On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:33 -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
2) Why is the website wrong?
DNS not working right for you, perhaps?
Bad proxy? Path MTU lossage? PEBCAK? :-)
[Sigh] This is what I get for failing to post
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:38:50PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:15:59 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Unable to confirm:
snip
Okay. Now I'm really bewildered. But apparently the problem is on my
Mac.
On a lark, I tried another system. This one is my OpenBSD
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:34:57AM -0600, Gunter Wambaugh wrote:
Is there any way to get java on sparc64?
Not at this time.
Kris
pgprmLvaZdqUC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 05:10:25PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all
the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on
CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements;
Since the full
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 04:09:46PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote:
I installed GCC 4.1 twice, thinking I just missed it. I can't find any
of the gcj tools on my BSD 6 box. I made extra double sure that Java was
compiled into GCC, but the gcj tools are nowhere to be found.
Am I doing something
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote:
I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and noticed the introduction of
option SCHED_ULE for supporting multi-processor environments.
However, I understood that using SCHED_ULE with only one CPU can also
improve performance
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:44:07AM +0100, Daniel A. wrote:
If you wish to use FreshPorts, all you need is an account. If your
registered
email address is @FreeBSD.org, you will see the opt-in link on the right
hand
side of the webpages. For those of you who already have a
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:19:10AM +0100, Angel Blazquez wrote:
Hello,
We are expecting incredible overload in a NFS server. A top shows nfsd
consuming most of the CPU:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
6000 root -80 1204K 660K
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:11:02PM -0800, James Long wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:35:19PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:50:49PM -0800, James Long wrote:
[snip]
What do I need to fix to be able to use a RAM-backed filesystem?
From
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:03:12PM +0100, K??vesd??n G??bor wrote:
RW wrote:
On Saturday 17 December 2005 07:54, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Well, if you really think you want this, then just:
cd /usr/ports
make fetch
Just idle curiosity, but does anyone have a feeling for how
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:59:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Saturday 17 December 2005 07:54, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Well, if you really think you want this, then just:
cd /usr/ports
make fetch
Just idle curiosity, but does anyone have a feeling for how much that would
download
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:12:39PM -0800, James Long wrote:
Message: 20
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 02:01:37 -0500
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Download the whole ports tree
To: Simon Maginnity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:18:11PM +, Dieter wrote:
How does one provide one or two devices, e.g. /dev/null
for a chroot environment?
Device nodes created by mknod do not work.
mount_devfs creates an entire device tree, negating
the security of the chroot.
See the jail manpage (jail
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:30:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ebay Item #6574118600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/15 Thu PM 11:28:35 EST
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Ebay Auction Win
Dear CatBecca,
I won you Ebay Auction for a Jolly N- Bank. I
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:32:33PM +1100, Simon Maginnity wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have unlimited bandwidth for the next month or so and
will not have access to the net again for a few month?s after January. What
I would like to do is grab a copy of the whole freeBSD ports
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I guess this means my new server is only using one of my CPUs?
esmtp# grep CPU /var/log/dmesg.today
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2399.33-MHz 686-class CPU)
Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs
cpu0: ACPI CPU (2 Cx
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:17:01PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
When installing the same software using either the ports or a package
do they both install in the same locations? For Example installing
Apache from ports on one server and installing Apache from packages on
another server would
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:00:13PM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 14:54 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I guess this means my new server is only using one of my CPUs?
esmtp# grep CPU /var/log
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:50:39PM -0700, Bob Lee wrote:
Quoting Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here's my top procs:
last pid: 2079; load averages: 8.31, 8.91, 8.43up 0
+00:35:15 20:57:53
149 processes: 13 running, 136 sleeping
Robert,
FWIW, I did some research
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:33:49AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
But thats not even the point. The point is that the purpose of
tearing apart 4.x was to go MP, and MP
performance is dismill across the board.
This statement is simply false. It's actually
quite funny to read.
Whats
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:09:29AM +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Hi!
Can someone tell me in plain words what will I gain if I upgrade my server
from 5.4 to 6.0?
An improvement in filesystem performance of up to an order of
magnitude, depending on your hardware.
Kris
pgppxeWPbP2oP.pgp
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:00:42PM +, David Gerard wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
I vote for
Look what they've done to my song, Ma - a
commentary on the destruction of the (formally)
world's best operating system.
