Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-10 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I knew this thread would bring up some ironies. For the record it's all in 
 their
 minds. E-Mails have been upheld in the US Court system as legal documents.

Maybe. But as soon as you have to interact with non-US companies or
administrations, you'll have to revert to fax, because in their legislations,
that's the only legally binding document in addition to real letters.

 IMHO...Faxing is so last century.

Yes, but that's the way the world is. Not everyone has transitioned to
authenticated e-mails. Most legal systems didn't, for some very good
security reasons. At least, I'm relieved that we don't have to fall back
to an even older technology than fax: telex (anyone remember that?)

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-10 Thread Arthur Chance

On 05/10/11 09:36, C. P. Ghost wrote:

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bill Tillmanbtillma...@yahoo.com  wrote:

I knew this thread would bring up some ironies. For the record it's all in their
minds. E-Mails have been upheld in the US Court system as legal documents.


Maybe. But as soon as you have to interact with non-US companies or
administrations, you'll have to revert to fax, because in their legislations,
that's the only legally binding document in addition to real letters.


Digitally signed email has been legally binding in the UK for a decade 
or more. It's only when I'm talking to Bank of America Merrill Lynch 
that I have to revert to faxes because they refuse to accept signed 
email. Sigh.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-07 Thread Bill Tillman
I knew this thread would bring up some ironies. For the record it's all in 
their 
minds. E-Mails have been upheld in the US Court system as legal documents. And 
those people afraid or distrusting of e-mail have only to give me their fax 
number and watch how quickly I can send them bogus fax documents. Like I said, 
it's all in their minds. Faxing is no safer or more secure than any other form 
of comminication. Its simply a waste of ink, toner and paper as far as I'm 
concerned.

I just finished an assignment at a dinosaur of a company which still prints of 
sets of huge D and E size drawings for their estimating department. When I 
showed them the things you can do with a software package like Bluebeam Revu, 
they scoffed at it because it costs $189 per seat. I showed them how they were 
wasting $200 to $500 each week printing out huge sets of drawings. In just on 
month they could have bought enough licensed copied of Revu to account for this 
and then stop printing so much paper which only ends up in the trash. Their 
secretaries were still sending out proposals via fax even when the client 
requested a PDF be sent by e-mail. Their reason for this was, This is the only 
way we know how and we've done it like this for so long, we don't want to 
change.

IMHO...Faxing is so last century.





From: David Brodbeck g...@gull.us
To: FreeBSD Questions questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 1:30:58 PM
Subject: Re: Sending a Fax

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I read the other replies to your post so let me put in my 2 cents worth. For 
the
 last few years, I have basically abandoned faxing in favor of e-mailing PDF 
and
 other document files. Paperless is not only more efficient but its green too.

Believe it or not, there are industries where faxing is still the
norm.  Many industrial suppliers want purchase orders by fax.  It also
seems to be the common way that pharmacies communicate with doctors'
offices.  These are conservative industries where email (and
especially, email attachments) are still viewed with some suspicion.
A lot of times these days the actual endpoint is a digital fax system,
though; sometimes the fax never actually reaches paper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-07 Thread Reed Loefgren

On 05/07/11 08:30, Bill Tillman wrote:

I knew this thread would bring up some ironies. For the record it's all in their
minds. E-Mails have been upheld in the US Court system as legal documents. And
those people afraid or distrusting of e-mail have only to give me their fax
number and watch how quickly I can send them bogus fax documents. Like I said,
it's all in their minds. Faxing is no safer or more secure than any other form
of comminication. Its simply a waste of ink, toner and paper as far as I'm
concerned.

I just finished an assignment at a dinosaur of a company which still prints of
sets of huge D and E size drawings for their estimating department. When I
showed them the things you can do with a software package like Bluebeam Revu,
they scoffed at it because it costs $189 per seat. I showed them how they were
wasting $200 to $500 each week printing out huge sets of drawings. In just on
month they could have bought enough licensed copied of Revu to account for this
and then stop printing so much paper which only ends up in the trash. Their
secretaries were still sending out proposals via fax even when the client
requested a PDF be sent by e-mail. Their reason for this was, This is the only
way we know how and we've done it like this for so long, we don't want to
change.

IMHO...Faxing is so last century.





