Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots

2011-09-06 Thread krad
On 5 September 2011 16:58, Gene f...@brightstar.bomgardner.net wrote:

 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:35:34 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote
  --As of September 5, 2011 10:23:32 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have
  said:
 
   On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote
   --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have
 said:
  
Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot
 of
usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such
 as
path/zfs/.snapshot
  
   --As for the rest, it is mine.
  
   Try path/.zfs.  ;)
  
   (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds
   all the snapshots.)
  
   Daniel T. Staal
  
  
   No such luck. The following:
  
   cd /
   ls -R | grep -i zfs
  
   finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports.
  
   Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with
   zfs list -t snapshot.
 
  --As for the rest, it is mine.
 
  Don't check if the directory is there first.  It isn't.  Just 'cd'
  to it, and it will exist.
 
  Daniel T. Staal

 Well I'll be hornswaggled ... Thanks!


 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


as others have posted its hidden. This is for good reason though. Just
imagine you backup program trawling your 10 TB array that has 100 historical
snapshots. Suddenly you are backing up 1 PB 8(
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop.

2011-09-06 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 9/5/2011 11:58 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
 (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1
 (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration
 value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth
 value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc
 value=modp1024
 (vid: len=16 afcad71372a1f1c96b8696fc99570100)
 03:17:31.637424 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP
 (17), length 108)
 w.x.y.z.500  a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid  cookie -:
 phase 1 R ident:
 (sa: doi=ipsec situation=identity
 (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1
 (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration
 value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth
 value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc
 value=modp1024


OK, both sides are 3des, psk and sha1 dhgroup 1. Thats good.

 
 Note: a.b.c.d is my end. w.x.y.z is the other end. vid:, ke: and
 nonce: are scrambled.
 flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(aes)
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000,
 lorv=MD5
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5)
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method,


... yet, you have AES and md5 ?? where are those coming from ? Do you
have an extra config for the remote somewhere in your files perhaps that
is matching ?

---Mike

 remote w.x.y.z {
 exchange_mode main;
 proposal_check obey;
 
 proposal {
 encryption_algorithm 3des;
 hash_algorithm sha1;
 authentication_method pre_shared_key;
 dh_group modp1024;
 }
 }
 




-- 
---
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


fetchmail in system-wide mode

2011-09-06 Thread Xavier FreeBSD questions
Hello,

On the Internet there are some sites where they say to start fetchmail(1) in
system-wide should put these two options in rc.conf(5) :

fetchmail_enable=YES
fetchmail_polling_interval=60

Although the second is optional and at first has little to do with this
question because this question is addressed rather to the first option.

I searched in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and rc.conf(5) manual and find no
reference to these two options.

I have them in my rc.conf(5) but fetchmail(1) does not start automatically.

In /usr/src/UPDATING not found any reference to it.

Which is the correct way to start fetchmail(1) in system-wide?

Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


bb hang detected

2011-09-06 Thread Monkeyfoahead
Hello, periodically I get a ath0 bb hang detected resetting message on my 
console. When this happens, sometimes it sets my default route to 0.0.0.0/24. 
Is there a way to make my routing tables unchangeable? Or to stop the bb hang 
error?

Thanks___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: fetchmail in system-wide mode

2011-09-06 Thread Daniel Bye
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:10:50PM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote:
 Hello,
 
 On the Internet there are some sites where they say to start fetchmail(1) in
 system-wide should put these two options in rc.conf(5) :
 
 fetchmail_enable=YES
 fetchmail_polling_interval=60

This has worked for me in the past when I've needed fetchmail(1).

 
 Although the second is optional and at first has little to do with this
 question because this question is addressed rather to the first option.
 
 I searched in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and rc.conf(5) manual and find no
 reference to these two options.

This is to be expected. fetchmail(1) is a port, not part of the base system.


 
 I have them in my rc.conf(5) but fetchmail(1) does not start automatically.
 
 In /usr/src/UPDATING not found any reference to it.

Again, what you'd expect.

 
 Which is the correct way to start fetchmail(1) in system-wide?

Is fetchmail installed on your system? If so, and you still can't get it to
start automatically, try this:

 # script fetchmail_startup sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail start

You'll now have a file called `fetchmail_startup' which will contain a
record of exactly what the fetchmail rc script did as it executed, which may
or may not prove informative.

