Re: Bye-bye beastie ...
I think on some early QNX you had a short series of dots then a static rotating display of | / -- \ | characters in that order (I hope you know what I mean) which showed that the kernel was loading devices etc However if you presed escape you could get the full output. This seemed like a good / neat compromise as you could 'see' that something was happening without all the debug output (but had the choice of doing so if you wished) I liked that by the login prompt you still had only (and no more than) one screeens worth of output. On Mandrake Linux 9.2 you could choose between a 'nice' hi rez background with a central window of the kernel text output in a colour that fitted in with the splash screen, a fixed full screen splash or the framebuffer console with a large but faint 9.2 in lite grey in the backround (very cool) I suppose it depends what you are doing. Most FreeBSD dare I suggest runs on servers and prolly only gets rebooted once a year so you never would see the startup screens. However that doesnt mean that FreeBSD shoudnt get all multimedia and provide a desktop too. I find Windogs 'Look over there children, its the mystical computer lantern doing its magic' splash screens somewhat annoying and would rather have the low rez kernel OP of FreeBSD any day !!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Set options to deamons
Syslog as many of the other daemons, which start on boot time depend on parameters set in file /etc/rc.conf. For the syslog you can specify: syslogd_enable=YES syslogd_flags=-s -s This two lines loads syslogd and passes parameters -s -s to it. You can find many configuration parameters in the shell script files in /usr/local/etc/rc.d directory. But generally you should use: xxx_enable=YES xxx_flags= Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Senior System administrator ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD tel. +359 2 921 7161 fax +359 2 921 7110 http://www.procreditbank.bg Disclaimer: The information contained in this message is intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom it is addressed and other authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. ProCredit Bank is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this message nor for any delay in its receipt. Efren Bravo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/27/2005 08:32 PM To freeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject Set options to deamons Hi, How do I set options to deamons? For instance, I've been reading a security doc and it says: Syslogd can be attacked directly and it's strongly recommended that you use -s option whenever possible, and the -a option otherwise. If Syslogd start when the OS start, how do I set the -s option. Thank... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limit client connections ssh
Better use firewall to protect the port from unwanted access. This way you'll have better protection and also you'll have a trace of unsuccessful (and maybe successful) connection attempts :) Ivailo Tanusheff Senior System administrator ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD tel. +359 2 921 7161 fax +359 2 921 7110 http://www.procreditbank.bg Disclaimer: The information contained in this message is intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom it is addressed and other authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. ProCredit Bank is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this message nor for any delay in its receipt. Efren Bravo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/27/2005 10:27 PM To freeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject Limit client connections ssh Hi, I'm using ssh to connect me to fBSD server, how can I limit the client connections?, I mean, I only only that the server(ssh) accept incoming connections from a specific IP or IPs range? Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: quick TTY Question
Le Mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 21:41 -0500, Eric Murphy a écrit : Hey all after installing the newest version of Xorg I am uable to switch consoles... with CTRL-ALT-F# I've the same problem so I'm interested in the answer. For me the problem is with xfce and wmaker but not with kde that work just fine. -- Sebastien Chassot - Geneva ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intel 2U server 4GB RAM showing only 3GB
Hi, I have a new dual Xeon Intel 2U server which I'm configuring with FreeBSD 5.4 and I can't get it to see more than 3GB RAM. If I try use the MAXMEM=(4096*1024) option it fails to boot up and just resets itself. Do I need to use the PAE option ? ..I wouldn't think so as this is meant for 4GB. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Regards, Nelis dmesg.boot Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kdebase3.4.2 install error
Hi, Am 27.09.2005 um 07:13 schrieb eodyna: I was wondering if someone can help me with this install problem. as well as the log it complains about favicons.cpp:29:77: kdatastream.h: No such file or directory kiontheme.h kimageio.h ksimpleconfig.h kstandardsdirs.h kio/job.h with the same error message reinstall your kdelibs port. regards arved ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disk inconsistency
I have reason to believe that a set of mirrored disks became inconsistent recently. Since reviving the disk array the system it's attached to has become highly unstable. It appears to deadlock every few hours. No errors, no logs, no response to keyboard, ping or other network requests. Each reboot takes several passes with FSCK to get the disks in to a clean state to boot with again. Can anyone confirm that reading data from a set of mirrored drives which are inconsistent would cause this type of symptom? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disk inconsistency
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:25:44 -0400, Michael Conlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have reason to believe that a set of mirrored disks became inconsistent recently. Since reviving the disk array the system it's attached to has become highly unstable. It appears to deadlock every few hours. No errors, no logs, no response to keyboard, ping or other network requests. Each reboot takes several passes with FSCK to get the disks in to a clean state to boot with again. Can anyone confirm that reading data from a set of mirrored drives which are inconsistent would cause this type of symptom? A month ago I had one drive in a raid 1 volume intermittently fail. I started seeing occasional (as in only once or twice per week) read errors in the logs for the volume in question; however, the drive didn't fail catastrophically enough for me to identify which one of the 2 drives was bad. After this happened a few times, I started seeing exactly the behaviour that you described above. At the time, I conjectured that the mirrored disks had become inconsistent. Fortunately, I was able to identify the bad drive soon after. After replacing the drive and rebuilding the redundant data, the system has been perfectly stable. Based on my experience, I would guess that it is indeed possible that your raid 1 data is inconsistent. The difficulty is determining which of the 2 disks has good data (if either). If you have a third drive of the same model, you might try replacing in succession each of the two drives with the third and rebuilding the reduntand data. It goes without saying that backing up to tape would be a good idea before mucking about with the drives. If your system isn't stable enough to dump the raid volume to tape, try offlining one or the other of the drives to see if that helps. You didn't state your raid setup (hardware or software?). In my case, I am using hardware raid (a Mylex extremeRAID 1100 controller) with SCSI disks. Sandy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disk inconsistency
On Sep 28, 2005, at 7:08 AM, Sandy Rutherford wrote: A month ago I had one drive in a raid 1 volume intermittently fail. I started seeing occasional (as in only once or twice per week) read errors in the logs for the volume in question; however, the drive didn't fail catastrophically enough for me to identify which one of the 2 drives was bad. After this happened a few times, I started seeing exactly the behaviour that you described above. At the time, I conjectured that the mirrored disks had become inconsistent. Fortunately, I was able to identify the bad drive soon after. After replacing the drive and rebuilding the redundant data, the system has been perfectly stable. You didn't state your raid setup (hardware or software?). In my case, I am using hardware raid (a Mylex extremeRAID 1100 controller) with SCSI disks. I'm using a IBM FAStT-100 disk array with 8 drives in a RAID-10 (all hardware RAID on the disk array). I think my only option is to pull an incremental backup and rebuild the file system. Thanks for the info. -- Michael Conlen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New user
On 9/28/05, Xian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tharaka Abeysekera wrote: I'm a new to UNIX, I got to know about your services recently. Please tell me ware to start FreeBSD(UNIX) . Because I'm pissed off with Windows On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:29, Derrick Test wrote: thats a big question. the handbook off the website is a great resource. It can also be found on the disk (at /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html ) once you have installed. Usefull for working out how to set up internet ;-) Using it will also save FreeBSD site bandwidth :-) But I believe the handbook at www.freebsd.org is more accurate and up-to-date than the one on the CDs. -- Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements We live less by imagination than despite it - Rockwell Kent, N by E ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UPS
I have FreeBSD 5.4 running on an older Compaq computer. I was wondering if someone could recommend a suitable UPS. I tried googling around, but mostly I found posts regarding problems that users had getting UPS to work dependably with FreeBSD. I am not looking for anything extraordinary. Just something, that can gracefully shut down my system if I lose power. An occurrence that transpires habitually in the northeast USA when I reside, -- Gerard E. Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
Hi! I am new to FreeBSD just migrated from linux. I have installed version 5.4 and ports collection via cvsup. Then I have used ports for cyrus22 to build Cyrus and also sasl2. Now I am trying to build sendmail 8.13.5 but it doesn't build with sasl support. In my make.conf I have added: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD+= -lsasl2 And then run make and make install under /usr/ports/mail/sendmail. But when I check with : -- mig29# telnet localhost 25 Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.workgroup. Escape character is '^]'. 220 xmail.homelinux.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.3/8.13.5; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:15:32 +0200 (CEST) ehlo localhost 250-xmail.homelinux.net Hello localhost.workgroup [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 10480760 250-DSN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP -- I don't have smtp auth. Moreover, I found out that it didn't built with SASL with: -- mig29# sendmail -bt -d0.1 Version 8.13.3 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG Warning: Option: AuthMechanisms requires SASL support (-DSASL) Warning: Option: AuthOptions requires SASL support (-DSASL) SYSTEM IDENTITY (after readcf) (short domain name) $w = mig29 (canonical domain name) $j = xmail.homelinux.net (subdomain name) $m = workgroup (node name) $k = mig29.workgroup ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked) -- What am I doing wrong here? Regards, Sasa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should I write bug report?
Hello everybody, I've experienced a bug that causes a reboot under FreeBSD 5.4 and I wonder if I should write an 'open' bug report or a 'secret' mail to one of the FreeBSD developers. This bug doesn't seem to be hardware-related and is easily reproducible by a normal user (with no special privileges), so the latter is perhaps the better option. Perhaps I'm making a fuss about nothing (ugh, this sounds wrong, sorry for my english). I'm not on this list, so please cc me. Bye, Tobias Mohrlüder ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UPS
Gerard Seibert wrote: I have FreeBSD 5.4 running on an older Compaq computer. I was wondering if someone could recommend a suitable UPS. I tried googling around, but mostly I found posts regarding problems that users had getting UPS to work dependably with FreeBSD. I am not looking for anything extraordinary. Just something, that can gracefully shut down my system if I lose power. An occurrence that transpires habitually in the northeast USA when [sic] I reside, I'd have a look at NUT's site and documentation. In particular: http://www.networkupstools.org/doc/2.0.1/README.html contains their hardware support table. I believe the port is in /usr/ports/sysutils HTH, Kevin Kinsey ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should I write bug report?
On 2005-09-28 14:19, Tobias Mohrl?der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everybody, I've experienced a bug that causes a reboot under FreeBSD 5.4 and I wonder if I should write an 'open' bug report or a 'secret' mail to one of the FreeBSD developers. This bug doesn't seem to be hardware-related and is easily reproducible by a normal user (with no special privileges), so the latter is perhaps the better option. If the problem is security related and you can verify that it is still unfixed in the latest version of the RELENG_5 branch, then please contact the security officer team and they'll tell you what to do. If the problem is not security related, yes go ahead and file a bug report using send-pr(1) or the web interface. - Giorgos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should I write bug report?