From: David Brodbeckg...@gull.us
To: FreeBSD Questionsquesti...@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 1:30:58 PM
Subject: Re: Sending a Fax

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bill Tillmanbtillma...@yahoo.com  wrote:

I read the other replies to your post so let me put in my 2 cents worth. For
the
last few years, I have basically abandoned faxing in favor of e-mailing PDF

and

other document files. Paperless is not only more efficient but its green too.

Believe it or not, there are industries where faxing is still the
norm.  Many industrial suppliers want purchase orders by fax.  It also
seems to be the common way that pharmacies communicate with doctors'
offices.  These are conservative industries where email (and
especially, email attachments) are still viewed with some suspicion.
A lot of times these days the actual endpoint is a digital fax system,
though; sometimes the fax never actually reaches paper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Bill,

I'd like to add to this that, in my opinion, the real issue these days 
is the emailing of unencrypted business papers. I take the position that 
*nothing* is ever deleted from an email server these days; or from those 
servers that are just relaying, no matter what the RFC says. I shake my 
head at what people send to their correspondents, that they would never 
think of discussing with a stranger. And yet they do just that via the 
spool.


Regards,

r
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-07 Thread Antonio Olivares
 I'd like to add to this that, in my opinion, the real issue these days is
 the emailing of unencrypted business papers. I take the position that
 *nothing* is ever deleted from an email server these days; or from those
 servers that are just relaying, no matter what the RFC says. I shake my head
 at what people send to their correspondents, that they would never think of
 discussing with a stranger. And yet they do just that via the spool.


I second your opinion.  Now that recording conversations  emails
between people, they save everything for later coming back with
lawsuits/blackmail/etc.  There are many examples but one that comes to
mind is the Brett Favre scandal with then Jet's reporter Jen Sterger.
That was a text, and *it apparently was saved since 2008* and it
became a scandal, this of course last year and now the *LOCKOUT * :(
These people make too much money already and they want more :(  Sorry
for drifting out of topic.

An example where paperless documents are preffered, take a look at IRS
they will require users to file electronically starting next year.
They want to save paper and this is a government agency.  Schools are
implementing this too, they want to send messages to their
teachers/workers/staff because ultiimately saving the environment is
more important (too many dead trees)

Regards,

Antonio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 7 May 2011 07:30:29 -0700 (PDT), Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 Like I said, 
 it's all in their minds. Faxing is no safer or more secure than any other 
 form 
 of comminication. Its simply a waste of ink, toner and paper as far as I'm 
 concerned.

I fully agree - especially in business. However, there are
FEW, and I may emphasize VERY FEW occassions where faxing
is a welcome solution.

Allow me to give one example - it's the only one I know. :-)

A friend pays his ISP monthly. Due to some mistake on his
side, he mixed some account numbers and got all his money
back, every month, while assuming he had paid. After six
months, the ISP cut his wire. He phoned them and asked for
the reason, and he was told that he didn't pay for a half
year. As he still had all the money on _his_ bank account,
he transferred it and sent a FAX of the banking receipt
to the ISP's accounting department. Less than one hour
later, he was back online.

Faxing is nice if you already have documents in paper form.
It's STUPID to fax if you generate the documents using some
means of modern IT (usually a PC, obviously), then PRINT
it, and THEN fax it - instead of using e-mail. It sounds
even more stupid if you do this internally (inside your
company).

But as I said, I've SEEN that.



 I just finished an assignment at a dinosaur of a company which still prints 
 of 
 sets of huge D and E size drawings for their estimating department. When I 
 showed them the things you can do with a software package like Bluebeam Revu, 
 they scoffed at it because it costs $189 per seat. I showed them how they 
 were 
 wasting $200 to $500 each week printing out huge sets of drawings. In just on 
 month they could have bought enough licensed copied of Revu to account for 
 this 
 and then stop printing so much paper which only ends up in the trash.

I thing you've been facing the common misbelief that
software is not allowed to cost anything, which leads
to either NOT using software, or using pirated copies.



 Their 
 secretaries were still sending out proposals via fax even when the client 
 requested a PDF be sent by e-mail.

Again something I recently encountered: We can't send you a
PDF file. - as the result of being UNABLE to use their everyday
software (export to PDF anyone?).

On the other hand, using a 10+ years old illegal copy of
a well-known... you know... :-)



 Their reason for this was, This is the only 
 way we know how and we've done it like this for so long, we don't want to 
 change.

