freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
Hi folks, I want ask about error in `dmesg` output remove Bump sched buckets to 64 (was 0) in FreeBSD 8.3 STABLE version. Where's the code lines should be remove (safety)? Thank You -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
PF RDR from LAN to LAN
Hi folks, I've little questions about RDR using Packet Filter (PF), I used IPF (IPFILTER) before and success with this scenario. extif = outside interface intif = internal interface public_ip = 202.xxx.xxx.xxx client_create = 192.168.1.1, port = 6112 client_join = 192.168.1.2 for outside/internet rdr pass on $extif proto tcp from any to $public_ip port 6112 - $client_create port 6112 That's rule success can forward from from internet to $client_create, now other plan how to forward $client_join to $client_create. I use this rule: rdr pass on $intif proto tcp from $client_join to $public_ip port 6112 - $client_create port 6112 As far i know if $client_create created game host with port 6112 will be translate to $public_ip with port 6112 too. so I need to forward from LAN to $public_ip/6112 to actually who create game ($client_create/6112) pfctl -s state resulting: client_create 6112 - public_ip 6112 - client_join SYS-CLOSED Anyone help for this issue - Thank you -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, budsz wrote: [..] keyword instead of an explicit address. The search terminates if this rule matches. Note particularly the last sentence. You'll have to do your dummynet piping first, if it is to apply also to forwarded packets. (sysctl) net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: 1 When set, the packet exiting from the dummynet pipe or from ng_ipfw(4) node is not passed though the firewall again. Other- wise, after an action, the packet is reinjected into the firewall at the next rule. It seems that you may have one_pass set to 1. Set to 0, packets will continue through the ruleset on exit from pipe/s, so to your fwd rule. cheers, Ian Thank you very much, lazy to read ipfw(8) :) pipe pipe_nr Pass packet to a dummynet ``pipe'' (for bandwidth limitation, delay, etc.). See the TRAFFIC SHAPER (DUMMYNET) CONFIGURATION Section for further information. The search terminates; however, on exit from the pipe and if the sysctl(8) variable net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass is not set, the packet is passed again to the firewall code starting from the next rule. -- budsz No problem. However it's considered good form to also copy responses cc'd back to the two lists this thread appears on, for the archives. Not that I need the credit, but it shows that the advice was useful, and that other list members need not also respond, thinking it unresolved. cheers, Ian OK,thank you for reminding me :) TIA -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules
Hi folks,
I already found the mistake of my ruleset sequence on my box, for ex:
${fwcmd} add 30 fwd ${ipproxy},${portproxy} tcp from ${ipclproxy} to
any dst-port ${porthttp} in via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} add 52 pipe 2 ip from any to ${ipclient} via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} add 53 pipe 3 ip from ${ipclient} to any via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw ${bwcldown} mask dst-ip 0x
${fwcmd} pipe 3 config bw ${bwclup} mask src-ip 0x
With this ruleset sequence, the limiter didn't work but fwd rules working.
If I switching like:
${fwcmd} add 52 pipe 2 ip from any to ${ipclient} via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} add 53 pipe 3 ip from ${ipclient} to any via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw ${bwcldown} mask dst-ip 0x
${fwcmd} pipe 3 config bw ${bwclup} mask src-ip 0x
${fwcmd} add 70 fwd ${ipproxy},${portproxy} tcp from ${ipclproxy} to
any dst-port ${porthttp} in via ${ifint0}
The limiter working but fwd didn't work. Anyone have a clue for fix
this dilemma?
