Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-16 Thread Tim Judd
As promised, here is the link

Was recommended only once by a vendor we use.  Haven't done ANY research on
it, and WILL do research on it.  I'd be interested to hear outcomes from
anybody here that tries it.

http://www.mailenable.com/

Thanks all,
--Tim
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-15 Thread Charles Oppermann
 I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows 2003.

Nothing unfortunate about using Windows 2003.  It's well supported and well
known.  That's not a knock against any other OS, but if there are other
reasons to use an OS other than FreeBSD, people shouldn't feel a need to
denigrate or apologize for it (not saying that you are doing that
specifically, but many people do).

 I need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for purchasing
 additional software.

That's what I love about FreeBSD :-)

 Exchange requires too many hacks to configure a
 catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get along very well.

I used to run a small Exchange 2000 (later Exchange 2003) system and it had
a method by which all mail that didn't match an existing mailbox account
could be routed to either a specific account or to a mailbox that could be
accessed by other accounts.  I don't recall the details, and I think someone
else pointed you in the right direction already, but if you still have
difficulty, let me know and I'll try to find out the exact steps.  What
version of Exchange would you run?

Microsoft's Small Business Server product might be better suited, but that
too might be too expensive.

 So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest
 OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?

I think that's a great idea.

I've ran FreeBSD 7.0 as a guest on Windows XP, Vista and FBSD7.1 under the
Windows 7 beta with good success.  The host was running Microsoft Virtual PC
2007 with the latest service pack.  There were some networking things I had
to figure out, but I was impressed with the performance.

I just checked and Windows Server 2003 is one of the supported operating
systems.  Note that VPC is a free product that is downloadable from
Microsoft.

Windows Server 200_8_ includes HyperV virtualization that differs
significantly from the technology in the VPC product, which focuses on
desktop scenarios (although Windows Server 200_3_ is supported). I have not
tried for myself, but I understand there are some challenges getting FreeBSD
running correctly under HyperV. I mention this because you might assume that
whatever works under Windows 2003+VPC will work under Windows 2008 w/HyperV
and that may not be the case.

 Thanks in advance,

Good luck!  Let us know how it works out.




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-15 Thread Tim Judd

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 10:23 -0800, Charles Oppermann wrote:
  I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows 2003.
 
 Nothing unfortunate about using Windows 2003.  It's well supported and well
 known.  That's not a knock against any other OS, but if there are other
 reasons to use an OS other than FreeBSD, people shouldn't feel a need to
 denigrate or apologize for it (not saying that you are doing that
 specifically, but many people do).
 
  I need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for purchasing
  additional software.
 
 That's what I love about FreeBSD :-)
 
  Exchange requires too many hacks to configure a
  catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get along very well.
 
 I used to run a small Exchange 2000 (later Exchange 2003) system and it had
 a method by which all mail that didn't match an existing mailbox account
 could be routed to either a specific account or to a mailbox that could be
 accessed by other accounts.  I don't recall the details, and I think someone
 else pointed you in the right direction already, but if you still have
 difficulty, let me know and I'll try to find out the exact steps.  What
 version of Exchange would you run?
 
 Microsoft's Small Business Server product might be better suited, but that
 too might be too expensive.
 
  So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest
  OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?
 
 I think that's a great idea.
 
 I've ran FreeBSD 7.0 as a guest on Windows XP, Vista and FBSD7.1 under the
 Windows 7 beta with good success.  The host was running Microsoft Virtual PC
 2007 with the latest service pack.  There were some networking things I had
 to figure out, but I was impressed with the performance.
 
 I just checked and Windows Server 2003 is one of the supported operating
 systems.  Note that VPC is a free product that is downloadable from
 Microsoft.
 
 Windows Server 200_8_ includes HyperV virtualization that differs
 significantly from the technology in the VPC product, which focuses on
 desktop scenarios (although Windows Server 200_3_ is supported). I have not
 tried for myself, but I understand there are some challenges getting FreeBSD
 running correctly under HyperV. I mention this because you might assume that
 whatever works under Windows 2003+VPC will work under Windows 2008 w/HyperV
 and that may not be the case.


We're running WS2008 with a WS2003 HyperV'd server.  Performance (disk,
network) sucks really badly and we are going to be pulling that VM off
of HyperV.

FreeBSD can't load the BTX with HyperV.  It's as if it's unsupported (go
figure!).

