On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:32 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Hi Everybody ,
I watching freebsd-stable list I saw that somebody have a problem
with SMP support which they are using 4.9 . I know that some improvement
are coming with 5.x But this problem are very important for example
I wonder Does anybody use SMP Support without Problem . Because SMP
is very important things ...
http://geofront.co.uk/cgi-bin/geo-stats.pl
That box has happily been running SMP under 5.0 for well over six months now
without a single glitch :)
Mike Wood
IT Techncian
I am using 4.9-Stable on a Dual Xeon 450MHz processors and have not had
any problems as reported by others.
Been running SMP from the beginning
later
MEM
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 14:32, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Hi Everybody ,
I watching freebsd-stable list I saw that somebody have
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:32:38 +0200
Vahric MUHTARYAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Hi Everybody ,
-
-
- I watching freebsd-stable list I saw that somebody have a problem
- with SMP support which they are using 4.9 . I know that some improvement are
- coming with 5.x But this problem are
I have around ten SMP machines, some Quads, rest Dual CPU machines.
I genuinely cannot remember the last time one of them crashed that
wasn't hardware related (ie physical failure, not software)
(PS I started using FreeBSD around 2.8).
Lawrence Farr
EPC Direct Limited
-Original
I have 5 (iXsystems) dual processors, all running 5.0-RELEASE or safely
behind -CURRENT, with one box unsafely at -CURRENT, so I can't comment
on the -STABLE question.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