Thank You
--
budsz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
arp rejecting not working
Hello, I've strange problem in FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE: root:~# uname -smr FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE i386 root:~# arp -a | grep pcbill pcbill.domain.net (192.168.100.100) at 00:1c:f0:63:03:08 on rl0 permanent [ethernet] root:~# arp -s pcbill.domain.net 00:1c:f0:63:03:08 reject root:~# ping 192.168.100.100 PING 192.168.100.100 (192.168.100.100): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.100.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=218.360 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.100.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=14.318 ms ^C --- 192.168.100.100 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 14.318/116.339/218.360/102.021 ms But on other machine: root:~# uname -smr FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE i386 root:~# arp -a | grep mdm-po-02 ip.mdm-po-02.p2m.domain.net (10.2.0.1) at 94:0c:6d:be:9e:1a on rl3 permanent [ethernet] root:~# arp -s ip.mdm-po-02.p2m.domain.net 94:0c:6d:be:9e:1a reject root:~# ping 10.2.0.1 PING 10.2.0.1 (10.2.0.1): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Host is down ^C --- 10.2.0.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss Any change log or something in FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE about arp -s command? Thanks in advance. -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
PPPoE trouble handshaking
Hi, I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as bridging to my box. here is my /etc/ppp/ppp.conf: default: #set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command #set log all set log Phase tun command speedy: set device PPPoE:rl1 set authname xx...@isp.net set authkey x set dial set login set cd 5 set crtscts off add default HISADDR set timeout 0 # 3 minute idle timer (the default) # no idle time out, will not disconnect set mru 1492 set mtu 1492 set speed sync enable lqr set lqrperiod 5 enable mssfixup # For noisy lines, we may want to reconnect (up to 20 times) after loss # of carrier, with 3 second delays between each attempt: # #set reconnect 3 20 set redial 0 0 I try to use -ddial mode with ppp(8). Here is log problem /var/log/ppp.log: Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - hangup Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Thu Jun 25 11:59:56 2009 Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup - opening Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Enter pause (0) for redialing. Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial Jun 25 12:00:01 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier Jun 25 12:00:06 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! And, with full debug mode: Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Timer: Begin of Timer Service List--- Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Timer: physical throughput timer[0x28412068]: freq = 1.00s, next = 0.00s, state = running Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Timer: End of Timer Service List --- Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x28412068] Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - hangup Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Debug: deflink: Close Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Thu Jun 25 11:24:27 2009 Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup - opening Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting dial timer[0x28410d44] Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Enter pause (0) for redialing. Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Timer: Select returns -1 Jun 25 11:24:32 rtr-gw ppp[3090]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Redial timer expired. Anyone know this problem.. my box very hard to negotiation with my ISP. Thank You -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PPPoE trouble handshaking
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Vassiliadisnvass9...@gmx.com wrote: budsz wrote: I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as bridging to my box. Could you run tcpdump -ni rl1 while trying and post it to the list? If problem appear, I will do it. This problem not regularly, I got the same problem 2 week ago and today. I don't know what happen exactly, but I can dialing again after 3 hours. Thank You. -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PPPoE trouble handshaking
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Nikos Vassiliadisnvass9...@gmx.com wrote: budsz wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Vassiliadisnvass9...@gmx.com wrote: budsz wrote: I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as bridging to my box. Could you run tcpdump -ni rl1 while trying and post it to the list? If problem appear, I will do it. This problem not regularly, I got the same problem 2 week ago and today. I don't know what happen exactly, but I can dialing again after 3 hours. So, your configuration works, but at times it gets disconnected. And when that disconnection happens, it fails to re-connect. That means that if you pull the modem's power plug, you'll be able to establish a connection after some time and not immediately, right? 1) You should also enable echo along with enable lqr. When you pull the FreeBSD's ethernet plug does it work? 2) You should watch the logs and wait for it to disconnect, plug the ethernet in and wait to re-connect on its own. 3) Then you should try the same with the DSL line, pull the plug from the modem and it should behave the same way, that is disconnect and re-connect on its own. Do these three steps and if everything works, wait for the random disconnection to happen. It should behave the same way. tcpdump is your friend while trying the above. OK, dud. Right now I got some problem here output tcpdump -ni rl1: 20:14:58.764661 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x009043C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:14:58.864426 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x009043C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:00.799157 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:00.799165 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:04.014864 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:04.031335 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:05.905186 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC05C5CC2] [Service-Name] 20:15:05.905193 