RE: Bandwidth hit in natd/ipfw on 4.4-RELEASE

2004-04-03 Thread Mark Weisman
My first question to help is why do you have any firewall at all? 
firewall_type=OPEN
Typically means that you have no ports being blocked? I'm hoping this is
just for testing purposes? 
I see in your natd.conf file you have a line for unregistered_only=YES.
This switch is for alteration of outgoing packets based on RFC 1918. I'm
assuming then that you are looking at using natd for outgoing packets
only? In which case in your files you would identify the
natd_interface=dc0 allowing for the unregistered statement to then alter
outgoing packets. I would also suggest if you have any LinkSys routers
between your FBSD box and the Internet, that you examine them, as I have
just recently replaced all my Internet hard routers with CISCO's due to
the LinkSys being unable to hold an MTU setting. Just my two cents.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic_One Internet Gaming Server
Anchorage, Alaska
http://games.mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bandwidth hit in natd/ipfw on 4.4-RELEASE


Hey, I just my got NAT box running 4.4-RELEASE on an old Pentium 90 and 
I'm experiencing a number of problems and I think they're related.. 
there's been a major bandwidth hit in all my web surfing and my ICQ, AOL
and MSN (using both Trillian and Messenger) are dropping connections --
a lot. I don't think a single day's gone by without a connection
dropping or two. As I said before, I've taken a bandwidth hit on my
surfing as well -- to the point where connection attempts are completely
timing out. I've included an abbreviated rc.conf and my natd.conf here..

rc.conf

snip
ifconfig_rl0=DHCP
ifconfig_dc0=inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 inetd_enable=YES
snip gateway_enable=YES natd_enable=YES natd_inteface=rl0
natd_flags=-config /etc/natd.conf firewall_enable=YES
firewall_type=OPEN

natd.conf

unregistered_only yes
same_ports yes
log yes
dynamic yes
interface rl0

Did I do anything wrong? Miss anything? Add anything unnecessary? The 
kernel's been recompiled as is appropriate.

Thanks in advance.

-- 
Matt Coe, CCNA
Member-At-Large, Dalhousie University CS Society Fall 2003

'Ford! There's an infinite number of monkeys outside who want to talk to
us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out.'
 -- DNA, 'The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy', Arthur Philip Dent

Sick of long-distance bills? Get Skype! www.skype.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Hardware problems or Software problems

2004-04-03 Thread Mark Weisman
Luke,
  If I may offer you my two cents. Many newer systems come standard with
125W power supplies which will probably power the motherboard, that's
usually about all. By the time you add several PCI cards and several
hard drives, you've overloaded the power supply. Typically overlooked,
this one small gadget is responsible for providing enough power to light
everything. 
  My advice here, if you are running more than one drive (CD included),
and have more than one peripheral device, I would start with a 350W
power supply and move up depending. Now I'm not saying this is your
problem, however, I will say that the symptoms for failing power
supplies can be almost anything that pushes over that last hump. A
simple Read/Write operation from the drive or memory could be all it
needs to shut itself down. Hope this helps.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic_One Internet Gaming Server
Anchorage, Alaska
http://games.mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Luke Kearney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:19 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Hardware problems or Software problems 


Hello,

I have a server which recently died on me. I believed that the problem
was likely the memory as the machine would reboot of its own accord
initially when accessing via samba or NFS. Then I noticed that it would
reboot when under no load. Given that the motherboard and CPU etc was
pushing three years old it seemed like a good opportunity to upgrade to
some newer kit I had. I installed a new ASUS P4800 motherboard with a
celeron 2.20ghz chip and brandnew 512mb memory. 

Now again whilst under no load at all it will freeze. The only original
parts are the HDD's. My difficulty is that nothing is left in the logs
or on std out. 

If it is the disks I will reluctantly replace but I cannot see why disks
would cause a reboot and leave nothing logged such as a time out or
anything. 

Are there any specific commands I can issue during start up to increase
the verbosity of logging to try to capture the root cause for this ?

