On 6/26/2010 6:07 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
On 6/26/10, Olivier GARNIERap1...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it
(http/samba/ 4 disk on RAID)
It's summer time and the old workstation will not work at the end the
summer time (too warm for
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr writes:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:19:53 +0200, Thomas Keusch
f...@bsd-solutions-duesseldorf.de wrote:
t...@eternity:~$ b=5
t...@eternity:~$ case $b in
[0-9] )
echo numeric
;;
* )
echo alpha
;;
esac
numeric
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 02:16:26 -0400
Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net articulated:
On 6/26/2010 6:07 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
On 6/26/10, Olivier GARNIERap1...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it
(http/samba/ 4 disk on RAID)
It's
Hi all,
What would be the prefered method of upgrading servers from freebsd 6.x to 8.x ?
Fresh install and reload users data, rebuild ports etc?
Upgrade direct from 6.x to 8.x?
Upgrade sequentially from 6.x to 7.x to 8.x?
-Grant
___
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 02:16:26 -0400
Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net articulated:
On 6/26/2010 6:07 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
On 6/26/10, Olivier GARNIERap1...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it
Grant Peel writes:
What would be the prefered method of upgrading servers from
freebsd 6.x to 8.x ?
Fresh install and reload users data, rebuild ports etc?
This.
Safer, expecially if you install to a clean disk.
Possibly less time.
Definitely less hassle
Thanks Robert.
This is what I have done in the past, and all went well. Just thought there
might be some progress in Major version to major version upgrades that I
have not read about.
I need to reask this question though:
I have a build of 8.0 ready to deploy. Does anyone know of any big
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Jorge Medina jo...@bsdchile.cl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:58 AM, step...@theched.org wrote:
Good morning/afternoon/evening,
Do you know of any virtualisation solution that would allow USB devices
when using Freebsd-8 as host ?
We do indeed
Hi all,
When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the newest
ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.
What is the best way to get them back?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
Maybe portsnap fetch extract ?
Maybe the tag in your supfile was wrong for the ports.
MB.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Jun 25, 2010, at 13:51 , andrew clarke wrote:
On Thu 2010-06-24 23:28:27 UTC+, Svavar Ingi Hermannsson
(sva...@security.is) wrote:
I just wanted to notify you that the Icelandic ftp mirror site doesn't seam
to be working.
ftp.is.freebsd.org
21:48 ozzmo...@blizzard [~]host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/06/2010 19:38:43, Grant Peel wrote:
When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the
newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.
What is the best way to get them back?
Fix your ports supfile: for ports you
Hey all,
It was suggested I do a memtest, but that checked out fine. (I wish it
was as simple as just the ram!)
I’ve realised the issue manifests itself almost immediately when
accessing an underlying ZFS filesystem using Samba. But if it is UFS, it
is fine.
Does this mean anything to
On 27 June 2010 22:14, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/06/2010 19:38:43, Grant Peel wrote:
When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the
newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.
I have two questions
AAAXXX 00:00:10:10:00:032 54M -81:-96 100 EPS
SSIDAAAXXX RATESB2,B4,B11,B22,36,B48,72,108 DSPARMS2 ERP0x0
???2f0100 RSNv1 mc:TKIP uc:AES-CCMP+TKIP km:8021X-PSK
XRATESB12,18,B24,96 VENdd090010180203f000 WMEqosinfo 0x80
BE[aifsn 3 cwmin 4 cwmax 10 txop 0]
I have a script I am hacking. The code has a check for a size suffix.
I know what m|mb|g|gb|k|kb| and the upper case version of the same letters
mean. But the code also has an w|x size options.
Is this a valid size type and what does it mean?
Are you looking at the expand_number(3) function?
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD ...
s/always/almost /
If one wanted to download a copy of the ports tree as it existed
when, say, 6.1 was released, specifying the corresponding tag would
be the way to get it.
17 matches
Mail list logo
