On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:44:26 + Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Yuri wrote:
> > Glen Barber wrote:
> >>
> >> Remove the file? Or rename it?
> >
> > I wouldn't ask this question if it was that easy.
> > There is even no such directory: /home/yuri/.googleearth
> Check /compat/linux/home/yuri/
...and re
> >From my information security manager:
>
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand)
I sometimes wonder the validity of such statements, since
we use it on 99% of our servers, the work-stations run Linux.
Then again, we are concidered a more theoretical than practical s
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Anton Shterenlikht :
>
>> >From my information security manager:
>>
>> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
>> (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
>>
>>
I think democracy is a choice of freedom. Freedom what to use, AND, in such
cases - freedom where to work! If you are marketing specialist probably you
should NOT touch much of your computer's control gear. If you are an IT
specialist or support such treatment is similar to treat you as a cattle.
I am a relative XML newbie (i.e. our backend does spit out some XML I
wrote but it just slapped together with no knowledge of the
underlaying structure of XML)... Now I am going back and actually
learning XML... our main application is to insert XML directly into
XHTML documents and use either CSS
Yuri wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
Remove the file? Or rename it?
I wouldn't ask this question if it was that easy.
There is even no such directory: /home/yuri/.googleearth
Check /compat/linux/home/yuri/
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
Can someone give me a clue what went wrong in so described upgrade and what
made Kernel 8.0 REL not to see either disklabel nor even partition of my
gmirror? I need some advice prior starting upgrade process of the rest of my
servers. As you see in my previous posts the problem is NOT in DD mode!
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:46:38PM -0800, Roger Agraviador wrote:
> I clicked the ISO link and I was brought to a directory, this to be exact (
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/)
>
> Once I have downloaded all Iso Images do I burn the 'boot only.iso' file on
> one D
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:38:04 -0700 (MST), Warren Block
wrote:
> Please
> see the Handbook section on X11 configuration instead:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html
Just a side question: 5.4.2 Note 2 § 5 states:
You will have to reboot your machi
I clicked the ISO link and I was brought to a directory, this to be exact (
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/)
Once I have downloaded all Iso Images do I burn the 'boot only.iso' file on
one DVD or CD only? or do I burn that along with 'disc1.iso', and how do I
go abo
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:44:16PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>Just update to release 8.0 a few days ago, then when update ports by
> csup, error occurs:
>
> Fatal error 'kse_create() failed
> ' at line 469 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 0)
>
At a guess, yo
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> (comparatively) poor security record.
unlike linux or windoze, rofl
randy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Diego Montalvo wrote:
Have upgraded my 7.1 RELEASE clean install (no ports) to 8.0 RELEASE
using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RELEASE" and everything
installed correctly and works fine. Updated the Ports tree using
"portsnap" and then tried to Install "usr/ports/x11-wm/xf
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Glen Barber wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM, mpd wrote:
I just updated my system from 7.2 to 8.0 STABLE. What do I need to do to
make my mouse work in X again? This system has an unbroken chain of
fbsd since 2.2.6, but I'm about to drop it due to this. This is
horri
--On December 10, 2009 2:11:31 PM -0600 Kevin Wilcox
wrote:
2009/12/10 Anton Shterenlikht :
I was just stressed after being forced by him
to explain why I wanted firewall exceptions
for two ports to my FreeBSD portscluster nodes.
I explained the reasons and that was settled.
Anton, I don'
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:54:11 +, RW wrote:
> It's fairly trivial to write an rc.d script that pauses the boot
> process and waits for devices, but sshd runs after LOGIN, and nfs runs
> before, so you can't easily reorder then without maintaining modified
> rc.d scripts.
I think it's possible t
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:50:56 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> I don't think you will have a problem using a USB2 interface.
> But, I really cannot recommend DAT. That type of system seems
> to have been pushed beyond its ability.The tapes fail
> frequently.
What about Ultrium tape? Is it
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:19:43PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM, mpd wrote:
> > I just updated my system from 7.2 to 8.0 STABLE. What do I need to do to
> > make my mouse work in X again? This system has an unbroken chain of
> > fbsd since 2.2.6, but I'm about to dro
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:57:44 -0500, Mike L wrote:
> all I gotta say is I just spent 3 days compiling gnome2 for fbsd..