Any assistance is appreciated. 

LukeK

-- 
Luke Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Operation timmed out

2004-04-03 Thread Mark Weisman
This could also be caused by the wrong information about the key at
either the server or workstation. Simply locate the file known_hosts on
both computers to ensure that a key entry does not exist for the other
computer. If it does, delete it. If there are no keys, then the
possibility of a blocked port could be to blame. However, it's just my
two cents.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic_One Internet Gaming Server
Anchorage, Alaska
http://games.mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Vasil Dimov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ssh: Operation timmed out


 Hello FreeBSD gurus!
 
 I have a question for you.
 
 I have two computers, both of them running FreeBSD 2.5.1-RELEASE. Let 
 us call them A and B.
 
 Computer A receives ssh connections from computers running Linux, 
 Solaris and even Windows; it also receives connections from FreeBSD 
 4.x and 5.1  but it does not receive ssh connections from B.
 
 A ask for password and then it takes a long time to say Operation 
 timmed out Connection to A closed.
 
 Enabling sshd in rc.d or using it from inetd makes no difference.
 
 Strange, isn't it?
 
 Hope you can help me.
 Thanks in advance:
 
 PD.  Here you will find what ssh -v A dislays:
 
 
 B:/home/mrspock ssh -v A
 OpenSSH_3.6.1p1 FreeBSD-20030924, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 
 0x0090703f
 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
 ...

try running
A:/windows sshd -ddd
on computer A to see if anything happens.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Installing OpenOffice 1.1 question

2004-03-01 Thread Mark Weisman
Actually I just downloaded the OO tar from the OO website giving me the
latest and greatest. I also found that the pre-built copy I had was too
old for my FBSD 5.1-Release. I've got it installed under Gnome2 and it
works great! Really impressed. Once I un-tarred the tarball, I simply
typed make, then make install. Worked like a charm. Links below:
http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.0/index.html. Have fun.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installing OpenOffice 1.1 question


Hi all folks,

FreeBSD 5.2

I installed the captioned OS from CD1 which is the only CD in my 
possession.  I tried to install OpenOffice1.1 but could not find it

# /stand/sysinstall

could not find it.  Kindly advise whether I can install OO.1.1 direct 
from FBSD website OR I have to start from its tarball to be downloaded 
from OO website.

If from FBSD site, kindly advise how to make it.  Pointer would be 
appreciated.

TIA

B.R.
Stephen Liu

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wireless Mouse?

2004-02-28 Thread Mark Weisman
I'll start this post by saying THANKS to all involved who have provided
me with the answers to my last two posts (as frustrating as I'm sure
they were). So far my FBSD box is living up to its reputation as being a
windows replacement. Now I would like to configure a Logitech wireless
mouse and keyboard. I've got the keyboard all hooked up and working,
however, in version 5.1-Release of FBSD I only see either a sysmouse or
serial, of which I've tried with no success. Is there a modification or
port I need to add for a wireless mouse? Anyone?

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Boot and MBR.

2004-02-27 Thread Mark Weisman
I've installed GAG, and that is a really easy setup! It identified all
the partitions, and what was in them, stepped me through the process of
copying the manager to the disk and everything, kudos for the
recommendation! When I select to boot to the WindowsXP partition, it
come to a black screen with red squares in a diagonal line across the
screen, not sure but it doesn't look good. Have to hit reset on the box
to get out, the three finger salute doesn't work. I see the cursor
blinking in the upper left corner, yet no operating system. Any ideas?

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:24 AM
To: Mark Weisman
Cc: Jerry McAllister; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Boot and MBR.


 
 Just out of curiosity what is the order in creating a dual boot 
 system? Which operating system do you put on first? I see that having 
 WinXP setup in partitions is not a good idea, yet I'm not aware of how

 to load the system in just a slice? I would appreciate any and all 
 help in trying to get this thing online. I need my workstation back as

 soon as possible. Thanks.

I am not sure which thing you are referring to when you use
the word 'order' but...