Tobias Mohrlüder wrote: I've experienced a bug that causes a reboot under FreeBSD 5.4 and I wonder if I should write an 'open' bug report or a 'secret' mail to one of the FreeBSD developers. This bug doesn't seem to be hardware-related and is easily reproducible by a normal user (with no special privileges), so the latter is perhaps the better option. Please send the details to the FreeBSD security team at [EMAIL PROTECTED]. We don't consider local denial of service problems (which is what this sounds like) to be security issues, but we always like to investigate them to make sure that there isn't anything more serious. Colin Percival FreeBSD Security Officer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New user
On Wed 28 Sep 05 03:54, Dmitry Mityugov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Xian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tharaka Abeysekera wrote: I'm a new to UNIX, I got to know about your services recently. Please tell me ware to start FreeBSD(UNIX) . Because I'm pissed off with Windows On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:29, Derrick Test wrote: thats a big question. the handbook off the website is a great resource. It can also be found on the disk (at /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html ) once you have installed. Usefull for working out how to set up internet ;-) Using it will also save FreeBSD site bandwidth :-) But I believe the handbook at www.freebsd.org is more accurate and up-to-date than the one on the CDs. Yes, but if you update the doc tree locally and build from that, then you have the most up-to-date copy right on your machine. You have to install /usr/ports/textproc/docproj first, and there's more details about that here: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/02/08/Big_Scary_Daemons.html Hope I don't scare off the new user, but this does demonstrate the power and simplicity of UNIX in general, and FreeBSD in particular. Here's an example straight from my workstation (this can be used as a way to update and serve docs for an entire organization, such as one build machine being used for packages for the other machines in a network, though presumably there would be NFS or a webserver involved in such a case). My /etc/make.conf includes this: # doc proj make options SUP=/usr/local/bin/cvsup SUPFLAGS= -L 2 -1 DOC_LANG= en_US.ISO8859-1 SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c us` DOCSUPFILE= /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/doc-supfile SUP_UPDATE= yes ... and my supfile for docs: % cat /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/doc-supfile *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress doc-all And in my root crontab is: # cvsup and build docs, 4am, every day 1 4 * * * /bin/sh /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/sup-doc 21 And the script referenced above: # cat /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/sup-doc #!/bin/sh MAILTO=krinklyfig MEHOME=/usr/home/krinklyfig touch $MEHOME/log/sup-doc.log ; touch $MEHOME/log/sup-make-doc.log ; cd /usr/doc ; make update $MEHOME/log/sup-doc.log 21 make install clean $MEHOME/log/sup-make-doc.log 21 At 4am every day the above script is run: the changes to docs are downloaded though cvsup, and the new docs are built. My local docs are most likely just as up-to-date as the ones on the web (1 day), and I only have to download the updates from cvs to keep them current. - jt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
acpi_thorttle and cpufreq/ichss questions
Hello, my laptop (PIII LV) runs fine with cpufreq and ichss: dev.ichss.0.%desc: SpeedStep ICH dev.ichss.0.%driver: ichss dev.ichss.0.%parent: cpu0 dev.ichss.0.freq_settings: 794/-1 497/-1 If I understand the output correctly i have two SpeedSteps, the full 800MHz (with higher voltage) and 500MHz. But now I also have acpi_throttle (if I don't disable it in /boot/loader.conf): dev.acpi_throttle.0.%desc: ACPI CPU Throttling dev.acpi_throttle.0.%driver: acpi_throttle dev.acpi_throttle.0.%parent: cpu0 dev.acpi_throttle.0.freq_settings: 1/-1 8750/-1 7500/-1 6250/-1 5000/-1 3750/-1 2500/-1 1250/-1 What do these values tell me? I think that are divisors, but how can I see which one is used? I remember that some time back I saw at boot time some information about throttle has xx steps, currently using 100% or something like that. Can I constrain the divisors, lets say I want to have only 1, 7500 and 5000? (I know I can limit the lowest frequency cpufreq may use with debug.cpufreq.lowest=310 but then I don't know if it throttles the 800MHz mode (thus using high core voltage) or if it throttles the power saving 500MHz mode) And what does this tell me: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 C2/10 C3/85 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% Thanks in advance, -Harry pgp70UjmbSJ0X.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: proftpd: No address associated with hostname
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: proftpd: No address associated with hostname Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:30 GMT Hello, I have been running proftpd for years (FreeBSD 4.11). Today I upgraded to 1.3.0rc2. And now I get this in my log: getaddrinfo 'asarian-host.net' error: No address associated with hostname Yeah, right. I have googled on this quite a bit; but all I see are lame recommendations like to add the hostname to /etc/hosts, or to DNS. As if my hostname has not been resolving for years. :) Besides, it was working fine with 1.2.9 just a few minutes ago. Obviously something changed on the proftpd side. Does anyone here have the answer? I too wonder why I get this error for the first time and cannot find anything in the docs about what to do to eliminate the error message. ProFTP seems to work okay, but the error is a mystery and I have not made any host name changes. Thanks! Regards, Jack _ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UPS
Gerard Seibert wrote: I am not looking for anything extraordinary. Just something, that can gracefully shut down my system if I lose power. An occurrence that transpires habitually in the northeast USA when I reside, Your bog-standard APC brand plus sysutils/apcupsd port works fine for me for less than, say 3000 volt-ampere UPS. If you're going to get something bigger, look at Leviton or Powerware. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bye-bye beastie ...
taking the risk of starting the 'ultimate-religion-flame-war' (please not!)... ;) religion (of any kind!) limits the scope of people's thoughts and makes them more easy to manipulate, what patch is this, please tell me it name and location in ports, because I want to make sure its removed from my system at immediately. As a Zen Buddhist, I will loosely quote a Chinese Ch'an (Zen) Master Rinzai who has said that religion is toilet paper, you use it to clean yourself up then you thow it away. ergo, the purpose is not to contend with others but to wipe your own ass ... so please get on with the task. If you have wiped then flush ... not talk. not even mentioning what religion can do to the 'evolution' of mankind (yes, even in these days (-the creationists in the usa for example)). they don't even come close to be representative of religion in a global context. the world would be a better place if we all would get rid of this. adding all the (positive and negative) ways in which religion has affected history, you end up with more bad than good. Is this another master plan for everyone. one of the main problems is, rules that may have been necessary and good at some times, aren't reflected and reconsidered because they are now 'send by god' and therefore untouchable. this creates some really weird (and sometimes brutal) situations. are you trying to say that religious proclaimations utilize God as a self-referential way of imputing authority to the statement within the statement; if you are then that is an interesting comment on how authority and legitimation are used tactically to create consent or consensus ... but then again this is not only true of religion but is part of socio-cultural dynamics in terms of the use of authoritative declarations ... It would be useful to apply it to the windows/linux debate but this is probably offtopic... no ... FreeBSD has an extensive array of functions and capabilities and so I am sure that this one is in there somewhere please check the code. albertfuller - email home 2albertfuller AT gmail DOT com - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Server Crash
Ok, I'm having some problemsdue to the fact that I'm pretty new and have no idea on how to do this. We had a server crash, hardware related, and I want to take my dump backups and restore them on another system. The dump files are located on a remote ftp server. So basically what I'm trying to accomplish is installing FreeBSD on the new system, getting the dump files off of the backup server, and then restoring them on a live server. Is this possible, or should I be trying to do this a different way. I cannot restore everything exactly without some changes. The new server is SCSI, and the old server was on an IDE hard drive and I had re-compiled the kernel with all SCSI devices disabled (I don't know if that even matters). Anyway I'm kind of lost and am looking for some guidance. I've done plenty of reading and have attempted the restoration on my own, but keep hosing the new system. Any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks, Cody ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail question on gateway install
steve lasiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is a follow up to an issue I still have concerning my FreeBSD 5.4 gateway. I've done a basic install and have disabled inetd and sendmail. My mail server is behind my gateway. I can send mail out but the gateway is blocking incoming request on port 25. I have the ipf rules and ipnat rules in place but the gateway never allows it through. I can telnet to the 192.x.x.1 address behind the gateway fine so I know my postfix is up and running. I can do a port scan via the internet and see that 25 is opened but when I try to telnet into the public ip on 25 I never get in and get a connection refused. When I check with tcpdump -vnt port 25 and run the web port scan I see it catching the packets. But when I run the tcpdump and try to telnet in on 25 it never reaches it. There is also output in my maillog even though sendmail is disabled via rc.conf. Can anyone give me a heads up on what configuration files need modifying to open this up? It sounds obvious that your firewall rules are *not* in place to allow SMTP through. You didn't show them. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should I write bug report?
Hello everybody, I've experienced a bug that causes a reboot under FreeBSD 5.4 and I wonder if I should write an 'open' bug report or a 'secret' mail to one of the FreeBSD developers. This bug doesn't seem to be hardware-related and is easily reproducible by a normal user (with no special privileges), so the latter is perhaps the better option. Perhaps I'm making a fuss about nothing (ugh, this sounds wrong, sorry for my english). I'm not on this list, so please cc me. Do a bug report. Use sendpr. This is open source software and there are no secrets. jerry Bye, Tobias Mohrlüder ___ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bye-bye beastie ...