> It shouldn't take that long or be that hard/complicated.
I recognized increased compiling times since FreeBSD 7. I
was told that this is due to much more optimization in
the co
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM, mpd wrote:
> I just updated my system from 7.2 to 8.0 STABLE. What do I need to do to
> make my mouse work in X again? This system has an unbroken chain of
> fbsd since 2.2.6, but I'm about to drop it due to this. This is
> horrible.
>
Since you have given no info
I just updated my system from 7.2 to 8.0 STABLE. What do I need to do to
make my mouse work in X again? This system has an unbroken chain of
fbsd since 2.2.6, but I'm about to drop it due to this. This is
horrible.
Please respond directly. I dropped this list in the '90s.
peace,
-mpd
___
Jerry wrote:
> Out of pure morbid curiosity, would you please answer this question for
> me.
>
> You work for a corporation that specifically requires the use of
> a specific OS, the OS itself is not material to this question. It also
> forbids the use of any unauthorized OS or equipment on the c
Have upgraded my 7.1 RELEASE clean install (no ports) to 8.0 RELEASE
using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RELEASE" and everything
installed correctly and works fine. Updated the Ports tree using
"portsnap" and then tried to Install "usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4" but to
no avail...
I get the following e
So we are saying, that bsdlabel and fdisk are broken? This is *very*
disappointing.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@
Glen Barber wrote:
Have you tried creating the directory?
Creating it doesn't help.
But I solved the problem: when it talks about /home/yuri/~.googleearth
it actually means /compat/linux/home/yuri/.googleearth/
Deleting file there fixes the problem.
I guess it's a good idea to have a lin
I enabled UseLogin in sshd_config.
Scott
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Yuri wrote:
> Glen Barber wrote:
>>
>> Remove the file? Or rename it?
>>
>
>
> I wouldn't ask this question if it was that easy.
> There is even no such directory: /home/yuri/.googleearth
Could you provide possibly important information such as this in
future que
Glen Barber wrote:
Remove the file? Or rename it?
I wouldn't ask this question if it was that easy.
There is even no such directory: /home/yuri/.googleearth
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Yuri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting this fatal error:
> Unable to create symlink for lock
> '/home/yuri/.googleearth/instance-running-lock'. File exists.
>
Remove the file? Or rename it?
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-qu
Hi,
I am getting this fatal error:
Unable to create symlink for lock
'/home/yuri/.googleearth/instance-running-lock'. File exists.
google-earth-5.1.3509.4636
8.0-STABLE
Thanks,
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
> > FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> > (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
> >
> >
> > http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exploit-for-FreeBSD-873352.html
>
> Are you trying to make your infosec guy loo
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction in regard to
getting automounts working via LDAP-distributed automountMap-style maps?
We are already using automountMap-style maps distributed via LDAP for a few
thousand Linux, Mac and SunOS clients and I'd like to be able to
Hi,
Just update to release 8.0 a few days ago, then when update ports by
csup, error occurs:
Fatal error 'kse_create() failed
' at line 469 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 0)
what should I do? thank you!!
TFC
___
freebsd-
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:08 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith
wrote:
But the naive or new installer knows of no such thing, and
could beat around in the huge lists of X software for ages, wondering
what's required and what's not to get a desktop going.
RW wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:31:47 -0600
> "Corey J. Bukolt" <0...@mail.ru> wrote:
>
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I have a FreeNAS box with a CF card for root, and 3 drives (soon to be
>> 4) set up with encryption and raidz on top of them.
>> A less than excellent detailed report of what I did i
I figured the world and the kernel are in sync on the DVD, so I tried to
rebuild just the kernel. Is this assumption valid?
It failed to link due to symbols like dcons_crom. So I commented dcons_crom
out of my kernel config.
Is this actually a bug or do I need to buildworld/installworld?
_
I installed FreeBSD8.0-RELEASE so I could see if it's compatible with my
Netgear WG111T (this is newly supported in 8.0).
Not surprising, uath (the new driver) is not in GENERIC (oopps, yes it is), so
I copied GENERIC to LAPTOP3 and commented out most of the drivers, since I
don't need them. I
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:21:26 +0100
>
> Julian H. Stacey replied:
> >> Fortuantely, I had no problem setting up a "black" FreeBSD box to
> >> preserve my sanity.
