Any one else get FreeBSD installed on an R210? Is there a BIOS
setting that I need to check or something? I've spent about a week on
this and will need to return both R210s soon if I can't get them
working.
I've got loads of these and never had a problem, including 8.2-REL.
do the drives de
Thanks for your comments, tomorow morning will check it again, now is
normal . I was thinking on shutting it down but I guess it is better
to leave it running and even with the risk , the server will have
problems soon but I guess is better to tr to find how they did it
will go to sleep a
At 11:25 p.m. 26/05/2011, you wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez
wrote:
> I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing
is not that
> root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list of
> address...
Was the root account on the box actuall
At 11:27 p.m. 26/05/2011, Jon Radel wrote:
On 5/27/11 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello.
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing is not
that root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list
of address...
And what does it say in the logs? We'll he
On 5/27/11 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello.
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing is not
that root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list
of address...
And what does it say in the logs? We'll help you interpret them if you
wish, but righ
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem or what... thing is not that
> root receive email but that root was used to send email to a list of
> address...
Was the root account on the box actually used, or did someone spoof
email coming
Hello.
I am trying to find if sendmail was the problem
or what... thing is not that root receive email
but that root was used to send email to a list of address...
JB
At 11:07 p.m. 26/05/2011, you wrote:
I don't remember for sendmail but if you
install postfix root cannot receive any
email
I don't remember for sendmail but if you
install postfix root cannot receive any
email
Le 27/05/2011 05:03, Jorge Biquez a écrit :
Hello all.
Is it possible that the root user can be limited to send email only for
activities realetd to the server and only locally?
or
limit the amount of root
Hello all.
Is it possible that the root user can be limited to send email only
for activities realetd to the server and only locally?
or
limit the amount of root user can send.
I have a 7.3 small server working as secondary dns, 3 domains for
http and email. very few traffic. Using sendmail
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Gary Gatten wrote:
Your biggest consumers would be FBSD itself and the routing tables. I
*think* full internet routing tables are still less than 512MB, (google
to check), so unless you have more routes than that - 512MB may work,
1GB most likely will. Too many unknowns,
Your biggest consumers would be FBSD itself and the routing tables. I *think*
full internet routing tables are still less than 512MB, (google to check), so
unless you have more routes than that - 512MB may work, 1GB most likely will.
Too many unknowns, like; is this ipv4 only or 6 and 4 routes?
On May 26, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
> question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
How many DHCP leases and NAT clients?
ISC's DHCPd typically runs a few tens of MB unless you have
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
not much else. I expect the amount of traffic (throughput) to
On Thu, 26 May 2011 15:40:09 -0700
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On May 26, 2011, at 3:01 PM, David Banning wrote:
> > I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
>
> You've also got a FreeBSD installation which the ports tree does not
> support.
>
> > I wanted to install something fr
On May 26, 2011, at 3:01 PM, David Banning wrote:
> I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
You've also got a FreeBSD installation which the ports tree does not support.
> I wanted to install something from the ports, but I am getting
> this error on almost every port;
>
>
I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
I wanted to install something from the ports, but I am getting
this error on almost every port;
# make
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Extracting f
Jaime,
If you are using the on board controller, try changing the BIOS
settings between AHCI and ATA. An issue you may have with ATA, the
internal DVDROM may not work. I always had an external USB CDROM so I
can't say for certain.
Hope that helps.
Barrett W. Clark
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:16
On 05/26/11 15:16, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
I am attempting to install FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 from a CD onto a Dell
R210 server. When I boot and run fdisk from sysinstall (under
"Custom"), it tells me "No disks found!" and then points me to the
hardware guide. Nothing in the hardware guide really seems
I am attempting to install FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 from a CD onto a Dell
R210 server. When I boot and run fdisk from sysinstall (under
"Custom"), it tells me "No disks found!" and then points me to the
hardware guide. Nothing in the hardware guide really seems to apply.
Any one else get FreeBSD instal
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:44:16PM +0200, herbert langhans thus spake:
Hi Daemons,
recently some of the ports get stuck when I compile from the portstree
with #make install - it says '1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to
nbase/configure.rej'.
The portstree is updated, FreeBSD 7.2 on this l
On 05/26/11 17:29, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Hi,
zpool create is a destructive command to data on the disks, ie any
preexisting pool, but it would normally warn you if it found an
existing pool on the disks you are trying to use.
Run:
# zpool import
and it will scan any attached disks for
Hi Polytropon cc list,
I wrote:
>
> > > You could look at man fsdb
> >
> > FreeBSD offers a lot of versatile diagnostic and rescue
> > tools, and surely fsdb is one of them. Others, provided
> > by the base system, are "fetch -rR " and also
> > recoverdisk.
> >
> > In the ports collection you'll
Hi,
zpool create is a destructive command to data on the disks, ie any
preexisting pool, but it would normally warn you if it found an
existing pool on the disks you are trying to use.
Run:
# zpool import
and it will scan any attached disks for pools that are importable, if
it detects
Hi Daemons,
recently some of the ports get stuck when I compile from the portstree
with #make install - it says '1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to
nbase/configure.rej'.
The portstree is updated, FreeBSD 7.2 on this laptop, many other ports
are working.
I had such trouble with ports/graph
If a server has one interface to the Internet and another interface to a
switch connecting to a few other servers, it seems TCP's MSL value might
reasonably be set a lot lower on the private interface.
I'm specifically thinking of a lot of short MySQL connections between the
servers on the private
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
They were not, but I synced them both to the same time server. I don't use
Kerberos anyways, I use nss_ldap, so it didn't work.
Best regards,
Aleksander Steffensen
Den 26. mai 2011 kl. 14.42 skrev mcoyles:
>> Hello!
>
>> Yesterday I finally manage
hi,
i have a new fbsd-8.2 install (dual boot with win7, just desktop general use)
on entirely ufs disk, and am not
sure how to mount a zfs formatted disk from a previous install, without
loosing what is on there. (freebsd-zfs).
in short, the zfs disk was from a previous freebsd install, same v
> Hello!
> Yesterday I finally managed to get my FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE box to actually
authenticate to the Xserve, running Open > Directory on Mac OS X 10.5
Server. I was able to log in to the FreeBSD box (egil.kreativsone.no) as a
directory > > user via SSH and also via netatalk.
>
> Unfortunately,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Yesterday I finally managed to get my FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE box to actually
authenticate to the Xserve, running Open Directory on Mac OS X 10.5 Server. I
was able to log in to the FreeBSD box (egil.kreativsone.no) as a directory user
via SSH an
fuser(1) man page mentions the tool is supposed to list processes that
have specified named file(s) open. As there are several types of files
(according to stat(2)) it's not clear which are supported, e.g.
$ (mkfifo foo.fifo; cat <>foo.fifo) & nc -lU foo.socket &
$ fuser foo.*
foo.fifo:
fo
30 matches
Mail list logo
