Hello list
How do I find the ip address of the default route?
thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Hello list
How do I find the ip address of the default route?
The next-hop address, or the local address?
The former can be easily parsed out of the netstat(1) output,
the latter isn't necessarily unique
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Hello list
How do I find the ip address of the default route?
The following examples return the next hop, usually a router.
# grep defaultrouter /etc/rc.conf
defaultrouter=192.168.0.1
or
# netstat -r
Routing tables
Internet
route -n get default
On 13-05-29 12:03 PM, Joe wrote:
Hello list
How do I find the ip address of the default route?
thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
, as you do not use NAT, then the
devices in the 192.168.1.0/24 should know where to find your server.
The basic ideas are:
1. Make 192.168.1.250 default gateway for the devices in 192.168.1.0/24 or
2. route add -net 192.168.2 gw 192.168.1.250 (syntax depends on the OS)
Also check if the device
Hi folks! On my lan I've:
server1
re0 - 192.168.1.250
xl0 - 192.168.2.250
default192.168.1.212 UGS 0 189re0
127.0.0.1 link#8 UH 0 18lo0
192.168.1.0/24 link#1 U 0 6145re0
192.168.1.250
UHS 00lo0
I can ping 192.168.2.0/24 and ONLY 192.168.1.250.
I need ping 192.168.1.0/24 lan but I can only see 192.168.1.250
any idea?
thanks!
Pol
I'm pretty sure you need a route on server2 to 192.168.1.0/24.
Try:
route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250
--
Andre
Try:
route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250
does not run :-(
Pol
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 2013-05-20 4:19 pm, Pol Hallen wrote:
Try:
route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250
does not run :-(
Pol
Interesting. I had a similar issue I got around with a similar route
addition, though I was going from a LAN PC through my server that was
running openvpn out to a remotely connected
If you don't mind could you post the output of ifconfig from both boxes?
server1:
re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8209bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE
ether 70:71:bc:94:c3:6d
inet
On 2013-05-20 5:01 pm, Pol Hallen wrote:
If you don't mind could you post the output of ifconfig from both
boxes?
server1:
re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=8209bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE
dear firiend,
do you have configuration routing BGP in freebsd ?
thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
On 22/03/2013 12:28 PM, just man man wrote:
do you have configuration routing BGP in freebsd ?
thank you
I use quagga, because that's what I have been using for the last 10 years.
http://www.freshports.org/net/quagga-re/
http://www.freshports.org/net/quagga/
You might also like to try
Hi,
On 22/03/2013 12:28 PM, just man man wrote:
do you have configuration routing BGP in freebsd ?
thank you
I use quagga, because that's what I have been using for the last 10 years.
http://www.freshports.org/net/quagga-re/
http://www.freshports.org/net/quagga/
You might also
(10.227.148.0/24) via eu0 interface.
When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP
request is always showing up.
A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why ARP
is going on?
Is any sysctl parameter can fix this problem?
-Jin
Internet
a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP
request is always showing up.
A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why
ARP
is going on?
You've told the interface that it can reach 10.227.148.52 via 10.234.37.80,
which is
the IP ue0
/etc/ethers does not help because there is no way resolve the IP by QFHN in
ethers.
The correct way is to use router IP (10.234.37.1) between 10.234.37.0 and
10.227.148.0 instead of interface IP (10.234.37.80) for static route.
From: Chuck Swiger cswi
), but it has
problem
to talk to a remote network or host (10.227.148.0/24) via eu0 interface.
When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP
request is always showing up.
A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why
ARP
is going on?
Is any
way is to use router IP (10.234.37.1) between 10.234.37.0 and
10.227.148.0 instead of interface IP (10.234.37.80) for static route.
Assuming there's a router at 10.234.37.1 which knows how to get to
10.227.148.52, yes.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd
To: Jin Guojun jguo...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: questions freebsd questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 2:33:57 PM
Subject: Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?
On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Jin Guojun wrote:
/etc/ethers does not help because there is no way resolve
showed an overriding route for the gateway address.