Hi All, This is really an interesting discussion. I actually appreciate it. But, it doesn't belong here. Start a list or forum somewhere and let us all know about it so those who would like to continue can without tieing up the FreeBSD questions list. jerry taking the risk of starting the 'ultimate-religion-flame-war' (please not!)... ;) religion (of any kind!) limits the scope of people's thoughts and makes them more easy to manipulate, what patch is this, please tell me it name and location in ports, because I want to make sure its removed from my system at immediately. As a Zen Buddhist, I will loosely quote a Chinese Ch'an (Zen) Master Rinzai who has said that religion is toilet paper, you use it to clean yourself up then you thow it away. ergo, the purpose is not to contend with others but to wipe your own ass ... so please get on with the task. If you have wiped then flush ... not talk. not even mentioning what religion can do to the 'evolution' of mankind (yes, even in these days (-the creationists in the usa for example)). they don't even come close to be representative of religion in a global context. the world would be a better place if we all would get rid of this. adding all the (positive and negative) ways in which religion has affected history, you end up with more bad than good. Is this another master plan for everyone. one of the main problems is, rules that may have been necessary and good at some times, aren't reflected and reconsidered because they are now 'send by god' and therefore untouchable. this creates some really weird (and sometimes brutal) situations. are you trying to say that religious proclaimations utilize God as a self-referential way of imputing authority to the statement within the statement; if you are then that is an interesting comment on how authority and legitimation are used tactically to create consent or consensus ... but then again this is not only true of religion but is part of socio-cultural dynamics in terms of the use of authoritative declarations ... It would be useful to apply it to the windows/linux debate but this is probably offtopic... no ... FreeBSD has an extensive array of functions and capabilities and so I am sure that this one is in there somewhere please check the code. albertfuller - email home 2albertfuller AT gmail DOT com - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendmail
I have just noticed this message appearing when I did a reboot of my system. I rebooted twice, and the message was there both times. I have no idea why, or what I might have done to cause it. Worse, I do not know how to correct it. Starting sendmail. Sep 28 09:31:31 seibercom sm-mta[418]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): service smtp unknown: No such file or directory Sep 28 09:31:31 seibercom sm-mta[418]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): service smtp unknown -- Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:36:55 -0400 (EDT), Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sendmail Wrote these words of wisdom: I have just noticed this message appearing when I did a reboot of my system. I rebooted twice, and the message was there both times. I have no idea why, or what I might have done to cause it. Worse, I do not know how to correct it. Starting sendmail. Sep 28 09:31:31 seibercom sm-mta[418]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): service smtp unknown: No such file or directory Sep 28 09:31:31 seibercom sm-mta[418]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): service smtp unknown I was just checking my /etc/inetd.conf' file, and noticed that there is no entry for 'smtp' in it. I thought that there was suppose to be one. I was setting up 'qpopper' on this system the other day, and I am wondering if I inadvertently deleted something that might have had to do with this error message. Strangely enough, everything does seem to work correctly. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel 2U server 4GB RAM showing only 3GB
On 9/28/05, Nelis Lamprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a new dual Xeon Intel 2U server which I'm configuring with FreeBSD 5.4 and I can't get it to see more than 3GB RAM. If I try use the MAXMEM=(4096*1024) option it fails to boot up and just resets itself. Do I need to use the PAE option ? ..I wouldn't think so as this is meant for 4GB. Yeah, you'll need to use PAE. Some BIOS apparently remap the top few hundred megabytes (I've seen it use up to 768MB or so) for PCI (-X, -Express?) devices. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE, unpatched, has a bug that causes kernel panics when you use PAE and memory above the 4GB barrier is accessed. The bug is fixed in 5.4-STABLE, as of a while ago. I'm not sure if it made it back in to any of the 5.4-RELEASE-p?? patches. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Sendmail
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:56:48 -0700 (PDT), Derrick Test [EMAIL PROTECTED] Replied to: Re: Sendmail With these words of wisdom: grep smtp /etc/services smtp 25/tcpmail #Simple Mail Transfer smtp 25/udpmail #Simple Mail Transfer smtps 465/tcp#smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) smtps 465/udp#smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) Thats what I get from my system, you should too *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 9/28/2005 10:17:57 AM Gerard Replied: Somehow, the second entry was missing in my /etc/services file. I do not understand how though. I never touched that file. Very strange indeed. I would hove thought I did something in the /etc/inetd.conf file since I was writing in that recently. (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) /0\ /0\ /o\ /o\ /0\ /0\ /O\ /O\ /o\ /o\ /0\ /0\ \__V__/ \__V__/ \__V__/ \__V__/ \__V__/ \__V__/ /|:. .:|\ /|;, ,;|\ /|:. .:|\ /|;, ,;|\ /|;, ,;|\ /|:. .:|\ \\:// \\;// \\:// \\;// \\;// \\:// jgs--` `---` `---` `---` `---` `---` `--- ^~^^~^~^~^~^^~~^^^~^~~^~^~^~^^~~^^^~^~~^~^~^~^^~~^^^~^^~^~^~^^~~^^ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail
Gerard Seibert writes: I was just checking my /etc/inetd.conf' file, and noticed that there is no entry for 'smtp' in it. I would not start whatever progam handles smtp traffic from inetd. Rather, leave the line out (or put it in, deactivated, and add a comment about when and why) and start sendmail by itself. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New user
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:38:53 -0600 Joshua Tinnin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed 28 Sep 05 03:54, Dmitry Mityugov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Xian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tharaka Abeysekera wrote: I'm a new to UNIX, I got to know about your services recently. Please tell me ware to start FreeBSD(UNIX) . Because I'm pissed off with Windows On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:29, Derrick Test wrote: thats a big question. the handbook off the website is a great resource. It can also be found on the disk (at /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html ) once you have installed. Usefull for working out how to set up internet ;-) Using it will also save FreeBSD site bandwidth :-) But I believe the handbook at www.freebsd.org is more accurate and up-to-date than the one on the CDs. Yes, but if you update the doc tree locally and build from that, then you have the most up-to-date copy right on your machine. You have to install /usr/ports/textproc/docproj first, and there's more details about that here: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/02/08/Big_Scary_Daemons.html Hope I don't scare off the new user, but this does demonstrate the power and simplicity of UNIX in general, and FreeBSD in particular. Here's an example straight from my workstation (this can be used as a way to update and serve docs for an entire organization, such as one build machine being used for packages for the other machines in a network, though presumably there would be NFS or a webserver involved in such a case). My /etc/make.conf includes this: # doc proj make options SUP=/usr/local/bin/cvsup SUPFLAGS= -L 2 -1 DOC_LANG= en_US.ISO8859-1 SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c us` DOCSUPFILE= /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/doc-supfile SUP_UPDATE= yes ... and my supfile for docs: % cat /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/doc-supfile *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress doc-all And in my root crontab is: # cvsup and build docs, 4am, every day 1 4 * * * /bin/sh /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/sup-doc 21 And the script referenced above: # cat /home/krinklyfig/supfiles/sup-doc #!/bin/sh MAILTO=krinklyfig MEHOME=/usr/home/krinklyfig touch $MEHOME/log/sup-doc.log ; touch $MEHOME/log/sup-make-doc.log ; cd /usr/doc ; make update $MEHOME/log/sup-doc.log 21 make install clean $MEHOME/log/sup-make-doc.log 21 At 4am every day the above script is run: the changes to docs are downloaded though cvsup, and the new docs are built. My local docs are most likely just as up-to-date as the ones on the web (1 day), and I only have to download the updates from cvs to keep them current. - jt There is (yet) another way to get the latest documentation. Docsnap doesn't require the overhead of the documentation tool chain and is quite easy to use. More information about docsnap can be found at: http://docsnap.sk.freebsd.org/ For the original poster, reading the documentation before you start installation will give you a lot more confidence in your new venture. Its a steep learning curve at first, but stick with it and you'll get there. Additionally, the fun never ends since you'll learn new things every day. If you run into snags, chances are that someone on the mailing lists will be able to help you if reading the docs or googling doesn't turn up a solution. Above all, have fun! Randy -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I am new to FreeBSD just migrated from linux. I have installed version 5.4 and ports collection via cvsup. Then I have used ports for cyrus22 to build Cyrus and also sasl2. Now I am trying to build sendmail 8.13.5 but it doesn't build with sasl support. In my make.conf I have added: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD+= -lsasl2 And then run make and make install under /usr/ports/mail/sendmail. But when I check with : -- mig29# telnet localhost 25 Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.workgroup. Escape character is '^]'. 220 xmail.homelinux.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.3/8.13.5; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:15:32 +0200 (CEST) ehlo localhost 250-xmail.homelinux.net Hello localhost.workgroup [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 10480760 250-DSN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP -- I don't have smtp auth. Moreover, I found out that it didn't built with SASL with: -- mig29# sendmail -bt -d0.1 Version 8.13.3 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG Warning: Option: AuthMechanisms requires SASL support (-DSASL) Warning: Option: AuthOptions requires SASL support (-DSASL) SYSTEM IDENTITY (after readcf) (short domain name) $w = mig29 (canonical domain name) $j = xmail.homelinux.net (subdomain name) $m = workgroup (node name) $k = mig29.workgroup ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked) -- What am I doing wrong here? I think you might be getting the BASE sendmail mixed up with the PORT sendmail. For max flexibility, there are TWO separate versions of sendmail available. Unless you know you need the version provided in the ports you should stick with the one provided in the base. Your sendmail-related make.conf syntax looks correct but what you need to do is rebuild the BASE sendmail with sasl support under /usr/src NOT /usr/ports. I suggest you remove/deinstall the sendmail version found under /usr/ports and do a full `make world` as recommended in the handbook. Others may be able to give you specific directions on rebuilding ONLY the base sendmail if a full make world is undesirable. cheers, G ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firefox won't stay as default browser ...
open up firefox and type into the url: about:config look up browser.shell.checkDefaultBrowser and check the value. if its false, change to true and restart the browser. let me know if that works.. -Ben Kiffin Gish wrote: Every time I fire up firefox it claims it is not the default browser. If I click on yes to make it the default browser or go into Prferences | General and hit the Default Browser [Check Now]-button and/or I restart firefox, I still get the message that it is NOT the default browser. Nothing I do helps -- what got stuch?! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Portsdb returns error after cvsup - How to Proceed?
Mark Kane wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 12:33 pm, Mark Kane wrote:
Hi everyone. I CVSupped yesterday to make sure I got the Firefox fix.
My plan was to do the following:
# cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
# portsdb -Uu
# portversion -l
# portupgrade -arR
After cvsupping and running portsdb -Uu, I got an error which is at
the end of my email.
Today I tried a make index from /usr/ports/, and that seemed to run
OK. A portupgrade -arRn simulated the upgrade process and nothing
seemed to fail, but I want to be safe and not mess anything up as I
am relatively new to portupgrade and don't want a big mess.
I did the same process that I listed above a couple weeks ago and
everything went fine, so I was surprised to see the error this time.
I'm not sure how to proceed, so thanks in advance for any
suggestions.
portsdb -U was converted to using make index a long time ago. There is
something else going on. Do you have any refuses? In addition, it may
have been fixed by now. Make index was failing on 4.x but that was
fixed on Sunday.
Kent
Thanks for the reply. Nope, no refuses. CVSup was run yesterday
afternoon around this time.
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (amd64)
-Mark
Well I just tried running CVSup again to see if indeed it was fixed
since Monday, now I get different errors. Thanks in advance.
amd64# portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait../usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 2890: warning: duplicate script
for target checksum ignored
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk, line 179: warning: String comparison
operator should be either == or !=
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk, line 179: Malformed conditional
(!empty(_PYTHON_VERSION_MINIMUM) ( ${_PYTHON_VERSION}
${_PYTHON_VERSION_MINIMUM}))
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk, line 182: warning: String comparison
operator should be either == or !=
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk, line 182: Malformed conditional
(!empty(_PYTHON_VERSION_MAXIMUM) ( ${_PYTHON_VERSION}
${_PYTHON_VERSION_MAXIMUM}))
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 1378: if-less endif
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 1378: Need an operator
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
=== net/py-kenosis-bittorrent failed
*** Error code 1
=== security/p5-Crypt-HCE_SHA failed
*** Error code 1
2 errors
Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported
version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you
have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are
not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in
particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all
collection, and have no refuse files.) If that is the case, then
report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together with relevant
details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version,
your architecture, your environment, and your /etc/make.conf
settings, especially compiler flags and WITH/WITHOUT settings).
Note: the latest pre-generated version of INDEX may be fetched
automatically with make fetchindex.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports.
failed to generate INDEX!
portsdb: index generation error
amd64# uname -a
FreeBSD amd64.localhost 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #4: Sun Aug 28
02:04:13 CDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD643000 amd64
amd64# cat /etc/make.conf
# added by use.perl 2005-09-15 14:33:09
PERL_VER=5.8.7
PERL_VERSION=5.8.7
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail question on gateway install
Lowell, Since I sent this I've found out that the problem lies with the MX record at the site I registered with. It was corrupted and they needed to manually reset it. The other problem of not getting in on port 25 was due to my lack of knowledge concerning my new setup of my gateway and my LAN and that I can't get to my public IP from withing my LAN. When I telneted in from another PC outside the LAN I was able to pass through successfully. I appreciate the input. Steve L --- Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: steve lasiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is a follow up to an issue I still have concerning my FreeBSD 5.4 gateway. I've done a basic install and have disabled inetd and sendmail. My mail server is behind my gateway. I can send mail out but the gateway is blocking incoming request on port 25. I have the ipf rules and ipnat rules in place but the gateway never allows it through. I can telnet to the 192.x.x.1 address behind the gateway fine so I know my postfix is up and running. I can do a port scan via the internet and see that 25 is opened but when I try to telnet into the public ip on 25 I never get in and get a connection refused. When I check with tcpdump -vnt port 25 and run the web port scan I see it catching the packets. But when I run the tcpdump and try to telnet in on 25 it never reaches it. There is also output in my maillog even though sendmail is disabled via rc.conf. Can anyone give me a heads up on what configuration files need modifying to open this up? It sounds obvious that your firewall rules are *not* in place to allow SMTP through. You didn't show them. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP SUPPORT
Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I neeed install imap-2004c1 in my freeBSD 5.2.1 You are trying to install an old version of the UW IMAP server on an old (and officially unsupported -- it was released for early adopters, not production use) version of FreeBSD. I would recommend that you update both your base system and your ports, and your problems will be easier to deal with (if they still exist at all). When I give the cmd make bsf SSLTYPE=none I get error code 1 in /var/www/html/imap-2004c1/c-client That's not enough information about the failure. Error code 1 is just make(1) saying that something it called returned a failure value, so the real error message would have been somewhat earlier. Nor is it clear where you were executing that command, or why /var/www was involved at all. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: errors compilling JDK15
This seems to have been fixed. Please update your ports and try again. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mounting NetBSD disk under FreeBSD.