Dan

-- 
Daniel Bye
 _
  ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
 - against HTML, vCards and  X
- proprietary attachments in e-mail / \


pgpqwPjWkYetD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


ejabberd cannot be controlled with ejabberdctl

2011-09-06 Thread Vick Khera
A while ago I upgraded ejabberd from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8, and also updated
erlang to r14b03 (not sure the prior version, but it was an r14
release). Running on FreeBSD 8.2/i386.

Ever since the upgrade, I cannot use the ejabberdctl program to
control it. It always says Failed RPC connection to the node
ejabberd@lorax: nodedown.

The short host name of my server is lorax. If I log into the web
interface, it does show node ejabberd@lorax is running as the only
node.

Up until this upgrade I was able to use ejabberdctl just fine to
re-open logs and do clean shutdown. I searched the forums and mailing
lists and found basically that I need to ensure that when ejabberd
starts, it uses the same node name. I checked the start scripts and it
does indeed (and always has) explicitly set the node name to
ejabberd@lorax, so I'm pretty well stumped at this point. The only
tricky part of the config is that I bound the web interface to the
private IP of this machine, instead of the public (it has two NICs).

I'm using the FreeBSD port version of both erlang and ejabberd.

Any help would be appreciated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FW: cpio command and schg flags

2011-09-06 Thread joeb1


 I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree.
 mkdir /usr/test1
 cd /var
 find . | cpio -dmp  /usr/test1

 The result is  /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but
 all the schg flags get stripped off.

 How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory?

Did you copy under root? BSD cpio unlike GNU cpio does preserve file flags.

  $ cpio --version
  bsdcpio 2.8.4 -- libarchive 2.8.4

  $ find /lib | sudo cpio -dmp test
  56525 blocks

  $ ls -lo test/lib | awk '$5 != -'
  total 15595
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  schg 4440677 Sep  5 22:24 libc.so.7
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  schg  131655 Sep  5 22:24 libcrypt.so.5
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  schg  592241 Sep  5 22:24 libthr.so.3

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: A quality operating system

2011-09-06 Thread Michael Doyle
Lots of other people have given good answers. I'm just chiming in on  
points 3 and 7


On 20 Aug 2011, at 05:47, Evan Busch wrote:


What is a quality operating system?


I work as a database developer in an SME. I support end users on Mac  
OSX and Windows XP .. Windows Vista

clients, and Windows 2008, FreeBSD and SuSE linux servers.

Of these, the FreeBSD servers give least trouble.
For non-techie users, usually but not always the OS X people have  
fewer problems.



In his view, and now mine, a quality operating system is reliable,
streamlined and clearly organized.


That is hard to disagree with


(3) Horrible documentation.

This is my specialty and has been since the early 1980s. The FreeBSD
documentation is wordy, disorganized, inconsistent and highly
selective in what it mentions. It is not the product of professionals
but it also not the product of volunteers with a focus on
communication. It seems pro-forma, as in, it's in the documentation,
so don't bother me. The web site compounds this error by pointing us
in multiple directions instead of to a singular resource. It is bad
enough that man pages are separate from your main documentation tree,
but now you have doubled or trebled the workload required of you
without any benefit to the end user.


I personally find the documentation that comes as part of the install  
and the documentation on the
FreeBSD website EASIER to use and more complete than any alternatives  
I use on a regular basis.




(7) Disorganized website.


Again, what are you comparing it to?
I can often find my way to exactly the information I am looking for on  
the FreeBSD site using

the search tool and menu structure within that site.

To search for answers about Windows server, Windows desktop or OSX  
problems, I tend to rely
on external search engines (Bing, Google) to trawl through the sites,  
and it takes longer to find the answers

I need


Michael Doyle
mdo...@cooperationireland.org





--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Fbsd8
I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to 
issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.


How do I fix this?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote:
 I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to
 issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.
 
 How do I fix this?

Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a
new subdirectory writable by group wheel.  Either that, or teach your
user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop.

