if anybody had OOO math 3.0.1 installed, they can see one of my
favoriite equations.
:-)
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
The 2.41a release
?
Continuing the OT, it is also interesting that the desktop publishing
applications that I am aware of (an that is certainly incomplete) do
not handle equations very well either. Scribus didn't the last time I
looked; Frame might but that is not really an option.
ConTeXt includes several pre
On 2007-10-05 15:03, Frank Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 23:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am always a bit surprised that TeX was released in 78 (before my
birth!) and---despite its algorithms are published---its output
quality remains unmatched [1] by common
that the desktop publishing
applications that I am aware of (an that is certainly incomplete) do not
handle equations very well either. Scribus didn't the last time I
looked; Frame might but that is not really an option.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Frank Jahnke wrote:
I figured this was the case, and it makes a difference. This is OT, but
do you have a link that describe what font families are available? I
assume the Postscript base set is easy. But how about the others?
There is an entire fat book devoted to that:
Fonts Encodings by
and easy app (no tex,troff,...) that can do equations as
the first message said. Can i think that there is no such app?
Thanks.
--
This document represent my ideas. They are mine
Eduardo Morras said:
Excuse me for the intromision, but i'm reading this thread, waiting
for a tiny and easy app (no tex,troff,...) that can do equations as
the first message said. Can i think that there is no such app?
There may be some under Windows, but i don't know. Under Unix machines
Since you seem to use the equation feature quite intensively, maybe
you have any clue on making the equation editor perform better.
Sorry I can't really be of much help with OO.o equations.
What I do personally is a kludge, but it works well enough. For
documents that I create for read-only
On 10/5/07, Frank Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you seem to use the equation feature quite intensively, maybe
you have any clue on making the equation editor perform better.
Sorry I can't really be of much help with OO.o equations.
What I do personally is a kludge, but it works
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:34:00PM -0500, Andrew Gould wrote:
On 10/5/07, Frank Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've given up on trying to find a BSD or Linux program that is good
enough for this purpose -- none really are. So I just use Word in a VM
and am done with it.
Have you
, we stand on each other's feet.
You are so right about that. I saw equations in the subject line and
jumped a little to quickly. ;-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Word rather than try to teach them troff (or TeX). While they are all
i'm not top-flight scientist but i was able to learn latex...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 20:13 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Word rather than try to teach them troff (or TeX). While they are all
i'm not top-flight scientist but i was able to learn latex...
That may be true, but trust me, the faculty with whom I work just would
not do it. No way, no how,
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 12:34 -0500, Andrew Gould wrote:
Have you tried LyX?
I'm aware of it, and will indeed try it one of these days, but that is
not the issue. I'm fine with troff -- I've used it for so many years
that I can get it to jump through hoops. Time has passed it by, though,
so
Frank Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since you seem to use the equation feature quite intensively, maybe
you have any clue on making the equation editor perform better.
Sorry I can't really be of much help with OO.o equations.
What I do personally is a kludge, but it works well enough
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 23:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there is no reason to be
optimistic about the existence of an ``office-like'' program
that deals smartly with equations.
The input method from MathType (which is what WP uses) actually is quite
good. The formatting
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007, Frank Jahnke wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 23:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there is no reason to be
optimistic about the existence of an ``office-like'' program
that deals smartly with equations.
The input method from MathType (which is what WP uses
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:37:11PM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
There's a big difference between sophisticated typesetting programs such as
TeX and groff, and word processors. TeX and ?roff were designed to do
major, professional quality, publishing projects by people who understood
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