This attitude will always be funny (for us) when the
technical basis of some procedure is removed (due to
evolution in technology). Then, they surprisingly
and right now encounter problems they can't solve.
And then, it gets REALLY expensive.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 07 May 2011 10:29:46 -0600, Reed Loefgren rloefg...@forethought.net 
wrote:
 I'd like to add to this that, in my opinion, the real issue these days 
 is the emailing of unencrypted business papers.

You do not have ANY idea of how clueless people can be,
do you? :-)

Again, I've seen in REALITY that it was NO PROBLEM for
me to obtain classified and secret documents via a
chain of unencrypted and unprotected WLAN and Windows
shares. No e-mail magic involved. I could even use the
company's printer to tell them the surprising facts. :-)



 I take the position that 
 *nothing* is ever deleted from an email server these days; or from those 
 servers that are just relaying, no matter what the RFC says.

I think so, too, especially if legislation encourages
the providers of those services to store all the messages
they handle for investigation purposes. You can imagine
the standard arguments for that procedures...



 I shake my 
 head at what people send to their correspondents, that they would never 
 think of discussing with a stranger.

This is a result of PC on, brain off. :-)

Popular intant messengers sometimes are even more problematic,
i. e. when the terms of use for those services state that IF
you use the service, you delegate all your rights on the
messages written to the provider of the service.

Bob: i made great invention today will bring many money
Tim: cool tell me more !

I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. :-)
-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Bill Campbell
On Thu, May 05, 2011, Doug Hardie wrote:

On 5 May 2011, at 22:19, Matthias Apitz wrote:

 El día Thursday, May 05, 2011 a las 07:21:29PM -0700, Doug Hardie escribió:
 
 One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN 
 which will fax.  Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a 
 fax?  I am not finding anything beyond printing for that unit via 
 Google.___
 
 Check out HylaFAX in the ports; don't know if your modem is supported;


Thanks.  As best as I can tell the Brother unit has a modem built it, but
the only interface to it is via ethernet.  I suspect it takes a PDF and
then sends that, much like printing.

I've found that the Multitech external modems have been the most
reliable for fax operations.  We've been using HylaFAX for years,
since it was called Flexfax.

Bill
-- 
INTERNET:   b...@celestial.com  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
Voice:  (206) 236-1676  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
Fax:(206) 232-9186  Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792

Never chastise a Windows user...just smile at them kindly as you would a
disadvantaged child. WBM
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, May 05, 2011 a las 11:48:55PM -0700, Bill Campbell escribió:

 I've found that the Multitech external modems have been the most
 reliable for fax operations.  We've been using HylaFAX for years,
 since it was called Flexfax.

I have been using HylaFAX for many years in my company and at home,
mostly with ZyXEL 1496 modems, very robust, and I have in that time
beeing tested a lot of other modems too w/ FlexFAX and HylaFAX..


 Never chastise a Windows user...just smile at them kindly as you would a
 disadvantaged child. WBM

nice :-)

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, May 05, 2011 a las 07:21:29PM -0700, Doug Hardie escribió:

 One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN 
 which will fax.  Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a fax? 
  I am not finding anything beyond printing for that unit via 
 Google.___

Check out HylaFAX in the ports; don't know if your modem is supported;

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
¡Ya basta! ¡Imperialistas occidentales, quitad las manos de Libia!  
There's an end of it! Imperialists occidentals, hands off Libya!
Schluss jetzt endlich! Imperialisten des Westens, Haende weg von Libyen!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Robert Bonomi
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Thu May  5 21:50:34 2011
 From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:21:29 -0700
 To: FreeBSD Questions questi...@freebsd.org
 Cc: 
 Subject: Sending a Fax

 One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN 
 which will fax.  Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a 
 fax?  I am not finding anything beyond printing for that unit via 
 Google.

Not to belabor the obvious, but do you have the owners manual?  what does
it say about faxing?

*MOST* computer-driven fax machines have the 'logical equivalent' of a
serial port, to which you send specialized AT (extended Hayes modem
commands) to go into fax mode, and originate a call. Then you shovel out
a bit-stream that is the  already rasterized fax data.

I've always used 'Hylafax' -- a _smart_ fax-management daemon that supports
a whole bunch of different kinds of fax modems, handles -multiple- fax-
modems, automatic retries, etc., etc.  It supports a very simple protocol
for queueing faxes from applicatioons, or the command line, and handles
either ASCII or PostScript input.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Bill Tillman


From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
To: FreeBSD Questions questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 10:21:29 PM
Subject: Sending a Fax

One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN which 
will fax.  Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a fax?  I am 
not finding anything beyond printing for that unit via 
Google.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


I read the other replies to your post so let me put in my 2 cents worth. For 
the 
last few years, I have basically abandoned faxing in favor of e-mailing PDF and 
other document files. Paperless is not only more efficient but its green too. 
Still there are those who must or insist on cutting down huge swaths or forest 
in order to send out more paper which will only end up in the land-fills. OK 
that's my 2 cents worth so now I will address your question.