2011-09-06 Thread Mikhail Goriachev

Mike Tancsa wrote:
 On 9/5/2011 11:58 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
 (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1
 (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration
 value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth
 value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc
 value=modp1024
 (vid: len=16 afcad71372a1f1c96b8696fc99570100)
 03:17:31.637424 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto
 UDP
 (17), length 108)
 w.x.y.z.500  a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid  cookie -:
 phase 1 R ident:
 (sa: doi=ipsec situation=identity
 (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1
 (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration
 value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth
 value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc
 value=modp1024


 OK, both sides are 3des, psk and sha1 dhgroup 1. Thats good.


 Note: a.b.c.d is my end. w.x.y.z is the other end. vid:, ke: and
 nonce: are scrambled.
 flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(aes)
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000,
 lorv=MD5
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5)
 Sep  5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method,


 ... yet, you have AES and md5 ?? where are those coming from ? Do you
 have an extra config for the remote somewhere in your files perhaps that
 is matching ?


Nop. There're no extra files. The only thing the other guys gave me was:

Operation Mode: Tunnel (Net to Net)
Authentication Type: Pre shared secret
Phase 1: 3DES/SHA1, DH Group=2
Phase 2: 3DES/SHA1, PFS=no, DH Group=any

Based on that I got it working.

So, do you reckon the other end suddenly began advertising/requesting aes
and md5 instead of 3des and sha1?



   ---Mike

 remote w.x.y.z {
 exchange_mode main;
 proposal_check obey;

 proposal {
 encryption_algorithm 3des;
 hash_algorithm sha1;
 authentication_method pre_shared_key;
 dh_group modp1024;
 }
 }





 --
 ---
 Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
 Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
 Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
 Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/



-- 
Mikhail Goriachev
Webanoide

Mobile: +56 9 78772741
Web: www.webanoide.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:49:32 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 Either that, or teach your
 user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
 to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
 the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)

Just an addition: In regards of what sudo does, see super
(it's in the ports, same category as sudo). It allows a fine
control over _what_ commands can be executed.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Robert Bonomi
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Tue Sep  6 11:07:48 2011
 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:49:04 -0400
 From: Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com
 To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Cc: 
 Subject: wheel group  mkdir

 I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to 
 issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.

 How do I fix this?

First, figure out _why_ the user is getting that error. grin

exactly -what- executable named 'mkdir' are they trying to run?
  'which mkdir'
What are the permissions on that file
*WHERE* are they trying to create the file, and what are the permissions
on -that- directory?

Note: Including the _exact_ error message is a GOOD IDEA(tm).

There is a *SIGNIFICANT* difference between:
   $ mkdir foo
   mkdir: permission denied
and
   $ mkdir foo
   mkdir: foo: permission denied
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Fbsd8

Matthew Seaman wrote:

On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote:

I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to
issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.

How do I fix this?


Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a
new subdirectory writable by group wheel.  Either that, or teach your
user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)

Cheers,

Matthew



Matthew
	Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I 
su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get 
returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command 
embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man 
page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get 
su to work.


Thanks




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Jon Radel

On 9/6/11 7:13 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:


Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I su
and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get returned
to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command embedded
still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man page to
no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get su to work.


Since you're the one having the issue you wish to have resolved, you 
might want to take it upon yourself to tell us *exactly* what you're 
typing, what the results are, and what you'd prefer to have happen 
instead.  We can guess what you're doing when you say I su and get 
prompted for the user id's password after which I get returned to the 
command line, but given the root problem is that you don't fully 
understand the su command, it's hard to be certain what you mean by that.


Going out on a limb, however, I'll point out that, when you're logged in 
as fred


su - fred

doesn't do much for you as you remain fred, whereas, what was meant in 
the suggestion to you was something more along the lines of


su -

which, if you enter root's password, leaves you as root.  (Or gives you 
a shell with root's privileges to be a bit more precise.)


But, again, I'd suggest that this would go faster if you provide what 
you're doing and what the results are rather than what you think you're 
doing and what you think the results mean.


To recap: Cut and paste what's actually happening, not your summary of same.

--

--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com



Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 06 September 2011 15:13:48 Fbsd8 wrote:
 Matthew Seaman wrote:
  On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote:
  I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to
  issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.
  
  How do I fix this?
  
  Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a
  new subdirectory writable by group wheel.  Either that, or teach your
  user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
  to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
  the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)
  
  Cheers,
  
  Matthew
 
 Matthew
   Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I
 su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get
 returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command
 embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man
 page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get
 su to work.

user# su
Pass: root password
root#

Beech

-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
---



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: cpio command and schg flags

2011-09-06 Thread Fbsd8





I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree.
mkdir /usr/test1
cd /var
find . | cpio -dmp  /usr/test1

The result is  /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but
all the schg flags get stripped off.

How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory?


Did you copy under root? BSD cpio unlike GNU cpio does preserve file flags.

  $ cpio --version
  bsdcpio 2.8.4 -- libarchive 2.8.4

  $ find /lib | sudo cpio -dmp test
  56525 blocks

  $ ls -lo test/lib | awk '$5 != -'
  total 15595
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  schg 4440677 Sep  5 22:24 libc.so.7
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  schg  131655 Sep  5 22:24 libcrypt.so.5
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  schg  592241 Sep  5 22:24 libthr.so.3



I am running release 8.2 and
   $ cpio --version  returns
   bsdcpio 2.7.0 -- libarchive 2.7.0

This version seems not to copy the schg flag

maybe cpio got upgraded in release 9.0 which you must be running.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Fbsd8

Beech Rintoul wrote:

On Tuesday 06 September 2011 15:13:48 Fbsd8 wrote:

Matthew Seaman wrote:

On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote:

I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to
issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.

How do I fix this?

Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a
new subdirectory writable by group wheel.  Either that, or teach your
user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)

Cheers,

Matthew

Matthew
Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I
su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get
returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command
embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man
page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get
su to work.


user# su
Pass: root password
root#

Beech



Thank you Beech.
I was entering the password of the user.
When I entered root's password the script containing mkdir worked.

One remaining question. Is there any time limit on having root access?
I mean will root access remain until the user exits?

Thanks again




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


SV: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Hasse Hansson

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] På vegne af Fbsd8
Sendt: den 7 september 2011 01:14
Til: Matthew Seaman
Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Emne: Re: wheel group  mkdir

Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote:
 I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to
 issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.

 How do I fix this?
 
 Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a
 new subdirectory writable by group wheel.  Either that, or teach your
 user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
 to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
 the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)
 
   Cheers,
 
   Matthew
 

Matthew
Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group.
I 
su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get 
returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command 
embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man 
page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get 
su to work.

Thanks

Hello.

If I've got the correct impression of it, to be in the wheel group, able you
to su to root, meaning get root privilieges.
BUT you have to know and use the root password.
If you have installed the sudo port, which is very easy to config, just by
removing some hash # marks some common privilieges of the wheel group, to
obtain almost root power configurable by you. And also configuarable is,
if you like the group to use their own passwords or none, just belonging to
the wheel group, when issuing the sudo command.
According to my humble understanding, just belonging to the wheel group
without further configuration, don't get you much more. 

/Hasse


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: SV: wheel group mkdir

2011-09-06 Thread Fbsd8

Hasse Hansson wrote:

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] På vegne af Fbsd8
Sendt: den 7 september 2011 01:14
Til: Matthew Seaman
Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Emne: Re: wheel group  mkdir

Matthew Seaman wrote:

On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote:

I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to
issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error.

How do I fix this?

Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a
new subdirectory writable by group wheel.  Either that, or teach your
user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root.  (Adding users
to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is
the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.)

Cheers,

Matthew



Matthew
Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group.
I 
su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get 
returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command 
embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man 
page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get 
su to work.


Thanks

Hello.

If I've got the correct impression of it, to be in the wheel group, able you
to su to root, meaning get root privilieges.
BUT you have to know and use the root password.
If you have installed the sudo port, which is very easy to config, just by
removing some hash # marks some common privilieges of the wheel group, to
obtain almost root power configurable by you. And also configuarable is,
if you like the group to use their own passwords or none, just belonging to
the wheel group, when issuing the sudo command.
According to my humble understanding, just belonging to the wheel group
without further configuration, don't get you much more. 


