El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 03:31:16PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
> Meanwhile I did:
>
> # cp -Rp ~guru/PKGDIR/mnt
>
> # PKG_PATH=/PKGDIR
> # export PKG_PATH
> # chroot /mnt pkg_add xorg-7.7
> # chroot /mnt pkg_add kde-4.10.5
> # chroot /mnt pkg_add vim-7.3.1314
> ...
>
> #
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 08:12:31AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
> > No. The r255948 was built on a clean, empty environment but with
> >
> > $ cat /etc/src.conf
> > WITH_PKGTOOLS=yes
> >
>
> Ok, I won't question your needs for pkg_* as you seem to be aware of
> what you're doing
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 8:07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > >
> > > So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
> > > in /mnt. What w
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
> > in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
> > flag --
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
> in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
> flag --chroot chrootdir, or use chroot(8) directly? Or any other idea?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
Hello,
I have prepared a boot-able USB-key (to be exactly a disk image of it)
the usual way:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=da0 bs=8m count=1868
# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f da0
md0
# fdisk -I md0
# fdisk -B md0
# bsdlabel -w md0s1 auto
# bsdlabel -B md0s1
# bsdlabel -e md0s1 # edit the disk label and cha
What is a fdescfs file-descriptor file system?
Is it still a normal part of 9.1?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-uns
"Ralf Mardorf" writes:
> Hi :)
>
> is it possible to mount Linux ext3 file systems with fstab by label?
> Before I run mount -a /mnt/dump had the same permissions, owner and
> group as /mnt/archlinux has got. Is it possible to keep this? Both are
> Linux ext3 fs. Mounting without a label does wo
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
is it possible to mount Linux ext3 file systems with fstab by label?
Before I run mount -a /mnt/dump had the same permissions, owner and group as
/mnt/archlinux has got. Is it possible to keep this? Both are Linux ext3 fs.
Mounting without a label does
Hi :)
is it possible to mount Linux ext3 file systems with fstab by label?
Before I run mount -a /mnt/dump had the same permissions, owner and group
as /mnt/archlinux has got. Is it possible to keep this? Both are Linux
ext3 fs. Mounting without a label does work.
root@freebsd:/usr/home/roc
On 2012-12-21 11:28, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 12/21/12 14:06, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be
using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and
On 12/21/12 14:06, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
file systems to choo
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
> I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
> disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
> I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
> file systems to choose.
>
> According to the docs,
Hi all,
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
file systems to choose.
According to the docs, ufs is suggested for the system partitions but
My
guesses just generate similar to 'directories unknown' My disk is also
gpt. If I leave out the file system type after -t my machine apparently
accepts a command to do something, but it of course does not do what is
needed.
Thanks
If you're going to run "advanced" f
'ufs' since I have zfs. My
> guesses just generate similar to 'directories unknown' My disk is also
> gpt. If I leave out the file system type after -t my machine apparently
> accepts a command to do something, but it of course does not do what is
> needed.
;ufs' since I have zfs. My
> guesses just generate similar to 'directories unknown' My disk is also
> gpt. If I leave out the file system type after -t my machine apparently
> accepts a command to do something, but it of course does not do what is
>
is also
gpt. If I leave out the file system type after -t my machine apparently
accepts a command to do something, but it of course does not do what is
needed.
Thanks
--
Steve
Poetry and commentary on the war;
http://www.blueleafsyndicate.org
Using Opera's mail client:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:09 AM, s m wrote:
> thanks saeedeh
>
> OK i try to explain what i have done more in detail.
>
> i want to restore unencrypted dump files on an encrypted file system.
> in order to do that, i encrypted my file system by geli command and
> sure t
thanks saeedeh
OK i try to explain what i have done more in detail.
i want to restore unencrypted dump files on an encrypted file system.
in order to do that, i encrypted my file system by geli command and
sure that is done correctly because when i install base and kernel on
it, freebsd start up
s information help to understand what is wrong.
> thanks
>
> On 9/29/12, Fabian Keil wrote:
>> s m wrote:
>>
>>> I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
>>> this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
hen i restore dump files,
FreeBSD doesn't start up correctly.
i hope this information help to understand what is wrong.
thanks
On 9/29/12, Fabian Keil wrote:
> s m wrote:
>
>> I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
>> this dump file on an e
s m wrote:
> I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
> this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
> file system) but do not know how to do that.
>
> is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an
> enc
hello guys,
I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
file system) but do not know how to do that.
is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an
encrypted file system? i tried to
trieve anything that might have
been lost.
> > Script started on Wed Sep 19 04:15:02 2012
> > fsck_ffs /dev/ada0p9
> just to make sure: the partition was not mounted when you started fsck?
> > Now I wonder if the file system is really fixed, with possibly some
> > fil
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:06 -0400
"Thomas Mueller" wrote:
> Script started on Wed Sep 19 04:15:02 2012
> fsck_ffs /dev/ada0p9
just to make sure: the partition was not mounted when you started fsck?
