howdy, y'all ---
so, i was looking over the offerings of the on_line retailing usual suspects,
when i got to thinking:
q: to what extent does freebsd cache recently_used hard_drive files ?
q: under freebsd, to what extent are
hard_drive internal_caches and their sizes [ e. g.,
thanks, warren [ love your dot_com, btw ] ---
Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, spellberg_robert wrote:
howdy, y'all ---
so, i was looking over the offerings of the on_line retailing usual
suspects,
when i got to thinking:
q: to what extent does freebsd cache recently_used
greetings, all ---
i confess that this one has me flummoxed.
the short question: does tar(1) spit_up when extracting onto an msdos_fs
hard_drive ?
[ i tried the mailing_list archives tar AND msdos, for -questions, -chat,
-bugs, -newbies, -performance ]
[ other research as indicated ]
i
howdy, y'all ---
these may be stupid questions and, if so, i am prepared to slap my forehead
with the palm of my hand.
i recently acquired my first batch of intel cpus with 64_bit integer registers
[ celeron 440 ],
specifically for the 16 registers and the potential for a truly_gargantuan
hmmm ..., you did not answer the question that i asked.
per your statement, on i386, amd64 or both ?
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, spellberg_robert email...@emailrob.com wrote:
q:if i install an amd64 version on an intel_64 platform,
am i restricted
aha !
this relates to what i found in machine/types.h,
on my existing i386 version of freebsd on my intel_64 hardware platform.
i will look into the questions archive.
meanwhile, back at the ranch,
does this mean that i need the amd64 version of freebsd to get the right
headers ?
Dan
well, i looked at questions back to the beginning of august.
on aug_09 i found a thread that suggests the following questions.
for a given release of freebsd,
q:is it that the version labeled i386 contains only 32_bit headers and
source,
which creates the 32_bit version of
to publish these ].
note that i am, in_frequently, in_consistent in my rule_application.
third, i will address your points in_line.
note that my text is delimited by one blank_line above and three blank_lines
below.
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 05), spellberg_robert said:
well, i
greetings, all ---
this is a follow_up to my recent inquiry.
a while back, i took apart mr. kamp's malloc(3), so, i have a fair idea of its
operation.
i have not, as yet, done the same for its replacement.
therefore, treat these questions, regarding je_malloc(3), as coming from a user.
q:
howdy, folks ---
this may be a stupid question,
but, i figure that it is better to ask than to assume.
premise:
i was looking at a retail site that is offering
a dvd_archive of every issue of a particular magazine back to its beginning,
many decades ago
[ these have become popular,
, spellberg_robert wrote:
premise:
i was looking at a retail site that is offering
a dvd_archive of every issue of a particular magazine back to its beginning,
many decades ago
[ these have become popular, lately ].
If the archive contains this magazine in a common format like PDF, you can view
greetings, all ---
as long as folks are paying attention to
this whole time zone foolishness
foisted on us by congress
[ as if they don't have --real-- work to do; but, i digress ],
it seems to be a good time to inquire about my pet peeve.
please note:
this is the --one-- thing about
greetings, all ---
i've been meaning to write a whole lot sooner.
too many non_maskable interrupts.
thank you, matthew.
thank you, duane.
as it eventuated,
i spent all day for four days, mar_01_thu through 04_sun,
working on this.
most of the results occurred thursday,
but i wound up
greetings ---
i finally ran into a situation where
my existing approaces are no longer satisfactory.
i never bought office.
i have a twelve_year_old version of wordperfect
from [ at that time ] novell that still works just fine
[ i first used wordperfect in the early 1980's; why change ?
thanks to everyone for their assistance.
thanks, especially,
for reports of personal satisfaction
with a particular solution.
it appears, now, that i had found everything
that there is to be found, currently.
without the feedback, however,
i would not know that.
i will give these ideas
greetings, all ---
this isn't exactly a free_bsd question, --but--,
since free_bsd is popular w/ the i386 crowd and
there are many rugged individualists on these lists
who like to roll their own,
i figure i'll get way less hyperbole and
more practical experience here,
than at some of
Mark Picone wrote:
it's that i don't recognize so many of the manufacturers names.
some look familiar, but they might just be
similar to something i remember from long ago.
q: would anyone care to wax rhapsodic
about any manufacturer
with whose heatsink / fan combo product[s]
Chuck Robey wrote:
q: would anyone care to wax rhapsodic
about any manufacturer
with whose heatsink / fan combo product[s]
they have had good success ?
OK, I will. I got taught, in extremely clear fashion, about the direct linkage
between keeping the temperatures low and
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
If you haven't already bought your cpu you could check out how much heat
different cpu's produce, they vary quite a lot. Lower power = lower heat
production = less stress on heatsink/fan (and = lower electricity
costs). Also the overclockers websites and forums usually
19 matches
Mail list logo
