On 20/02/2011 03:05, Frank Shute wrote:
Just keep following RELENG_8 and once the 8.2-RELEASE is done it will
become 8.3-STABLE.
Well, yes. But not for something like 4 months until the process for
releasing 8.3 has happened. Most of the time between now and then, it
will appear as
before,
however, running uname ony machine after building world reports FreeBSD
8.2-PRERELEASE. I expect it not to show 8.2-PRERELEASE but something newer
(maybe 8.3-PRERELEASE?) Is uname reporting that I'm stick in some old bits?
If so, how can I move to the newer 8.x bits? If not, when does
).
According to [1], RELENG_8_2 and RELENG_8_2_0_RELEASE were created before,
however, running uname ony machine after building world reports FreeBSD
8.2-PRERELEASE. I expect it not to show 8.2-PRERELEASE but something newer
(maybe 8.3-PRERELEASE?) Is uname reporting that I'm stick in some old
On 02/06/2011 21:44, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Net, I've formatted drives as fat32 that were well over 4gb. In fact I have
an external 120gb we datavault that's fat32
Max per file, not the whole partition. Virtual machines
On 02/06/2011 22:02, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.org wrote:
Ok... found the logs. :)
Looks as if each machine has 4 log files, and that the set of files is
from the last run. Anything in there I could post to help diagnose?
On 02/07/2011 05:58, Eric Schuele wrote:
On 02/06/2011 22:02, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.org wrote:
Ok... found the logs. :)
Looks as if each machine has 4 log files, and that the set of files is
from the last run. Anything in
On Saturday 05 February 2011 22:12:45 Eric Schuele wrote:
All,
I have a laptop running 8.2-prerelease GENERIC. I have virtualbox ose
3.2.12 from ports (and kmod as well).
I've only installed windows guests in vbox. I've installed windows 2008
server 64, windows vista 64bit, and windows
On 02/06/2011 09:23, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 22:12:45 Eric Schuele wrote:
All,
I have a laptop running 8.2-prerelease GENERIC. I have virtualbox ose
3.2.12 from ports (and kmod as well).
I've only installed windows guests in vbox. I've installed windows
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.org wrote:
What else could I provide that might allow someone to point me in the
right direction here?
You can try recompiling virtualbox with debug options and see if it spits
out any pertinent messages. I have no problems with
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.orgwrote:
I realize NTFS on fBSD has been shaky in the past, but had heard it had
come a long way these days. It does seem to work well for all my
purposes, except these VMs. Had hoped NTFS was not the issue.
ntfs/ntfs-3g is
On Sunday 06 February 2011 13:09:47 Eric Schuele wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, however, I've already tried this (sorta).
From my original post...
I did try a windows guest on a non fuse filesystem just to rule that
out, but had same issue.
I suppose it may have been a little less
On Sunday 06 February 2011 17:48:45 Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.orgwrote:
I realize NTFS on fBSD has been shaky in the past, but had heard it had
come a long way these days. It does seem to work well for all my
purposes, except
Net, I've formatted drives as fat32 that were well over 4gb. In fact I have
an external 120gb we datavault that's fat32
-- Sent from my Droid
On Feb 6, 2011 5:25 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
On Sunday 06 February 2011 17:48:45 Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Eric
On 02/06/2011 11:35, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.org wrote:
What else could I provide that might allow someone to point me in the
right direction here?
You can try recompiling virtualbox with debug options and see if it spits
out
On 02/06/2011 21:17, Eric Schuele wrote:
On 02/06/2011 11:35, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.org wrote:
What else could I provide that might allow someone to point me in the
right direction here?
You can try recompiling virtualbox with
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Net, I've formatted drives as fat32 that were well over 4gb. In fact I have
an external 120gb we datavault that's fat32
Max per file, not the whole partition. Virtual machines generally
store the whole disk as a single
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.org wrote:
Ok... found the logs. :)
Looks as if each machine has 4 log files, and that the set of files is
from the last run. Anything in there I could post to help diagnose?
