> Same issue, different package. Apparently perl-after-upgrade didn't do it's
> job.
> I would:
> portupgrade -f p5-*
>
> Then go back to upgrade spamassasin.
> --
> Mel
OK, this solved the problem. Everything upgrades fine now. Thank
you very much for all your help. Not sure why this happened
> If:
> # grep 'Socket6.pm' /var/db/pkg/p5-Socket6*/+CONTENTS
>
> gives something with site_perl/5.8.8, you:
> pkg_delete -f p5-Socket6-*
>
> Then go back to building what you were building.
>
> If the output is empty, then still do the pkg_delete -f, then install
> p5-Socket6. Then run the above c
>
> We need the line that says:
> ===> p5-IO-INET6 depends on file
>
> That line is probably faulty.
This is the closest thing I can find to p5-IO-INET6 in the build output.
===> Installing for p5-Net-DNS-0.65
===> p5-Net-DNS-0.65 depends on executable: ipcount - found
===> p5-Net-DNS-0.65
I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
Before I go though and hand correct these one by one, I thought I'd
ask if I was doing something w
n_tmps_enable="YES"
>
> You can tailor its behaviour depending on your needs - look for the
> relevant knobs in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf
>
Thank you for all your help. I now understand what is going wrong.
Thanks again!
Tankko
___
fr
from
/tmp? Seems like a lot of apps are happy to leave files in /tmp. Is
clean up commonly done as a cron job? What about files like
mysql.sock= which are important. I can't just blindly remove
everything in /tmp each night.
Thanks for any hel
Does anyone know the answer to this? I am stuck as to how to proceed?
Tankko
On Dec 28, 2007 9:40 AM, Tankko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am upgrading apache...
>
> apache-2.2.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.2.6_3)
>
> ...and I get the following error:
ving ports.
I am running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
Thanks, Tankko
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
l use db42 (or
db43)? Is that wise?
Tankko
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> yea ran into a similar issue yesterday myself. i had to make this
> modification in /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd-ssl:
>
> TLS_PROTOCOL=SSL23
>
> believe old default value was:
> TLS_PROTOCOL=SSL3
>
> HTH
> -pete
>
Thanks! Thi
(port has 0.60.0)
I am assuming the upgraded server had these three ports as well before
the upgrade, but I can not be 100% sure. I always kept these 2 severs
running the same versions of everything, so I assume they were.
Anyone know how to fix this?
Tankko
__
. Plus I can't really figure out how
portdowngrade works. :-)
Any help will be much appreciated.
Tankko
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
3, I don't know if that is messing things up, or if I
need to modify the Makefile more to get it to work.
I have a...
/usr/ports/lang/ghc/work/ghc-6.6.1
...but not a...
/usr/ports/lang/ghc/work/ghc-6.6.1-boot
...as the Makefile seems to want.
Thanks, Tankko
correct or I am doing something wrong? It seems strange that
a programming language would require x11.
Is there a better was to get darcs and/or Haskell on my server without
installing x11? Do most people that run backend server just install
x11 an
d5]
Abort trap
If I run "sudo portversion", it works.
Does anyone know why I can run "portversion" on one of the machines
and have to run "sudo portversion" on the other?
I can run pkg_version of either machine without sudo.
Tankko
15 matches
Mail list logo