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC05C5CC2] [Service-Name] 20:15:08.964978 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0xC05C5CC2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:09.064289 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0xC05C5CC2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:11.011223 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x008922C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:11.011231 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x008922C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:14.164175 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x008922C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:14.181137 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x008922C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:16.117251 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC0595CC2] [Service-Name] 20:15:16.117259 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC0595CC2] [Service-Name] 20:15:19.248075 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0xC0595CC2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:19.264056 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0xC0595CC2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:22.367294 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x007D22C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:22.367302 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:22.367311 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [Service-Name] 20:15:25.464788 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x007D22C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:25.480781 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:25.497286 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x408612C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:15:27.473336 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x805B5CC2] [Service-Name] tcpdump: WARNING: rl1: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on rl1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 20:16:18.533688 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x009443C2] [Service-Name] 20:16:18.533695 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x009443C2] [Service-Name] 20:16:18.968779 PPPoE [ses 0x197f] LCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 92, length 21 20:16:21.662866 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x009443C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:16:21.679340 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x009443C2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:16:22.040825 PPPoE [ses 0x197f] LCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 92, length 21 20:16:23.639726 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x005B5CC2] [Service-Name] 20:16:23.639733 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x005B5CC2] [Service-Name] 20:16:25.138200 PPPoE [ses 0x197f] LCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 92, length 21 20:16:26.762773 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x005B5CC2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:16:26.779243 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uniq 0x005B5CC2] [AC-Name BRAS-D3-BDG-8Y224150703147] [Service-Name] 20:16:28.562282 PPPoE PADT [ses 0x197f] 20:16:28.562306 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC08722C2] [Service-Name] 20:16:28.745757 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC08722C2] [Service-Name] We got disconnected after get some warning in /var/log/ppp.log: Jun 25 20:12:15 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Phase: deflink: open - lcp Jun 25 20:12:15 rtr-gw ppp[346]: tun0: Warning
Re: Syntax base IP
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
budsz wrote:
ipunlimit=192.168.0.100/32,10.35.4.1/32,202.129.189.42/32,\
202.129.189.45/32,125.163.77.180/32,202.43.167.70/32,\
202.43.167.72/32,202.43.161.119/32,202.10.32.10/32,202.93.20.22/32,\
202.93.20.23/32,202.93.20.24/32,122.102.49.132/32,\
202.43.161.124/32,202.93.247.26/32,202.93.247.28/32
${fwcmd} add 100 pipe 1 ip from ${ippriviix} to { not ${ipunlimit} }
${portlim} via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} add 101 pipe 1 ip from { not ${ipunlimit} } ${portlim} to
${ippriviix} via ${ifint0}
Executing firewall I got error message like this:
#sh /etc/rc.firewall
ipfw: opcode 6 size 33 wrong
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
ipfw: opcode 2 size 33 wrong
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
Hallo,
I got some problem here, these are the example of the rules i've set:
portlim=20-21,80,88,443,2009,8080,8088,10007,18755
bwunlimit=64Kbit/s
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw ${bwunlimit}
${fwcmd} table 1 add 10.35.4.1/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 122.102.49.132/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 125.163.77.180/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 192.168.0.100/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.10.32.10/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.129.189.42/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.129.189.45/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.43.161.119/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.43.161.124/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.43.167.70/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.43.167.72/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.93.20.22/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.93.20.23/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.93.20.24/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.93.247.26/32 1
${fwcmd} table 1 add 202.93.247.28/32 1
${fwcmd} add 100 pipe tablearg ip from ${ippriviix} to not table(1)
${portlim} via ${ifint0}
${fwcmd} add 101 pipe tablearg ip from not table(1) ${portlim} to
${ippriviix} via ${ifint0}
As a result, those ip addresses can pass. But any other ip adresses
(other than) those above could not be accessed, as if it were blocked.
My intention is to limit (NOT blocking) any other ip addresses (other
than) those ip's above. How could i use the 'not' keyword for above
case ?
Thank You
--
budsz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACPI trouble FreeBSD 7.0 STABLE
