Re: suPHP - secure/reliable?

2005-11-03 Thread Sam Nilsson
jonas wrote: I'd be really intrested to hear some few details about installation through the ports. From what I saw in the FastCGI documentation you need to do some strange configuration changes to your httpd.conf, so that .php files are properly passed to the FastCGI handler and that they'll b

Re: suPHP - secure/reliable?

2005-11-03 Thread jonas
Hi M.L., Sam, > > Does anyone have anything to say about suPHP, either good or bad stuff ? > > I'd like your opinions. this reply is a bit late, but still helpfull I hope, since nobody using suPHP answered your request. I am currently using suPHP and it works quite nice. It's not as strict as

Re: suPHP - secure/reliable?

2005-10-10 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Saturday 08 October 2005 02:14, M. L. wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to know your opinions on suPHP. I was looking for some software > that would execute PHP scripts as the user who owns them, instead of > www, and came up with that. But the site is written in poor english, the > software consist

Re: suPHP - secure/reliable?

2005-10-07 Thread Sam Nilsson
M. L. wrote: Hi all, I'd like to know your opinions on suPHP. I was looking for some software that would execute PHP scripts as the user who owns them, instead of www, and came up with that. But the site is written in poor english, the software consists on a root setuid binary, so I'm a bit w

suPHP - secure/reliable?

2005-10-07 Thread M. L.
Hi all, I'd like to know your opinions on suPHP. I was looking for some software that would execute PHP scripts as the user who owns them, instead of www, and came up with that. But the site is written in poor english, the software consists on a root setuid binary, so I'm a bit worried about