[image removed]
Re: Effects of CPUTYPE
Wojciech Puchar
to:
freebsd-questions, parish
2008-06-11 20:31
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my personal opinion, the small gain you get is more than
overwhelmed by the big pain you get from setting CPUTYPE.
I'm setting
Jonathan Chen wrote:
Mark Ovens wrote:
Trying to identify why I should be having all these problems I've been
looking for anything that may be specific to my machine. One thing I've
come up with is the fact that I have CPUTYPE?=athlon-mp in
/etc/make.conf on both 6.3 and 7.0.
In my personal opinion, the small gain you get is more than
overwhelmed by the big pain you get from setting CPUTYPE.
I'm setting CPUTYPE on all of my machines for many years,
without the slightest problems. No pain at all. They're
all kinds of different processors, c3-2 (VIA), athlon64,
and
On Thu, June 5, 2008 00:24, Jonathan Chen wrote:
In my personal opinion, the small gain you get is more than
overwhelmed by the big pain you get from setting CPUTYPE.
Thanks Jonathan. I think I'll reinstall my 7.0 system from scratch and
install the apps from packages rather than build from
For months now I've been having ever increasing problems with software
(ports) stopping working - or not working properly; xorg, digikam,
jalbum, etc.
The problems are the same on 6.3-STABLE and a brand new, clean install
of 7.0. Searching mailing lists and Google makes me think that a lot of
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:14:14PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
Trying to identify why I should be having all these problems I've been
looking for anything that may be specific to my machine. One thing I've
come up with is the fact that I have CPUTYPE?=athlon-mp in
/etc/make.conf on both 6.3
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:14:14 +0100
Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For months now I've been having ever increasing problems with
software (ports) stopping working - or not working properly; xorg,
digikam, jalbum, etc.
...
I understand that this optimizes compilation for that CPU but
