On 07.07.2010, at 23:24, Henrik Hudson wrote:
One caveat is that ESX / ESXi are very picky about their hardware
and pretty much won't run on anything but server class devices
(mobo, NICs and CPU are the big ones).
Yes, I'm aware of that. We have entry level, but ESXi compatible, HP and IBM
On 08.07.2010, at 03:04, Olivier Nicole wrote:
That's the idea: bare metal and free, proxmox has something based
on... I don't remember. I opted for vmware becuase it seems to be more
wide spread.
Yes, that's what I think, too.
You will have to make your fingers dirty, because once you are
Hello everyone,
I have been using FreeBSD since 4.x for web related applications (php, Apache,
PostgreSQL, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, etc.), and while I am not an expert, I feel
quite comfortable.
Lately I find myself in situations where I have I have to take care of legacy
Oracle (10g on Windows)
Hi,
What is the recommended parallel way for a person, who feels
comfortable with FreeBSD, when FreeBSD cannot do the job? - i. e. is
it a good idea to go towards Solaris, instead of Linux? Or rather go
towards some sort of Linux?
I see 2 questions in one.
What virtulization system to use?
What virtulization system to use? Personnally I use ESXi from vmware
This was a great tip, thank you. I wasn't aware that ESXi is a bare metal and
free.
What OS to use instead of FreeBSD? It depends on what is recommended
for your application, what resources you have available around you,
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010, Iv Ray wrote:
What virtulization system to use? Personnally I use ESXi from vmware
This was a great tip, thank you. I wasn't aware that ESXi is a bare metal and
free.
What OS to use instead of FreeBSD? It depends on what is recommended
for your application, what
What virtulization system to use? Personnally I use ESXi from vmware
This was a great tip, thank you. I wasn't aware that ESXi is a bare metal and
free.
That's the idea: bare metal and free, proxmox has something based
on... I don't remember. I opted for vmware becuase it seems to be more