FC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: fdisk show that disk containing a NetBSD partition and bsdlabel show no slices. It's like if the disk was not labeled. I thing FreeBSD gets confused because NetBSD 2.x can have up to 16 slices and FreeBSD only 8 That would make sense. I think the size of the slice table is a compile constant; if you traced it down and changed it, you might well be able to import your filesystem. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mounting NetBSD disk under FreeBSD.
On Sep 28, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: *** This message was sent to your KasMail disposable email address: FC [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: fdisk show that disk containing a NetBSD partition and bsdlabel show no slices. It's like if the disk was not labeled. I thing FreeBSD gets confused because NetBSD 2.x can have up to 16 slices and FreeBSD only 8 That would make sense. I think the size of the slice table is a compile constant; if you traced it down and changed it, you might well be able to import your filesystem. In fact I have booted the machine with NetBSD mounted the FreeBSD disk and transfered my datas on the FreeBSD disk. Then I have recreated the file system on my second disk with FreeBSD. I thinks it is a shame that all the BSD OS can get together and have something consistent through all the platforms. ext2fs can be mounted on all the Linux flavors. -fred- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Maruszeczka Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:03 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I am new to FreeBSD just migrated from linux. I have installed version 5.4 and ports collection via cvsup. Then I have used ports for cyrus22 to build Cyrus and also sasl2. Now I am trying to build sendmail 8.13.5 but it doesn't build with sasl support. In my make.conf I have added: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD+= -lsasl2 And then run make and make install under /usr/ports/mail/sendmail. But when I check with : -- mig29# telnet localhost 25 Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.workgroup. Escape character is '^]'. 220 xmail.homelinux.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.3/8.13.5; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:15:32 +0200 (CEST) ehlo localhost 250-xmail.homelinux.net Hello localhost.workgroup [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 10480760 250-DSN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP -- I don't have smtp auth. Moreover, I found out that it didn't built with SASL with: -- mig29# sendmail -bt -d0.1 Version 8.13.3 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG Warning: Option: AuthMechanisms requires SASL support (-DSASL) Warning: Option: AuthOptions requires SASL support (-DSASL) SYSTEM IDENTITY (after readcf) (short domain name) $w = mig29 (canonical domain name) $j = xmail.homelinux.net (subdomain name) $m = workgroup (node name) $k = mig29.workgroup ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked) -- What am I doing wrong here? I think you might be getting the BASE sendmail mixed up with the PORT sendmail. For max flexibility, there are TWO separate versions of sendmail available. Unless you know you need the version provided in the ports you should stick with the one provided in the base. Your sendmail-related make.conf syntax looks correct but what you need to do is rebuild the BASE sendmail with sasl support under /usr/src NOT /usr/ports. I suggest you remove/deinstall the sendmail version found under /usr/ports and do a full `make world` as recommended in the handbook. Others may be able to give you specific directions on rebuilding ONLY the base sendmail if a full make world is undesirable. cheers, G --- Reply --- But I have nothing under /usr/src. I have installed minimum of FreeBSD. Regards, Sasa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vqadmin
VirtualHost my ip ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/vqadmin AuthUserFile /usr/local/etc/apache/.htpasswd ServerName mydomain.com http://mydomain.com ScriptAlias /cgi-bin /usr/local/www/cgi-bin /VirtualHost If I am added this line apache cant restart with this error bash-2.05b# apachectl restart /usr/local/sbin/apachectl restart: configuration broken, ignoring restart /usr/local/sbin/apachectl restart: (run 'apachectl configtest' for details) bash-2.05b# apachectl configtest Syntax error on line 21 of /usr/local/etc/apache/VHosts.conf: AuthUserFile not allowed here bash-2.05b# but I tried it as in the document Directory /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/vqadmin deny from all Options ExecCGI AllowOverride AuthConfig Order deny,allow /Directory it is ok it check passwd but page come with another error page like this *Error Syntax erorr in access lists* error occured while initiating the interface. Please contact the administrator if this continues. vqadmin http://www.inter7.com/vqadmin/ 2.3.6 vpopmail http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/ 5.4.10 On 27 Sep 2005 17:09:52 -0400, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tethys ocean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I want setup vqadmin-2.3.6. FreeBSD 5.4 and qmail-1.03_4 and qmailadmin-1.2.7,1 apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22 mysql-server-4.0.24_1 is running on my system. Install vqadmin from ports and than setting up depens on http://freebsd.qmailrocks.org/vqadmin.htm but it is not running installaion by using port with setted up make enable-cgibindir=/usr/local/www/cgi-bin enable-htmldir=/usr/local/www/data install clean my www directory contains these directory and files bash-2.05b# ls -als total 20 2 drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Jul 1 21:05 . 2 drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 512 Jul 1 20:07 .. 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Jul 1 20:21 cgi 2 drwxr-xr-x 5 vpopmail vchkpw 512 Sep 25 14:56 cgi-bin 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Sep 25 14:51 cgi-bin-dist 2 drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Sep 25 15:28 data 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 1024 Sep 25 14:51 data-dist 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3584 Jul 1 21:05 icons 2 drwxr-xr-x 2 www www 512 Jul 1 21:05 proxy bash-2.05b# bash-2.05b# ls -als cgi-bin total 10 2 drwxr-xr-x 5 vpopmail vchkpw 512 Sep 25 14:56 . 2 drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Jul 1 21:05 .. 2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 1 20:21 qmailadmin 2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 1 20:36 sqwebmail 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 vpopmail vchkpw 512 Sep 25 14:51 vqadmin bash-2.05b# My httpd.conf is VirtualHost mydomain.com http://mydomain.com http://mydomain.com ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/vqadmin ServerName mydomain.com http://mydomain.com http://mydomain.com #ServerAlias mydomain.com http://mydomain.com http://mydomain.com ScriptAlias /cgi-bin /usr/local/www/cgi-bin /VirtualHost .htaccess is AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /usr/local/etc/apache/.htpasswd AuthName vQadmin require valid-user satisfy any but when *http://www.mydomain.com/cgi-bin/vqadmin/vqadmin.cgi* *Authentication Failed Username unknown* *vQadmin was unable to determine your username, which means your webserver is improperly configured to run with this CGI. For security reasons, this script will not run without Apache htaccess lists. vqadmin http://www.inter7.com/vqadmin/ 2.3.6 vpopmail http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/ 5.4.10* Does the AuthUserFile /usr/local/etc/apache/.htpasswd actually exist? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re vlc 0.8.2 compile errors on 5.4
Hi List, I am having problems compiling vlc 0.8.2 on 5.4. I can add it as a package but when portupgrade or portmanager tries to update it. I get the following compile error: smb.c: In function `Close': smb.c:304: error: structure has no member named `close' gmake[4]: *** [libaccess_smb_plugin_a-smb.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.2/modules/access' gmake[3]: *** [all-modules] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.2/modules/access' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.2/modules' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.2' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/vlc. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade87320.59 make ** Fix the problem and try again. I have tried deinstalling and reinstalling. I have also tried making vlc-devel but I get the same error. Any ideas would be appreciated, as this it totally driving me nuts. Thanks .nbco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
openssl 0.9.8 breaking things
Just upgraded to openssl 0.9.8 and things are breaking, namely exim and cyrus-imap. Non-SSL connections work, SSL connections cause a segfault. I'm going back to 0.9.7g using the WITH_OPENSSL_097 flag, but is there some way to make this work with 0.9.8? Have I totally missed something here? This is FreeBSD 4.11. Thanks! -- Mark Edwards ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openssl 0.9.8 breaking things
Hello Mark, Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 6:41:47 PM, you contributed this to our collective wisdom: Just upgraded to openssl 0.9.8 and things are breaking, namely exim and cyrus-imap. Non-SSL connections work, SSL connections cause a segfault. I'm going back to 0.9.7g using the WITH_OPENSSL_097 flag, but is there some way to make this work with 0.9.8? Have I totally missed something here? you need to recompile your software (exim,cyrus-imap,...) against new openssl libs. This is FreeBSD 4.11. Thanks! -- Best Regards, DanGer, ICQ: 261701668 | e-mail protecting at: http://www.2pu.net/ http://danger.rulez.sk | proxy list at:http://www.proxy-web.com/ | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! [ Was Jimi Hendrix's modem a `[1;35mPurple Hayes`[0m? ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
Sasa Stupar wrote: But I have nothing under /usr/src. I have installed minimum of FreeBSD. Regards, Sasa Try installing /usr/ports/mail/sendmail-sasl Gary ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e
Hi, I'm a newbie when it comes to firewire, in fact I have never had it working because I never had a device to connect. Then recently I bought a Canon MVX200 (PAL) video cam. But when trying to transfer the video using fwcontrol as described in the man page I get: charm# fwcontrol -R test.dv (EAGAIN) (EAGAIN) fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e I have asked on the list before, and on other lists as well as searched google with little luck. Eventually some indicated it may be the brand since he had had bad experiences with other Canon hardware. The cam was returned within the 15 trial period I had. I then bought a Sony HC39E but get the exact same error suggesting that the problem is in the other end. According to the hardware list my firewire chipset is supported. Please, any hints on how to solve this will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Erik Debug stuff follows: System: FreeBSD charm 6.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 #0: Tue Sep 6 21:16:56 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 dmesg: fwohci0: Ricoh R5C552 mem 0xe580-0xe58007ff irq 11 at device 10.2 on pci0 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:e0:18:00:03:09:43:39 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: IEEE1394(FireWire) bus on fwohci0 sbp0: SBP-2/SCSI over FireWire on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop = 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) Connecting the firewire device creates the following output (from /var/log/messages): fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0x8800ffc0, gen=11, non CYCLEMAST ER mode firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop = 1, cable IRM = 0 (me) fwohci0: txd err= 3 miss Ack err firewire0: bus_explore node=1 addr=0x400 resp=22 retry=1 fwohci0: txd err= 3 miss Ack err firewire0: bus_explore node=1 addr=0x400 resp=22 retry=2 fwohci0: txd err= 3 miss Ack err firewire0: bus_explore node=1 addr=0x400 resp=22 retry=3 fwohci0: txd err= 3 miss Ack err firewire0: bus_explore node=1 addr=0x400 resp=22 retry=4 firewire0: bus_explore failed for 1 nodes fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=12, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop = 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0x8800ffc0, gen=13, non CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop = 1, cable IRM = 1 There is no /dev/firewire0 Output from fwcontrol and dvrecv tools: Script started on Tue Sep 6 23:00:04 2005 charm# fwcontrol -r charm# fwcontrol -t crc_len: 4 generation:7 node_count:2 sid_count:2 id link gap_cnt speed delay cIRM power port0 port1 port2 ini more 001 5 S400 01 -1W P - 10 011 5 S100 010W C - - 00 charm# fwcontrol -p === base register === 0x01 0x3f 0xe2 0x41 0xcc 0x03 0x00 0x20 Physical_ID:0 R:0 CPS:1 RHB:0 IBR:0 Gap_Count:63 Extended:7 Num_Ports:2 PHY_Speed:2 Delay:1 LCtrl:1 C:1 Jitter:1 Pwr_Class:4 WDIE:0 ISBR:0 CTOI:0 CPSI:0 STOI:0 PEI:0 EAA:1 EMC:1 Max_Legacy_SPD:0 BLINK:0 Bridge:0 Page_Select:1 Port_Select0 === page 0 port 0 === 0xf6 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 Astat:3 BStat:3 Ch:0 Con:1 RXOK:1 Dis:0 Negotiated_speed:0 PIE:0 Fault:0 Stanby_fault:0 Disscrm:0 B_Only:0 DC_connected:0 Max_port_speed:0 LPP:0 Cable_speed:0 Connection_unreliable:0 Beta_mode:0 Port_error:0x0 Loop_disable:0 In_standby:0 Hard_disable:0 === page 0 port 1 === 0xf8 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 Astat:3 BStat:3 Ch:1 Con:0 RXOK:0 Dis:0 Negotiated_speed:0 PIE:0 Fault:0 Stanby_fault:0 Disscrm:0 B_Only:0 DC_connected:0 Max_port_speed:0 LPP:0 Cable_speed:0 Connection_unreliable:0 Beta_mode:0 Port_error:0x0 Loop_disable:0 In_standby:0 Hard_disable:0 === page 1 === 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x74 0x00 0x55 0x20 Compliance:1 Vendor_ID:0x74 Product_ID:0x005520 charm# fwcontrol -c 0 first quad: 0x041ceb3e info_len=4 crc_len=28 crc=0xeb3e(OK) bus_name: 0x31333934 irmc:1 cmc:1 isc:1 bmc:1 pmc:0 cyc_clk_acc:100 max_rec:10 max_rom:0 generation:3 link_spd:2 EUI64: 00-e0-18-00-03-09-43-39 root_directory: len=0x0005(5) crc=0x8a4a(OK) 0c(I:0c) 0083c0 node_capabilities: 03(I:03) acde48 module_vendor_ID: 81(L:01) 03 text_leaf: len=7 crc=0x82ed(OK) FreeBSD Project 04(I:04) 0927e2 hardware_version: 81(L:01) 09 text_leaf: len=9 crc=0x0412(OK) charm charm# fwcontrol -R test.dv (EAGAIN) (EAGAIN) fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e charm# fwcontrol -R test.dv PAL 0fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e charm# fwcontrol -R test.dv PAL 0fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e charm# sysctl hw.firewire.try_bmr=0 hw.firewire.try_bmr: 1 - 0 charm# fwcontrol -r charm# fwcontrol -R test.dv PAL 0fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e charm# fwcontrol -R test.dv (EAGAIN) (EAGAIN) fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e charm# fwcontrol -u 0 -R test.dv (EAGAIN) (EAGAIN) fwcontrol: unknown format 0x1e charm# dvrecv test.dv Found AV/C device Vendor: Canon Model: MVX200 waiting
Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
big snip But I have nothing under /usr/src. I have installed minimum of FreeBSD. But you originally said you cvsup'ed to get 5.4 which means you should have downloaded the source tree for the entire release as well as the ports. Unless you meant to say that you ONLY cvsup'd the ports tree. Can you show us the contents of your cvsupfile? (or at least the commandline args you used to cvsup if you're not reading from a config file for this purpose) For reference, I use a single global config file to get the source tree (userland + kernel) and ports tree (plus docs) in one pass. This is what my /etc/cvsupfile contains: *defaulthost=cvsup11.FreeBSD.org *defaultbase=/usr *defaultprefix=/usr *defaultrelease=cvs *defaulttag=RELENG_5_4 *defaultdelete use-rel-suffix src-all *defaulttag=. doc-all ports-all Then, I just type this at the shell (I use bash) before putting it into a cronjob once I know it works: cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portsdb -uF As an alternative to my earlier suggestion regarding sendmail, I believe you could also disable the base sendmail and use the ports sendmail instead but that seems like more work to me. I don't offhand know what you'd additionally have to supply in /etc/make.conf and/or the make args for the ports build in order to do this properly. If you're set on doing it this way, maybe check the archives and/or post a new question specific to this (ie. replacing base sendmail with sendmail from ports) Otherwise, just check that you've got the right syntax for cvsup and get the source for the release you want. You'll likely need/want it later for doing updates anyway. G ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Server Crash
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 14:20, Cody Holland wrote: Ok, I'm having some problemsdue to the fact that I'm pretty new and have no idea on how to do this. We had a server crash, hardware related, and I want to take my dump backups and restore them on another system. The dump files are located on a remote ftp server. So basically what I'm trying to accomplish is installing FreeBSD on the new system, getting the dump files off of the backup server, and then restoring them on a live server. Is this possible, or should I be trying to do this a different way. I cannot restore everything exactly without some changes. The new server is SCSI, and the old server was on an IDE hard drive and I had re-compiled the kernel with all SCSI devices disabled (I don't know if that even matters). Anyway I'm kind of lost and am looking for some guidance. I've done plenty of reading and have attempted the restoration on my own, but keep hosing the new system. Any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks, Cody If you old system has the SCSI devices compiled out of the kernel this could make things difficult. The way I would go about this would be to find a bootable CD of FreeBSD (FreeSBIE is good). And make the partitions on your new disks with it. Then make a folder somewhere (like /mnt/new) and mount your new (empty) root file system on it. restore your root file system from your backups. Commands such as `fetch ftp://blah/blah | restore -rf -` could work nicely but restore can hang around long enough creating directories that fetch sometimes times out. just use a bit of cunning here or shout again on this list. Then mount the other new (empty) file systems on /mnt/new or wherever _and_ a devfs on /mnt/new/dev. Restore the rest of the file systems. Chroot yourself into /mnt/new and its just like your old machine was. Build and install yourself a new kernel with all the bits you need for your new hardware. Then reboot and remove the bootable CD. I _should_ just work (TM) Maybe other people here can improve on this but this way has worked for me in the past. /Xian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
-Original Message- From: Gary Hayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:56 PM To: Sasa Stupar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl Sasa Stupar wrote: But I have nothing under /usr/src. I have installed minimum of FreeBSD. Regards, Sasa Try installing /usr/ports/mail/sendmail-sasl Gary I have found my error: I didn't change path in /etc/mailer.conf Now I have smtp auth. I have setup my pwcheck_method: passwd BUT now whe I try to send I get back denied. In the logs I have a line Uknown password verifier. Any idea? Sasa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openssl 0.9.8 breaking things
On Sep 28, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello Mark, Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 6:41:47 PM, you contributed this to our collective wisdom: Just upgraded to openssl 0.9.8 and things are breaking, namely exim and cyrus-imap. Non-SSL connections work, SSL connections cause a segfault. I'm going back to 0.9.7g using the WITH_OPENSSL_097 flag, but is there some way to make this work with 0.9.8? Have I totally missed something here? you need to recompile your software (exim,cyrus-imap,...) against new openssl libs. Thanks, I'm getting it under control now. I tried recompiling things at first, but I missed a component, which made it seem like there was just an incompatibility. Its slowly coming back to life now... -- Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: +46704070332 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openssl 0.9.8 breaking things
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:48:03PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello Mark, Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 6:41:47 PM, you contributed this to our collective wisdom: Just upgraded to openssl 0.9.8 and things are breaking, namely exim and cyrus-imap. Non-SSL connections work, SSL connections cause a segfault. I'm going back to 0.9.7g using the WITH_OPENSSL_097 flag, but is there some way to make this work with 0.9.8? Have I totally missed something here? you need to recompile your software (exim,cyrus-imap,...) against new openssl libs. This is FreeBSD 4.11. Thanks! I'll toss in my two cents here just FWIW. I had troubles with all sorts of sh* (stuff) breaking when I touched openssl. I had not---or maybe I did, inadvertently--used the openssl port. I *had* to use /usr/src/secure/openssl/whatever; when applications began breaking. I pkg_deleted openssl and rebuilt the native /usr/src/* stuff. These apps are tightly interdependent; that's why you are seeing things break. This may or may not work generally. It cost me at least a day's investigation ... and I'm *still* not sure that everything's right. gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
Sasa Stupar wrote: Try installing /usr/ports/mail/sendmail-sasl Gary I have found my error: I didn't change path in /etc/mailer.conf Now I have smtp auth. I have setup my pwcheck_method: passwd BUT now whe I try to send I get back denied. In the logs I have a line Uknown password verifier. Any idea? Sasa Course what you should follow is the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Gary ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
-Original Message- From: Gary Hayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:34 PM To: Sasa Stupar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl Sasa Stupar wrote: Try installing /usr/ports/mail/sendmail-sasl Gary I have found my error: I didn't change path in /etc/mailer.conf Now I have smtp auth. I have setup my pwcheck_method: passwd BUT now whe I try to send I get back denied. In the logs I have a line Uknown password verifier. Any idea? Sasa Course what you should follow is the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Gary I know about this. This is for sasl v1. I want to use sasl v2. Sasa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cgi help - malformed header from script. Bad header
I had the same problem suddenly appear with Apache 2.0.44 with my .JS and .CSS files. Both needed a blank line at the top of the file. NO other header required for ordinary (HTML vs XHTML) usage. THANK YOU (!) for the solution. This was not a requirement in 2.0.39, which my other machine was running, so the error couldn't be duplicated. Regards, D.J. Foreman, Ph.D. website: http://dforeman.cs.binghamton.edu/~foreman ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Submitting PR without outgoing mail
Hey there, Just been reading http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/index.html It says that send_pr needs outgoing mail from the system in order to work. Is there anyway to send a PR without having to set up outgoing mail? Hi there I use ssmtp to route my mougoing mail using my ISP's smtp servers, it's easy, small and faster than the web inteface. check in ports mail/ssmtp = Either write things worth reading, Or do things worth the writing. -Benjamin Franklin __ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: re vlc 0.8.2 compile errors on 5.4
nbco wrote: Hi List, I am having problems compiling vlc 0.8.2 on 5.4. I can add it as a package but when portupgrade or portmanager tries to update it. I get the following compile error: [Error text snipped] I also am experiencing this problem, but I've developed a workaround, as de/reinstalling doesn't seem to do anything, as well as making distclean. The problem occurs within the smb access module of vlc. Navigate to /usr/ports/multimedia/vlc and do a make config to get to the options menu, then uncheck the smb module. Accept the changes and do a make install and things will work for you. I'm no expert, but I'm guessing that removing the smb functionality in this manner will prevent one from directly accessing smb shares via the vlc interface. If you fall into this situation, I'd suggest mounting the share via mount_smbfs. -- Alan Gerber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:42 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl -Original Message- From: Gary Hayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:34 PM To: Sasa Stupar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl Sasa Stupar wrote: Try installing /usr/ports/mail/sendmail-sasl Gary I have found my error: I didn't change path in /etc/mailer.conf Now I have smtp auth. I have setup my pwcheck_method: passwd BUT now whe I try to send I get back denied. In the logs I have a line Uknown password verifier. Any idea? Sasa Course what you should follow is the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Gary I know about this. This is for sasl v1. I want to use sasl v2. Sasa Another thing: looks like something is wrong with saslauth. I have ran testsaslauthd with username/password and I got back 0: NO authentication failed. Saslauthd is running with pam method. Sasa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Submitting PR without outgoing mail
On 2005-09-28 12:56, Jorge Mario G. Mazo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey there, Just been reading http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/index.html It says that send_pr needs outgoing mail from the system in order to work. Is there anyway to send a PR without having to set up outgoing mail? Hi there I use ssmtp to route my mougoing mail using my ISP's smtp servers, it's easy, small and faster than the web inteface. check in ports mail/ssmtp Agreed, If that's the only problem of people to use send-pr(1), I'm always willing to help *ANYONE* set up the system version of Sendmail properly for their ISP / connection. Having a proper outgoing email setup is such a beneficial thing in so many ways, that's it's definitely worth the setup time IMO. - Giorgos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Server Crash
OK Cody, Based upon the information you've given, specific advice is going to be a guessing game. Here's how I'd approach the problem. First off I wouldn't worry too much about restoring the 'system' files, OS, etc..., but concentrate on getting a server back up and operational and then move on to the data. My inital intro into the world of disaster recovery was headed by someone who refused to call the process 'backup' instead calling it 'restore'. You're now finding out why. So, build a new server, install apps, restore data. If you need or want to restore config files (/etc and others) you need to be careful and probably get used to running diff on newly installed vs archived files and updating files as necessary. If you feel you need to truly perform a complete recovery, you may find yourself doing alot of trial and error. Once you get over this setback spend some time and think about how you want to deal with this type of problem in the future. If you need bare metal drive recovery -- a quick search of the 'net should point you to sources of info on how to set up a system for such a process. Good luck. Bob Quoting Cody Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok, I'm having some problemsdue to the fact that I'm pretty new and have no idea on how to do this. We had a server crash, hardware related, and I want to take my dump backups and restore them on another system. The dump files are located on a remote ftp server. So basically what I'm trying to accomplish is installing FreeBSD on the new system, getting the dump files off of the backup server, and then restoring them on a live server. Is this possible, or should I be trying to do this a different way. I cannot restore everything exactly without some changes. The new server is SCSI, and the old server was on an IDE hard drive and I had re-compiled the kernel with all SCSI devices disabled (I don't know if that even matters). Anyway I'm kind of lost and am looking for some guidance. I've done plenty of reading and have attempted the restoration on my own, but keep hosing the new system. Any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks, Cody ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- * I prefer mail in plain text format ** PGP/GnuPG: D3EE2269 pgp.mit.edu ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mounting NetBSD disk under FreeBSD.
