I have installed 9.0-RELEASE on this motherboard with the following
brief results:
$ cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64)
Installed devices:
pcm0: (play/rec) default
pcm1: (play/rec)
pcm2: (play)
pcm3: (play)
pcm4: (play)
$
The devices /dev/dsp0, /dev/dsp1 e
Warren Block wrote:
[dd]
> >>> I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I really need to? Is
> >>> anything else advisable?
> >>
> >> If it's not aligned, there can be a pretty significant performance
> >> drop. Please show the output of 'gpart show' on that drive if it's GPT
> >> (gpa
On 06/01/12 00:00, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an err
On Friday 01 June 2012 03:29:40 Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> I ddon't see any advantage in FreeBSD 8.x or earlier.
Well, I still see complains about a few quirks in 9 here in the list,
specially after certain src updates.
Re:Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148
Re: kern/168190
On Friday 01 June 2012 04:25:12 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
> >> Hiya
> >>
> >> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
> >> on the FreeBSD ports.
> >>
> >> To show you what I mean.
>
On 05/31/12 16:16, Polytropon wrote:
> Impedance and level mismatch would be the typical reason
> for this. But basically, it's not _much_ worse than using
> an internal analog connection.
Probably ok if you soldered it up so you didn't have the mismatch from crappy
high impedance plug-in connec
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 20:55:00 +0200
Dwayne Henderson wrote:
DH> I run this Ruby script 24/7 (records data from this live stream).
DH> It runs inside a screen though, so it's easy to check in on it
DH> every once in a while.
DH>
DH> But how do I crontab the screen with the script inside it? It
I run this Ruby script 24/7 (records data from this live stream). It runs
inside a screen though, so it's easy to check in on it every once in a
while.
But how do I crontab the screen with the script inside it? It has to be
with a "don't run it if it's already running" check.
So far I have this (
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Rick Miller wrote:
> BCM5720
I haven't gotten this working on my Dell R620 via bge(4), but we are
actively working on it.
Sean
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Thanks, Michael!
I took a look at the manpage and it does appear that it is supported
by the bge driver. It also states that the 572x controller is also
supported, but I heard a rumor stating that the BCM5720 in particular
did not work even though the manpage indicates it is supported. I was
una
> Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
> doesn't have any software bugs you may be right.
That was part of their assumption. It's based on server grade hardware and
ECC RAM, and lots of redundancy.
They missed the part about their code not being perfect.
>
On 06/01/12 04:01, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> My goal is to get it recognized on one of the two USB3 ports I have.
> All I get there is
> Jun 1 11:43:45 hal9000 kernel: ugen4.2: at usbus4
> Jun 1 11:43:45 hal9000 kernel: umass0: 0/0, rev 3.00/1.00, addr 1> on usbus4
> and after 100 seconds:
>
On 06/01/12 10:51, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 05/31/12 17:59, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>From Gary Aitken :
>>
>>> I've got an HP printer directly connected to the local network.
>>
>>> hp-probe finds it:
>>
>>> #hp-probe -bnet
>>
>>> HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.12.2)
>>> Printer
On 06/01/12 13:06, Rick Miller wrote:
> Thanks, Jack!
>
> Also another support question for the listsIs the Broadcom BCM5719
> supported? I can find neither in the hardware notes for 8.3 nor 9.0.
man bge
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> I have an HP LaserJet M1212nf MFP, and hplip/hp-setup in FreeBSD finds the
> printer all right when connected by Ethernet, but then fails on installing
> the required binary plugin. Printer is not detected at all when connected
> by USB.
>
Thanks, Jack!
Also another support question for the listsIs the Broadcom BCM5719
supported? I can find neither in the hardware notes for 8.3 nor 9.0.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, it is supported in the ixgbe driver.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM,
On 05/31/12 17:59, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> From Gary Aitken :
>
>> I've got an HP printer directly connected to the local network.
>
>> hp-probe finds it:
>
>> #hp-probe -bnet
>
>> HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.12.2)
>> Printer Discovery Utility ver. 4.1
>> ...
>>Device UR
Yes, it is supported in the ixgbe driver.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I did not see the Intel 82599ES chipset in the hardware release notes
> for 8.3 or 9.0. Are these controllers supported at this time?
>
> --
> Take care
> Rick Miller
> _
Le 01/06/2012 ? 18:17:38+0200, Wojciech Puchar a écrit
>
> i dare not to agree about "very fast". very fast is relative term. how did
> you configured your storage?
