Re: any bandwidth limiting tools other than dummynet?
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:45:39 +0200 Alex de Kruijff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ADK Well you have some higher level tools embebed in some services ADK like pure-ftpd/puredb you can limit up/down bandwitdh and quotas, ADK etc.. But it's better to limit it with ALTQ/dummynet, that's why ADK they exist. By the way, where is the most recent stable ALTQ for FreeBSD 4.x? ALTQ on http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/kjc/programs.html is from bronze age at best, seeming more likely from late neolith. ALTQ in pf is 5.x only, and I didn't find a way to reserve bandwidth for high-priority traffic in dummynet. -- Alex. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sysinstall config question
Hello! According to sysinstall(8), LOAD_CONFIG_FILE If sysinstall is compiled with LOAD_CONFIG_FILE set in the envi- ronment (or in the Makefile) to some value, then that value will be used as the filename to automatically look for and load when sysinstall starts up and with no user interaction required. This option is aimed primarily at large sites who wish to create a single prototype install for multiple machines with largely iden- tical configurations and/or installation options. However, attempt to make release as follows make release BUILDNAME=5.2.1-RELEASE CHROOTDIR=/var/release CVSROOT=/home/ncvs RELEASETAG=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE LOAD_CONFIG_FILE=gw.conf result in the following error: === bin === bin/cat install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /var/release/bin install: cat: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/src/bin/cat. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/bin. *** Error code 1 while building release without LOAD_CONFIG_FILE builds just fine. I do not have a 4.X box with enough resources to try the same there; maybe someone could enlighten me? Or I should ask in -current? -- Alex. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sysinstall config question
On Mon, 24 May 2004 12:37:43 +0100 Daniel Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DB My understanding from reading sysinstall(8) is that the sysinstall DB binary needs to have LOAD_CONFIG_FILE set in the environment, not DB the release build. DB DB Try adding it to the Makefile for sysinstall, and see what DB happens... DB DB However, I have recently set up a custom install script, which DB simply has the default name, install.cfg. As long as it is located DB in the root of your mfsroot file system, sysinstall will load it. DB If you don't have a particular need to give it a different name, you DB might give it a go. Thanks; will try it. WHat is the correct way to add install.cfg? Should it jut be put into /usr/src/release before build? -- Alex. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too little swap to dumpon
Hello! I have on one of my boxes too little swap partition to dumpon on it. Actually, it is too little by several bytes # swapinfo Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Type /dev/da0s1b 1048448 100 1048348 0%Interleaved /dev/da1s1b 10484480 1048448 0%Interleaved Total 2096896 100 2096796 0% real memory = 1073741824 (1048576K bytes) but I still cannot dumpon. Moreover, I don't need any dumping besides kernel memory. Does there exist any solution to dump on two swap partition, or to dump only limited amount of memory, or to dump on both swap partitions? Or I have to repartition my disk? -- Alex. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jailed virtual https, anyone?
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:21:10 +0100 Marc Perisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MP I'm forwarding incoming connection to jail, currently with ipnat. I need to pass information MP about real (outside) IP to mod_ssl. That is my problem. MP MP ? (I understand what you do - but not why ...) On one hand, I'm going to isolate users from outside world. On the other hand, I cannot afford right now to provide each ot these users by their own jail with. Hmm, maybe I could run lots of jails on the same filesystem, but this will create immeasurable lots of apaches mostly staying idle. MP Ok. Why don't you put every single jail with it's outside IP up and let MP it run there (binded to fxp0). What do you want to reach with that setup MP ? More security? I'm running several scores of virtualhosts right now, ant number of the is going to increase. At least 5 apaches, one sshd... hmm, even if I'll make annother jail for sshd/cron, I'm going to have LOTS and LOTS of idle apaches. MP MP Next possibility is to setup a https-http gateway on the external IP MP (binded to fxp0) and forward the un-encrypted requests over to the MP apache (name-based or whatever). Yes, I'm starting to look towards that direction. Most likely, I'll install/patch some https-http proxy on weekend. But in this case, I need to pass https variables some more or less efficient and elegant way... Well, I'll do it ;-) -- Alex. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