FC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thinks it is a shame that all the BSD OS can get together and have something consistent through all the platforms. ext2fs can be mounted on all the Linux flavors. You do realize that your problem had nothing to do with filesystem format, right? As your solution showed, both OS *do* understand UFS. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firefox won't stay as default browser ...
nawcom wrote: open up firefox and type into the url: about:config look up browser.shell.checkDefaultBrowser and check the value. if its false, change to true and restart the browser. let me know if that works.. -Ben Kiffin Gish wrote: Every time I fire up firefox it claims it is not the default browser. If I click on yes to make it the default browser or go into Prferences | General and hit the Default Browser [Check Now]-button and/or I restart firefox, I still get the message that it is NOT the default browser. Nothing I do helps -- what got stuch?! Set to true (as expected) but that is not the problem. The check is being done, however the setting is not retained. -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
Sasa Stupar wrote: -Original Message- From: Gary Hayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:34 PM To: Sasa Stupar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl Sasa Stupar wrote: Try installing /usr/ports/mail/sendmail-sasl Gary I have found my error: I didn't change path in /etc/mailer.conf Now I have smtp auth. I have setup my pwcheck_method: passwd BUT now whe I try to send I get back denied. In the logs I have a line Uknown password verifier. Any idea? Sasa Course what you should follow is the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Gary I know about this. This is for sasl v1. I want to use sasl v2. Sasa Well its the same, just keep your make.conf as you have it now and install sasl v2 instead of v1 and it will work ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mounting NetBSD disk under FreeBSD.
On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: *** This message was sent to your KasMail disposable email address: FC [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I thinks it is a shame that all the BSD OS can get together and have something consistent through all the platforms. ext2fs can be mounted on all the Linux flavors. You do realize that your problem had nothing to do with filesystem format, right? As your solution showed, both OS *do* understand UFS. Yes, I understand that. The only think I am saying is kind of little detail give a bad customer/user experience and it can be easily avoided. I don't mind snorkeling around in the OS, but this came at some point which I ad no time to loose and I spend almost two day trying to figure out why this disk would not be mounted. I'm not accusing FreeBSD nor NetBSD people. I just think, that's sad. Anyway, I finally got what I wanted and thanks for your patience and your help. -fred- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: re vlc 0.8.2 compile errors on 5.4
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 19:13, Alan Gerber wrote: nbco wrote: Hi List, I am having problems compiling vlc 0.8.2 on 5.4. I can add it as a package but when portupgrade or portmanager tries to update it. I get the following compile error: [Error text snipped] snip The problem occurs within the smb access module of vlc. Navigate to /usr/ports/multimedia/vlc and do a make config to get to the options menu, then uncheck the smb module. Accept the changes and do a make install and things will work for you. I'm no expert, but I'm guessing that removing the smb functionality in this manner will prevent one from directly accessing smb shares via the vlc interface. If you fall into this situation, I'd suggest mounting the share via mount_smbfs. Thanks very much that resolved the issue for me too. .nbco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP server that supports virtual users/domains (other than dovecot)?
Hi all - Looking for recommendations for a POP server that supportts virtual users and domains and preferably hooks into PostgreSQL. dovecot does this and I'm looking at it now, but it's got a lot of IMAP stuff that I will never ever use (really I won't). Anyone have recommendations for other packages? I've searched, but would like some actual user experiences... Thanks! -philip ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file
When I fire up a program, I get the following error message: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file What do I have to do to get the program working properly? -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acpi_thorttle and cpufreq/ichss questions
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 14:49, Emanuel Strobl wrote: my laptop (PIII LV) runs fine with cpufreq and ichss: dev.ichss.0.%desc: SpeedStep ICH dev.ichss.0.%driver: ichss dev.ichss.0.%parent: cpu0 dev.ichss.0.freq_settings: 794/-1 497/-1 If I understand the output correctly i have two SpeedSteps, the full 800MHz (with higher voltage) and 500MHz. Correct. But now I also have acpi_throttle (if I don't disable it in /boot/loader.conf): dev.acpi_throttle.0.%desc: ACPI CPU Throttling dev.acpi_throttle.0.%driver: acpi_throttle dev.acpi_throttle.0.%parent: cpu0 dev.acpi_throttle.0.freq_settings: 1/-1 8750/-1 7500/-1 6250/-1 5000/-1 3750/-1 2500/-1 1250/-1 What do these values tell me? I think that are divisors, but how can I see which one is used? These are percentage values. 1 is 100.00%, 8750 is 87.50% etc. Currently there doesn't seem to be a way to know the current setting of a specific cpufreq driver. You could however derive it from dev.cpu.0.freq. Can I constrain the divisors, lets say I want to have only 1, 7500 and 5000? (I know I can limit the lowest frequency cpufreq may use with debug.cpufreq.lowest=310 but then I don't know if it throttles the 800MHz mode (thus using high core voltage) or if it throttles the power saving 500MHz mode) Cpufreq will not throttle 800MHz below 500MHz. For example, 800*50% should be missing from dev.cpu.0.freq_levels. And what does this tell me: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 C2/10 C3/85 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% This is something different entirely. Cx states are CPU power states used when the CPU is idle. The higher, the less power it consumes, but the longer it takes to return from that state. I don't know what the exact differences are, but C1 is probably a simple halt instruction, whereas C2 and C3 probably also disable things like caches. I suppose hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest allows you to set the lowest Cx state the OS (scheduler) should use, but I haven't experimented with this myself yet because of errors in my laptop's bios... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Crash
Ok, I've successfully restored the systemI think. Basically I installed a fresh install of FreeBSD on the new system. Then, restored /etc, all of /var, all of /usr except /usr/src. Reconfigured the /etc/fstab and rebooted. Everything seems to be working finewhich has me kind of leery. It seemed to be too easy. Anyone ever restored like this, and if so had any issues I can look out for? Cody -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cody Holland Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:21 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Server Crash Ok, I'm having some problemsdue to the fact that I'm pretty new and have no idea on how to do this. We had a server crash, hardware related, and I want to take my dump backups and restore them on another system. The dump files are located on a remote ftp server. So basically what I'm trying to accomplish is installing FreeBSD on the new system, getting the dump files off of the backup server, and then restoring them on a live server. Is this possible, or should I be trying to do this a different way. I cannot restore everything exactly without some changes. The new server is SCSI, and the old server was on an IDE hard drive and I had re-compiled the kernel with all SCSI devices disabled (I don't know if that even matters). Anyway I'm kind of lost and am looking for some guidance. I've done plenty of reading and have attempted the restoration on my own, but keep hosing the new system. Any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks, Cody ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting up mime-types globaly ...
What do I have to do to make sure that clicking on links fire up the correct applications. For example: http - firefox mailto - thunderbird pls - xmms If from thunderbird I click on a http-link nothing happens, etc. For some strange reason this stopped working for me all of a sudden. -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP SUPPORT
Thank you very much ; I will install freeBSD 5.3 Pierre Binelli Gibraltar - Original Message - From: Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:46 PM Subject: Re: IMAP SUPPORT Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I neeed install imap-2004c1 in my freeBSD 5.2.1 You are trying to install an old version of the UW IMAP server on an old (and officially unsupported -- it was released for early adopters, not production use) version of FreeBSD. I would recommend that you update both your base system and your ports, and your problems will be easier to deal with (if they still exist at all). When I give the cmd make bsf SSLTYPE=none I get error code 1 in /var/www/html/imap-2004c1/c-client That's not enough information about the failure. Error code 1 is just make(1) saying that something it called returned a failure value, so the real error message would have been somewhat earlier. Nor is it clear where you were executing that command, or why /var/www was involved at all. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 26/09/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 26/09/2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bye-bye beastie ...
Glenn Dawson wrote: At 12:52 PM 9/26/2005, Kiffin Gish wrote: I would like to have a different bootup screen appearing which looks more professional (sorry), e.g. removing that awful looking beastie thingie on the side. What's the best way to do this? (Sorry to all those beastie lovers out there, but really) You can put beastie_disable=YES in your /boot/loader.conf to turn it off. Replacing it with something else is a bit trickier. You would need to replace /boot/beasier.4th. -Glenn -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you sure this belongs in the loader.conf file and not somehwere else. I get all kinds of error messages and the menu never comes up, just skipping past to the login prompt. -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portaudit question.....
