fuser(1) man page mentions the tool is supposed to list processes that
have specified named file(s) open. As there are several types of files
(according to stat(2)) it's not clear which are supported, e.g.
$ (mkfifo foo.fifo; cat foo.fifo) nc -lU foo.socket
$ fuser foo.*
foo.fifo:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Yesterday I finally managed to get my FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE box to actually
authenticate to the Xserve, running Open Directory on Mac OS X 10.5 Server. I
was able to log in to the FreeBSD box (egil.kreativsone.no) as a directory user
via SSH
Hello!
Yesterday I finally managed to get my FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE box to actually
authenticate to the Xserve, running Open Directory on Mac OS X 10.5
Server. I was able to log in to the FreeBSD box (egil.kreativsone.no) as a
directory user via SSH and also via netatalk.
Unfortunately, after
hi,
i have a new fbsd-8.2 install (dual boot with win7, just desktop general use)
on entirely ufs disk, and am not
sure how to mount a zfs formatted disk from a previous install, without
loosing what is on there. (freebsd-zfs).
in short, the zfs disk was from a previous freebsd install, same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
They were not, but I synced them both to the same time server. I don't use
Kerberos anyways, I use nss_ldap, so it didn't work.
Best regards,
Aleksander Steffensen
Den 26. mai 2011 kl. 14.42 skrev mcoyles:
Hello!
Yesterday I finally managed to
If a server has one interface to the Internet and another interface to a
switch connecting to a few other servers, it seems TCP's MSL value might
reasonably be set a lot lower on the private interface.
I'm specifically thinking of a lot of short MySQL connections between the
servers on the
Hi,
zpool create is a destructive command to data on the disks, ie any
preexisting pool, but it would normally warn you if it found an
existing pool on the disks you are trying to use.
Run:
# zpool import
and it will scan any attached disks for pools that are importable, if
it detects
Hi Polytropon cc list,
I wrote:
You could look at man fsdb
FreeBSD offers a lot of versatile diagnostic and rescue
tools, and surely fsdb is one of them. Others, provided
by the base system, are fetch -rR device and also
recoverdisk.
In the ports collection you'll find tools
On 05/26/11 17:29, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Hi,
zpool create is a destructive command to data on the disks, ie any
preexisting pool, but it would normally warn you if it found an
existing pool on the disks you are trying to use.
Run:
# zpool import
and it will scan any attached disks
I am attempting to install FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 from a CD onto a Dell
R210 server. When I boot and run fdisk from sysinstall (under
Custom), it tells me No disks found! and then points me to the
hardware guide. Nothing in the hardware guide really seems to apply.
Any one else get FreeBSD installed
On 05/26/11 15:16, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
I am attempting to install FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 from a CD onto a Dell
R210 server. When I boot and run fdisk from sysinstall (under
Custom), it tells me No disks found! and then points me to the
hardware guide. Nothing in the hardware guide really seems to
Jaime,
If you are using the on board controller, try changing the BIOS
settings between AHCI and ATA. An issue you may have with ATA, the
internal DVDROM may not work. I always had an external USB CDROM so I
can't say for certain.
Hope that helps.
Barrett W. Clark
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at
I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
I wanted to install something from the ports, but I am getting
this error on almost every port;
# make
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
=== Extracting for
On May 26, 2011, at 3:01 PM, David Banning wrote:
I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
You've also got a FreeBSD installation which the ports tree does not support.
I wanted to install something from the ports, but I am getting
this error on almost every port;
#
On Thu, 26 May 2011 15:40:09 -0700
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On May 26, 2011, at 3:01 PM, David Banning wrote:
I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
You've also got a FreeBSD installation which the ports tree does not
support.
I wanted to install
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
not much else. I expect the amount of traffic (throughput)
On May 26, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
How many DHCP leases and NAT clients?
ISC's DHCPd typically runs a few tens of MB unless you have
Your biggest consumers would be FBSD itself and the routing tables. I *think*
full internet routing tables are still less than 512MB, (google to check), so
unless you have more routes than that - 512MB may work, 1GB most likely will.
Too many unknowns, like; is this ipv4 only or 6 and 4
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Gary Gatten wrote:
Your biggest consumers would be FBSD itself and the routing tables. I
*think* full internet routing tables are still less than 512MB, (google
to check), so unless you have more routes than that - 512MB may work,
1GB most likely will. Too many unknowns,
Hello all.
Is it possible that the root user can be limited to send email only
for activities realetd to the server and only locally?
or
limit the amount of root user can send.
I have a 7.3 small server working as secondary dns, 3 domains for
http and email. very few traffic. Using
I don't remember for sendmail but if you
install postfix root cannot receive any
email
Le 27/05/2011 05:03, Jorge Biquez a écrit :
Hello all.
Is it possible that the root user can be limited to send email only for
activities realetd to the server and only locally?
or
limit the amount of
Hello.
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem
or what... thing is not that root receive email
but that root was used to send email to a list of address...
JB
At 11:07 p.m. 26/05/2011, you wrote:
I don't remember for sendmail but if you
install postfix root cannot receive any
email
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing is not that
root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list of
address...
Was the root account on the box actually used, or did
On 5/27/11 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello.
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing is not
that root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list
of address...
And what does it say in the logs? We'll help you interpret them if you
wish, but
At 11:27 p.m. 26/05/2011, Jon Radel wrote:
On 5/27/11 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello.
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing is not
that root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list
of address...
And what does it say in the logs? We'll
At 11:25 p.m. 26/05/2011, you wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez
jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing
is not that
root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list of
address...
Was the root
Thanks for your comments, tomorow morning will check it again, now is
normal . I was thinking on shutting it down but I guess it is better
to leave it running and even with the risk , the server will have
problems soon but I guess is better to tr to find how they did it
will go to sleep a
27 matches
Mail list logo