So far I'm
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 09:02:40PM +, David Gerard wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The thing you have to remember about Denial is that the ONLY THING he
cares about in an OS is how fast it can route network packets. The
major improvements in other areas of FreeBSD are of absolutely
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:14:18PM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
Well thats just hogwash Kris. Pure bridging
performance is a measure of the efficiency of the
kernel to do rote tasks like respond to
interrupts, and the latencies in performing those
tasks. Its the best way, IMO, to exercise and
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:34:23PM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
But anyway, FreeBSD 6.0 is hugely superior to 5.4 and 4.11 in
filesystem performance. I have been measuring this carefully for the
past couple of months and hope to have the paper out soon.
For instance in 5.4 the fastest I could
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:41:00AM -0500, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Recently installed 6.0 on a new server. Never had a problem with a /usr FS
at 2.0 Gig before, but this one seems to be filling up fast. make clean
already done on ports, what else am I missing here?
DOnt really want to
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:47:53PM +0430, Lee Harr wrote:
When I plug in some usb drives, I get a message that the da0 device
is available and I can mount the drive, but sometimes I just see this:
Dec 8 12:46:12 tern /kernel: umass0: LEXAR MEDIA JUMPDRIVE ELITE, rev
2.00/20.00, addr 2
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:43:06PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
umame -a FreeBSD localhost 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD-RELEASE #0 Wed Aug 31
10:24:01 UTC 2005 root@/;/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/VILi386
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:31:05PM +, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
kalin mintchev wrote:
hi all...
trying to build firefox firefox-1.5 from ports.
machine: 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Mon Aug 15 20:16:14 EDT 2005
upgraded www ports last night and today. mozilla port was updated
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 04:43:40PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to disallow password auth on ssh (freebsd 5.4). The only
lines that contain Password are these:
PasswordAuthentication no
#PasswordAuthentication yes
#PermitEmptyPasswords no
#KerberosOrLocalPasswd
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:26:37PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
When trying to upgrade my ports I get the following message:
openssl-stable-0.9.7i conflicts with installed package(s):
openssl-beta-0.9.8a
Several ports (like openoffice.org-2xxx) require the beta version, while
kde
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:21:17PM -0500, kalin mintchev wrote:
i'm trying to build libxml2 from ports on a 4.10 machine...
i just get:
gmake: Makefile: no such file or directory.
that's not true - the file is where it shuold be. permissions are fine too...
?!?!??!
Show us more
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:03:09PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:26:37PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
When trying to upgrade my ports I get the following message:
openssl-stable-0.9.7i conflicts with installed package(s
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:10:40AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:13:50AM +0100, Guillaume R. wrote:
2005/12/5, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 06:50:55PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I recently bought a new Intel Xeon server, and
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:59:40AM -0500, Peter wrote:
Does anyone know what the status is for the RAIDframe port?
Dead and gone.
Kris
pgpyGWDbDyAED.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:37:23AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 12/4/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this true? If so, it would be the very first Unix that I've seen
crash from this kind of user-mistake.
Turns out it's pretty hard to fix.
Well, all I know
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:04:05AM -0800, Rob wrote:
The idea of running Mozilla or Firefox from a terminal was a very good one.
I am getting an error message: (Gecko:40685) Gdk-WARNING **:
gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass
G_MAXLONG?)
I will
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:58:42PM -0600, Douglas A. Maske wrote:
Hi,
Just curious why this port isn't properly building?
Talk to the maintainer, or at least to the ports@ mailing list.
Kris
P.S. Including errors is usually required for someone to figure out
your problem.