Install whatever MS-Win system you want to have first and make sure it
boots OK.

Then, use one or another utility to shrink the MS slice and make room
for another - you can have up to 4 primary slices.   FIPS works fine
if the MS slice (called partition in MS land) is a FAT, but if it is
NTFS you will need some more sophisticated utility like Partition Magic
(which is not free - about $69 in Best Buy type stores) I have heard
there is a newer free one now available that can handle NTFS and MS
extended slices (partitions in MS speak) but I don't remember the
name.   Partition Magic will create a slice (which they call partition
since they are mostly MS oriented) and mark it as a FAT32 - or something
else if you tell it too.

Then install FreeBSD.   Presuming you use the CD sysinstall method,
when you get to the partitioning stage it shows you the primary
slices on the disk and what they currently have in them.   Put the
cursor on the new FAT slice that was created when you resized stuff with
PM or FIPS and 'D' delete it.  Then hit 'C' create and it will
make that a FreeBSD slice.   Then hit 'S' make it bootable (which,
non-intuitively will put an 'A' in the Flags column to indicate it
should be bootable.   I have also, sometimes, moved the cursor up and
marked the slice with the MS system in it as bootable (hit 'S' on it)
but sometimes not bothered and it hasn't seemed to make a difference as
long as the MS system booted OK before I got started.

As soon as you get this done and hit 'Q' to save and go on, you will
be presented with a screen that has three choices.   
   BootMgrInstall the FreeBSD Boot Manager
   Standard   Install a standard MBR (no boot manager)
   None   Leave the Master Boot Record Untouched

On this screen you want to choose the first one:  BootMgr
Then use the tab to make sure OK is selected and go on to
the next stuff.

After this you will be put in to a screen to divide up the FreeBSD
slice in to partitions.   Do this as needed for your installation

From here on out you are past the boot stuff.  You will choose what you
want installed - if you have room, just grab it all, and where you want
to install from - FTP or CD, etc

Finish up the install and network configuration.

When you boot, you will be presented with a menu something like:

  F1  DOS
  F2  FreeBSD

or maybe 

  F1  ??
  F2  FreeBSD

or I have on one machine

  F1  ??
  F2  DOS
  F3  FreeBSD

because it is a Dell machine and has a bootable Dell Slice with their
maintenance stuff on it.

You get a menu listing for every slice that is marked bootable
regardless of what it is.   It labels all MS FAT slices as 'DOS'
regardless of which MS system is on it.. 
You get the ?? if the Boot Manager finds it bootable, but doesn't know 
sort of system it is - such as for NTFS.   It doesn't have to know what 
kind of system it is to boot it so the ?? doesn't matter.  It is just a 
cosmetic annoyance.   IF it is too much for your stomach to take, then 
you can get a fancier Boot Manager such as GAG or GRUB and install it
and you can configure those with whatever labels you want to use. Those
can be installed later after the system is fully installed 
and you have some time to play.  

The basic FreeBSD boot manager is small to fit in the official one 
sector space that is available.  The fancier boot managers generally use

some additional space that, by convention is never otherwise used, but 
is not officially available for it.   I kind of with they (whoever does 
this sort of official definition) would just officially redefine the
standard so the whole unused cylinder was official boot mangler space.

jerry


 
 Res Ipsa Loquitor,
 Mark-Nathaniel

RE: Boot and MBR.

2004-02-27 Thread Mark Weisman
I appreciate the ease of installation of Gag, however, my objectives
still not being met, when I boot into the Windows partition, I get an
error that shows little red squares in a diagonal pattern across the
screen. No Windows?

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Jud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 8:46 AM
To: HOLLOW, CHRISTOPHER; Mark Weisman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Boot and MBR.



On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:50:03 -0500, HOLLOW, CHRISTOPHER
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Jud wrote:
[snip]
  3. Install GAG, a free, easy and automagical boot loader.  URL:
  http://gag.sourceforge.net/.