I would assume that the Brother Fax machine you have should be able to handle 
network printing which means it should handle network faxing. It not then it 
will almost certainly have to be decommissioned if network faxing is what 
you're 
after. Some have said you can get FreeBSD using Linux emulation to talk to it, 
but unless you really know what you're doing this will be like reinventing the 
wheel. Personally, I doubt you could get this to work and even if you did, it 
would be such a complex setup that no one but you would know how it works and 
the next IT person who steps up to manage it will curse the day you were born. 
Not to mention getting your people in userland to understand and use this 
process will prove fruitless because unless the users can simply point and 
click 
it will never be accepted by them. So unless you plan on being there to hold 
the 
user's hand throughout each fax.get the picture.

HylaFAX is a nice alternative and the port in FreeBSD has been tried and tested 
by many and it has earned it's stripes. But you will need a modem of some kind 
to work with it and I doubt that the modem inside the Brother unit you have 
will 
work. On top of that, if your client is using Windows as their workstation OS 
then you wil need a client to interface with HylaFAX unless again you plan on 
being there to massage and handhold them through the entire process. There are 
several Windows clients available for HylaFAX, a few of them are free but 
require more than a point and click process to run. The makers of HylaFAX have 
an excellent client which works just like a simple print queue process but it 
costs $35 per seat. Other clients are available and cost a few $$ per seat as 
well. I have a nice setup with HylaFAX and Windows clients but I just don't fax 
anymore so I hardly ever use it.

I assume the Brother machine will do other tasks like printing, scanning, 
etc... 
but to get it to interface with FreeBSD will be a major undertaking. No offense 
but the users in this group will make suggestions which sounf like you just 
simply plug-n-play. When in reality, it will take a huge effort for which there 
will be little or no documentation available and in many cases will never work 
in the first place because drivers don't exist for what you want to do.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Warren Block

On Thu, 5 May 2011, Doug Hardie wrote:



Thanks.  As best as I can tell the Brother unit has a modem built it, 
but the only interface to it is via ethernet.  I suspect it takes a 
PDF and then sends that, much like printing.


The Linux drivers should have scripts for this, like brpcfax and 
filterBRFAX.  Maybe useful as a guide if not directly.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread David Brodbeck
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I read the other replies to your post so let me put in my 2 cents worth. For 
 the
 last few years, I have basically abandoned faxing in favor of e-mailing PDF 
 and
 other document files. Paperless is not only more efficient but its green too.

Believe it or not, there are industries where faxing is still the
norm.  Many industrial suppliers want purchase orders by fax.  It also
seems to be the common way that pharmacies communicate with doctors'
offices.  These are conservative industries where email (and
especially, email attachments) are still viewed with some suspicion.
A lot of times these days the actual endpoint is a digital fax system,
though; sometimes the fax never actually reaches paper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 6 May 2011 10:30:58 -0700, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us wrote:
 On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
  I read the other replies to your post so let me put in my 2 cents worth. 
  For the
  last few years, I have basically abandoned faxing in favor of e-mailing PDF 
  and
  other document files. Paperless is not only more efficient but its green 
  too.

The paperless office is an utopium since the 60's, and
it will be, as printing gets cheaper and cheaper. :-(



 Believe it or not, there are industries where faxing is still the
 norm. 

Don't just think about big industries, also keep small
businesses in mind - LOTS of them. A manager writes a
letter, prints it, faxes it to the secretary, she then
types it, prints it, and faxes it back to the manager.
In case the manager requires some changes, he phones
her, or makes annotations to her fax and faxes it back.
Then she processes the changes and faxes the result
again. On both sides, it's an inkpee fax. If it's not
used heavily enough, it will dry out.

You think: Stupid! Inefficient! Expensive!

Fully correct. And it's more the _norm_ than the exception,
at least here in Germany.

There are enough businesses that could invest in a
computer-driven fax system (storage instead of paper,
printing if and ONLY IF required), but they are too
lazy in mind.



 Many industrial suppliers want purchase orders by fax. 