> >
> >A tip for those threatened with no BSD box at work:
> >FreeBSD runs fine _inside_ a box that looks like a multi sheet scanner.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:39:03AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> Also, is there anyway to detect if there are hardware without drivers (such
> as
> a sound card without any snd_ loaded) and to detect the type of device (e.g.
> network, usb, sound, graphics)?
pciconf -lv|less
Every device name
2009/12/10 Anton Shterenlikht :
> I was just stressed after being forced by him
> to explain why I wanted firewall exceptions
> for two ports to my FreeBSD portscluster nodes.
> I explained the reasons and that was settled.
Anton, I don't know about the UK, Great Britain or England, but in US
Uni
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:21:26 +0100
Julian H. Stacey replied:
>> Fortuantely, I had no problem setting up a "black" FreeBSD box to
>> preserve my sanity.
>
>A tip for those threatened with no BSD box at work:
>FreeBSD runs fine _inside_ a box that looks like a multi sheet scanner.
>OK, slow, but i
patrick wrote:
> I've made some headway... perl supports "sitecustomize.pl" which can
> be used to execute code when any perl script is run. It doesn't seem
> to be enabled by default, so I had to add the following line to
> /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/Makefile's CONFIGURE_ARGS:
>
> -Dusesit
APseudoUtopia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the improvements in SMP in FreeBSD 8.0, is the ALTQ_NOPCC option
> still required? In the handbook and other older documentation, it says
> ALTQ_NOPCC is in fact required on SMP systems because the TSC is
> unstable. I was wondering if this is still the case
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 287, Issue 16, Message: 8
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:39:08 +0200 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> >
> > However, I do not see any distributions listed that are prefixed with
> > "X-". The choices are "All", "Reset", "Developer",
> Fortuantely, I had no problem setting up a "black" FreeBSD box to
> preserve my sanity.
A tip for those threatened with no BSD box at work:
FreeBSD runs fine _inside_ a box that looks like a multi sheet scanner.
OK, slow, but invisible to managers who require MS only.
These scanners often lie a
Hello List
Having upgraded to FreeBSD 8.0 everything is running fine, I decided to
try the ahci_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf
The first machine was fine after a reboot,
zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scrub: scrub completed after 0h14m with 0 errors on Thu Dec 10 07:19:
bsdlabel: Class not found
re-edit the label? [y]:
You cant edit it. You can only say "N" and it exits w/o
saving any changes.
This is very annoying, because you cannot do anything with the label
unlike the old days..
I had to mount an older drive and then I was able to edit the bsdlabel
on th
I have had a posting on the Cups list from Michael Sweet
who has suggested the problem is something to do with my pam configuration.
Thanks in advance for further guidance:
> Thanks Michael - it looks as though you may have put your finger on the
> problem -- but I am not certain how to react to
Hello all! I've found many references to this error on Google: "fdisk: Class
not found, bsdlabel: Class not found" but none explain what this error
*means*. Could someone explain this error and possible remedies? I'm using a
custom 8.0-RELEASE-p1 kernel. I don't even need to edit the label in order
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Perhaps I should start putting together
> some statistics to make my case more forcefully.
>
I fought the same battle at the Univ. I attended (as a student). They were
an M$ shop as well and had issues with me running OpenBSD. I stuc
fbsd 7.2
amd64
"kernel developer" install
Here's a successful install du
du -d1 -h /
2.0K/.snap
2.0K/dev
1.8G/usr
1.6G/var
1.7M/etc
2.0K/cdrom
2.0K/dist
1.1M/bin
206M/boot
6.7M/lib
396K/libexec
2.0K/media
2.0K/mnt
2.0K/proc
4.0M/rescue
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:21:50 +
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I had to fight a long battle, well.. I had
> some support from other academics, to have
> a linux class in my Faculty. Here the
> opposition wasn't so much security, as
> "why would any undegraduate need linux",
> as if MS solutions a
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:50:04PM -0800, Doug Sampson wrote:
> Does anyone have had positive or negative experience using these USB-based
> DAT tape drives? Specifically, I am looking at the HP (Hewlett-Packard)
> StorageWorks Q1581SB DAT 160 Tape Drive. If there are other branded USB
> 2.0-based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chargen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:51:22AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
>>> In response to Anton Shterenlikht :
>
>> I had to fight a long battle, well.. I had
>> some support from
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-09:16.rtld.asc
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:05:16AM -0600, Paul Schmehl thus spake:
--On Thursday, December 10, 2009 08:41:41 -0600 Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the Un
--On Thursday, December 10, 2009 08:41:41 -0600 Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
(comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
http://www.h-online.com
We have a Nagios server (ports/net-mgmt/nagios) that has a lot of
check_nrpe2 (ports/net-mgmt/nrpe2) checks.