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 05:32:42PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hey all,
I'm reading BSD Hacks by Dru Lavigne, published by O'Reilly. In the
section on managing floppies, it mentions that if you pull a floppy
without umounting it first, the next time to try to access the
filesystem,
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 11:07:38PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
People,
I was just looking at my package database, and it seems that I have
some dups installed thanks to some ports I've installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ alias pkg_dups
alias pkg_dups='pkg_info | sort | sed -e
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 07:05:16PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
I just recently did a make buildworld, make buildkernel, make install
kernel, make installworld, and mergemaster in that order. When I login
as root I get the following email message:
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 01:05:23PM +0800, Hongxing Song wrote:
cc -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -msse -m3dnow
-maccumula
te-outgoing-args -minline-all-stringops -march=athlon-xp -Werror
You set your COPTFLAGS to a random string..don't do this unless you
understand the
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:05:11AM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add
-r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error:
Error: FTP Unable to get
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:51:16PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 installed previously from packages. I have
recently installed OpenOffice 2.0 from ports. How do I go about:
1- removing the 1.1.3 package install - I know to use pkg_delete, but
can't seem to find the
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:57:27PM -0500, Mike Barnard wrote:
Hi, all. I have a fairly beefy server (Dell PowerEdge 8450,
8-processor 700 Mhz Xeon, 32GB RAM) I'm testing with FreeBSD. I got a
6.0-RELEASE kernel compiled with both SMP and PAE (the only catch was
that the hptmv driver
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 06:16:25PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 23:57:48 +0100
albi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:51:16 -0500
Trey Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 installed previously from packages. I have
recently
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
what tools do you use making FreeBSD packages CD? i mean tool that will
split all of them to many CD's or DVD's and make all INDEX files just
right.
The tools in /usr/src/release/scripts.
amd64 packages directory takes about
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:16:51AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
It's my suspicion that updating 5.4 to 6.0 via CVSup leaves alot of old
libraries in place. Is this anywhere near correct?
I updated my system recently thus, using the steps in
/usr/src/UPDATING, but
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:14:05PM -0600, Cody Holland wrote:
Ok, I know this has come up before but I cannot find any good
documentation on BSD vs Linux threads using 5.4 or 6.0. This will
basically be for a multi-processor mysql 5 server. What are your
recommendations?
What are your
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:36:19PM -0600, Cody Holland wrote:
Well in the past it was stated that on a MySQL server installed using
Linux threads was faster than using the native BSD threads. I'm in the
process of building a new MySQL 5 server with FreeBSD 5.4 and was
wanting to know if using
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Javier Matos wrote:
Hi, I need to compile a program to run it in a linux box.
I know that freebsd has linux compatibility with binary files.
Can I compile using freebsd gcc a binary file that can run under linux and
try if it works with freebsd
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:19:41PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
I recently rebuilt my FreeBSD system from sources and it took around 2
hours on an old PIII 800MHz pc to run make buildworld. If I include
the -j option to run multiple processes as once such as make -j2
buildworld does that
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:00:47AM +, buttmanizer wrote:
hello people. i always get this error when compiling from the ports. note
that my ports tree is always up-to-date with cvsup.
thanks a lot. i hope you can help me.
ps. i included my system specs:
FreeBSD buttstation
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:15:49AM +, buttmanizer wrote:
yeah i always do. after cvsup, i execute:
pkgdb -F
portupgrade -Ufu
i encountered this libglib problem eversince i wantonly deinstall gnome2.
but now i can't put it back together again because i always encounter this
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:27:34PM +0800, Huajian.Luo wrote:
Hi there,
I found myself stumbling over many failed cases when compile
ports fails while w/ the same kinda error message.
That's each time there was something missing when generating symbol
list, say in
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Thomas Uhrfelt wrote:
Dear fellow FreeBSDers,
I have recently started to get the message in the subject when installing
ports from source. I have scanned the mailinglists and other resources and
found a few others with these particular problems. And
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:02:06PM +0100, Thomas Uhrfelt wrote:
Thanks, but shouldn't that really be in the handbook?
It should. It would be great if you could submit a PR with the
relevant change.
I ran out of time today and since it's a production system I need to
wait until tomorrow to se
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:50:58AM +0800, Huajian.Luo wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
uniq .libs/libglade-2.0.exp
eval: 1: Syntax error: | unexpected
Try reinstalling your libtool port(s).
After I re-installed the devel/libtool15, everything works great.
Great!
If you already had
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:16:38AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Is there any way of determining *what* is causing this, based on the
information that I'm getting on the console? :(
dev=#da/0x20007, bno = 671547887, bsize = 16384, size = 16384, fs = /vm
panic: ffs_blkfree: bad size
Let
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:26:18PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i've read few articles on the net that FreeBSD/amd64 crashes very
frequently, contrary to /i386.
how much truth is in that? i would strongly prefer to run amd64 system on
amd64 machine that i will buy this week.
