In the last episode (Aug 23), jaymax said:
> I've just reset my telnet setup, now it comes up with a SRA secure login
> prompt, how can I get rid of it. I'm just using it for a short while to
> troubleshoot another installation, Qmail.
>
>telnet localhost
>Trying 127.0.0.1...
>Connect
I've just reset my telnet setup, now it comes up with a SRA secure login
prompt,
how can I get rid of it. I'm just using it for a short while to troubleshoot
another installation, Qmail.
telnet localhost
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
Trying S
Perhaps they rely on the opinions of other OSes' developers -- many of
whom have borrowed FreeBSD TCP/IP code to bootstrap their own network
stacks. Of course, I think a number of factors contribute to this
without necessarily proving it is the technical "best":
* BSD Unix was first out the gate
On 8/23/2010 11:20 AM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have several networking books (TCP/IP, Network Security, etc., etc.)
and it seems that several of them discuss TCP/IP in different
scenarios.
One of the common discussions of different OSes are their own
implementations of the TCP/IP stack. M
On 08/23/10 16:59, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
First, let's try the "vesa" thing.
Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and
X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the
configuration, but at this point I'm not going
On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> First, let's try the "vesa" thing.
>>
>
> Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and
> X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the
> configuration, but at this point I'm not going to complain.
>
Great. It
On 08/23/10 16:33, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 7:01 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Ok, one quick question. When your screen goes blank, can you
[ctrl][alt][fN] to a different TTY, where N is anything between 2-7?
I'm curious about the machine's state when you start X.
No, when the screen goes bl
On 8/23/10 7:33 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> In addition, it might be helpful to build debugging options into your
> GENERIC kernel. If you're willing to go down this path, I'll help you
> get set up,
I should mention, though - I used to have issues with the nVidia driver
putting my machine in an unu
On 8/23/10 7:01 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> Ok, one quick question. When your screen goes blank, can you
>> [ctrl][alt][fN] to a different TTY, where N is anything between 2-7?
>> I'm curious about the machine's state when you start X.
>>
>
> No, when the screen goes blank the whole computer free
Friedemann Becker wrote:
Hello,
I have some questions about an installation on a memorystick.
I have (a few weeks still) a very poor internet connection at home
that's unusable for anything beyond email. I tried some hacking on
musescore (yes I know that it can't work, but that's not my problem
On 08/23/10 15:31, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 5:51 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
On 8/23/10 5:51 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>>
>>> I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
>>> was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
>>> install. The screen goe
On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
install. The screen goes blank and the computer freezes, just as
happens when
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
install. The screen goes blank and the computer freezes, just as
happens when trying to install X11 with FreeBSD 8.1
On 08/23/10 12:11, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot to mention that previous to my installing 8.1 I had PCBSD
8.1 installed just to check it out (no likee), and the PCBSD
installer had no problem configuring X. Unfortunately, I don't have
a copy of that
--On Friday, August 20, 2010 17:24:55 -0700 "Randal L. Schwartz"
wrote:
"Paul" == Paul Schmehl writes:
Paul> Yes, I know I could do this easily in Perl. I'm doing this to try
Paul> and improve my understanding of awk.
To what end?
Every modern system that can run awk can also run Perl.
Jerry, Congratulations! You and Connor are now connected.
Connor Burke
Computer Software Professional
Austin, Texas Area
Computer Software Industry
cwbu...@gmail.com
To view Connor Burke's profile, go to
http://www.linkedin.com/e/fiopes-gd7titd1-6g/fpf/17644572/EML-inv-acc-prof/
--
On 08/23/10 12:14, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 3:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Dev
Thank you all for your replies. The information I posted to you all was NOT
my opinion or statement. I use and like FreeBSD more than windows having
been introduced to it by a friend some years ago. I was and am most
certainly NOT trolling, I merely did not know how much truth was in the
statement
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
Interesting, two device sections. Some notebooks actually do have two
video cards, although the R51 might not and this might just be
misdetected.
Doesn't have to be - maybe it's one VGA and
Thanks Roland,
The books that I have refer to the "efficiency" of the stack.
Perhaps that's what the authors are referring to as you've referenced
being able to saturate a link with traffic and there's little, if any,
dropped packets?
Ed
___
freebsd-que
Dnia poniedziałek, 23 sierpnia 2010 o 21:03:32 Polytropon napisał(a):
>
> > ppp ON localhost> dial
> > Warning: deflink: /dev/cuad1: Bad file descriptor
> > Warning: deflink: /dev/cuad0: Bad file descriptor
>
> PPP tries to access regular serial lines.
>
> > Nothing happens, there is still no c
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
On 08/23/10 10:51, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Here is the xorg.conf that was created by Xorg -configure:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
> Interesting, two device sections. Some notebooks actually do have two
> video cards, although the R51 might not and this might just be
> misdetected.