 You can also Grub it up:
 
 http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/ 
 http://www.daemonnews.org/200102/grub.html
 
 
 Grub is a popular and well-supported OSS boot loader

Absolutely.  I've happily used Grub, but turned to GAG when I went to
RAID-0.

Grub is an excellent bootloader and learning tool.  The only reason I
didn't include it in my recommendations to the OP was that I figured
he'd be happier at this point with something very easy and automagic.

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Boot and MBR. Thank YOU!

2004-02-27 Thread Mark Weisman
Sorry for being such a pest, my boss kept asking why my computer wasn't
working, and I'm not ready to ready for him to know I've got BSD loaded.
I was in panic mode because I couldn't get my Windows XP screens and
applications to come up. I deeply apologize, I was finally able to read
all of your message Jerry and it worked they way you said it would. All
is well, I'm on my way to prove that I can get twice the stuff I need
through the open source community than we can buy through Microsoft.
Thanks for all the posts and help. You guys rock!

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Anti-Virus?

2004-02-27 Thread Mark Weisman
Anyone know of a good Anti-virus software that works on FBSD?

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Boot and MBR.

2004-02-26 Thread Mark Weisman
You are right, I have them setup originally under WinXP as partitions,
then added FreeBSD to the second partition where it calls it a slice.
Divided up the slice into the required folders. I have tested, and it is
not cosmetic, in that when I select that menu item, the computer goes to
the next row and stays indefinitely. I can put WinXP back on the
computer if I have to, however, wouldn't that put the WinXP MBR on the
box? I've gone in under fdisk and set the slice bootable, however
nothing. I'm not sure how to install it now to just that slice. Any help
would be greatly appreciated.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:27 PM
To: Mark Weisman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Boot and MBR.


 
 I've got my primary drive divided in two partitions, one partition had

 WindowsXP and the other has FreeBSD 5.1-Release on it. I had WindowsXP

 installed and working until I put FreeBSD on the second partition and 
 had it take control of the MBR. I know that the other partition is 
 still bootable if I can get a pointer to it, currently the boot menu 
 shows it
 as:
   F!: ??
   F2: FreeBSD
 How can I get that first menu choice to look at the installation on
the
 first partition as bootable? Making the machine a dual boot between
the
 two system?

The fact that it displays ?? is only a cosmetic problem.
Have you tried selecting F1 to see if it will boot the XP slice?   
Mine does.

Also, a side issue, in FreeBSD land, what you have is a disk
with tw0 'slices' as apposed to partitions.   Probably you have
your FreeBSD slice divided up in to several 'partitions'.   MS calls
the primary divisions of a disk partitions, but in BSD UNIX land they
are called slices.

 The second question I have, is can I put the command startx into my 
 rc.conf file to have it boot directly into the x-server? Any help on 
 these two would be awesome. Thanks.

I have not been successfule with that sort of thing.   Anyway, I 
don't think just putting it in rc.conf would do the trick because 
that just sets a bunch of variables in there.  Then the stuff is
actually run from rc (and some other places I think) using those 
variable values set in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf..

I think you might not want your startx to fire off until after
you log in anyway.That would mean putting it in .login (if 
you have a csh or tcsh shell)  and that is what didn't work
for me, though I didn't try many variations.

But, someone else better weigh in on this.

jerry

 
 Res Ipsa Loquitor,
 Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
 Site Master
 Mystic1.net
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Boot and MBR.

2004-02-26 Thread Mark Weisman
Hey all,
  I've tried setting the MBR within fdisk from the FBSD side of the house, however, it 
won't set. I go through all the motions, yet when it goes to write it says that it 
can't write to drsk ad0. I then went into a dos boot using a Windows98 boot disk and 
made the partition active, it still will not boot into the Windows partition. For the 
life of me, I cannot think of how to fix this. I need some help, any ideas?

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic_One Internet Gaming Servers
Anchorage, AK
http://games.mystic1.net

 --
 From: Jud
 Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:49 PM
 To:   Mark Weisman; Jerry McAllister
 Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Boot and MBR.
 