Hi, Yesterday, I try to CVSUP/make world from FreeBSD 6.3 STABLE to FreeBSD 7.0 STABLE: I got strange debug message here: Mar 2 14:14:14 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) Mar 2 14:14:14 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) Mar 2 14:14:15 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) Mar 2 14:14:15 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) Mar 2 14:14:16 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) Mar 2 14:14:16 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) Mar 2 14:14:17 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) Mar 2 14:14:17 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) Mar 2 14:14:18 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) Mar 2 14:14:18 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) Mar 2 14:14:18 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: suspend request ignored (not ready yet) Mar 2 14:14:18 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi: request to enter state S5 failed (err 6) Mar 2 14:14:19 gw-core-iixrouter syslogd: exiting on signal 15 Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sat Mar 1 09:44:33 WIT 2008 Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IIX-ROUTER Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.13GHz (2130.56-MHz 686-class CPU) Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,F Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: Features2=0x441dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNXT-ID,xTPR Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: real memory = 263454720 (251 MB) Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: avail memory = 247963648 (236 MB) Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: ACPI APIC Table: A M I OEMAPIC Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi0: A M I OEMRSDT on motherboard Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi0: [ITHREAD] Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed Mar 2 14:21:20 gw-core-iixrouter kernel: acpi0: reservation of 10, fb0 (3) failed Someone give me clue to resolving this problem. Thanks You. -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange problem of ipfilter
Hallo, I got strange problem ipfilter on FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. After uptime my machine running 7 days until 10 days, I can't access DNS, sometime SSH, and etc, to my box, but this happen randomly. For example I've rule like this: # SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.0.100/32 port = 22 keep state # DNS pass in quick proto udp from 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.0.100/32 port = 53 keep state Whereis: 192.168.0.0/24 my client block ip, 192.168.0.200/32 ip box running ipfilter. I try to create rule: pass in all pass out all Then reload ipfilter rule. Or I try to restart my machine with my default rule. So everything gone be alright. FYI, I use: root:~# ipf -V ipf: IP Filter: v4.1.13 (416) Kernel: IP Filter: v4.1.13 Running: yes Log Flags: 0 = none set Default: block all, Logging: available Active list: 0 Feature mask: 0xa root:~# uname -srm FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 I do compile ipfilter with default block in kernel configuration. This night I'll try to make world my FreeBSD box and I hope FreeBSD's commiter already revision with this bug. Would you give some clue to fix this problem. Thanks you for your help. TIA -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help about dynamic rule dummynet
Hi,
I've old problem with dynamic rule dummynet. I've internet cafe and of
couse they could using download accelerator for download large file
from HTTP/FTP server. In this case they use Freshget or something like
that. In /etc/rc.firewall I have rule like:
# Downstream for client
ipcl=192.168.0.0/24{1,10,11,12,13,14,50}
bwdown=68Kbit/s
${fwcmd} add 52 queue 1 ip from any to ${ipcl} out via ${ifint}
${fwcmd} queue 1 config weight 5 pipe 2 mask dst-ip 0x00ff
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw ${bwdown}
# Upstream for client
bwup=36Kbit/s
${fwcmd} add 53 queue 2 ip from ${ipcl} to any in via ${ifint}
${fwcmd} queue 2 config weight 5 pipe 3 mask src-ip 0x00ff
${fwcmd} pipe 3 config bw ${bwup}
My LAN using private ip address block C (192.168.0.0/24), my client's
ip address 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.10 - 192.168.0.14, ${ifint} is
inside interface, also I use 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD.
This illustration with output iftop:
www.yahoo.com= client10.example.com 1.91Kb 1.93Kb 1.82Kb
www.hotmail.com = client11.example.com 1.90Kb 1.91Kb 1.80Kb
www.friendster.com = client12.example.com 1.50Kb 1.52Kb 1.51Kb
www.geocities.com= client13.example.com 1.60Kb 1.64Kb 1.61Kb
www.geocities.com= client14.example.com 1.54Kb 1.57Kb 1.53Kb
ftp.freebsd.org = client01.example.com 10.92Kb 10.90Kb 10.89Kb
ftp.freebsd.org = client01.example.com 11.87Kb 11.91Kb 11.90Kb
ftp.freebsd.org = client01.example.com 12.88Kb 12.91Kb 12.89Kb
ftp.freebsd.org = client01.example.com 10.70Kb 10.72Kb 10.71Kb
ftp.freebsd.org = client01.example.com 10.75Kb 10.78Kb 10.77Kb
If 192.168.0.1 using accelerator to download large file and splited to
5 file simultantly, the client's (192.168.0.10 - 192.168.0.14) will
exhausted bandwidht.
How to resolve this problem, any suggestion?
TIA
--
budsz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Realtek ethernet problem
Hi folks, I've some problem (can't ping etc) with rl (Realtek Ethernet Manufacture), if I installing that ethernet on the one CPU rl0 rl, either that ethernet can't be use. Whereas rl0 rl1 has been active if I use `ifconfig` command. If I droping one of them from my CPU, ethernet can use again. Would you give information with this situation TIA -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CPU Hang after upgrade to -STABLE
Hi Folks I use FreeBSD 4.10 -RELEASE for gateway with DSL Modem connection, so far so good, but one day I decide to upgrade to 4.11 -STABLE version, I don't know why with the same hardware suddenly my CPU hang, nothing to do except press riset button. I didn't find any log message so very difficult for us to find the solution. I try to downgrade with FreeBSD 4.10 -RELEASE again, so the trouble doesn't appear. I've contact vendor hardware for solve problem, but they said my CPU is OK, I don't know if the DSL modem doesn't compatible with -STABLE version, or other hardware maybe? I was running (CPU+FreeBSD -STABLE version) three years ago with wireless connection, after I change to DSL modem, I get problem CPU hang. Would you like to guide me how to solve problem or at least advice. Thank You. -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rule dummynet.
