On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:51:46PM +0530, manish jain wrote:
> I want to move vi to /bin so that I have an editor available in
> single-user mode. This sounds simple (and should be if all you have is
> a single partition), but there are problems. For starters, terminfo
> can't locate its database i
ve all posts that are not about group topic!
Group topic? As far as I can tell, the topic is "user questions"
(according to http://lists.freebsd.org/ and the List-Id header). Where
exactly is it defined what those questions may be about?
--
Benjamin M. A'Lee || mail: b...@subvert.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:52:23PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
> cpghost writes:
>
> > > For instance: I open an xterm, type some text and select it. When i
> > > do a switch to a console, and get back to my X with Alt-F9, the text
> > > is automaticly pasted into my xterm. As if i pressed the
>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:15:22AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2007-11-30 16:06, "Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to build all of FreeBSD from a Linux Machine and seem to
> > be running into problems. We have farm of build machines th
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:39:00PM +, Howard Jones wrote:
> Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
>> You could possibly also put "bash -l && exit" in your .shrc, which would
>> exit if bash exited successfully. I haven't tested it, but it should
>> work.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:50:40PM +, Stephen Allen wrote:
> It's been drawn to my attention not to use bash from the ports collection,
> because if one of it's dependencies (gettext or libiconv) fails or is
> updated significantly, it could break, and prevent login. The suggested
> solution
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:47:56AM -0500, icantthinkofone wrote:
> Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
>> icantthinkofone wrote:
>>
>>> My naive question is, what is involved with creating an open source
>>> driver for flash for freebsd? Is it a legal issue? Or does it take more
>>> time than anyo
at 07:30:29AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:32:39PM +0100, Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
> > Is there any way to specify options in make.conf on a per-port basis?
> >
> > For example, if I want Vim built without X11, I can specify the WITHOUT_X11
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:41:40PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> Is there an easier way by sed or ed to remove strings
> (caight by grep) of the sort:
>
> part5.chapter2.text-
>
> where "5" and "2" can be any integer below 10?
>
> (I know how to delete the *entire*
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:25:42PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:44:18PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote:
> > On Sun 21 Oct 2007 12:10, Danielisz Laszlo wrote:
> > > Please do not try to execute this: :() { :&:; } ;: on your BSD machine.
> > > I ask all who already tried it how
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:33:57PM +0100, Donovan R. Palmer wrote:
> I have been using Linux for over 10 years, but have for a number of reasons
> become very interested in learning to use FreeBSD. Are there any ex or
> current Linux users here and could you tell me how hard it is to make the
>
Is there any way to specify options in make.conf on a per-port basis?
For example, if I want Vim built without X11, I can specify the WITHOUT_X11
flag, but putting that in make.conf will affect every port.
I'm aware it's possible to do it with portupgrade, but I was hoping for a
method that would
12 matches
Mail list logo