 On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:18:01 -0900, Mark Weisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Just out of curiosity what is the order in creating a dual boot system?
  Which operating system do you put on first? I see that having WinXP
  setup in partitions is not a good idea, yet I'm not aware of how to load
  the system in just a slice? I would appreciate any and all help in
  trying to get this thing online. I need my workstation back as soon as
  possible. Thanks.
 [snip]
  I've got my primary drive divided in two partitions, one partition had
 
  WindowsXP and the other has FreeBSD 5.1-Release on it. I had WindowsXP
 
  installed and working until I put FreeBSD on the second partition and
  had it take control of the MBR. I know that the other partition is
  still bootable if I can get a pointer to it, currently the boot menu
  shows it
  as:
F!: ??
F2: FreeBSD
  How can I get that first menu choice to look at the installation on
  the
  first partition as bootable? Making the machine a dual boot between
  the
  two system?
 
 First off, don't worry about slice vs partition - Jerry was just telling  
 you those are the names used by FreeBSD and Windows, respectively, for the  
 same thing.
 
 Second, how to get your dual boot going -
 
 1. I think if you do what you've already done in FreeBSD (set the Windows  
 slice/partition bootable) and then type w to write the change, that  
 should work.
 
 If it doesn't, two other alternatives -
 
 2. If you have a Win9x emergency boot/system floppy hanging around, use  
 fdisk to set the Windows partition/slice active, then reboot; or
 
 3. Install GAG, a free, easy and automagical boot loader.  URL:  
 http://gag.sourceforge.net/.
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Jud
 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Boot and MBR.

2004-02-26 Thread Mark Weisman
Just out of curiosity what is the order in creating a dual boot system?
Which operating system do you put on first? I see that having WinXP
setup in partitions is not a good idea, yet I'm not aware of how to load
the system in just a slice? I would appreciate any and all help in
trying to get this thing online. I need my workstation back as soon as
possible. Thanks.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Mark Weisman 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 4:59 PM
To: Jerry McAllister
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Boot and MBR.


You are right, I have them setup originally under WinXP as partitions,
then added FreeBSD to the second partition where it calls it a slice.
Divided up the slice into the required folders. I have tested, and it is
not cosmetic, in that when I select that menu item, the computer goes to
the next row and stays indefinitely. I can put WinXP back on the
computer if I have to, however, wouldn't that put the WinXP MBR on the
box? I've gone in under fdisk and set the slice bootable, however
nothing. I'm not sure how to install it now to just that slice. Any help
would be greatly appreciated.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:27 PM
To: Mark Weisman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Boot and MBR.


 
 I've got my primary drive divided in two partitions, one partition had

 WindowsXP and the other has FreeBSD 5.1-Release on it. I had WindowsXP

 installed and working until I put FreeBSD on the second partition and
 had it take control of the MBR. I know that the other partition is 
 still bootable if I can get a pointer to it, currently the boot menu 
 shows it
 as:
   F!: ??
   F2: FreeBSD
 How can I get that first menu choice to look at the installation on
the
 first partition as bootable? Making the machine a dual boot between
the
 two system?

The fact that it displays ?? is only a cosmetic problem.
Have you tried selecting F1 to see if it will boot the XP slice?   
Mine does.

Also, a side issue, in FreeBSD land, what you have is a disk
with tw0 'slices' as apposed to partitions.   Probably you have
your FreeBSD slice divided up in to several 'partitions'.   MS calls
the primary divisions of a disk partitions, but in BSD UNIX land they
are called slices.

 The second question I have, is can I put the command startx into my
 rc.conf file to have it boot directly into the x-server? Any help on 
 these two would be awesome. Thanks.

I have not been successfule with that sort of thing.   Anyway, I 
don't think just putting it in rc.conf would do the trick because 
that just sets a bunch of variables in there.  Then the stuff is
actually run from rc (and some other places I think) using those 
variable values set in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf..