We recently upgraded the server it runs on to 8.0-STABLE (r199975).
The performance has never been great, but now it's really atrocious
and I'm trying to figure out what's going on.
The ma
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:51:22AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
>> In response to Anton Shterenlikht :
> I had to fight a long battle, well.. I had
> some support from other academics, to have
> a linux class in my Faculty. Here the
> oppos
On 10/12/2009 15:50, Alexandre L. wrote:
I think you wrong.
I read the Official Announce for FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html
You can find this sentence : "Systems running 7.[012]-RELEASE, 8.0-BETA[1234], or
8.0-RC[123] can upgrade as follows:"
You can upg
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:51:22AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Anton Shterenlikht :
>
> > >From my information security manager:
> >
> > FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> > (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for exampl
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
(comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exploit-for-FreeBSD-
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43:37AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Jerry McAllister writes:
>
> > It is dedicated because only FreeBSD can talk to it.
>
> Is this correct? What about {Net, Open, DregonFly}BSD, or
> Linux?
>
Not Linux without some programming, but maybe some of the other
I think you wrong.
I read the Official Announce for FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html
You can find this sentence : "Systems running 7.[012]-RELEASE, 8.0-BETA[1234],
or 8.0-RC[123] can upgrade as follows:"
You can upgrade directly from 7.1 to 8.0 with the ste
Jerry McAllister writes:
> It is dedicated because only FreeBSD can talk to it.
Is this correct? What about {Net, Open, DregonFly}BSD, or
Linux?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 03:08:16AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:33:17 +0100, Rolf Nielsen
> wrote:
> > As far as I understand it, it's called Dangerously Dedicated because it
> > may cause other systems not to recognise the disk.
>
> Primarily, it's called "dedicated" (onl
Fire the noob you have working for you and hire someone with a clue.
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
(comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:41:41 +
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> (comparatively) poor security record.
In comparison to what it is supposed to have a poor security record?
> Most recently, for example:
> http://www.h-online.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:50:04PM -0800, Doug Sampson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to buy a tape drive and am currently looking at USB 2.0 DAT tape
> drives from HP. I searched the hardware compatibility list and cannot locate
> any information tape drives except the disclaimer that SCSI tape dr
2009/12/10 Anton Shterenlikht :
> >From my information security manager:
>
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
>
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exploi
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
> From my information security manager:
>
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for
> example:
"comparatively", compared to what? Windows? Linux? We beat them
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Reed Loefgren
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Exactly. Most desktop users want a working system in the minimum of time
>>> (Can't blame them for that).
>>> Even with packages, we cannot beat an image-based distro, esp. since it
>>> will a
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Anton Shterenlikht :
>
>> >From my information security manager:
>>
>> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
>> (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
>>
>>
>> http://www.h-online.com/sec
At 09:41 AM 12/10/2009, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I
understand) and has a
(comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-ex
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:31:47 -0600
"Corey J. Bukolt" <0...@mail.ru> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a FreeNAS box with a CF card for root, and 3 drives (soon to be
> 4) set up with encryption and raidz on top of them.
> A less than excellent detailed report of what I did is here:
> http://bit.ly/
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>>From my information security manager:
>
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
>
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exploit-for-Fre
In response to Anton Shterenlikht :
> >From my information security manager:
>
> FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
> (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
>
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exp
On 10/12/2009 10:36, Dimitar Trandov wrote:
Hi list,
Yesterday I decided to upgrade my server, which currently running 7.1rel.
p8. Do I have to first upgrade to 7.2 release and then to 8.0, or instead of
this, directly do a safe step to 8.0 release ?
