Hi,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
swhetzel Here's the correct code for BDB detection:
swhetzel USE_BDB= 40+
Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined
as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough.
Sincerely,
On 8/11/07, snowcrash+freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
Sounds great, just one point: I'd prefer seeing that exim would make use
of bsd.database.mk.
i /thought/ that use of WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB *is* 'making use of'
bsd.database.mk, wherein,
...
.if defined(WITH_BDB_VER)
. if
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
swhetzel Here's the correct code for BDB detection:
swhetzel USE_BDB= 40+
Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined
as 41+ in
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
swhetzel I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched
swhetzel all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port
swhetzel supported into USE_BDB.
swhetzel USE_BDB=yes
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
swhetzel I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then
patched
swhetzel all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the
port
I have now fixed it so that the exim port doesn't need to set WITH_BDB_VER?=1
anymore. Instead setting either WITH_BDB or WITH_BDB_VER 1 will make the
port use Mk/bsd.database.mk to choose the version of BDB to use, otherwise it
will default to the system BDB.
The updated patch is in PR