I think you might not want your startx to fire off until after
you log in anyway.That would mean putting it in .login (if 
you have a csh or tcsh shell)  and that is what didn't work
for me, though I didn't try many variations.

But, someone else better weigh in on this.

jerry

 
 Res Ipsa Loquitor,
 Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
 Site Master
 Mystic1.net
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Boot and MBR.

2004-02-26 Thread Mark Weisman
I've got my primary drive divided in two partitions, one partition had
WindowsXP and the other has FreeBSD 5.1-Release on it. I had WindowsXP
installed and working until I put FreeBSD on the second partition and
had it take control of the MBR. I know that the other partition is still
bootable if I can get a pointer to it, currently the boot menu shows it
as:
  F!: ??
  F2: FreeBSD
How can I get that first menu choice to look at the installation on the
first partition as bootable? Making the machine a dual boot between the
two system?

The second question I have, is can I put the command startx into my
rc.conf file to have it boot directly into the x-server? Any help on
these two would be awesome. Thanks.

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Good comments

2004-02-05 Thread Mark Weisman
Lee,
  I'm not involved in FreeBSD in any way, however, currently all seven
of my webservers and support group run on a flavor of FreeBSD dating all
the way back to the 4.4-Stables that run DNS. The boxes run
exceptionally well with uptimes in the teens of months. I've recently
updated my primary webserver to 5.1 release, and other than a few of my
own stupidity moments, it too rocks. I have installed this, and will
continue to install this, and only this, operating system as the
Internet system of choice.

  My two cents...

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-Original Message-
From: lee slaughter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:31 AM
To: Simon Barner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Good comments


Simon Barner wrote:

Hi,

  

 I just bought BSDfree version 5.1 because I had very 
good
comments about your operating system. Our company is planning to use
as a NAT 
server . I want to know where can I take some courses to have at least
the 
basics that it looks to be an awesome operating system.



For a production system, the 5.x branch of FreeBSD (sic!) is not quite 
ready yet, so you should better go with FreeBSD 4.9 (FreeBSD 4.x is the

so-called stable branch at the present).

If you insist in deploying FreeBSD 5.x, please note that FreeBSD 5.2 is

already out.
  


I too bought shrink-wrapped 5.1 CD set from bookstore and now have it 
running pretty well.
I really don't feel like re-installing it already but the implication is

that if you (unwittingly) installed a -CURRENT, you need to keep it up, 
i.e. go  today to 5.2, etc.

I don't wanna do that. I'm newbie and my box is  production-prone and I 
don't want bleeding edge and too ignorant to be in the -CURRENT branch.

So  are we recommended to go to 4.9-STABLE?  (implying no updates 
until next -STABLE comes out?  

What are the dire consequences of staying with 5.1 until 5-STABLE comes 
out... and not  always upgrading?

tks. this is a great os and a great support group, btw.

lee slaughter


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Making MACs and Windows talk

2002-07-23 Thread Mark Weisman

User,
   There are many different application that can be used to do this, 
however the first question I would have would be what are you wanting 
to do? Although this may sound a little redundant at this point, the 
reason I ask is that if you're talking about networking Mac's to a 
WindowsNT/2K Server, then you're done. By using Mac file sharing on the 
server, mission accomplished.
   Now if you're talking about having the Mac act like a PC, maybe run 
Windows as an OS, I recommend Connectix Virtual PC, which allows you to 
install all of the Windows OS, Linux, to name a few on the Mac running 
in a Virtual Machine. Natively, the newer Mac all speak TCP/IP, so 
networking is already there. File Sharing may be a little trickier if 
you're using a Peer-to-Peer style of network, however, it can be done.

Let me know,
His Humble Servant,
Mark

On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 03:20 AM, User  wrote:

 I was tasked at work to network some Windows boxes with some Macs 
 running OS
 9.x.

 Anyone doing this and what programs do you recommend?

 Would like to use all open source if possible.

 Thanks,

 Tim

 --
 FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE
  6:17AM  up 6 days, 19:05, 1 user, load averages: 3.02, 3.31, 3.64

 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message