Let's see what's in the most recent log of an
All,
I have a laptop running 8.2-prerelease GENERIC. I have virtualbox ose
3.2.12 from ports (and kmod as well).
I've only installed windows guests in vbox. I've installed windows 2008
server 64, windows vista 64bit, and windows 7 32bit. I have the vbox
hdd images on an NTFS filesystem
According to Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com on Thu, 01/27/11 at 16:41:
Which is the correct port to install this poppler-cairo file?
poppler-0.14.5
Be sure to clean it before rebuilding and installing.
Thanks for the reply.
I did a make deinstall in /usr/ports/graphics/poppler and it
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, William Bulley wrote:
So something is clearly wrong here. The /var/db/ports/poppler/OPTIONS
file had:
WITHOUT_CAIRO=yes
inside, so I changed that to WITH_CAIRO=yes and repeated the above steps.
The file /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/poppler-cairo.pc is now there!
The
William Bulley w...@umich.edu writes:
Everything up to this point builds okay. Then this happens:
Making all in common
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gimp-app/work/gimp-2.6.11/plug-ins/common'
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT
According to Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org on Thu,
01/27/11 at 11:04:
William Bulley w...@umich.edu writes:
Everything up to this point builds okay. Then this happens:
Making all in common
gmake[3]: Entering directory
On 27/01/2011 17:22, William Bulley wrote:
According to Lowell Gilbertfreebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org on Thu,
01/27/11 at 11:04:
William Bulleyw...@umich.edu writes:
Everything up to this point builds okay. Then this happens:
Making all in common
gmake[3]: Entering directory
According to David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com on Thu, 01/27/11 at
11:39:
It seems that gmake does not call `pkg-config --libs --cflags poppler`.
do you have pkg-config and poppler installed correctly?
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/poppler-cairo.pc
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:55 AM, William Bulley w...@umich.edu wrote:
You mention gmake, yet I use # make install all the time. Is this
really gmake under the covers? I see both executables and they differ:
gmake is GNU Make, some applications don't talk nice w/ bsdmake ('make' on
your bsd
According to Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net on Thu, 01/27/11 at 12:03:
gmake is GNU Make, some applications don't talk nice w/ bsdmake ('make' on
your bsd system). If your installing GIMP from ports then you should be
correctly using something like 'make install clean'. The only time I've
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, William Bulley wrote:
According to David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com on Thu, 01/27/11 at
11:39:
It seems that gmake does not call `pkg-config --libs --cflags poppler`.
do you have pkg-config and poppler installed correctly?
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
Does reverting:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_usb.c.diff?r1=1.19.2.3;r2=1.19.2.4;f=h
fixed problem?
Hi Paul,
So did the find that this particular checkin caused the problem led to some
Everything up to this point builds okay. Then this happens:
Making all in common
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gimp-app/work/gimp-2.6.11/plug-ins/common'
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0
Does reverting:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_usb.c.diff?r1=1.19.2.3;r2=1.19.2.4;f=h
fixed problem?
Hi Paul,
So did the find that this particular checkin caused the problem led to
some resolution? Is it fixed now in 8.X or 9.X?
Yuri
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
Do you load ndis and if_ndis via loader.conf too?
Yes, presense of if_ndis and ndis in loader.conf doesn't change anything.
Does reverting:
On 01/18/2011 06:23, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Does reverting:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_usb.c.diff?r1=1.19.2.3;r2=1.19.2.4;f=h
fixed problem?
Yes it does fix the problem.
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Do you load ndis and if_ndis via loader.conf too?
Yes, presense of if_ndis and ndis in loader.conf doesn't change anything.
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
I have the old module that always worked.
Begining from some update (~8.1-STABLE), it stopped loading at boot time
with the messages:
...skipped...
module ndis already present
KLD file bcmwl5_sys.ko is missing dependencies
I have the old module that always worked.
Begining from some update (~8.1-STABLE), it stopped loading at boot time
with the messages:
...skipped...
module ndis already present
KLD file bcmwl5_sys.ko is missing dependencies
...skipped...
/boot/loader.conf has this line that is supposed to, and
35 matches
Mail list logo
