On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:22 AM, liquid wrote:
Also, the existing named.conf I've written... will it work if I make it
really simplified(for now - I know that bind 9 adds new functionality
so
eventually I'd find myself tweaking that a little)?
Thanks in advance for any insight.
Bin
> > Also, anyone know of a workaround for BIND 8 at this time? If I
> were to
> > simply install bind9 on my system from the ports, does it in fact
> simply
> > overwrite the "default" installation included with FreeBSD?
>
> No. It installs it under /usr/local.
>
Ok, Stupid question now. I'
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-09-19 09:58:25 -0400:
> "liquid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Right now, I've blocked off verisign's IP. I don't know how effective
> > that is though.
>
> "Not very" to "moderately," depending on your goals.
"hurts *you*"
mail sent to nonexistent domains u
"liquid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any fix for BIND 8 in the near future?
Maybe.
> Also, anyone know of a workaround for BIND 8 at this time? If I were to
> simply install bind9 on my system from the ports, does it in fact simply
> overwrite the "default" installation included with FreeBSD?
's IP. I don't know how effective
that is though.
Thanks,
Sandro M
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugene Lee
> Sent: September 18, 2003 9:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
The problem:
http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5077530.html
The fix:
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html
The question:
How soon can we expect the fix in CVS?
Thanks in advance!
--
Eugene Lee
eugene at fsck dot net
