Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-08 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ John Levine wrote on Mon 8.Oct'12 at 2:42:33 - ] > >... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will answer > >yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need for manual > >intervention during the build process. > > > >(This was said with respect to up

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-08 Thread Jerry
On 8 Oct 2012 02:42:33 - John Levine articulated: > >... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will > > answer yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need > > for manual intervention during the build process. > > > >(This was said with respect to upgrading p

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread John Levine
>... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will answer >yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need for manual >intervention during the build process. > >(This was said with respect to upgrading ports via portupgrade.) Or you can use portmaster, which ru

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20121008012414.34fd6a65.free...@edvax.de>, Polytropon wrote: ... >> ># make config-recursive ... >This target (and several other useful ones) are listed >and explained in the manpage: "man 7 ports". :-) Hey! Thanks again. I didn't know about that man page either! P.S. I'm

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:57:05 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <20121007234043.cadf5863.free...@edvax.de>, > Polytropon wrote: > > >A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is > >to process the config dialogs before starting the build: > > > > # make config

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20121007234043.cadf5863.free...@edvax.de>, Polytropon wrote: >A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is >to process the config dialogs before starting the build: > > # make config-recursive > >Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run. Hey!

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread jb
Ronald F. Guilmette tristatelogic.com> writes: > ... > However there's one instance where I don't know how to get this > functionality, i.e. the functionality provided by the --batch option. > ... There is no guarantee that either of those will work (try them separately): $ cat /etc/make.conf

Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:09:44 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Nowadays, whenever I use portinstall/portupgrade, I use the --batch > option, so that I don't have to sit around at the console, waiting > for and then accepting the default build options for a boatload of > depended-upon ports for wh

Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?

2012-10-07 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
I am impatient by nature. Nowadays, whenever I use portinstall/portupgrade, I use the --batch option, so that I don't have to sit around at the console, waiting for and then accepting the default build options for a boatload of depended-upon ports for whatever I am actually trying to install or u