Hi, I use FreeBSD 4.X using traffic shapper with dummynet, I've some questions about implementation rule for my box, for example: I've 4 client computer let's say A, B, C, and D. I've total bandwith 1 Mbps. If client A online and the other offline (B, C, D), client A should get 100% bandwidht (In this case 1 Mbps), if client A B online then A should get = 50% (500 kbps), B = 50% (500 kbps). If client A, B, C online then they should get 33,33% of 1 Mbps, If all user online they should get 25% of 1 Mbps. Dummynet can do this?, Would you give me an example rule? Thank You. -- budsz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Antoine Jacoutot schrieb:,
What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming:
- from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1
- from LAN to internet, using NET connection2
To be more understandable, something like this:
route add from DMZ defaut em0
route add from LAN defaut em1
-- I know it is not a real command line, it's just to make things clearer.
Thats easy on your router:
#!/bin/sh
gateway1=10.10.10.1
gateway2=10.10.10.2
dmz=10.10.20.0/24
lan=10.10.30.0/24
ipfw add fwd ${gateway2} ip from ${dmz} to any
ipfw add fwd ${gateway1} ip from ${lan} to any
I never try loading balancing using ipfw(8), but ever read in manual
ipf(5) using rdr for loading balancing. I think this is only work in NAT's box.
I want to know loading balancing with dual connection ISP with FreeBSD,
maybe like
http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN293, in
that URL only using routing can result loading balancing connection.
My questions is does FreeBSD with route(8) can do like that URL. We
playing only in routing table.
Thanks You.
--
budsz
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loading balancing with more than one ISP.
Hi, I was read in this URL: http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN293 The questions is: 1. With FreeBSD can do like this?, example with route(8)? 2. Does FreeBSD support more than 1 as defaut gateway in routing table?? 3. I found some options in /etc/default/rc.conf like static_routes=, if I use static_routes= _WITHOUT_ defaut gateway (defaultrouter= in /etc/rc.conf) it's possible? 4. In that URL using weight as prority balancing connection, so in FreeBSD how do this? Thanks You. -- budsz pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: What's this mean?
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 02:36:28PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: in_chksum is a routine that validates the checksum of recieved network data. As far as I can tell from the code, that error means that the packet of data was three bytes shorter than it should have been. One way or the other it's a network problem. Could be crappy NIC or other hardware. Could be some sort of attack using invalid packets. I'm not familiar enough with that corner of the code to say for sure. Is this happening frequently? If you only saw the message once, you can probably ignore it as a network glitch, but if it's showing up often, you'd do well to track down the source and fix it. Thanks Bill for explanation. I assume if I under attack with invalid packet of data maybe you've any advice to prevent this problem?. -- budsz ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's this mean?
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:58:25AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: I'm guessing the problem is continuous. Start monitoring your network traffic with tcpdump or ethereal or whatever seems easiest for you. Search the Internet for information on short packet attacks or anything else that seems to be similar to your problem. Lock down your firewall rules in general. As I said before, I'm not expert enough to give you any specific advice on this particular issue, but standard security techniques still apply. OK, this's clear Bill, I think this's like hardware error. I was check it, the kernel's message has repeat only four times. I don't know in the next time. Thanks for your reply. -- budsz pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
What's this mean?