Thanks in advance
Dimitar,
__
>From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
(comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exploit-for-FreeBSD-873352.html
--
Anton S
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Reed Loefgren wrote:
>
>
>> Exactly. Most desktop users want a working system in the minimum of time
>> (Can't blame them for that).
>> Even with packages, we cannot beat an image-based distro, esp. since it
>> will also provide all essential default settings.
>>
>
all I gotta say is I just spent 3 days compiling gnome2 for fbsd..
It shouldn't take that long or be that hard/complicated.
Most of it was stupid crap that I would of thought should of been taken care
of by now.
Applications complaining about which version of python is installed,
complaining about
Exactly. Most desktop users want a working system in the minimum of time
(Can't blame them for that).
Even with packages, we cannot beat an image-based distro, esp. since it
will also provide all essential default settings.
If I might butt in: If the user-to-be wants a working system in 5
Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:08 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith
> wrote:
>
>> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 287, Issue 16, Message: 8
>> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:39:08 +0200 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>> > Removing X from the distributions is a right step IMO, these are just
>> > 3rd p
Ian Smith wrote:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 287, Issue 16, Message: 8
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:39:08 +0200 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
> > >
> > > However, I do not see any distributions listed that are prefixed with
> > > "X-". The choices are "All", "Reset", "Developer", "Kern-Develope
Hi All
Thank you everyone for your help as a result of combined efforts I have
finally succeeded in getting cups the server to communicate with the printer
and print.
HOWEVER!!
One minor niggling problem remains. I cannot communicate with the cups
management interface on http://localhost:631
Hi list,
Yesterday I decided to upgrade my server, which currently running 7.1rel.
p8. Do I have to first upgrade to 7.2 release and then to 8.0, or instead of
this, directly do a safe step to 8.0 release ?
Thanks in advance
Dimitar,
___
freebsd-qu
Don't know if that loader.conf change affected this server, I disabled
APIC in loader.conf after finding it may be responsible for a slow clock
on this VMware guest FreeBSD install. I rebooted for the changes to take
affect and it goes now to a mountroot prompt, can't seem to load the
root part
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Randi Harper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 286, Issue 12, Message 7
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:51:50 -0800 Randi Harper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Derek (freebsd lists)
> > <48225...@raz
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:08 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith
wrote:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 287, Issue 16, Message: 8
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:39:08 +0200 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > Removing X from the distributions is a right step IMO, these are just
> > 3rd party packages and it seems conf
David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the pros and cons of building a stripped down kernel and loading all
> the missing parts via modules (such that you end up with the same
> functionality as generic kernel) vs having a kernel with all the modules
> built
> in?
Flexibility mainly. The de
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:54:19AM +0100, Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
>
> Frank Shute wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Successfully upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0 but had my usual problem when
> >jumping major versions with the make delete-old target.
> >
> >The problem being that it asks me to confirm deletion of each li
2009/12/10 David Naylor
> Hi,
>
> What are the pros and cons of building a stripped down kernel and loading
> all
> the missing parts via modules (such that you end up with the same
> functionality as generic kernel) vs having a kernel with all the modules
> built
> in?
>
> Also, is there anyway
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 287, Issue 16, Message: 8
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:39:08 +0200 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> Nicky Chorley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I downloaded the DVD ISO for FreeBSD 8.0 (i386) and verified the MD5
> > checksum before burning. With regards to choosing distributions
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:04:28 -0800 (PST), James Phillips
wrote:
> The Detailed 8.0 release notes don't say anything about bootability:
> 2.2.5 File Systems
> “dangerously dedicated” mode for the UFS file system
> is no longer supported
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases
Hi,
What are the pros and cons of building a stripped down kernel and loading all
the missing parts via modules (such that you end up with the same
functionality as generic kernel) vs having a kernel with all the modules built
in?
Also, is there anyway to detect if there are hardware without
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:12:45 +0100
> From: Polytropon
> Subject: Re: Dangerously Dedicated
> To: Maxim Khitrov
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <20091210031245.3fd58187.free...@edvax.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:41:40 -0500, Max
95 matches
Mail list logo