
Best regards,
Fred
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote:
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that
need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
It applies to installed ports. A commonly used command
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:31:11 +0100
Polytropon free...@edvax.de articulated:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote:
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports
that need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote:
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that
need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
It applies to installed
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction
with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the
-u -p flags with 'portmanger', it does accomplish its goal.
Isn't portupgrade -a equivalent to -arR? I hope so, or I
Yes, of course I did.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:22:49 +0100
Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Yes, of course I did.
Then of course you should have mentioned it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On 6-11-2010 13:39, RW wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:22:49 +0100
Dick Hoogendijkd...@nagual.nl wrote:
Yes, of course I did.
Then of course you should have mentioned it.
Ans of course you are right. ;-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Trying to update with portmaster (-a -B -d) but everytime the process
stops after some time and I can't find out why this happens. All I see
is a screen full of names, but no message why the thing dumped core.
Is there a way to find out _WHY_ portmaster can't complete the proces
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:15:27 +0100
Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Trying to update with portmaster (-a -B -d) but everytime the process
stops after some time and I can't find out why this happens. All I
see is a screen full of names, but no message why the thing dumped
core
On 11/1/10 9:14 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
portupgrade. However, I just unregistered php5-spl, because its no longer
necessary. I believe php5-spl and php5-pcre are now integrated into PHP-5.3
by default.
Yes and no. pcre depends on the separate pcre package, and php will
.
http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/error-with-apr-parameter-is-incorrect.html
http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/pcre-error-with-php5-filter-and-php5.html
-Lystic
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Tom Worster f...@thefsb.org wrote:
portmaster is looping on devel/php5-spl. it seems as though
is there a test i can run to see if my pcre is going to fail in any baffling
ways?
Just do a portupgrade on it to the current version, and it'll be find.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of The Internet for Dummies,
Please consider the environment before reading this
portmaster is looping on devel/php5-spl. it seems as though php5-spl depends
on itself. the excerpt below shows two cycles of the recursion. the list
php5-spl-5.2.11_1 php5-spl-5.2.11_1 gets one longer on each
interation.
any ideas how to fix this?
thanks
tom
=== Port directory: /usr/ports
may be of some help
later.
http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/error-with-apr-parameter-is-incorrect.html
http://www.unixnews.net/2010/10/pcre-error-with-php5-filter-and-php5.html
-Lystic
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Tom Worster f...@thefsb.org wrote:
portmaster is looping on devel/php5-spl
portupgrade. However, I just unregistered php5-spl, because its no longer
necessary. I believe php5-spl and php5-pcre are now integrated into PHP-5.3
by default.
Yes and no. pcre depends on the separate pcre package, and php will fail
in baffling ways is your pcre is too old.
The maintainer
On 27 October 2010 14:57, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:11 AM, David N david...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I currently use portmaster to do the upgrading of my ports.
Is it possible to use portmaster to create packages of upgrade ports?
I can
Hi,
I currently use portmaster to do the upgrading of my ports.
Is it possible to use portmaster to create packages of upgrade ports?
I can only see it upgrading via packages only.
Regards
David N
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:11 AM, David N david...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I currently use portmaster to do the upgrading of my ports.
Is it possible to use portmaster to create packages of upgrade ports?
I can only see it upgrading via packages only.
Yes, that is possible.
MAKE_PACKAGE=gopt
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
When I try to do portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` I get a prompt
CORRECTportmaster `cut ~/installed-port-list` (y|n|e|a)?
I choose n and hit enter
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
Why?
You only have to re-install all ports when changing between major releases
e.g. 7.x
On 2010-08-29 16:55, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
When I try to do portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` I get a prompt
I tried the same commands using ssh from
On 2010-08-29 17:07, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
Why?
You only have to re-install all ports when
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:46:50 +0200
David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/1 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com:
The differences are that portupgrade use a database, it's written in
ruby while portmaster is only one shell script. That's why I really
prefere portmaster that also
First, Thanks Doug for responding to my mails.
I don't know (or understand) if I have to set a value
to
PM_SU_VERBOSE
That depends on your goal. Why are you setting this?
I thought that PM_SU_VERBOSE will explain the errors about my sudo problem. I
can use portmaster with sudo only
101 - 200 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