Are you sure that the ARP is happening on the interface for the
gateway's network? According to the routing table you posted, it should
be hitting the loopback interface, but not leaving the box
Hello
On freebsd8.2 when i run netstat -rn i see below;
# netstat -rn | grep -r 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 1462933lo0
As flag i think that it should be UH but on my server as above;
How can i fix it ?
Yavuz Ma?lak wrote:
Hello
On freebsd8.2 when i run netstat -rn i see below;
# netstat -rn | grep -r 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 1462933lo0
As flag i think that it should be UH but on my server as above;
How can i fix it ?
Please show
Hi, I have diskless routers, on one of theese I have problem, that default gate
is changing.
Image is clean and updated. There is no route daemon, no snmp, dhclient isnt
running.
Whith resarch in cooperation in chzech bsd mailing list I get following things:
Ifconfig of this machine
. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without success.
[Chuck Swiger wrote:]
You need to implement NAT on this box, since 192.168.0.0/16 is an
RFC-1918 unrouteable private network range.
I previously connected to the internet
At 07:07 AM 5/18/2012, David Banning wrote:
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and
above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without success.
You
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without success.
You need to implement NAT on this box, since
and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without success.
If anyone by looking at my information can suggest a route command, or
suggest a way to dig
Hi--
On May 16, 2012, at 1:08 PM, David Banning wrote:
[ ... ]
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Maness chris at chrismaness.com wrote:
How do add a static route to rc.conf?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html
see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent Configuration
-- Noel Jones
I added:
# Add Internal Net 2
On 5/3/2012 11:45 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Maness chris at chrismaness.com wrote:
How do add a static route to rc.conf?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html
see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent Configuration
# Add Internal Net 2 as a static route
static_routes=internalnet2
route_internalnet2=-net 44.18.44.0/24 192.168.1.33
to rc.conf per the section above. I rebooted and it was a no go. Did
I miss something?
Looks OK, and works for me. Wild guess is you need to enable
netwait in rc.conf
:
How do add a static route to rc.conf?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html
see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent Configuration
-- Noel Jones
I added:
# Add Internal Net 2 as a static
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, I should have mentioned that if you have freebsd-8x or
earlier, this feature isn't built-in but can be easily added:
On 5/3/2012 1:54 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com
mailto:noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, I should have mentioned that if you have freebsd-8x or
earlier, this feature isn't built-in but can be easily added:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
How do add a static route to rc.conf?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html
see section 32.2.5.2 Persistent Configuration
-- Noel Jones
Thanks, Noel
Chris
How do add a static route to rc.conf?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/1/2012 10:31 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
How do add a static route to rc.conf?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
I can't figure out why on boot the default route is not being setup correctly.
I'm coming back to FreeBSD, having spent many years using OpenBSD primarily.
The server has 2 NICs, of which em0 is the one being used. I did see
something during boot about not adding the default route
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:54:46 -0500, Chad M Stewart c...@balius.com wrote:
Anyone have some suggestions how I can fix this?
I'm guessing having the default route on a tagged vlan was not tested and
the default route is attempted before the vlan interface is all the way
up. After
On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:54:46 -0500, Chad M Stewart c...@balius.com wrote:
Anyone have some suggestions how I can fix this?
I'm guessing having the default route on a tagged vlan was not tested and the
default route is attempted before
Those errors are usually from it trying to create interfaces that already
exist. It looks like it created your default route, though. Time to file a
PR because the network boot stuff is not doing the order right.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 4/20/2012 9:54 PM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
cloned_interfaces=vlan4 vlan7
ifconfig_vlan4=inet 192.168.4.21 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 4 vlandev em0
ifconfig_vlan7=inet 192.168.7.21 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 7 vlandev em0
ifconfig_vlan7=alias 192.168.7.31 netmask 255.255.255.255
On Apr 20, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
This is not the correct syntax. From the rc.conf manual page:
Thanks Nikos. Not sure how I came up with the incorrect syntax, but correcting
that fixed my issue.