Sounds like
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
is that planned? instead of 2 CD's, and much more packages.
Not from freebsd.org, but vendors like freebsd mall sell a DVD. I
don't know what's on it.
with even mc missing on package CD it would be very nice.
i tried to make
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:19:54PM +0100, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
hal wrote:
I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to
6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way?
Afaik, You must upgrade to 5.x first and then You can move to 6.x.
Yes. It might be easier to do a binary upgrade
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:25:55PM -0800, Ron wrote:
Thanks.
I updated my source tree, and am about to run the following (20.4.1 in
the handbook):
# make buildworld
# make buildkernel
# make installkernel
# reboot
But, it then says:
After installkernel finishes successfully, you
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:49:43AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i tried to make it myself but adding packages well is quite difficult..
BTW. why network install is so slow - it needs to check at least 6
directories on FTP server before downloading anything. same check every
each
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:00:48AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
it's not normal to do 6 times checking for permission for directory ...
(or similar) for every single downloaded file. if it needs to find a
directory, why it does every time?
Without a precise description of the problem,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:46:38AM -0800, John Palmer wrote:
I am running FreeBSD 5.4 p8. I did a tcpdump -vv -i em0. The output
produced
a bad udp cksum with my DNS server. Does anyone know what it means? Or,
how I can
correct the problem?
If your NIC is doing checksum offload,
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 04:43:19PM +0100, Mikael Backman wrote:
Hi.
I've done everything specified in the manual.
It seems to work. /crypt is mounted as nfs..
Created a sample dir with cmkdir and cattach-ed it
This is really stupid but I can't for the life of me
figure out how to encrypt
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:45:03AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:43:59PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:40:40AM +, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2005-11-24, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's what i see in systat
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:16:04AM -0500, Russell E. Meek wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server
enviroment, production or non?
Pros? Cons
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:26:16PM +0300, Evgenii Davidov wrote:
i have 4.11-RELEASE-p13 on smp machine
i've tested it with memtest and cpuburn for a day
but with site with simple perl scripts it crashes every hour with errors:
Nov 23 14:27:44 /kernel: panic: lockmgr: non-zero exclusive
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:40:40AM +, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2005-11-24, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's what i see in systat with FreeBSD 6.0/i386-SMP
540 534 99 pdwak 2000
cpu0: time
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
540 534 99 pdwak 2000
cpu0:
time
16825 pdpgs 2000
cpu1:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:38:49PM -0800, E.J Burritt wrote:
Hey Mike, thanks for the reply. I went ahead and tried that link,
but unfortunatley it didn't help. I also made a post over at the
FreeBSD forums, but also no reply. Not sure what to do now...
For one thing, you omitted all context
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:09:08AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
No, it's just a consequence of HZ=1000 instead of HZ=100. I've
so why 2000 not 1000?
2000 on each processor!
Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you,
but it's really not unless you're on a
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:08:42AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
That's why I have kern.hz=100 in my /boot/loader.conf .
Have you been able to measure a performance benefit from reducing it?
Have you shown that reducing it does not cause your performance to
*drop*? It was increased for a
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 04:16:49PM -0800, Ron wrote:
I went to upgrade mysql from 4.1 to 5.0. I updated my ports (no problems),
but when I ran:
pkg_add -r mysql50-server
I get:
Error: FTP Unable to get
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:09:32PM -0800, Ron wrote:
No, you can just compile it yourself using ports (although the ports
collection also doesn't support 5.3 any longer, most things will still
work). Using packages with pkg_add -r is an *alternative* to
compiling yourself using the ports
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:30:39AM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Kris,
thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I
catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB.
Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to
FreeBSD
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:23:26AM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
I was not really honest: I did compiled the kernel without -g option.
Nothing different. The only thing that looks like help was compile
without PREEMPTIVE option. I'm sorry very much for FreeBSD that I like
many years. I do
, but siwtched
to FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X.
About the port set: what do you mean under upgrading your ports
properly? I've downloaded the ports.tar.gz (about 30M) and untarred
it to /usr/ports. what else?
