- Original Message -
From: Jud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James A. Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: Dual booting FreeBSD and Windows XP - PROBLEM
On Fri
from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
$cmd 65000 allow ip from any to any
$cmd 65535 deny log all ip from any to any
This ruleset allows me establish passive ftp from any machine behind
the firewall, including accomplishing CVSUP.
So far I haven't had any problems with security.
HTH
Jim Coulter
--
James
of my neck standup.
Is this normal? If so, what the heck is it?
Or have I been rooted?
Thanks!
Jim
--
James A. Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jacoulter.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
a newbie, *nix is still a very strange and wonderous
creature to me, and sometimes in my excitement I forget my mailing list
ettiquette.
To all the other newbies out there: Google and the FreeBSD handbook are
our best friends.
Jim
--
James A. Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jacoulter.net
I am running FreeBSD 4.10 and am trying to connect to my Cox ISP via a an
Ethernet nic and cable modem.
I have DHCP for the nic enabled in /etc/rc.conf and can obtain an IP address
from my Windows 98 gateway, but when I connect the nic to the cable modem
and reboot I do not get a response from
to happen is that the cable modem
itself latches on (so to speak) to the MAC address of the nic you're
using. Usually, all that is required is to power cycle the cable modem
and it should see the new nic and you'll be able to get your DHCP
response.
HTH.
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:10:41 -0500, James
Your cd burner software should have an option to create a cd from an image.
This is different than just copying files to a bland cd-rom. Look in the
'File' drop-down menu.
Don't feel bad - I made the same mistake and posted the same question on
this board about two years ago.
P.S. Google is
I am trying to setup my FreeBSD 4.10 box as an internet gateway for a small
home LAN (2x Win XP and 1x Win 98SE)
The LAN operates without any problems when using the Win 98SE box as a
gateway - all computers can access the internet
I have two nics installed in the FreeBSD box:
dc0 is
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:51:21AM -0500, James A. Coulter wrote:
I am trying to setup my FreeBSD 4.10 box as an internet gateway for a
small home LAN (2x Win XP and 1x Win 98SE)
The LAN operates without any problems when using the Win 98SE box as a
gateway - all computers can
I am setting up a firewall for a gateway/router running FreeBSD 4.10.
This is for a small home LAN.
I have already compiled and installed a custom kernel with the IPFIREWALL
and IPDIVERT options and configured the firewall to pass any to any without
any problems - now it's time to start locking
Thanks - I'm going to give the Stateful + NATD rule set a try.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JJB
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:20 AM
To: James A. Coulter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DHCP and the SIMPLE option in /etc
I am using FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router for a small home LAN. My
outside interface (dc1) is connected to a cable modem and is configured for
DHCP.
I have compiled and installed a custome kernel with IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT
options and with a rule set allowing any to any with no problems
I
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JJB
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 1:20 PM
To: James A. Coulter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
Change this ipfw rule from
5 allow ip from any to any via xl0
To
5 allow ip from any
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James A. Coulter
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
Thanks for the response. . .
I changed rule 5 from x10 to dc0 - thanks
To: James A. Coulter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
Look back at the ipfw sample rule set and you will see that
there are both udp and tcp protocol access to DSN. Also not
that udp does not use setup keyword.
# Allow out access to my ISP's
I recently got my firewall up and configured (many thanks to JJB and everyone else for
their help) and have been reading the daily security message from root with a great
deal of interest.
My question is, when I see entries like this:
Aug 5 17:55:54 sara sshd[2099]: Failed password for root
Checked /var/log/security this morning and found these entries:
Aug 4 09:00:45 sara /kernel: ipfw: limit 10 reached on entry 500
Aug 5 07:45:38 sara /kernel: drop session, too many entries
Aug 5 17:54:32 sara /kernel: drop session, too many entries
Aug 5 17:55:55 sara last message repeated 9
This message has been showing up in /var/log/security:
Aug 6 01:56:44 sara /kernel: drop session, too many entries
Aug 6 16:40:05 sara /kernel: drop session, too many entries
Aug 7 13:25:23 sara /kernel: drop session, too many entries
Aug 7 15:32:00 sara
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 04:39:58PM +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:46:47PM -0500, James A. Coulter wrote:
This message has been showing up in /var/log/security:
Aug 6 01:56:44 sara /kernel: drop session, too many entries
Aug 6 16:40:05 sara /kernel
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:01:51PM +0200, Volker Kindermann wrote:
Hi James,
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 03:36:31PM +0800, AETCH wrote:
I have install freebsd 4.x,and have two netcards.
I want it as getway.
I have config gateway_enable=YES in rc.conf,and then reboot.
[a pc][freebsd]---[b pc]
After reboot , I try to use a pc to ping b pc ,it`s not work ,but a
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:04:48AM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Jason Lieurance wrote:
Hello,
Late couple days on our Freebsd 4.7 email/web server I've got this message
in the
nightly cron jobs:
Checking setuid files and devices:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
nfs_server_enable=YES
sendmail_enable=NONE
sshd_enable=YES
usbd_enable=YES
ntpd_enable=YES
inetd_enable=YES
gateway_enable=YES
natd_enable=YES
natd_interface=dc1
natd_flags=-dynamic
apache_enable=YES
--
James A. Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jacoulter.net
4.11-STABLE itself (scheduled date is 24 January 2005 - release schedule
here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.11R/schedule.html)
HTH
Jim
--
James A. Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jacoulter.net
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
James A. Coulter wrote:
Paul wrote:
hi,
i currently installed 4.10-release and cvsup to get -stable but it
gave me
4.11-prelease is there a current tag
that allow me to get 4.10-stable?
regards,
paul
The same thing happened to me. After some googling, I found this:
RELENG_4 marks the 4-STABLE
26 matches
Mail list logo
