Hi,
My 4.8 box died (after 70+ days) for reasons as yet unknown. I couldn't log
in remotely or at virtual consoles, main console was completely unresponsive
and I couldn't ctrl-alt-del so I had to hit reset.
I've got the box back up but I can't mount my 2 ext2fs partitions (had to
comment them
Thus spake Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:09:12PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FreeBSD support for ext2fs is a specific instance of the more
general problem that features that very few people care about tend
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:25:56AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:12:12PM -0500, Chris Pepper wrote:
At 7:50 PM -0800 2002/11/20, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
LINT says:
#
# Add support for the EXT2FS filesystem
On 2002-11-20 19:50, David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know they're distinct, but it's silly for a discussion of Linux
applications to ignore the possibility of those apps residing on a
Linux filesystem. I couldn't find ext2fs documented
not talking about linking ext2fs support into the kernel by
default, I'm talking about just *creating* the module by default.
See previous discussion. Stability isn't an issue, except for
people who explicitly load the module. I'm aware of the problems
with linking GPL'd code into the kernel
Thus spake Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LINT says:
#
# Add support for the EXT2FS filesystem of Linux fame. Be a bit
# careful with this - the ext2fs code has a tendency to lag behind
# changes and not be exercised very much, so mounting read/write could
# be dangerous
At 2:06 AM -0800 2002/11/19, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to get at a file on an ext2fs slice. I'm a bit
confused about kernel recompiles vs. KLDs for Linux compatibility,
though. Am I reading correctly at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To use ext2fs, you can either add
the option EXT2FS to your kernel config to compile it statically
into your kernel, or you can load the ext2fs module dynamically,
even into GENERIC. To do the latter, the module must exist;
it will be created if you
At 7:50 PM -0800 2002/11/20, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To use ext2fs, you can either add
the option EXT2FS to your kernel config to compile it statically
into your kernel, or you can load the ext2fs module dynamically,
even into GENERIC. To do
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:12:12PM -0500, Chris Pepper wrote:
At 7:50 PM -0800 2002/11/20, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
LINT says:
#
# Add support for the EXT2FS filesystem of Linux fame. Be a bit
# careful with this - the ext2fs code has
Thus spake Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to get at a file on an ext2fs slice. I'm a bit
confused about kernel recompiles vs. KLDs for Linux compatibility,
though. Am I reading correctly at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu.html
http
Folks,
I'm trying to get at a file on an ext2fs slice. I'm a bit
confused about kernel recompiles vs. KLDs for Linux compatibility,
though. Am I reading correctly at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu.html
http://www.seabug.org/archive/2000-05/msg00086.html
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:47:21PM -0500, Chris Pepper wrote:
This seems a bit backwards -- is anyone aware of work to make
ext2fs a standard module, so it can be loaded under GENERIC?
xor# uname -a
FreeBSD xor.obsecurity.org 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #7: Sun Nov 3 17:11:34 PST
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