This has to do with a legal situation in many cases.
A fax, unlike an e-mail, is often said to have a status
like letter with receipt, so the statement: You
did get the message. can be made from sending a fax
and applying the receipt printed by the fax machine
(sending report).

Also printing a text, signing it, and then faxing it
makes it look more legal.



 It also
 seems to be the common way that pharmacies communicate with doctors'
 offices.  These are conservative industries where email (and
 especially, email attachments) are still viewed with some suspicion.

Except it's a greeting card with a dancing bunny that
requires you to download SALES.XLS.EXE and have fun. :-)



 A lot of times these days the actual endpoint is a digital fax system,
 though; sometimes the fax never actually reaches paper.

In bigger business, this may very well apply, as the
huge blocks of software used there traditionally include
such solutions. Small and medium businesses that use
one size fits all kind of software tend to stick to
traditional methods, and in many cases (I've SEEN them!)
they combine them with inefficient methods and expensive
operations.

In the past, I've also used the hylafax port with a
regular external serial modem, and it worked perfectly.
I think the moden was an... Elsa? MicroLink something?
Looked like a green toy, but worked very well.


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread David Brodbeck
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
 In the past, I've also used the hylafax port with a
 regular external serial modem, and it worked perfectly.
 I think the moden was an... Elsa? MicroLink something?
 Looked like a green toy, but worked very well.

I've used it with US Robotics modems, the cheap Sportster consumer
ones.  I imagine you can pick these up for a pittance now on the used
market.  What I found was the sending compatibility of the US Robotics
modem was really good, but the receive compatibility wasn't quite as
good as our Multitech; a few machines had trouble sending to the US
Robotics modem.  I used it as a send-only modem in our Hylafax system
in order to avoid tying up the Multitech.  We were a small
manufacturing company and when we got a project started it wasn't
unusual for our purchasing department to send off three dozen faxes in
rapid succession and get faxed replies back for each one.  We had
incoming DID with each number routed to a different email address.
Hylafax handled it really well.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 6 May 2011 19:50:47 +0200
Polytropon free...@edvax.de articulated:

 On Fri, 6 May 2011 10:30:58 -0700, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us
 wrote:
  On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com
  wrote:
  Believe it or not, there are industries where faxing is still the
  norm. 
 
 Don't just think about big industries, also keep small
 businesses in mind - LOTS of them. A manager writes a
 letter, prints it, faxes it to the secretary, she then
 types it, prints it, and faxes it back to the manager.
 In case the manager requires some changes, he phones
 her, or makes annotations to her fax and faxes it back.
 Then she processes the changes and faxes the result
 again. On both sides, it's an inkpee fax. If it's not
 used heavily enough, it will dry out.

Are you joking? Why would anyone create a document, print it and then
FAX it? I create documents all the time in MS Word and then FAX the
document directly to the intended recipient. No printing required. And
why would the manager FAX it to a secretary to be transcribed and
printed then FAXed back? There are so many solutions to this that the
only answer that I can conceive of in this situation is that you are
describing an office environment from the 60's, unless you were just
joking to begin with.

 You think: Stupid! Inefficient! Expensive!

Absolutely

 Fully correct. And it's more the _norm_ than the exception,
 at least here in Germany.
 
 There are enough businesses that could invest in a
 computer-driven fax system (storage instead of paper,
 printing if and ONLY IF required), but they are too
 lazy in mind.
 
  Many industrial suppliers want purchase orders by fax. 
 
 This has to do with a legal situation in many cases.
 A fax, unlike an e-mail, is often said to have a status
 like letter with receipt, so the statement: You
 did get the message. can be made from sending a fax
 and applying the receipt printed by the fax machine
 (sending report).
 
 Also printing a text, signing it, and then faxing it
 makes it look more legal.

My legal signature has been scanned and stored so that I can simply add
it to any document I created sans the whole wasteful printing
operation, assuming that I do not require a hard copy.

  It also
  seems to be the common way that pharmacies communicate with doctors'
  offices.  These are conservative industries where email (and
  especially, email attachments) are still viewed with some suspicion.

It is legal in many locals in the US to FAX a prescription into a
pharmacy. The same applies to many legal documents for use in courts,
etcetera. I have never seen an e-mailed document accepted though.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-06 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 6 May 2011 19:09:58 -0400, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
 On Fri, 6 May 2011 19:50:47 +0200
 Polytropon free...@edvax.de articulated:
 
  On Fri, 6 May 2011 10:30:58 -0700, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us
  wrote:
   On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com
   wrote:
   Believe it or not, there are industries where faxing is still the
   norm. 
  
