On 8 October 2013, at 16:40, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705:
>> hastctl(8)'s `status'
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I tried downloading the src with:
>
> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>
> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>
> 20130705:
> hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to
Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> The Thick Plottens…
>>> I received the drives and installed them on a working system. The
>>> failed system is structured with a single partition for the system and
>>> another for swap. For some unknown reason, the BIOS got left
>>> configured to boot the extra disk if its
On 8 October 2013, at 06:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug
On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wr
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fr
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >> The exact sequence was:
> >>
> >> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
> >
> > Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.c
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> The exact sequence was:
>>
>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
>
> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
> is definitely part of what should be updated?
System i
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> The exact sequence was:
>
> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
is definitely part of what should be updated?
> Step 2: make buildworld
> Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=LA
On 4 October 2013, at 09:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am
On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses
a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>> However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPD
On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>>
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been
upd
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
> kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
> noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
> says:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct?
_
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the buildwo
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
http://www.dweimer
21 matches
Mail list logo