.
Another solution would be to setup a dedicated NAS of some sort. But I
suppose it's too late for all of that.
On 4/25/05, Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No flaming here, when dealing with projects this big, you cannot be bias
obviously because generally it is someone else's time
solution in a situation like this, where you are needing to provide
SMB based file sharing to obviously Windows client desktops.
Another solution would be to setup a dedicated NAS of some sort. But I
suppose it's too late for all of that.
On 4/25/05, Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
No flaming here, when dealing with projects this big, you cannot be bias
obviously because generally it is someone else's time and money that is on
the line. Thanks for the info, I didn't know the whole second array thing,
that would explain some of the weirdness that I have been seeing.
sharing to obviously Windows client desktops.
Another solution would be to setup a dedicated NAS of some sort. But I
suppose it's too late for all of that.
On 4/25/05, Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No flaming here, when dealing with projects this big, you cannot be bias
obviously because
Are you booting to the array? Is it over 2TB? Or are you mounting the array?
-Original Message-
From: Benson Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nick Pavlica; Dan Nelson; Nick Evans; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:
On 4/15/05, Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK...so now we are going into some new territory...I am curious if you would
care to elaborate a bit more...I am intrigued...if anyone wants me to do
some experiments or test something, let me know...I for one welcome any
attempts at pushing any
Yeah it was pretty much boo hoo hoo...it appears we have either backplane,
MI cable issues, or controller problems...I was only getting 11 drives
available with improper identification...so I am going thru the tedious task
of ripping it all down, and testing backplanes, drives, and cables...one at
Sorry for the delay in response.I had to go to the IRS today.OMFG.what a
model of inefficiency.
I am having some minor hardware issues with the build that we are going to
be working on to get corrected first.but I will def keep everyone informed
on what is going on..
_
From: Nick
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Nick Pavlica'; 'Benson Wong'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:13:48 -0500
Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benson..GREAT RESPONSE!! I Don't think I could have done any better
myself.
Although I knew most
OK...so now we are going into some new territory...I am curious if you would
care to elaborate a bit more...I am intrigued...if anyone wants me to do
some experiments or test something, let me know...I for one welcome any
attempts at pushing any limits or trying new things...
-Original
-
From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 12:15 PM
To: Edgar Martinez
Cc: 'Nick Evans'; 'Benson Wong'; 'Nick Pavlica';
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions
In the last episode (Apr 15), Edgar Martinez said:
OK...so now we
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.8TB RAID5 SATA Array Questions
On 4/15/05, Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK...so now we are going into some new territory...I am curious if you would
care to elaborate a bit more...I am intrigued...if anyone wants me to do
some experiments or test something, let
All,
I have a project in which I have purchased the hardware to build a massive
file server (specifically for video). The array from all estimates will come
in at close to 5.8TB after overheard and formatting. Questions are:
What Version of BSD (5.3, 5.4, 4.X)?
What should the stripe size
Benson..GREAT RESPONSE!! I Don't think I could have done any better myself.
Although I knew most of the information you provided, it was good to know
that my knowledge was not very far off. It's also reassuring that I'm not
the only nut job building ludicrous systems..
Nick, I believe that we
: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:23 AM
To: Edgar Martinez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:10:42AM -0500, Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible
install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
OK, removed all misc cards, devices, recabled...attempting to reinstall
with
5.3, and I continue to get a kernel: priviledged instruction fault
followed by a reboot...RAM is brand new Patriot 2-2-2-5...mem timings?
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway
New error before death
Panic: page fault
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez
, 2005 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
New error before death
Panic: page fault
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April
Message-
From: Alex Zbyslaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
OK, removed all misc cards, devices, recabled...attempting
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; questions
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
--- Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I
have had
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throwing up a privilege
fault
-
From: Emanuel Strobl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:15 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Promise TX2 Rebuild via atacontrol??
Am Montag, 4. April 2005 23:29 schrieb Edgar Martinez:
All,
I have a failed member in a RAID1 array
All,
I have a failed member in a RAID1 array and using atacontrol can see that
the status is degraded. I am curious if I can use atacontrol to rebuild the
array if the original array was built using the Promise BIOS utility. If I
tell atacontrol to rebuild.will it corrupt my data or catch fire
23 matches
Mail list logo