I've ran VirtualPC as test boxes plenty of times -- works for the most
part, but VMWare server/player might be a better product overall.  I've
played with VirtualBox too -- but it seemed bloated beyond reason.

I think a purchased copy of VMWare quite honestly, is the best option
out there to have UNIVERSAL, global access.  And yes, I'm going to find
that link I mentioned earlier and post it tomorrow.

--Tim

 
  Thanks in advance,
 
 Good luck!  Let us know how it works out.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-15 Thread Kurt Buff
Using catchall email account is a sin. Don't do it.

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Bobby Walker bo...@missionaccess.org wrote:
 I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows 2003.   I
 need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for purchasing
 additional software.  Exchange requires too many hacks to configure a
 catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get along very well.  So,
 today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest OS on
 the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?

 Thanks in advance,
 Bobby
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-14 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 14/2/09 06:28, Tim Judd wrote:
 On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 22:32 -0600, Bobby Walker wrote:
   
 I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows 2003.   
 I need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for purchasing 
 additional software.  Exchange requires too many hacks to configure a 
 catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get along very well.  
 So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest 
 OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?

 Thanks in advance,
 Bobby
 

 There was a recommendation of another win32-based email server -- and I
 have it bookmarked at work.  From the single person that mentioned it,
 he was praising it pretty well.

 When I get to work, I'll send it on your way.  I just don't have a clue
 what it was right now.

   
From what I can remember http://www.hmailserver.com/ is decent for a
windows based free mailserver (smtp imap pop and imap.)
Been a while since i used it and they seem to have closed the source for
the latest version but its still free as in beer.

Vince
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
   

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-14 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:32:39 -0600
Bobby Walker bo...@missionaccess.org wrote:

I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows
2003. I need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for
purchasing additional software.  Exchange requires too many hacks to
configure a catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get
along very well. So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run
FreeBSD as a guest OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of
doing this?

Actually, I know of several instances of Exchange with 'catchall mail
boxes. It is, to a certain degree, version dependent. You can get the
scripts and other information here. Google for more if you need it.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/324021
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691132.aspx

-- 
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com

The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.

Oscar Wilde


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-14 Thread Michael Powell
Bobby Walker wrote:

 I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows 2003.
 I need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for purchasing
 additional software.  Exchange requires too many hacks to configure a
 catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get along very well.
 So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest
 OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?
 

Another options may be to just use the smtp and pop3 that comes with Win2K3. 
You'll see these in the Add/Remove Windows Components under Add or Remove 
Software of Control Panel. These were previously on the Options Pack CD 
from which you installed IIS, but when Win2K3 came out they were added.

May not fit your requirements. But it is free and Exchange is high $dollar 
and in many situations is overkill. Postfix in a VM might suffice for a 
small load. Free: http://www.vmware.com/products/server/

The main problem I see is the default networking situation in most VM 
installs is NAT. This allows outbound/return traffic but will block incoming 
connection attempts. There are three different networking configurations you 
can choose from, and the one you want is bridge. It's also the most 
difficult to configure. 

I've used VirtualBox on a Linux machine for a while now but it's quite 
possible the VMware Server may be a little more mature for use on a Windows 
box. YMMV

-Mike




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-13 Thread Uwe Laverenz

Bobby Walker schrieb:

So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest 
OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?


If it has to run on top of W2K3 server I would suggest VMware server 2.0 
which can be used for free (as in free beer). Don't expect it to deliver 
high performance, but it should be fine for a small duty server.


Another option would be VirtualBox (free for private use) but there have 
been serious problems with freebsd guests in the past.


bye,
Uwe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Recommendations for running FreeBSD as a guest OS

2009-02-13 Thread Tim Judd
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 22:32 -0600, Bobby Walker wrote:
 I have a small network at work that, unfortunately, uses Windows 2003.   
 I need a good mail server, but I do not have a budget for purchasing 
 additional software.  Exchange requires too many hacks to configure a 
 catchall email account, and Exchange and I do not get along very well.  
 So, today while brainstorming, I thought why not run FreeBSD as a guest 
 OS on the box.  Any suggestions for the best way of doing this?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Bobby

There was a recommendation of another win32-based email server -- and I
have it bookmarked at work.  From the single person that mentioned it,
he was praising it pretty well.

When I get to work, I'll send it on your way.  I just don't have a clue
what it was right now.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org