  Don't just think about big industries, also keep small
  businesses in mind - LOTS of them. A manager writes a
  letter, prints it, faxes it to the secretary, she then
  types it, prints it, and faxes it back to the manager.
  In case the manager requires some changes, he phones
  her, or makes annotations to her fax and faxes it back.
  Then she processes the changes and faxes the result
  again. On both sides, it's an inkpee fax. If it's not
  used heavily enough, it will dry out.
 
 Are you joking?

No, I'm not. I've actually SEEN that MYSELF, more than
one time, and after asking, I was told that was the normal
procedure for correspondency!

Unbelievable you say? Sure, but REALITY.



 Why would anyone create a document, print it and then
 FAX it? I create documents all the time in MS Word and then FAX the
 document directly to the intended recipient. No printing required.

I know this is possible. It would even be possible to use
the normal way of e-mail for that. But it isn't done. In
this specific company, my house of horrors where every
sin in IT is business as usual, pirated copies of incom-
patible versions of Word are also typical. Those who
work there are hardly able to do the simplest tricks
of cheap word processing, so how could one expect they'd
be able to send an e-mail?



 And
 why would the manager FAX it to a secretary to be transcribed and
 printed then FAXed back?

Because they've always done that, and it works. Investing
few time into (1st) installing a paperless fax solution
and (2nd) training the employees to properly use it is too
much. So they keep wasting paper, ink, power, money. But
as I mentioned before, they safe a lot of money by using
illegal software. :-)



 There are so many solutions to this that the
 only answer that I can conceive of in this situation is that you are
 describing an office environment from the 60's, unless you were just
 joking to begin with.

Ha! It's of TODAY! And NO joke!



  You think: Stupid! Inefficient! Expensive!
 
 Absolutely

Well, _me_ too, but my suggestions is just too complicated,
and they would be cost-intensive. You know that the majority
of users who do not have a clue about what they're doing are
resistent to any argumentation and learning.



   Many industrial suppliers want purchase orders by fax. 
  
  This has to do with a legal situation in many cases.
  A fax, unlike an e-mail, is often said to have a status
  like letter with receipt, so the statement: You
  did get the message. can be made from sending a fax
  and applying the receipt printed by the fax machine
  (sending report).
  
  Also printing a text, signing it, and then faxing it
  makes it look more legal.
 
 My legal signature has been scanned and stored so that I can simply add
 it to any document I created sans the whole wasteful printing
 operation, assuming that I do not require a hard copy.

That's the problem. Certain fields of post-use (e. g. tax
matters, insurance issues or documentation in procedures
of law) require a hardcopy. In _those_ cases, it's okay
to use paper. In many other cases, it's just a waste of
resources, and finally of money.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Sending a Fax

2011-05-05 Thread Doug Hardie
One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN which 
will fax.  Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a fax?  I am 
not finding anything beyond printing for that unit via 
Google.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sending a Fax

2011-05-05 Thread Doug Hardie

On 5 May 2011, at 22:19, Matthias Apitz wrote:

 El día Thursday, May 05, 2011 a las 07:21:29PM -0700, Doug Hardie escribió:
 
 One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN 
 which will fax.  Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a 
 fax?  I am not finding anything beyond printing for that unit via 
 Google.___
 
 Check out HylaFAX in the ports; don't know if your modem is supported;

Thanks.  As best as I can tell the Brother unit has a modem built it, but the 
only interface to it is via ethernet.  I suspect it takes a PDF and then sends 
that, much like printing.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: Sending a Fax

2011-05-05 Thread Matt Emmerton
 One of my clients needs to send a lot of faxes.  He has a Brother 8680DN
which will fax.
 Any ideas how to send a file to it and get it to send a fax?  I am not
finding anything
 beyond printing for that unit via Google.



According to
http://welcome.solutions.brother.com/bsc/public_s/id/us/us/en/monolasermfc/m
fc8680dn_us/spec/index.html, this device does have PC FAX capabilities on
Windows/Mac/Linux.

Here is the download site for Linux drivers:
http://welcome.solutions.brother.com/bsc/public_s/id/linux/en/index.html

With some Linux emulator and CUPS tweaking, you should be able to get the
Linux PC FAX capability working on FreeBSD.

YMMV, HTH.

--
Regards,
Matt Emmerton

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org