Doesn't have to be - maybe it's one VGA and one DVI output? It's also
possible
On 8/23/10 3:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "Card0"
>> Driver "intel"
>> VendorName "Intel Corporation"
>> BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
>> BusID
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot to mention that previous to my installing 8.1 I had PCBSD 8.1
installed just to check it out (no likee), and the PCBSD installer had
no problem configuring X. Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of that
xorg.conf.
PCBSD has a live mode to ru
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:05:32 +0200, Jakub Nowacki
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> (First of all - forgive me my language, I'am form Poland)
Dobre. :-)
> I'am new in FreeBSD, but I have used Linux for a few year.
As a first note, know that FreeBSD has *excellent* manpages. Know
the "apropos" and "man"
On 8/23/10 1:34 PM, Friedemann Becker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some questions about an installation on a memorystick.
>
> I have (a few weeks still) a very poor internet connection at home
> that's unusable for anything beyond email. I tried some hacking on
> musescore (yes I know that it can't
Hello!
(First of all - forgive me my language, I'am form Poland)
I'am new in FreeBSD, but I have used Linux for a few year.
I have got mobile modem: Huawei e1750c. As far as I know it is supported by
u3g driver. On Linux I use wvdial as a dialer, and there are no problems with
connection. On Fr
On 2010-08-23 19:34, Friedemann Becker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some questions about an installation on a memorystick.
>
> I have (a few weeks still) a very poor internet connection at home
> that's unusable for anything beyond email. I tried some hacking on
> musescore (yes I know that it can'
On 08/23/10 10:59, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:51 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&confi
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:20:35AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> One of the common discussions of different OSes are their own
> implementations of the TCP/IP stack. Most of the authors seem to agree
> that while different OSes have their pros and cons, most seem to agree
> that in terms of pure, netwo
On 08/23/10 10:51, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
Here is the xo
Hello,
I have some questions about an installation on a memorystick.
I have (a few weeks still) a very poor internet connection at home
that's unusable for anything beyond email. I tried some hacking on
musescore (yes I know that it can't work, but that's not my problem
for now). Since I don't wa
On 8/23/10 1:51 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>
>>> The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
>>> xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
>>>
>>> http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
>> xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
>>
>> http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
>>
>>
>
> Here is the xorg.conf that was cre
Apple is also giving back extensively in the X11 arena with
pretty much everything they're doing in X11 being made available
with current development and testing done by Apple employees
withing the open source tree. X11 snapshots are openly available
with extensive feedback through the x11-us...@a
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaste
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
Here is the xorg.conf that was created by Xorg -configure:
---
On 08/23/10 09:21, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on
this new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program,
copyin
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:25:34AM +0100, Garry wrote:
> This is a conversation held on a UK group page, can you confirm or deny this
> as twaddle.
> Mac OS X is basically BSD that's been appleised (serious vendor lock-in),
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_X#History and
http://en.wikipedia.o
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so on my
Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this new 8.1
installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying the
xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11 as x
Hi folks,
I have several networking books (TCP/IP, Network Security, etc., etc.)
and it seems that several of them discuss TCP/IP in different
scenarios.
One of the common discussions of different OSes are their own
implementations of the TCP/IP stack. Most of the authors seem to agree
that while
Quoth Chad Perrin on Monday, 23 August 2010:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:00:36AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> >
> > As for the GPL itself, I think the biggest problem is who controls it
> > and who enforces it. Companies get sued over busybox frequently, and
> > not by the busybox developers.
Am 23.08.2010 16:36, schrieb Chris Maness:
> What is a good tool to encrypt a directory? I need an application
> that is also readily available for Apple OSX, and that does not get
> mangled when transferring via rsync.
How about "openssl'?
Encrypt a TARed directory:
$ tar cjf - /path/to/source
On 8/23/10 11:53 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/23/10 11:44 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
>> on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
>> new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program,
On 8/23/10 11:44 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
> on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
> new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying
> the xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying
the xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11 as xorg.conf. I have both hald and
dbus enabl
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:00:36AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
>
> As for the GPL itself, I think the biggest problem is who controls it
> and who enforces it. Companies get sued over busybox frequently, and
> not by the busybox developers. Stallman's views about how computers
> should work amo
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:10:19PM -0400, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
> At 1:25 AM +0100 8/23/10, Garry wrote:
> >
> >Also, Windows uses (or used to use) a BSD stack for networking
> >for instance.
>
> This is true. (or at least it definitely used to be true, I
> have no idea if Vista and Windows7
I use Win 7 64 bit - Virtual Box 3.2.6 r63112 with FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
/ Xfce installed in Virtual Box have not had any issues at all.
Diego
On 23 August 2010 07:18, Diego Arias wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
>> On 23/08/2010 2:26 μ.μ., Matthias Apitz wrot
Quoth Matthias Apitz on Monday, 23 August 2010:
> Hello,
>
> I've to re-install my laptop with some Windows version (Vista or Windows
> 7) with disk encryption. Of course I will go on to work in FreeBSD
> 9-CURRENT and KDE3 as desktop. Please, don't ask me why I have to put Windows
> below :-)
>
What is a good tool to encrypt a directory? I need an application
that is also readily available for Apple OSX, and that does not get
mangled when transferring via rsync.
