Release engineering process confusions and make (build)world

2008-06-16 Thread cco1817-0
Hi folks,

Up to now, when I'm installing my FreeBSD boxes I download the latest RELEASE 
iso-image for my platform. These days I used 7.0-RELEASE. For security fixes I 
use the provided patches as mentioned in the security advisories. 

Since a long time I'm asking myself the following questions and I don't find 
answers in the handbook (e.g. 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/article.html) or 
other ressources:

1. Some SA's say that the a bug is corrected in a particular RELENG or RELEASE 
or a patched RELEASE. For example FreeBSD-SA-08:05.openssh states that 
RELENG_7_0, 7.0-RELEASE-p1. But where can I get a -p1??? I've never seen 
iso-images for a x.y-RELEASE-pnn. Is this the time where I need to build a 
release (as iso-image) by myself? If so, what branch-tag do I need to get 
7.0-RELEASE-p1?

2. I understood that there are two different development branches, HEAD aka 
CURRENT and STABLE. I avoid using these branches because I'm not a 
developer. Thats the reason why I only want to use RELEASES. But what the hell 
is a RELENG??? Why are these things not called 7.0-CURRENT or 7.0-STABLE and 
so on (and 7.0-RELEASE for me)? Maybe I've a problem to understand this because 
I'm not really familar with CVSup.

3. I played around with jails these days and I had my first contact with make 
world. Despite the inconsistencies in the handbook where the jail-chapter 
instructs to use make world and the rebuilding world part warns explicitly 
and proposes make buildworld (but the Makefile tells me that the target 
world stands for buildworld + installworld, no kernel which seems 
okay?!), does it make sense to use make buildworld also when I'm not updating 
to another RELEASE? As it compiles everything on my machine (it autodetects my 
CPU and features?!) I guess the system should perform better?! Is it possible 
or common to update to the latest source tree (where latest means I want to 
stay at the current RELEASE but want to have all patches like 7.0-RELEASE-p1)? 
Or results an updating process of the source tree always in a switch to STABLE 
or CURRENT (depending on the branch tag in CVSup config?)?

Many thanks in advance to everyone who puts me in the right direction. Before 
posting to the list I read some documents (mainly the handbook), but maybe I 
missed some small but important sentences. Thanks!

cheers,
Ede


  __
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail.
Dem pfiffigeren Posteingang.
http://de.overview.mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


VIA UniChrome Pro II 3D/2D

2007-09-09 Thread cco1817-0
Hi,
   
  is there any way to get my VIA UniChrome Pro II 3D/2D on a Via EPIA EX1 
to work without the vesa-driver under xorg? Looking for a specific driver but 
don't find something.
   
  With vesa it's nearly unusable slow.
  Didn't found anything, neither on www.openchrome.org.
   
  Thanks for help in advance!
  Greetings,
  Robert
   

   
-
Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen? Versuchen SieĀ“s mit 
dem  neuen Yahoo! Mail. 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]