/Hasse



Thank you Hasse

You gave me the solution. I was entering the password of the user and 
should have been entering the root password.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)

2011-09-06 Thread Antonio Olivares
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
 In the last episode (Sep 05), Antonio Olivares said:
 Dear folks,

 sorry to bother you guys, but I am encountering a problem updating I
 need 4 ports only, but can't get past the error above:

 Building new INDEX files... done.

       === New version available: ca_root_nss-3.12.11_1
       === New version available: gtk-2.24.6
       === New version available: gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.6
       === New version available: firefox-6.0.1,1
 === 402 total installed ports
       === 4 have new versions available
 grullahighschool# portmaster -a
 ===  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
 ===  Found saved configuration for ca_root_nss-3.12.9
 = nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in 
 /usr/ports/distfiles//.
 = Attempting to fetch  
 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz
 fetch: 
 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz:
  No address record

 This is your main problem; you aren't able to resolve ftp.mozilla.org for
 some reason.  The other sites are mirrors that either aren't mirroring the
 security subdirectory, or haven't updated their mirror recently enough to
 have a copy of that file.

 I tried to get the file manually, but it does not exist.  Thanks for
 advice/suggestions/comments.

 It definitely does exist at the above url.  Since you seem to be having DNS
 issues, try putting

        63.245.209.137  ftp.mozilla.org

 in your /etc/hosts file and try fetching again, since that's what
 ftp.mozilla.org currently resolves to.  Remember to remove the line after
 fetching, since the IP may change later.

 http://www.robtex.com/dns/ftp.mozilla.org#records

 --

Thank you very much Dan :)  Adding the line to /etc/hosts does get the
package and installs it.  I am updated to latest.  Appreciate the
help.

Regards,

Antonio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis?

2011-09-06 Thread Frank Shute
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:

 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
  How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD 
  web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also 
  and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)?
 
 Quite well - as long as you're satisfied with the default
 building options. You know that a binary package is a port,
 compiled with the default set of options. This is okay in
 most cases, but there may be situations where you explicitely
 need to enable or disable a certain feature at compile time.
 
 You also may encounter a situation where _no_ package is
 available for a port (e. g. too many options, or licensing
 restrictions).
 
 This can be solved by portmaster which has an option to
 go through all interactive configuration screens _before_
 starting any action. Those settings can be saved for the
 next update run.
 
 The portmaster program itself can be instructed to _use_
 binary packages (just as pkg_add -r would do) with the -P
 and -PP options. In this case, binary packages will be
 used as long as possible, and only those ports that
 require building (as no package exists) will be compiled.
 See man portmaster for details.
 
 This is a good approach in combination with freebsd-update.
 I have used that concept on some servers myself (especially
 on smaller ones with low resources where compiling would
 be too problematic).
 
 
 
  I noticed that in 
  the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring 
  more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being 
  updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow 
  to avoid more such user intervention?
 
 Yes. All dependencies would be incorporated automatically.
 Only ports without equivalent package that additionally have
 OPTIONS to set would invoke a configuration screen, and this
 screen would have to be dealt with only in the first run of
 the updating process.
 
 There are also options for portmaster that can be used to
 control program behaviour in case of problems (e. g. some
 package not found, conflicting ports, versioning problem,
 or port marked broken).
 
 Those solutions can also easily be scripted, e. g. check
 one a week for possible updates and get the packages, but
 do not install them automatically (which can be a security
 requirement). If the list is approved, the updates will
 be installed during night, creating a fallback copy just
 in case something went wrong (e. g. malfunctioning new
 software). Reports can be generated automatically and mailed
 to the system administrator.
 
 I would also suggest to frequently check the mailing lists
 of the software in use for bugs and security updates that
 might be interesting in terms of system security. This sould
 be done for any major server software (Apache, PHP, MySQL
 and the services utilizing those software, whatever you
 want to run on the server).
 

I'd recommend installing ports-mgmt/portaudit to keep an eye out on
any vulnerabilities that require an update of the ports/packages.

Personally, I'd go for ports rather than packages.

As long as your friend reads /usr/ports/UPDATING and he uses either
portupgrade or portmaster, he shouldn't go too far wrong.

Also couldn't your friend give you a key for his server so that you
can ssh into it and fix things if it goes wrong?