To keep the story short: I'm using version FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Aug 25 09:12:43 CDT 2005; pasted from the dmesg.boot file. To the best of my knowledge, I'm using CVSup, pkgdb -F, and portupgrade commands correctly. But, I'm pretty sure I'm still overlooking and/or leaving something out. I just discovered the portaudit command and ran it against my system. It comes up with 15 items that need to be upgraded or deinstalled. For this question I'll use Mozilla. The version it reports is Mozilla-1.7.7,2. When I go to http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html and do a search for Mozilla, I find that Mozilla-1.7.12,2 is the latest (stable) version. I guess my question is this. How do I use the FreeBSD tools, Ports/Packages, etc, to install this latest version?? Or am I missing the concept altogether ? ( I understand the process of downloading this latest version and installing it manually. Just trying to understand and use the FreeBSD tools ) Thanks for any and all help, Jim Wright Columbus, Mississippi 28 Sep 2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgrading
Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on having my trusty dvd with me. So, the question is: what is the best way to do an upgrade? I figure ill do the install, make sure its all ok, and before I go ahead and install anything ill upgrade. I did hear people say that using the sysinstall isnt the way to go - maybe or maybe not? So any opinions here on how it should be done would be appreciated. Thank you Eoghan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portaudit question.....
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:07:40 -0500, Wright Jim Contractor 14MDSS/SGSI [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: portaudit question. Wrote these words of wisdom: To keep the story short: I'm using version FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Aug 25 09:12:43 CDT 2005; pasted from the dmesg.boot file. To the best of my knowledge, I'm using CVSup, pkgdb -F, and portupgrade commands correctly. But, I'm pretty sure I'm still overlooking and/or leaving something out. I just discovered the portaudit command and ran it against my system. It comes up with 15 items that need to be upgraded or deinstalled. For this question I'll use Mozilla. The version it reports is Mozilla-1.7.7,2. When I go to http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html and do a search for Mozilla, I find that Mozilla-1.7.12,2 is the latest (stable) version. I guess my question is this. How do I use the FreeBSD tools, Ports/Packages, etc, to install this latest version?? Or am I missing the concept altogether ? ( I understand the process of downloading this latest version and installing it manually. Just trying to understand and use the FreeBSD tools ) Thanks for any and all help, Jim Wright Columbus, Mississippi 28 Sep 2005 * REPLY SEPARATOR * On 9/29/2005 4:29:46 PM, Gerard Seibert Replied: Personally, I would first make sure you have a freshly updated ports collection. Next, install 'portmanager' from the ports collection. Then run it. portmanager -u This will take care of updating all of your out of date ports and their dependencies. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bye-bye beastie ...
At 12:52 PM 9/28/2005, Kiffin Gish wrote: Glenn Dawson wrote: At 12:52 PM 9/26/2005, Kiffin Gish wrote: I would like to have a different bootup screen appearing which looks more professional (sorry), e.g. removing that awful looking beastie thingie on the side. What's the best way to do this? (Sorry to all those beastie lovers out there, but really) You can put beastie_disable=YES in your /boot/loader.conf to turn it off. Replacing it with something else is a bit trickier. You would need to replace /boot/beasier.4th. -Glenn -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you sure this belongs in the loader.conf file and not somehwere else. I get all kinds of error messages and the menu never comes up, just skipping past to the login prompt. glenn# grep beastie /boot/defaults/loader.conf #beastie_disable=NO # Turn the beastie boot menu on and off -Glenn -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrading
On 9/28/05, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on having my trusty dvd with me. Why would you want to do that? Why not just install 5.4? Or wait a bit and install 6? Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shadowed Files
When running 'portsclean', this message is displayed: ** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /lib/libcrypto.so.3 /lib/libcrypto.so.3 - ? /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 - openssl-0.9.8 -- This may be an undesirable situation Leave /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) ** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 /usr/lib/libssl.so.3- ? /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 - openssl-0.9.8 -- This may be an undesirable situation Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) Would it be safe to delete the redundant library? I assume that I should remove the /usr/lib/ version and not the /usr/local/lib version. -- Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrading
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:28 pm, eoghan wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on having my trusty dvd with me. So, the question is: what is the best way to do an upgrade? I figure ill do the install, make sure its all ok, and before I go ahead and install anything ill upgrade. I did hear people say that using the sysinstall isnt the way to go - maybe or maybe not? So any opinions here on how it should be done would be appreciated. To save yourself some time, just boot from your disk change the tag in the options screen to 5.4-RELEASE and do a net install. No need to start from 5.3. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ --- pgphVynlsB1c9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: upgrading
On 28 Sep 2005, at 21:46, Beecher Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:28 pm, eoghan wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on having my trusty dvd with me. So, the question is: what is the best way to do an upgrade? I figure ill do the install, make sure its all ok, and before I go ahead and install anything ill upgrade. I did hear people say that using the sysinstall isnt the way to go - maybe or maybe not? So any opinions here on how it should be done would be appreciated. To save yourself some time, just boot from your disk change the tag in the options screen to 5.4-RELEASE and do a net install. No need to start from 5.3. Beech Thanks for your advice. and thank you Derrick. I will read into those articles. Mike, the main reason is just so I can learn how to do it. Im using freebsd on my other computer only to learn it. Thanks all Eoghan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make package
Hello! I have a web server (ca 20 vhosts) currently running with php4-cgi-4.3.10_2 port and a lot of PHP4 extensions ports such as php4-ctype-4.3.10_2, php4-dbase-4.3.10_2 etc. I want to upgrade all those ports to PHP 4.4.0. As I've seen some websites break afer they'd been upgraded from PHP 4.3.10 to PHP 4.4.0, I'd like to have a quick way to go back to 4.3.10 if 4.4.0 doesn't work for me. I was thinking about doing a 'make package' beforehand for each PHP4 port that I currently have installed. Then, if things turn out bad, I could just uninstall the PHP 4.4.0 ports and install those packages. When I originally installed the PHP4 ports, I didn't run 'make clean' in port directories, so all the port directories still contain 'work' subdirectories. However, the ports tree itself has been cvsupped since then, so the port skeletons are actually PHP 4.4.0 already. If I would run 'make package' in a such a port subdirectory, what would it do? Would it make a package of existing 4.3.10 version, or try to build 4.4.0 and make package of that? --- ... Terminator virus found: Use ILLBE.BAK? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portaudit question.....
- Original Message - From: Wright Jim Contractor 14MDSS/SGSI [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 1:07 PM Subject: portaudit question. To keep the story short: I'm using version FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Aug 25 09:12:43 CDT 2005; pasted from the dmesg.boot file. To the best of my knowledge, I'm using CVSup, pkgdb -F, and portupgrade commands correctly. But, I'm pretty sure I'm still overlooking and/or leaving something out. I just discovered the portaudit command and ran it against my system. It comes up with 15 items that need to be upgraded or deinstalled. For this question I'll use Mozilla. The version it reports is Mozilla-1.7.7,2. I'll take a stab at this one. Portaudit is a tool that takes your installed ports then goes out and finds any known vulnerabilities (man portaudit says -- portaudit -- system to check installed packages for known vulnerabilities.) In your example Mozilla. There are times that a vulnerable port does not have an update to it (pkg_version | grep ) so all the updating you do may or may not make a difference. Keep your ports tree up to date and check with pkg_version | grep to see if there are changes. One other thing to note, they give you a URL to the issue they are talking about so you could potentially find more information that may guide you to getting an update or what's involved in the issue. Hope that helps. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Updating exim failed
i am trying to update exim port from exim-4.52 to exim-4.53. OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE Here is the error output, any suggestions appreciated.. server# portversion -v -l exim-4.52 needs updating (port has 4.53) server# portupgrade -varRDD .. rm -f exim cc -o exim lookups/lookups.a(nis.o)(.text+0xd): In function `nis_open': : undefined reference to `yp_get_default_domain' lookups/lookups.a(nis.o)(.text+0x70): In function `nis_find': : undefined reference to `yp_match' lookups/lookups.a(nis.o)(.text+0xe1): In function `nis0_find': : undefined reference to `yp_match' *** Error code 1 Stop in /var/tmp/usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.53/build-FreeBSD-i386. *** Error code 1 Stop in /var/tmp/usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.53. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade773.4 make ** Fix the problem and try again. -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bye-bye beastie ...
Right back at ya Jerry: .:\:/:. +---+ .:\:\:/:/:. | PLEASE DO NOT |:.:\:\:/:/:.: | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: | | '=(\ 9 9 /)=' | Thank you, | ( (_) ) | Management | /`-vvv-'\ +---+ / \ | |@@@ / /|,|\ \ | |@@@ /_// /^\ \\_\ @x@@x@| | |/ WW( ( ) )WW \/| |\| __\,,\ /,,/__ \||/ | | | jgs (__Y__) /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ I seem to recall you expressing appreciation for this sentiment. ;-) Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry McAllister Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bye-bye beastie ... Hi All, This is really an interesting discussion. I actually appreciate it. But, it doesn't belong here. Start a list or forum somewhere and let us all know about it so those who would like to continue can without tieing up the FreeBSD questions list. jerry taking the risk of starting the 'ultimate-religion-flame-war' (please not!)... ;) religion (of any kind!) limits the scope of people's thoughts and makes them more easy to manipulate, what patch is this, please tell me it name and location in ports, because I want to make sure its removed from my system at immediately. As a Zen Buddhist, I will loosely quote a Chinese Ch'an (Zen) Master Rinzai who has said that religion is toilet paper, you use it to clean yourself up then you thow it away. ergo, the purpose is not to contend with others but to wipe your own ass ... so please get on with the task. If you have wiped then flush ... not talk. not even mentioning what religion can do to the 'evolution' of mankind (yes, even in these days (-the creationists in the usa for example)). they don't even come close to be representative of religion in a global context. the world would be a better place if we all would get rid of this. adding all the (positive and negative) ways in which religion has affected history, you end up with more bad than good. Is this another master plan for everyone. one of the main problems is, rules that may have been necessary and good at some times, aren't reflected and reconsidered because they are now 'send by god' and therefore untouchable. this creates some really weird (and sometimes brutal) situations. are you trying to say that religious proclaimations utilize God as a self-referential way of imputing authority to the statement within the statement; if you are then that is an interesting comment on how authority and legitimation are used tactically to create consent or consensus ... but then again this is not only true of religion but is part of socio-cultural dynamics in terms of the use of authoritative declarations ... It would be useful to apply it to the windows/linux debate but this is probably offtopic... no ... FreeBSD has an extensive array of functions and capabilities and so I am sure that this one is in there somewhere please check the code. albertfuller - email home 2albertfuller AT gmail DOT com - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.6/111 - Release Date: 9/23/2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openssl 0.9.8 breaking things
On Sep 28, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:48:03PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello Mark, Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 6:41:47 PM, you contributed this to our collective wisdom: Just upgraded to openssl 0.9.8 and things are breaking, namely exim and cyrus-imap. Non-SSL connections work, SSL connections cause a segfault. I'm going back to 0.9.7g using the WITH_OPENSSL_097 flag, but is there some way to make this work with 0.9.8? Have I totally missed something here? you need to recompile your software (exim,cyrus-imap,...) against new openssl libs. This is FreeBSD 4.11. Thanks! I'll toss in my two cents here just FWIW. I had troubles with all sorts of sh* (stuff) breaking when I touched openssl. I had not---or maybe I did, inadvertently--used the openssl port. I *had* to use /usr/src/secure/openssl/whatever; when applications began breaking. I pkg_deleted openssl and rebuilt the native /usr/src/* stuff. These apps are tightly interdependent; that's why you are seeing things break. This may or may not work generally. It cost me at least a day's investigation ... and I'm *still* not sure that everything's right. gary I take back what I said about things working. I was fooled into thinking things were working when I had deinstalled 0.9.8 and things started working again. I reinstalled 0.9.8 and things broke again, with no other changes. Now I'm reinstalling 0.9.7g and hoping for the best. I guess I have to install 0.9.8 and clean install everything that depends on it, at a time when I can have everything broken for several hours. Just rebuilding cyrus-imap, cyrus-sasl, and exim didn't do it. -- Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: +46704070332 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UPS
Chuck Swiger writes: I am not looking for anything extraordinary. Just something, that can gracefully shut down my system if I lose power. An occurrence that transpires habitually in the northeast USA when I reside, Your bog-standard APC brand plus sysutils/apcupsd port works fine for me for less than, say 3000 volt-ampere UPS. Apcupsd is good stuff - I use it - but reading the docs is essential. There are a number of issues (some applicable to FreeBSD) that require manual configuration. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cyrus-sasl2 configuration
This document is available on the FreeBSD site: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html However, this doc references security/cyrus-sasl version 1.x. Is it still relevant to version2.x? If so, are there any specific changes that should be made to the installation? I think the modification I made in the following statements is correct, but I am not sure. SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/sasl2 -DSASL SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl One last question. In the above document, there is a reference to 'pwcheck'. Is the port suppose to be built with that option and if so, how do I go about setting it? -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portaudit question.....