Regards,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 2:26 μ.μ., Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Monday, August 23, 2010 a las 12:39:14PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias
> escribió:
> >
> >
> >> Win 7 is a lot better than Vista...
> >>
> >>> Any recommendation for the virtualisation sof
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Fred Boatwright wrote:
Until FBSD X is working on the pc I have to use Netscape 4.79 on
a Sun running Solaris 2.6 (which I would prefer to keep using if
only a modern browser was available) ...
If the problems with X on FBSD are limited to the X "server"
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:12:59AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:25:34AM +0100, Garry wrote:
> > Mac OS X is basically BSD that's been appleised (serious vendor
> > lock-in), they do give a little back to BSDs, but have made sure
> > that BSDs can't get much off of them, but t
2010-08-22 00:48, Bruce Cran skrev:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:57 +0200
Svein Skogen wrote:
Anybody else seem to get these header-falsified messages lately:
I think anyone who posts to freebsd-questions is probably getting them.
I haven't seen them, and haven't looked for them.
I contacte
Garry wrote:
Mac OS X is basically BSD that's been appleised (serious vendor lock-in),
they do give a little back to BSDs, but have made sure that BSDs can't get
much off of them, but they can get a lot out of BSD.
Also, Windows uses (or used to use) a BSD stack for networking for
instance.
T
On 08/23/10 11:50, n dhert wrote:
> After a reboot of my FreeBSD 8.0-p4 system
> a vmstat shows:
> Mon Aug 23 08:40:00 CEST 2010
> procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
> r b w avmfre flt re pi pofr sr da0 pa0 in sy cs us
> sy id
> 1
On Saturday 21 August 2010 19:48:32 Steffen Neubauer wrote:
> I think I can exclude the ZFS implementation too, because I tried dd
> if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null and executed killall -SIGINFO dd while it was
> copying and it looked like it stalled randomly too.
Not related your problem, but you can pr
On 23/08/2010 2:26 μ.μ., Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, August 23, 2010 a las 12:39:14PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias
> escribió:
>
>
>> Win 7 is a lot better than Vista...
>>
>>> Any recommendation for the virtualisation software for best performance?
>>>
>>>
>> Vmware achieve
On 23/08/2010 1:31 μ.μ., Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:14 +0300
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
>
>> Vmware achieves very good performance without trouble.
>> VirtualBox works OK most of the time (and it's free) but I had some
>> kernel panics running FreeBSD (unless the host is also
El día Monday, August 23, 2010 a las 12:39:14PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias escribió:
>
> Win 7 is a lot better than Vista...
> > Any recommendation for the virtualisation software for best performance?
> >
>
> Vmware achieves very good performance without trouble.
> VirtualBox works OK most of th
Hi,
In my case(stuck at bios splash after freebsd install) ,i had to give it to
acer support ,as i risked losing warranty if i opened/dismantled my laptop.
They have diagnosed harddrive to be faulty(the laptop is hardly 15 days old
:-( ). The lappy was running ubuntu and fedora fine.
Hope this
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:14 +0300
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> Vmware achieves very good performance without trouble.
> VirtualBox works OK most of the time (and it's free) but I had some
> kernel panics running FreeBSD (unless the host is also FreeBSD!)
> Have not tried very recent versions though,
After a reboot of my FreeBSD 8.0-p4 system
a vmstat shows:
Mon Aug 23 08:40:00 CEST 2010
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi pofr sr da0 pa0 in sy cs us
sy id
1 1 0 1515M 7118M 816 5 5 0 726 0
On 23/08/2010 10:08 π.μ., Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've to re-install my laptop with some Windows version (Vista or Windows
> 7) with disk encryption. Of course I will go on to work in FreeBSD
> 9-CURRENT and KDE3 as desktop. Please, don't ask me why I have to put Windows
> below :-)
>
>
Matthias Apitz skrev 2010-08-23 09:08:
Hello,
I've to re-install my laptop with some Windows version (Vista or Windows
7) with disk encryption. Of course I will go on to work in FreeBSD
9-CURRENT and KDE3 as desktop. Please, don't ask me why I have to put Windows
below :-)
I have some quest
2010/8/23 Matthias Apitz :
>
> Hello,
Hi Matthias
>
> I've to re-install my laptop with some Windows version (Vista or Windows
> 7) with disk encryption. Of course I will go on to work in FreeBSD
> 9-CURRENT and KDE3 as desktop. Please, don't ask me why I have to put Windows
> below :-)
>
> I h
Hello,
I've to re-install my laptop with some Windows version (Vista or Windows
7) with disk encryption. Of course I will go on to work in FreeBSD
9-CURRENT and KDE3 as desktop. Please, don't ask me why I have to put Windows
below :-)
I have some questions:
>From the point of view of performan
71 matches
Mail list logo