-Chad___
address correctly shows up under ifconfig however the
default route doesn't seem to be installed, so I'm basically cut off
the Internet in terms of IPv6.
Please note that the above config has worked unser FreeBSD8 - in fact
I've got a couple of boxes under FreeBSD8 with this exact same config.
Has
ipv6_defaultrouter=2001:76c:2218:2009::1
The interface address correctly shows up under ifconfig however the
default route doesn't seem to be installed, so I'm basically cut off
the Internet in terms of IPv6.
Please note that the above config has worked unser FreeBSD8 - in fact
I've got a couple
: re0
К
К ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1
К
К will delete these static routes from route table:
К
К 10.3.0.1 10.1.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74
К 10.1.6.0/23 10.1.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74
К
К Does this a bug?
It is.
The problem
ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1
will delete these static routes from route table:
10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS8 367 vlan74
10.1.6.0/2310.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74
Does this a bug?
I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know
On 21/02/2012 08:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use
/32 aliases for additional IPs, not your original netmask.
Actually, it's optional nowadays. Either way works.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA,
On 2/21/12 9:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/02/2012 08:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use
/32 aliases for additional IPs, not your original netmask.
Actually, it's optional nowadays. Either way works.
Well idk, seeing
10.1.26.1
will delete these static routes from route table:
10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS8 367 vlan74
10.1.6.0/2310.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74
Does this a bug?
Hmmm... how have you managed to have a next hop address of 10.7.26.2
10.1.26.1
will delete these static routes from route table:
10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS8 367 vlan74
10.1.6.0/2310.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74
Does this a bug?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128954cat=bin
--
Adam Vande More
: active
vlan: 74 parent interface: re0
ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1
will delete these static routes from route table:
10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS8 367 vlan74
10.1.6.0/2310.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74
10.3.0.1 10.1.26.2
vlan: 74 parent interface: re0
ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1
will delete these static routes from route table:
10.3.0.1 10.1.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74
10.1.6.0/23 10.1.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74
Does this a bug?
II See here:
II http
netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255
nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
status: active
vlan: 74 parent interface: re0
ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1
will delete these static routes from route
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
Since rpc.lockd and rpc.statd expect to be able to do IP broadcast
(same goes for rpcbind), I suspect that might be a problem w.r.t.
jails, although I know nothing about how jails work?
Oh, and you can use the nolock mount option to avoid use of
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
Since rpc.lockd and rpc.statd expect to be able to do IP broadcast
(same goes for rpcbind), I suspect that might be a problem w.r.t.
jails, although I know nothing about how jails work?
Oh, and you can use the nolock mount option to avoid use of
, I get:
[Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't grab the
accept mutex
When I try and do a 'newaliases', I get:
# newaliases
postalias: fatal: lock /etc/aliases.db: No route to host
Yet, for instance, both MySQL and PostgreSQL are running without any
issues ...
So
...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear to
work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for when I
try and startup Apache, I get:
[Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route
Apache, I get:
[Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't grab
the
accept mutex
When I try and do a 'newaliases', I get:
# newaliases
postalias: fatal: lock /etc/aliases.db: No route to host
Yet, for instance, both MySQL and PostgreSQL are running without any
and startup Apache, I get:
[Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't
grab
the
accept mutex
When I try and do a 'newaliases', I get:
# newaliases
postalias: fatal: lock /etc/aliases.db: No route to host
Yet, for instance, both MySQL and PostgreSQL are running
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup a gateway between an internal network using Vbox test
machines of which one is a FreeBSD router/gateway. Being familiar with Cisco
I know how easy this is to do but I think that I'm struggling a bit with the
syntax.
My setup is as so:
Damn Small Linux (virtual
Ok I've managed to make some headway however it still isn't working
properly:
/etc/ipnat.rules
#map em1 10.100.100.0/26 - 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1:65000
map em1 10.100.100.0/26 - 0.0.0.0/32
map em1 10.100.100.0/26 - 0.0.0.0/32 auto
I then added this addition to the end of the
interface within the NAT
map file then direct the internal network via the 'gateway of last
resort' - default route.