>
> trivial test:
>
> make 10 100GB files (so none fits in RAM) by
>
> for x in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9;do ( dd if=/dev/zero of=test
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
I've Dell R610 + 48 Go Ram, 2x 6 core + 4 * MD1200 (36*3T + 12*2T)
[root@filer ~]# zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
filer 119T 35,4T 83,9T 29% 1.00x ONLINE -
[root@filer ~]#
Work very fine (I can
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
Better=random read performance of single drive.
What an entirely useless performance measure!
if random read performance is a useless measure for you then i really
cannot help you. sorry.
__
Are you running FreeBSD 9?
Most of the LSI drivers officially support 8.2, but I don't see any
indication of later updates.
I presume all work OK with 9.0 ... yes?
... oscar.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 01/06/2012 ? 11:36:02-0400, Oscar Hodgson a écrit
> Hi,
>
> I
Thank you for bringing up this topic.
We've got significant experience with both UFS and ZFS (as delivered
by Solaris). Our internal testing has shown that UFS provides
significantly better throughput, roughly 20% to 30% higher in general,
and 50% higher in some specific use cases.
My internal c
Le 01/06/2012 ? 11:36:02-0400, Oscar Hodgson a écrit
Hi,
I use a LSI SAS 9200-8e 8 port Low Profile
It's working well, I got
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 122 9 avr 10:30 /dev/da0
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 176 9 avr 10:30 /dev/da1
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 192 9 avr
In the last episode (Jun 01), Wojciech Puchar said:
> > and unbelievable narrow cases, when you don't have or can't access a
> > backup (which you should have even when using ZFS), and you _need_ to do
> > some forensic analysis on disks, ZFS seems to be a worse solution than
> > UFS. On ZFS, you
Hi All,
I did not see the Intel 82599ES chipset in the hardware release notes
for 8.3 or 9.0. Are these controllers supported at this time?
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
Albert,
What are you using for an HBA in the Dell?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> I've Dell R610 + 48 Go Ram, 2x 6 core + 4 * MD1200 (36*3T + 12*2T)
>
> [root@filer ~]# zpool list
> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
> filer 119T 35,4T 83,9T
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> ZFS is somehow in that part similar to Amiga "Fast" File System. when you
> overwrite a directory block (by hardware fault for example), everything
> below that directory will disappear. You may not be even aware of it until
> you need that
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> Better=random read performance of single drive.
What an entirely useless performance measure! Maybe you should
restrict yourself to
using SSDs, which have rather unbeatable random read performance - the
spindle speed
is really high. ;-)
_
As for ZFS being dangerous, we have a score of drive-years with no loss of
data. The lack of fsck is considered in this intelligently written piece
you are just lucky.
before i would start using anything new in such important part as
filesystem, i do extreme test, ssimulate hardware faults, ra
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> I do _not_ want to try to claim a "ZFS inferiority due to
> missing backups", but there may be occassions where (except
> performance), low-level file system aspects of UFS might be
> superior to using ZFS.
If you have an operational need for o
and unbelievable narrow cases, when you don't have or can't
access a backup (which you should have even when using ZFS),
and you _need_ to do some forensic analysis on disks, ZFS
seems to be a worse solution than UFS. On ZFS, you never
can predict where the data will go. Add several disks to
tru
level?
It was my impression that ZFS doesn't actually format the disk as
does any filesystem "format" a disk?
disks are nowadays factory formatted.
filesystem only write data and it's metadata on it.
I really recommend you to get basic knowledge of how (any) filesystem
works.
THEN pleas
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:05:57 +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
> It was my impression that ZFS doesn't actually format the disk as
> stores data as raw information on the hard disk directly rather then
> using an actual "file system" structure as such.
In worst... in ultra-worst abysmal inexpected exception
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem check utility
because it "never crash" is funny.
zfs scrub...???
when starting means crash quickly?
Well.. no.
Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
d
>
>> Additionally ZFS works directly at the block level of the HD meaning
>> that it is slightly different to the 'normal' file systems in storing
>> information and is also "self healing"..
>
>
> doesn't other filesystem work on block level too? if no - then at what
> level?
>
>
It was my imp
Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem check utility
because it "never crash" is funny.
zfs scrub...???
when starting means crash quickly?
Well.. no.
Certainly with computers that never have hardware faults and assuming ZFS
doesn't have any software bugs you may be right.