Wright Jim Contractor 14MDSS/SGSI wrote: To keep the story short: I'm using version FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Aug 25 09:12:43 CDT 2005; pasted from the dmesg.boot file. To the best of my knowledge, I'm using CVSup, pkgdb -F, and portupgrade commands correctly. But, I'm pretty sure I'm still overlooking and/or leaving something out. I just discovered the portaudit command and ran it against my system. It comes up with 15 items that need to be upgraded or deinstalled. For this question I'll use Mozilla. The version it reports is Mozilla-1.7.7,2. When I go to http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html and do a search for Mozilla, I find that Mozilla-1.7.12,2 is the latest (stable) version. I guess my question is this. How do I use the FreeBSD tools, Ports/Packages, etc, to install this latest version?? Or am I missing the concept altogether ? ( I understand the process of downloading this latest version and installing it manually. Just trying to understand and use the FreeBSD tools ) Thanks for any and all help, Jim Wright Columbus, Mississippi 28 Sep 2005 jim, i recommend using portsnap instead of cvsup, especially if you update your ports tree often. then use portversion instead of pkg_version, it's much faster. and always and periodically run portaudit. you don't need your ports tree to be updated for portaudit to be effective, btw. so based on what i said, here's a procedure to follow: /usr/local/sbin/portsnap fetch /usr/local/sbin/portsnap update /usr/local/sbin/portversion -v -l /usr/local/sbin/portaudit -Fda hope that helps. regards, martin ps: regarding mozilla, if it's not packaged on freebsd's ftp server (that is pkg_add doesn't help), you've got to install it from ports (that is to compile it). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
strange routing (?) issues with a jail
I have a freebsd 5.3 machine, with a jailed off machine running in it. Let's call them host and slave (they have seperate IP addresses and hostnames). Within the slave, I have sshd and apache running. In the host, I just have sshd running. From within the slave machine, I can connect to localhost ports 80 and 22, with the expected results. From within the host machine, I can connect to the slave's ports 80 and 22 correctly as well. From outside that machine, I can only connect to port 22 on the slave. Attempts to connect to port 80 on the slave time out. The slave is running apache version 1.33+modssl from ports. I have it configured with a basic vhosting setup, and it seems to work perfectly from within the physical machine the jail is running on. Pf is totally disabled, and it's a fresh install with no strange services running or unnecessary packages installed. Can anyone give a hint as to why someone external would be unable to connect to port 80, but able to connect to port 22? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make package
Use pkg_create(1) instead. HTH, Dan On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:58, Toomas Aas wrote: Hello! I have a web server (ca 20 vhosts) currently running with php4-cgi-4.3.10_2 port and a lot of PHP4 extensions ports such as php4-ctype-4.3.10_2, php4-dbase-4.3.10_2 etc. I want to upgrade all those ports to PHP 4.4.0. As I've seen some websites break afer they'd been upgraded from PHP 4.3.10 to PHP 4.4.0, I'd like to have a quick way to go back to 4.3.10 if 4.4.0 doesn't work for me. I was thinking about doing a 'make package' beforehand for each PHP4 port that I currently have installed. Then, if things turn out bad, I could just uninstall the PHP 4.4.0 ports and install those packages. When I originally installed the PHP4 ports, I didn't run 'make clean' in port directories, so all the port directories still contain 'work' subdirectories. However, the ports tree itself has been cvsupped since then, so the port skeletons are actually PHP 4.4.0 already. If I would run 'make package' in a such a port subdirectory, what would it do? Would it make a package of existing 4.3.10 version, or try to build 4.4.0 and make package of that? --- ... Terminator virus found: Use ILLBE.BAK? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: quick TTY Question
Eric Murphy wrote: Hey all after installing the newest version of Xorg I am uable to switch consoles... with CTRL-ALT-F# Im running AMD64 version of BSD 6.0 this worked in i386 wonder why its not working in amd64 I have gdm set in /etc/ttys instead of xdm... didnt see anything that wouldnt allow me to set consoles any ideas? Anything like this in your xorg.conf file? Section ServerFlags Option DontVTSwitch Option DontZap EndSection ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Eric ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating IPSec VPN between FreeBSD and Linksys WRV54G
I have setup many IPSec FreeBSD VPN's using racoon and gif interfaces. On the FreeBSD side I've got: gif0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1280 tunnel inet [LOCAL_WAN_IP] -- [REMOTE_WAN_IP] inet 172.31.1.1 -- 192.168.1.1 netmask 0x I have the usual setkey policies in /etc/ipsec.conf (loaded with setkey -f). The router and the BSD box are establishing IKE no problem according to racoon logs, however I can't actually get any traffic across. Clearly there is something about the Linksys implementation that I'm not familiar with. Anybody have any luck with this particular setup? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dream editor
Folks, This may be considered OT by some, but it hits home with me given my continual use of editors/WP's. My dream word processor or an Gnome app like gedit would include at least a few vi-isms. (I've known about xemacs for years; it has a vi-like drops, so the user has that option. ) I'm also familiar with vim and gvim. --I just found the autoindent feature in gedit. How much work (and it is serious hacking) to integrate the some of vi into a GUI/Gnome or KDE editor? I like the newer AbiWord and the growing stability of OO. But my fingers have been using vi BillJoy finished it. vi beats the hell out of (forgive me!) ed. I'm likely among the few who this matters to; but I'd like to see some reasoned discussion. Flames to /dev/null, please. gary PS: Didn't knews let people reply with a large vi-like thing that popped up? -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with Promise supertrak sx6000 still an issue ??
Hi I was wondering if the PR http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=74153 is still an issue, it isn't closed yet, but i'm really curius because i have a few of these cards and planning on purchasing 6 400G disks and it's nice to know if i can at all use this controller. Thx -- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Brian Josefsen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange routing (?) issues with a jail
At 04:08 PM 9/28/2005, tsuraan wrote: I have a freebsd 5.3 machine, with a jailed off machine running in it. Let's call them host and slave (they have seperate IP addresses and hostnames). Within the slave, I have sshd and apache running. In the host, I just have sshd running. From within the slave machine, I can connect to localhost ports 80 and 22, with the expected results. From within the host machine, I can connect to the slave's ports 80 and 22 correctly as well. From outside that machine, I can only connect to port 22 on the slave. Attempts to connect to port 80 on the slave time out. The slave is running apache version 1.33+modssl from ports. I have it configured with a basic vhosting setup, and it seems to work perfectly from within the physical machine the jail is running on. Pf is totally disabled, and it's a fresh install with no strange services running or unnecessary packages installed. Can anyone give a hint as to why someone external would be unable to connect to port 80, but able to connect to port 22? Are the IP's for the host and the jail on the same network? A look at the relevant portions of rc.conf from both the host and the jail would be most helpful in troubleshooting the problem. You'll also want to make sure that sshd in the host is being told to listen only to it's IP. If you don't and there's no sshd running in the jail, you'll get a connection to the host instead of the jail. -Glenn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make package
Danny Pansters wrote: Use pkg_create(1) instead. Thanks a lot! pkg_create -b seems to be exactly what I was looking for. On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:58, Toomas Aas wrote: Hello! I have a web server (ca 20 vhosts) currently running with php4-cgi-4.3.10_2 port and a lot of PHP4 extensions ports such as php4-ctype-4.3.10_2, php4-dbase-4.3.10_2 etc. I want to upgrade all those ports to PHP 4.4.0. As I've seen some websites break afer they'd been upgraded from PHP 4.3.10 to PHP 4.4.0, I'd like to have a quick way to go back to 4.3.10 if 4.4.0 doesn't work for me. --- ... Paul's Law: You can't fall off the floor. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCSI tape drive
Dear all, I am a newbies to BSD world so bare with me a moment here please.. I inherited this freebsd 4.10-RELEASE server and i was told to install a DLT 20/40 tape drive to the server. So, what i did was; 1. shutdown the server 2. Install the Adaptec SCSI card into the PCI slot in the server 3. Connect the tape drive to the server 4. Power up the tape drive then the server I though thats all i need to do to get it working but i was wrong.. I tried; red1# mt status mt: /dev/nsa0: Device not configured AND red1# mt -f /dev/rsa0 status mt: /dev/rsa0: Device not configured When i did a red1# camcontrol devlist -v scbus0 on ata0 bus 0: SONY DVD RW DRU-700A VY02 at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass0,cd0) at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () scbus1 on ata1 bus 0: at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) As i'm not sure what this camcontrol list means, can someone please explain? It doesn't seems like the server detect the new tape drive. I google around, didn't find anything hopefull. Does anyone have any ideas what i did wrong or suggestions that i can try? Thanks in advance! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCSI tape drive
Van Diep writes: I am a newbies to BSD world so bare with me a moment here please.. I inherited this freebsd 4.10-RELEASE server and i was told to install a DLT 20/40 tape drive to the server. So, what i did was; 1. shutdown the server 2. Install the Adaptec SCSI card into the PCI slot in the server 3. Connect the tape drive to the server 4. Power up the tape drive then the server I though thats all i need to do to get it working but i was wrong.. Have you checked the kernel to see that if has the necessary code to handle a) SCSI and b) SCSI tape drives? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with compiling sendmail+sasl
Still problem with unknown verifier when I try to authenticate myself. Now my sendmail is copiled with sasl2: -- mig29# sendmail -d0.1 -bv root Version 8.13.5 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETUNIX NEWDB PIPELINING SASLv2 SCANF SOCKETMAP STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG -- And when I telnet to port 25: -- mig29# telnet 127.0.0.1 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.workgroup. Escape character is '^]'. 220 xmail.homelinux.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.5/8.13.5; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:59:07 +0200 (CEST) ehlo localhost 250-xmail.homelinux.net Hello localhost.workgroup [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 10480760 250-DSN 250-AUTH DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP -- And SASL2 is working too. I have verified with testsaslauthd and it return OK. So what am I still missing here? I am starting getting desperate. Regards, Sasa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