Dmytro
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:35:41AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
that's what i see in systat with FreeBSD 6.0/i386-SMP
540 534 99 pdwak 2000 cpu0:
time
16825 pdpgs 2000 cpu1:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server
enviroment, production or non?
Pros? Cons?
This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well
to research the answer before asking :)
It's
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:59:13AM +0800, Huajian.Luo wrote:
Hi there,
After I upgrade my box to 6.0, I found that portsnap is currently
in the base system. I'm curious that why we need invent a tool that
just fetch the ports.tar.gz from mirror, while can not fetch the
kernel source, while
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Hello,
Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much
slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases.
It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements
that led you to conclude this.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 04:49:40PM -0500, Mike Hernandez wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:39:19PM +, Uncle Deejy-Pooh wrote:
I may be guilty of mis-reading this, but the thought of downloading @
compiling anything of any complexity fills me with horror !?!? By the time
KDE is ready
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:37:52PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
The stock Generic Kernel for 6.0-Release has debugging features which
according to the kernel developement team where left in during release.
Try to recompile the Generic Kernel with the option debug -g commented
out and see if
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:23:44AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i got a Problem on my dual XEON 3.06 GhZ machine, 2GB of RAM, FreeBSD
5.4-STABLE.
I got option SMP in the kernel config and machdep.hlt_logical_cpus=1 in
/boot/loader.conf.
There are just 20 processes running (typical
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:07:40PM +, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Javier Matos wrote:
Hello, I want information about uninstallation of packages. I know how to
perform that kind of actions but I really want to know if something like
pkg_add a_package and then pkg_delete a_package really delete
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 06:40:48PM +0300, Vasiliy Khodyrev wrote:
Good morning/afternoon/evening,
I have a question to FreeBSD developers:
Are you planning to include support for ZFS(link below) into FreeBSD in any
future releases?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:23:56AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build perl 5.8.7 from the ports.
On some machines it goes OK.
On my 5.3 machines I get:
BSDPAN -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -Wall
`sh cflags optimize='-O -pipe' toke.o`
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:37:45AM +0100, Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote:
.. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package
system occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given
port/package without having met all the dependencies.. just how does it
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:14:58PM +1100, Quinn Ellis wrote:
I was just wondering if you can download FreeBSD on DVD ISO, rather than
cd images.
No.
Kris
pgp4sYCp9zIyS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 01:32:36PM -0500, Doug Lee wrote:
I just ran a MySQL lookup process (written in Perl) as root prefixed
with idprio 1. I expected it to take a while, but not several
minutes. After a while I decided to abort it, so I typed ^c in its
`screen' window. From then on
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:57:59PM +0100, Efren Bravo wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded from 5.4-RELEASE-i386 to
6.0-RELEASE-i386 and everything went well but
when I tried to rebuild the kernel, I get these
errors:
# pwd
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf
# config MYKERNEL
../../conf/files: coda/coda_fbsd.c
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:16:31PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a little confused about which tags to use in my supfiles for cvsup.
I've installed 6.0-RELEASE, and really want to stay with STABLE. AFAICT,
in my supfile, I should have the following to do so:
*default
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:18:04PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
I am running FreeBSD 5.4 presently. In my /usr/local/etc/rc.d
directory, I have come across this file: '001slpd.sh'. I cannot seem
to find out what it does or how it got there. It does not appear to be
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:48:15PM +0100, Guido Van Hoecke wrote:
I am fairly new at FreeBSD. I installed a 'beastie' server with
FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
but it traps immediately after the boot menu with
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:33:49PM -0500, My mailing Lists wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Michael. Of course, you are right. I should have
been
more specific. I had reinstalled glib version 2, but that did not solve my
problem. Just to be double sure, after I read your email, I
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:23:22AM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
I am presently running FreeBSD 5.4, but am considering upgrading to
version 6.0 in the near future.
I have read on this forum that the /etc/make.conf file has been moved in
version 6.0. I assume that although it has been moved,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:32:30PM -0500, stan wrote:
The subject really says it all. What major feature got added that was worth
breaking this?
UFS2.
I _assume_ the oposite is _not_ tur? IE a version 5 system _can_ mount
filesystems created under V4, right?
Yes.
Oh, and while I'm at it,
1201 - 1300 of 3577 matches
Mail list logo