Hi dude, I get message in /var/log/message: /kernel: in_cksum: out of data by 3 Would you explain this message? -- budsz ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tunnel
Hi, I've tried some tunnel in FreeBSD box, I started with this URL : http://www.ezunix.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=indexreq=viewarticleartid=5page=1 I've two interface in that machine 'wi0' and 'xl0', wi0 link to my IPS and xl0 link for my local net. My ifconfig output look like: router# ifconfig -a xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 202.143.103.229 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast 202.143.103.239 inet6 fe80::260:97ff:fedc:f02e%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 202.143.103.225 netmask 0x broadcast 202.143.103.225 ether 00:60:97:dc:f0:2e media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active lp0: flags=8810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 faith0: flags=8002BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 wi0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 202.143.98.250 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 202.143.98.251 inet6 fe80::202:2dff:fe2d:228b%wi0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 ether 00:02:2d:2d:22:8b media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (DS/11Mbps) status: associated ssid terasnet-09 1:terasnet-09 stationname kumprang channel 2 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 wepmode MIXED weptxkey 1 wepkey 1:64-bit gif0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1280 tunnel inet 202.143.103.229 -- 213.253.1.201 inet6 2001:618:4:2000::dde -- 2001:618:4:2000::ddd prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::260:97ff:fedc:f02e%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 I used ipng.org.uk for broke tunnel, so this /etc/tunnel.conf # Account details username=user password=X #host and port of tunnel server (5571 non ssl, 5572 ssl) hostname=ipng.org.uk port=5572 #interface containing the tunnel endpoint ip and the tunnel interface name local_interface=xl0 tunnel_interface=gif0 #remote tunnel ipv4 endpoint and tunnel ipv6 endpoints #local_ip=youip - Only use this if you have a static address! local_ip=202.143.103.229 remote_ip=213.253.1.201 local_endpoint=2001:618:4:2000::dde remote_endpoint=2001:618:4:2000::ddd I've tunnel in inside interface xl0 (202.143.103.229). and I run a tunnelc like: router# ifconfig gif0 destroy router# tunnelc WARNING: Unable to verify Server Certificate 210 - OK TLS Session Established. DES-CBC3-SHA 200 - Tunnel Server 0.2.1 waiting. 201 - OK Now a password if you please. 202 - OK Password accepted. Welcome budsz 203 - OK Ip updated to 202.143.103.229 210 - OK If you insist. Bye. add net default: gateway 2001:618:4:2000::ddd Tunnel(gif0) created For ipf.rules and ipf6.rules: router# cat /etc/ipf.rules pass in all pass out all router# cat /etc/ipf6.rules pass in all pass out all So, I try to ping to xl0: router# ping6 2001:618:4:2000::dde PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:618:4:2000::dde -- 2001:618:4:2000::dde 16 bytes from 2001:618:4:2000::dde, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.54 ms 16 bytes from 2001:618:4:2000::dde, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=0.453 ms ^C --- 2001:618:4:2000::dde ping6 statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.453/0.497/0.540/0.043 ms If I try to broke gateway: router# ping6 2001:618:4:2000::ddd PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:618:4:2000::dde -- 2001:618:4:2000::ddd ping6: sendmsg: No route to host ping6: wrote 2001:618:4:2000::ddd 16 chars, ret=-1 ping6: sendmsg: No route to host ping6: wrote 2001:618:4:2000::ddd 16 chars, ret=-1 I try to find in routing table: $ netstat -r | more Internet6: DestinationGatewayFlags Netif Expire :: localhost.kumprang UGRSc lo0 = defaultgif1635.tunnels.ip UGSc gif0 localhost.kumprang localhost.kumprang UH lo0 :::0.0.0.0 localhost.kumprang UGRSc lo0 gif1635.tunnels.ipUH gif0 link#6 UHL lo0 fe80:: localhost.kumprang UGRSc lo0 fe80::%xl0 link#1 UC xl0 fe80::260:97ff:fed 00:60:97:dc:f0:2e UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0 fe80::1%lo0Uc lo0 fe80::1%lo0link#3 UHL lo0 fe80::%wi0 link#5 UC wi0 fe80::202:2dff:fe2 00:02:2d:2d:22:8b UHL lo0 fe80::%gif0link#6 UC gif0 fe80::260:97ff:fed link#6 UHL lo0 ff01:: localhost.kumprang U lo0 ff02:: localhost.kumprang UGRSlo0 ff02::%xl0 link#1 UC xl0 ff02::%lo0 localhost.kumprang UC lo0 ff02::%wi0 link#5 UC wi0 ff02::%gif0link#6 UC gif0 I can't understand why it's happen, so finally I ask
About ipfilter
Hi folks, I need ipfilter which supported by IPv6, I was try in FreeBSD 4.7 STABLE it's OK, but if I compiled on FreeBSD 5.0 DP1 always failure, because ipfilter in FreeBSD 5.0 DP1 is too old so not support IPv6. any sugestion for this?, I finished searching in web resource but I can't found anything. TIA -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Tool conveter IPv4 to IPv6
Hi, I've plan to learn IPv6, Now I use IPv4 but it's imposible to hint one by one IPv4 change to IPv6, so anyone who know tool to convert them? and if my ISP doen't support using IPv6 it's possible if I use IPv6? sorry if my questions very silly but I want to know so far the concept to to this. Thx -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Log about named