The config can be easily adapted and modified from here if anyone is
interested in doing something similar or adding extra networks in the
middle such as a firewall or proxy
:
Dear list,
I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I
feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and
noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se
as
static under /etc/rc.conf. The only way I can get my default route
Dear list,
I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I
feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and
noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se as
static under /etc/rc.conf. The only way I can get my default route
On 02/02/2011 15:44, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
Dear list,
I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I
feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and
noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se as
static under /etc
On 23.04.10 18:02, Onur Aslan wrote:
$ cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.8.4;
8.8.8.4 is not a valid Nameserver. You want 8.8.4.4...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 23-4-2010 17:22, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Onur Aslan wrote:
I am using isc-dhcp30-server-3.0.7_5 in FreeBSD 7.2. When I run dhclient in a
client machine, this machine doesn't get gateway from dhcp server. I
configured
dhcpd server as described in FreeBSD handbook.
On 23/04/10 15:14, Onur Aslan wrote:
Do you have any idea?
Still haven't solved the problem?
I just looked over your dhclient.conf:
#prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
prepend domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.8.4;
#request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, time-offset, routers,
#
,
rfc3442-classless-static-routes, ntp-servers;
It's working fine. But it was getting route ip from other
networks before doing that. I guess it's not a problem after all.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
option domain-name-servers ns1.example.com;
option domain-name example.com;
A fqdn for a name server? That'll give you a chicken and egg problem,
don't you think?
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On 24/04/10 17:41, Peter Boosten wrote:
option domain-name-servers ns1.example.com;
option domain-name example.com;
A fqdn for a name server? That'll give you a chicken and egg problem,
don't you think?
No, the dhcpd server resolves the address and sends the ip to the clients.
On 24 apr 2010, at 23:07, Erik Norgaard wrote:
On 24/04/10 17:41, Peter Boosten wrote:
option domain-name-servers ns1.example.com;
option domain-name example.com;
A fqdn for a name server? That'll give you a chicken and egg problem,
don't you think?
No, the dhcpd server
Hi.
I am using isc-dhcp30-server-3.0.7_5 in FreeBSD 7.2. When I run dhclient in a
client machine, this machine doesn't get gateway from dhcp server. I configured
dhcpd server as described in FreeBSD handbook.
My dhcpd.conf file:
option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.8.4;
option subnet-mask
On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Onur Aslan wrote:
I am using isc-dhcp30-server-3.0.7_5 in FreeBSD 7.2. When I run dhclient in a
client machine, this machine doesn't get gateway from dhcp server. I
configured
dhcpd server as described in FreeBSD handbook.
If the machine you are testing from is
I tried, but It doesn't helped.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:22:54AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Onur Aslan wrote:
I am using isc-dhcp30-server-3.0.7_5 in FreeBSD 7.2. When I run dhclient in
a
client machine, this machine doesn't get gateway from dhcp server. I
Onur Aslan wrote:
I tried, but It doesn't helped.
Please show us the revised dhcpd.conf. Also, did you -HUP
your named?
Kevin Kinsey
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying
Onur Aslan wrote:
I tried, but It doesn't helped.
Please show us the revised dhcpd.conf. Also, did you -HUP
your named?
Sorry! That should be dhcpd.
$kill -HUP `pgrep dhcpd`
should do the trick.
KDK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
$ cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.8.4;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
default-lease-time 3600;
max-lease-time 86400;
ddns-update-style none;
option routers 192.168.1.1;
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.1.4 192.168.1.24;
}
Hi--
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Onur Aslan wrote:
After I added dhcpd_flags=-HUP to my rc.conf It's giving an error message
when I starting dhcpd:
Remove that; I believe what Kevin meant was to do this:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/dhcpd.pid`
...to restart dhcpd. Running dhcpd -t will let
Onur Aslan wrote:
$ cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.8.4;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
default-lease-time 3600;
max-lease-time 86400;
ddns-update-style none;
option routers 192.168.1.1;
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.1.4
Hello,
It seems that deleting a route which does not exist gives some message
about writing to routing socket: No such process:
# route delete xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/27
delete net xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
# route delete xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/27
route: writing to routing socket: No such process
delete net
on
boot and set its IP accordingly (local network functions), but will NOT
set the default route unless I wait up to 10 minutes for the
advertisement, or manually run rtsol. The same problem happens with OS X
10.6.2, but not with Win7 (and Linux 2.6 remains untested at this time).