>
> and definitely do not use it if you will not have regular backups of all
> data, as in case of failures (yes they do happen) you will just have no
> chance to repair it.
>
> There is NO fsck_zfs! And ZFS is promoted as it "doesn't need" it.
>
> Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline file
Hello.
2012/05/30 17:04:42 +0400 Peter Vereshagin => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
PV> xterm works for me in my mutt under tmux, ask me if you need to tweak
locale ( I see his L char with the '/' over it in place, and the cyrilic
letters in my other mail, too )
PV>
PV> mlterm is better f
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:30:37PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >On ia64 r231193 I get:
> >
> ># netstat -r
> >netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
> >
> >What's the problem?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
>
> For jail environment this means that /dev is not mounted.
I'm sure I've
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On ia64 r231193 I get:
# netstat -r
netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
What's the problem?
Thanks
For jail environment this means that /dev is not mounted.
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
On ia64 r231193 I get:
# netstat -r
netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
What's the problem?
Thanks
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
__
Hi Wojciech et al,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
# > # mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/da5s1 /mnt
# > mount_ntfs: /dev/da5s1: Invalid argument
# > )
# your dmesg shows drive is properly detected.
Yes, but this was only on a USB2 (two) port, and just an auxiliary
infor
I have recompiled the kernel with "device ada" and put ahci_load="YES" in
/boot/loader.conf.
you don't need ada driver for USB disk. anyway you need it for your SATA
disk to make things fast.
and mounting it works. Obviously, for the disk the device nodes aren't
created...
Is there somethin
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests) is 5 to 6MB.
5-6MB = megabytes per second? megabytes per hour? per year?
be more precise.
Without the vpn I'm having 45-50 MB... My vpn service has servers in
do
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE (pc-bsd 9.0 actuallly) on amd64 and
I'm using a vpn connexion.
My problem is the enormous speed loss i'm having when I'm using the
vpn connexion.
I have tried Openvpn and mpd5 (with a pptp and l2pt connexion) and the
max speed (according to various speedtests) i
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:14:08PM -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
...
# I think you also need xhci driver in kernel config. xhci is for USB 3.0.
It's there. As I said, using a USB 3 *Stick* works fine. It is recogized as 3.0
and the speed is as expected. It's the *Disk* that is not recognized. They
On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
>> Hiya
>>
>> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
>> on the FreeBSD ports.
>>
>> To show you what I mean.
>>
>> [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch upda
On Thursday 31 May 2012 11:06:24 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I contacted my Internet service provider, Insight Cable, about the problem,
> and they need a copy of any message that bounces, so they can see what went
> awry.
I had the same problem a while ago with my ISP (Plusnet). Standard response
fr
I'm not using as huge a dataset, but I was seeing this behavior as well when
I first set my box up. What was happening was that ZFS was caching *lots* of
writes, and then would dump them all to disk at once, during which time the
computer was completely occupied with the disk I/O.
The solutio
I am also in charge of redesigning one of our virtual SAN's to a
FreeBSD ZFS storage system which will run well how many JBOD's can
you fit on the system?? Probably round ~100TB or so.
quite a bit more without buying overpriced things
___
free
48TB each, roughly. There would be a couple of units. The pizza
boxes would be used for computational tasks, and nominally would have
8 cores and 96G+ RAM.
Obvious questions are hardware compatibility and stability. I've set
up small FreeBSD 9 machines with ZFS roots and simple mirrors for
oth
# mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/da5s1 /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/da5s1: Invalid argument
)
your dmesg shows drive is properly detected.
seems like ntfs driver doesn't work OR MBR is't properly handled.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
> Hiya
>
> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
> on the FreeBSD ports.
>
> To show you what I mean.
>
> [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
> pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch inst
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen on the
FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install
auditfile.tbz 100
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
> WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
>
> When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
>
> I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
>
> If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
>
On 01/06/2012 00:32, Gene wrote:
> Actually, I did just as above except using portmanager.. Tried deleting the
> two packages & tried again with portmaster. Still no luck. So I deleted them
> again and installed from packages. mysql-client-5.4.. installed lib/mysql/
> libmysqlclient.so.18, but my
On 29 May 2012 20:06, wrote:
> Hello,
> I am moving away from MS products due to security a nd stability
> concerns. Below are the machines I use and would like to know which
> version of FreeBSD will work best with each. The computer s are used
> at home and away, for e-mail, prepa
58 matches
Mail list logo