Hi, I've 2 interface xl0 and wi0 in my box with bind9: $ cat /var/log/message | grep named Dec 15 13:42:00 router named[300]: omitting IPv4 interface wi0 from localnets ACL: address mask not contiguous What that's mean?, It's normally or some problem...? anyone can explain? Thx -- budsz msg12101/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Orinoco problem
Hi, I tried using orinoco lucent ISA adapter on FreeBSD 5.0-DP2, But I can't using it, Does FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 support orinoco ISA adapter?, Generally if I use that card in FreeBSD will auto detected with GENERIC kernel configuration. Of couse I was check my kernel and I found like: device card device wi Anything else..?, Or what..? TIA -- budsz msg11967/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
About options kernel
Hi, Last night I tried FreeBSD 5.0-DP1, but I found some error message: $ dmegs | more cut unknown: PNP0303 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0a03 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0700 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources (port) /cut I tried to find options in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SOME-CONFIG, So what options/device should I remove?. Thx -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: [oetiker@ee.ethz.ch: Re: MRTG problem]
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:07:06PM +0100, Frank Reppin wrote: budsz: have you already informed the maintainer? Not yet sir. Maybe I'll try. Thx -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: [oetiker@ee.ethz.ch: Re: MRTG problem]
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:37:38PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: For what it's worth 2.9.26 works fine on my -current system, monitoring ~500 ports. Ups I forgot tell about this, I was upgrade mrtg via portupgrade and I run in FreeBSD-4.7 STABLE version. -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
mrtg problem after portupgrade
Hi, I've problem in my box, Yesterday I was try to upgrade port and packages with this step : 1. Update port tree without X system. $ cvsup -g -L 2 port-file 2. Backup packages database. $ cd /var/db $ cp -rf pkg pkg.old 3. Check all dependecy application. $pkgdb -F 4. Process updating. $portupgrade -a -O -l /root/UpdateLog I was add -O because Amavis-Perl-11 require qmail-1.03_1 but in my system installed qmail-1.03. 5. Check again dependecy. $ pkgdb -F After that my mrtg graphic was broken, Look like full traffic but scale does't increase (Only 1 bps/s - 10 bps/s), I tried to reinstall mrtg but no change. TIA -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
[oetiker@ee.ethz.ch: Re: MRTG problem]
- Forwarded message from Tobias Oetiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:28:55 +0100 (MET) From: Tobias Oetiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: budsz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MRTG problem In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Today budsz wrote: Hi sir, Sorry if I send private this message, I use FreeBSD in my system, So far so good but yesterday I tried to upgrade mrtg 2.9.22 to mrtg 2.9.26 (Via porting), After that I get some error in mrtg, I have bandwidth only 64 kbps but in mrtg look like: Max In: 34.4 Gb/s (343597.8%)Average In: 34.3 Gb/s (343062.0%) Current In: 12.9 Gb/s (129421.8%) Max Out: 9223372036.9 Gb/s (92233720368547.8%) Average Out:110364024184.7 Gb/s (1103640241846862.6%) Current Out: 41635330833.4 Gb/s (416353308334472.8%) No error in log or stout so I'am very difficult to trace the problem, And I tried to search in web but I can't find anything. Would you help me sir. it seems 2.9.26 is broken on freebsd ... I don't know why ... sorry ... hoping for a patch from some user of this system tobi Thanks You very much. -- ____ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, ETZ J97, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland / // _ \/ _ \/ / System Manager Coach Time Lord Developer Designer /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker +41(0)1-632-5286 - End forwarded message - -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: [oetiker@ee.ethz.ch: Re: MRTG problem]
paul beard writes: budsz wrote: it seems 2.9.26 is broken on freebsd ... I don't know why ... sorry ... hoping for a patch from some user of this system tobi I guess the next question is, how to downgrade a port? Maybe, But however downgrade is tempolary answer -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Sendmail questions
Hi, I got some message from cron daemon like: ---cut Mail in local queue: Mail in submit queue: mailq: illegal option -- A sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [ arg... ] ---cut Whereas I was try to disable sendmail daemon from /etc/rc.conf like: ---cut # Settings for /etc/rc.sendmail: sendmail_enable=NONE # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO/NONE). sendmail_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m # Flags to sendmail (as a server) sendmail_submit_enable=NO # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission sendmail_submit_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost sendmail_outbound_enable=NO # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). sendmail_outbound_flags=-L sm-queue -q30m # Flags to sendmail (outbound only) sendmail_msp_queue_enable=NO # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). sendmail_msp_queue_flags=-L sm-msp-queue -Ac -q30m # Flags for sendmail_msp_queue daemon. ---cut How to resolve this problem? PS : Now I use qmail system for email. TIA -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Changing key in terminal