Regards,

-- 

 Frank

 Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html




pgpCyzp8FB6dy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: fetchmail in system-wide mode

2011-09-06 Thread Xavier FreeBSD questions
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote:

Hi Daniel,

 On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:10:50PM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote:
  Hello,
 
  On the Internet there are some sites where they say to start
fetchmail(1) in
  system-wide should put these two options in rc.conf(5) :
 
  fetchmail_enable=YES
  fetchmail_polling_interval=60

 This has worked for me in the past when I've needed fetchmail(1).

 
  Although the second is optional and at first has little to do with this
  question because this question is addressed rather to the first option.
 
  I searched in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and rc.conf(5) manual and find no
  reference to these two options.

 This is to be expected. fetchmail(1) is a port, not part of the base
system.


 
  I have them in my rc.conf(5) but fetchmail(1) does not start
automatically.
 
  In /usr/src/UPDATING not found any reference to it.

 Again, what you'd expect.

 
  Which is the correct way to start fetchmail(1) in system-wide?

 Is fetchmail installed on your system? If so, and you still can't get it
to
 start automatically, try this:

  # script fetchmail_startup sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail start

 You'll now have a file called `fetchmail_startup' which will contain a
 record of exactly what the fetchmail rc script did as it executed, which
may
 or may not prove informative.


I paste the fetchmail_startup in: http://pastebin.com/vFqdhwfg

For you, the answer of why don't worked for me fetchmail is lines 502 and
503 ?

Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Can someone help me with Ghostscript9?

2011-09-06 Thread Scott Ballantyne
Hello,

Trying to build ghostscript9 it fails because it is unable to make

./obj/../soobj/ld.tr.

I've looked in UPDATING and also googled, with no luck. I've appended
the output from make at the end.

Thanks in advance
Scott



gmake[1]: Entering directory 
`/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02'
./obj/../soobj/genconf ./obj/../soobj/devs.tr -h /dev/stdout -p %ss -pl 
-l%ss -pL -L%ss -ol ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr | awk 'BEGIN{j=0; p=1;} 
/jpeg_device/ {if(j++  0) p=0;} // {if(p==1) { print; } else { p=1 } }'  
./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h
Can't open /dev/stdout for output.
./obj/../soobj/echogs -a ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h 
rm -f ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c
rm -f ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.h
cp ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.h
cp ./base/gconf.c ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c
cc  -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT   -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN 
-DHAVE_SETLOCALE -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g 
-fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I.  
-I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/lcms/include  
-I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/jasper/src/libjasper/include
  -I/usr/local/include/libpng  -I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include/freetype2  -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings 
-Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-builtin -fno-common 
-DHAVE_STDINT_H -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE=unsigned long int -O2 
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DUSE_LIBICONV_GNU -DGS_DEVS_SHARED 
-DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/9.02\ -fPIC -I./obj/../soobj 
-I./base  -o ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.o -c ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c
./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c:189: warning: no previous prototype for 
'gs_lib_register_device'
rm -f ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.c
cp ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.h
cp ./psi/iconf.c ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.c
cc  -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT   -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN 
-DHAVE_SETLOCALE -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g 
-fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I.  
-I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/lcms/include  
-I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/jasper/src/libjasper/include
  -I/usr/local/include/libpng  -I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include/freetype2  -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings 
-Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-builtin -fno-common 
-DHAVE_STDINT_H -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE=unsigned long int -O2 
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DUSE_LIBICONV_GNU -DGS_DEVS_SHARED 
-DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/9.02\ -I./psi 
-I./obj/../soobj -I./obj/../soobj -I./base  -o ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.o -c 
./obj/../soobj/iconfig.c
./obj/../soobj/echogs -w ./obj/../soobj/ldt.tr -n - cc -L/usr/local/lib 
-L/usr/local/lib -shared -Wl,-soname=libgs.so.9 -o ./bin/../sobin/libgs.so.9.02
./obj/../soobj/echogs -a ./obj/../soobj/ldt.tr -n -s ./obj/../soobj/gsromfs0.o 
./obj/../soobj/gs.o -s
cat ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr ./obj/../soobj/ldt.tr
cat: ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr: No such file or directory
gmake[1]: *** [bin/../sobin/libgs.so.9.02] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory 
`/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02'
gmake: *** [so] Error 2
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org