The host has
that the host will only pick up the IPv6 prefix on boot and set its IP
accordingly (local network functions), but will NOT set the default route
unless I wait up to 10 minutes for the advertisement, or manually run rtsol.
The same problem happens with OS X 10.6.2, but not with Win7 (and Linux 2.6
remains
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes=2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2
but it does not set the correct routes.
--
Peter Ankerstål
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes=2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2
Do
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf
Anthony M. Rasat wrote:
Dear all,
I have two (ethernet) network interface with IP address within the same subnet, call it msk0 and nfe0.
Interface msk0 have IP address 192.168.0.2 and nfe0 192.168.0.3 and default router IP address is 192.168.0.1.
route(8) takes a 'dev' argument
Dear all,
I have two (ethernet) network interface with IP address within the same subnet,
call it msk0 and nfe0.
Interface msk0 have IP address 192.168.0.2 and nfe0 192.168.0.3 and default
router IP address is 192.168.0.1.
I want only nfe0 that can talk to default router while keeping msk0
Trober wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Dear all,
I have two (ethernet) network interface with IP address within the same
subnet, call it msk0 and nfe0.
Interface msk0 have IP address 192.168.0.2 and nfe0 192.168.0.3 and
default router IP address is 192.168.0.1.
I want only nfe0 that can talk to
Hi,
Im trying to route the outgoing traffic from a jail trough another gw than
the default one set on host with pf.
The host is using internal address 192.168.10.5 and the default route is to
192.168.10.1 wich is a dsl line.
The jail is using a public ip that is on a fiber line where
, but I
put something here anyways.
hostname=speedy.i
ifconfig_fxp0=inet 192.168.0.254 network 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_fxp0=up
My /etc/hosts includes this line:
192.168.0.254 speedy.i speedy
Now when I am logged in to this machine and I ping 192.168.0.254, I get:
ping: sendto: No route to host
On Saturday 08 August 2009 16:38:39 Nerius Landys wrote:
I'm trying to set up a LAN that is isolated from the internet, and I
don't know what to put in /etc/rc.conf for certain variables. I'm
running FreeBSD 7.1 with the latest patches.
So far my /etc/rc.conf file has the following lines:
: no route to host
I'm trying to set up a LAN that is isolated from the internet, and I
don't know what to put in /etc/rc.conf for certain variables. I'm
running FreeBSD 7.1 with the latest patches.
So far my /etc/rc.conf file has the following lines:
defaultrouter=192.168.0.1 # I would like to leave
I mistyped netmask as network in my email.
But removing that second line like you said fixes the problem. Thanks.
You should delete the second line (an interface will be marked up if an IP
address is assigned to it) and fix the netmask keyword.
___
have very weak passwords. Granted they will only be able to
get to the user's personal web space, but that would be inconvenient
for the user.
For a long time I have been using null routes for the persistent
attacks (set a route of 127.0.0.2 for their adddress in the route
table
run slow for a little
while instead of being blocked entirely.
G
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Doug Hardie
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions -
Subject: pf vs null route
My web
Hello,
I have an strange routing problem. I can't connect to some hosts in the
internet till I add an explicit route for this hosts with my default gw
as gateway.
There aren't any other routes that could match the destination IP for
non-working hosts. So the connection should also without
Fabian Holler wrote:
Hello,
I have an strange routing problem. I can't connect to some hosts in the
internet till I add an explicit route for this hosts with my default gw
as gateway.
There aren't any other routes that could match the destination IP for
non-working hosts. So the connection
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