Hi, I was try last night to split/create new windows in BitchX for example I typed /windows new hide in BX prompt and then I switched to other window using alt+1, alt+2 etc but nothing happend (doesn't switch), Yes If I trying using remote terminal it's OK. The question doesn't about BitctX but How to change key in terminal (console)?, I didn't found this reference in manual. The same problem I saw in ~/.bash_profile if I used TERM=xterm-color variable in this case, I can't using editor like vim, ed (I got like 22h char if I press a key), but if I remotly it's OK, In my box doesn't use X system. Thanks for the solution before. -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
What's this mean
Hi, I got same kernel messages like this: Oct 24 10:30 kumprang /kernel: arp: unknown hardware address format (0xa8aa) Oct 24 10:30 kumprang /kernel: ed0: NIC memoru corrupt - invalid packet length 2094 Oct 24 10?30 kumprang /kernel: arp: runt packet Oct 24 10:30 kumprang /kernel: ed0: NIC memoru corrupt - invalid packet length 2056 What this mean..? and how to resolve this problem..? TIA -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
About rc.firewall
Hi,
I've already read some manual ipfw, firewall etc, but I can't found
explanation some variable in /etc/rc.firewall for example:
case ${firewall_type} in
[Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]
Some rule
;;
*)
Some rule
;;
esac
I don't understand about [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn], [Cc][Ll][Ee][Nn][Tt],
[Ss][Ii][Mm][Pp][Ee]...etc, Why we should write like this..? what
this mean..?, How this work?, Would somebody give me some URL about
this or something else.
TIA
--
budsz
msg05129/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: About rc.firewall
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:23:43AM -0400, MikeM wrote: The [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn] syntax allows you to specify Open, oPen, OPen, opeN, etc. in rc.conf to configure the type of firewall you want from the samples provided in the base install. OK thx, So if I use firewall_type= in /etc/rc.conf, what's relations with line at /etc/rc.firewall for example [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]?, It's enough if I define firewall type only in /etc/rc.firewall..? -- budsz msg05138/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: About rc.firewall
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:30:18AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote: Designating the type open will make your system set up wide open and can be useful when debugging the rc.firewall script and the kernel has been compiled to deny all. If you want to the rc.firewall to load and bee effective though, you must modify it for your own use, incuding the proper designations of interfaces, ports, and rules. Sorry, I mean is: What is the relation between firewall_type in /etc/rc.conf and the same statement; firewall_type in rc.firewall? Is it enough if i only define the firewall_type just once; In rc.firewall only? -- budsz msg05155/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
more virtual console
Hi, Where I'am find some line config for adding more virtual for ex: ALT + F1 until F12 maybe..? Thanks -- budsz msg05010/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Question port in ipfw
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:43:37PM -0700, Michael wrote:
This is a good question and maybe someone can answer the question with regards
to using a variable to do it.
I do know however that it does support a range because I've used it within my
rules like this: 1030-1050 but not seperating multiple ranges with comma's.
The one time I did try to use multiple ranges I couldn't get it to work
either. I just assumed that it was just my lack of knowing how to format it
and not that it couldn't be done.
In man ipfw explain like:
[-cut-]
With the TCP and UDP protocols, optional ports may be specified
as:
{port|port-port|port:mask}[,port[,...]]
The `-' notation specifies a range of ports (including bound-
aries).
[-cut-]
Well, If I following this manual of couse with multiple ranges port is no
problem. can somebody explain about this?
--
budsz
msg04642/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Some problem with dummynet
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: budsz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night, I tried to limit my client which I changed 23Kbit/s to 1bit/s (Just experiment), I got some message like below: That's probably not a good idea, because it will take several minutes to transfer even a small packet. That will trigger timeouts, confuse retransmit algorithms etc. I'm not surprised that the dummynet code is confused by such useless values, too. OK thx for information -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Some problem with dummynet
Hi, Last night, I tried to limit my client which I changed 23Kbit/s to 1bit/s (Just experiment), I got some message like below: ---cut -- dummynet: warning, heap 0 is 1531352822 ticks late -- dummynet: warning, heap 0 is 1531314423 ticks late -- dummynet: warning, heap 0 is 1531276024 ticks late -- dummynet: warning, heap 0 is 1531237625 ticks late -- dummynet: warning, heap 0 is 1531199226 ticks late ---cut What's going on..?, does dummynet crash? any suggestion for this? PS: I use FreeBSD 4.6.2-Release. TIA -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
