of 8MB/s.
Is this possible bug in mount_smbfs or just the simple misconfiguration?
I have configured the /etc/nsmb.conf file as per manual and it really
gets connected nicely but afterwards it presents me with catastrophic
results.
With respect
Nenad Mihajlovic
Hello,
For the Intel processors VT support, you can check up on
http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx
go for no less than dual-core 8400.
and for the AMD desktop processors, here:
http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUResult.aspx
and some of new X4 phenoms.
Either AMD or Intel, both are good
Hi all,
Recently I have received the reuest from the colleague to create the
homebrewn NAS for his small office, so I started checking the possible
options, and having good, stable and long relationship with FreeBSD
I've settled again for it.
Machine is not something special, Pentium D
Hi all,
Recently I have received the reuest from the colleague to create the
homebrewn NAS for his small office, so I started checking the possible
options, and having good, long and stable relationship with FreeBSD
I've settled again for it.
Machine is not something special, Pentium D
Hi all,
Recently I have received the reuest from the colleague to create the
homebrewn NAS for his small office, so I started checking the possible
options, and having good, long and stable relationship with FreeBSD
I've settled again for it.
Machine is not something special, Pentium D
I found it.
I'll try it out, and see what we get.
Interesting thing is, that i went again to verify the finds that i
wrote in my letter, and it is not the ping itself that increases
performance, but the fact of multiple connections - while pinging from
console (ping -f), the behaviour
