On Jan 16, 2008 1:48 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The let's just slurp everything into the main distribution so we don't
have to worry about stable interfaces approach is really poor. It
encourages bad engineering practice among people maintaining the main
distribution,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 1:48 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The let's just slurp everything into the main distribution so we don't
have to worry about stable interfaces approach is really poor. It
encourages bad
Rick Macklem wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
[good stuff snipped]
Right now we maintain a relatively stable VM/VFS KPI withing a major
release (i.e, FreeBSD 6.0 - 6.1 - 6.2 - 6.3), but see fairly
significant changes between major releases (5.x - 6.x - 7.x, etc).
I
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
[good stuff snipped]
Right now we maintain a relatively stable VM/VFS KPI withing a major release
(i.e, FreeBSD 6.0 - 6.1 - 6.2 - 6.3), but see fairly significant changes
between major releases (5.x - 6.x - 7.x, etc). I expect to see further
--On Monday, January 14, 2008 02:23:47 PM + Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like very much to get at least the kernel parts of an AFS client into
the base system.
That may well be realistic for arla, though I believe there was a period
for a while where the kernel/arlad
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
--On Monday, January 14, 2008 02:23:47 PM + Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like very much to get at least the kernel parts of an AFS client into
the base system.
That may well be realistic for arla, though I believe there was a
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
The let's just slurp everything into the main distribution so we don't have
to worry about stable interfaces approach is really poor. It encourages
bad engineering practice among people maintaining
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working
under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or
something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it
as FreeBSD-pure as possible ...
Yes
The server runs on FreeBSD as far as I know. There is a client, and I think
it still builds if you apply Matt's patches, which are in the OpenAFS bug
tracking system. But it doesn't run. No one is actively maintaining the
FreeBSD port.
___
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jason C. Wells wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working
under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or
something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep
, Version 3.6
IBM AFS for Solaris, Version 3.6
Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working
under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or
something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it
as FreeBSD
For those of you who haven't seen this. Here is my rudimentary port.
It is nothing more than the FreeBSD parts wrapped around the OpenAFS
source. I think I was working on version 5 of FreeBSD but I don't
recall for sure. This was version OpenAFS 1.4.2. It compiled. The
kernel module
for Solaris, Version 3.6
Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working
under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or
something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it
as FreeBSD-pure as possible ...
Thoughts
anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working
under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or
something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it
as FreeBSD-pure as possible ...
Thoughts? Pointers?
-
Marc G
14 matches
Mail list logo
