r-xr-x 512 2010/08/02 13:35:40 .
drwxr-xr-x 512 2010/08/02 22:09:36 gnats
drwxr-xr-x 512 2010/08/03 02:34:06 mail
drwxr-xr-x 512 2010/08/02 21:50:04 ncvs
drwxr-xr-x 512 2010/08/03 00:51:26 www
%
--
Ken Smith
m the
FTP site instead of just using a CVSUP mirror. Is there some benefit
to it? We would sort of like to stop providing this as part of the
FTP site if there really isn't any benefit to it over using the
cvsup mirror infrastructure which won't be going away any time soon.
ed by portmgr@
for package builds which is the 6x750MHz machine. The
other I do the monthly snapshots and release builds on,
it's 4x900MHz. This was its performance on the world
built of 7.3-RELEASE:
>>> World build started on Sat Mar 20 23:34:54 EDT 2010
>>> World build compl
our script if you don't
already have FreeBSD installed on a machine. I don't see the harm in us
providing one pre-built memstick image for peoples' convenience.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
er fiddling as a
way to suggest "something is going on" but not freak out that set of
people too much...
We do bump src/sys/conf/newvers.sh in the release branches once they get
created (so it will become 7.1-RC1 at the point we create RELENG_7_1).
But for the BETAs the best you can do t
386 with no
boot floppy issues so I'm guessing whatever it is you're customizing is
having some sort of an impact on the boot floppy. Do you actually use
the floppies at all? If not I'd suggest you just add "NO_FLOPPIES=" to
the command line when you do the release build so
aster instead. I
still need to contact their upstream host to see what the
problem with them is...
And as part of a different thread... cvsup10 had a drive blow. We're
still working on that. cvsup10 is temporarily pointing to a different
machine.
And just
8ÐÐ up 498 days, 6:13, 5 users, load averages: 0.07, 0.03, 0.06
> $ uname -r
> 4.4-RELEASE
% uptime
7:25AM up 932 days, 3:48, 1 user, load averages: 0.47, 0.30, 0.23
% uname -r
4.4-STABLE
%
That said, I'd love to know what limit it was you (original poster)
saw. Maybe something h