> Now I wonder if the file system is really fixed, with possibly some
1475900 files, 4638292 used, 21162419 free (61643 frags, 2637597 blocks,
> 0.2% fragmentation)
>
> * FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY *
>
> * PLEASE RERUN FSCK *
>
> Script done on Wed Sep 19 04:17:27 2012
>
>
> Would this indicate a software bug, or is
I have or had a problem with a file system (FreeBSD UFS2) messed up, either by
errant software or system freeze/crash.
I successfully cross-compiled, from FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE, a NetBSD 5.1_STABLE
i386 system to install on 8 GB USB stick.
I have both the NetBSD system source as well as pkgsrc
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
> webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
> than any other?
>
> Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new b
the OCZ Vertex IIIs (About $1/G these days) wired into a *hardware*
RAID controller setup to mirror them. This gives you blazing speed
just like i would read some popular street PC newspaper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this
another ZFS fanatics. it is about performance.
direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a
RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits
per second range.
cl
On 08/16/2012 01:16 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably
better than any other?
With only 15G of data, I'd recommend a pair of 60G SSD d
--On August 16, 2012 9:42:30 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith
wrote:
I don't even know where to begin. There's about 15G of data on the
server.
OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this
purpose. You'd save a bit of time in crash recovery with no fsck going on,
an
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:16:26 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On August 16, 2012 6:02:57 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
> > Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is
Paul Schmehl writes:
> >That's an average of about 3 hits per second. If it's static pages
> > then pretty much anything will handle it easily (but please don't use
> > FAT). If it's dynamic then the whole problem is more complex than a
> > simple page rate. If that load is bursty it may
--On August 16, 2012 6:02:57 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably
better than any
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
> From: Paul Schmehl
> To: FreeBSD Questions List
> Subject: Best file system for a busy webserver
>
> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
> webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one sys
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
> webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
> than any other?
That's an average of about 3 hits per second.
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
than any other?
Use stock UFS, just configure it properly. most importantly noatime.
Amount of cached data is more important than hit count. Unless
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
than any other?
Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box running FreeBSD 9, and
since I'm starting from scratch, I'm que
On 08/09/2012 13:37, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hi List.
I'm using
fusefs_enable="YES"
in /etc/rc.conf
And
/dev/ad4s2 /home/mnt/windows ntfs rw,noauto 0 0
in /etc/fstab
I can read the NTFS file system and copy from it but I can't copy to it.
When I tr
Hi List.
I'm using
fusefs_enable="YES"
in /etc/rc.conf
And
/dev/ad4s2 /home/mnt/windows ntfs rw,noauto 0 0
in /etc/fstab
I can read the NTFS file system and copy from it but I can't copy to it.
When I try copying I get
"No such file or di
alternatively - use tar.
What I was trying to achieve, which I haven't done yet, was a smallish dump of the
"core system". By that I mean system + ports, without distfiles, etc. Then a
separate dump of user data, which is considerably larger. At this point I am thinking I
should do this:
On 06/16/12 10:19, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there
>> was no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to
>> build a backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
>>
>> I had originally se
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump flag on /tmp and /var, so my snapshot is e
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated
there was no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now
trying to build a backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate
/var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump
2012-06-07 22:05, Gary Aitken skrev:
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump flag
Would rsync or cpdup from single user mode cover your needs? Should cover
everything and then you can just reboot into your newly partitioned system.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-quest
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump flag on /tmp and /var, so my snapshot is em
> > > > Character device, size 3.771 GiB (4048551936 bytes)
> > > > FreeBSD boot loader (i386 boot2/BTX 1.02 at sector 2)
> > > > BSD disklabel (at sector 1), 8 partitions
> > > > Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
>
Hi,
Reference:
> From: RW
> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:13:19 +0100
> Message-id: <20120418141319.7cb8c...@gumby.homeunix.com>
RW wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:41 +0200
> Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
>
> > No mention of ext3 there, nor from find (above).
> >
> > .. so you
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:41 +0200
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> No mention of ext3 there, nor from find (above).
>
> .. so you May be out of luck ..
ext3 is ext2+journalling. If fsck supports ext3, then it can sync the
journal and the partition can be safely mounted as ext2.
It's a long time sinc
klabel (at sector 1), 8 partitions
> > > Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
> > > Type 0 (Unused)
> > > DOS/MBR partition map
> > > Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
> > > Type 0x83 (Linu
at sector 2)
> > BSD disklabel (at sector 1), 8 partitions
> > Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
> > Type 0 (Unused)
> > DOS/MBR partition map
> > Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
> >
tors from 0)
> Type 0 (Unused)
> DOS/MBR partition map
> Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
> Type 0x83 (Linux)
> Ext3 file system
> UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
> Last mounted at "/"
> Volu
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:25:29PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
Hi Adam,
> >
> > > > I don't know why !?
> > > >
> > > > Is ext2fs.ko loaded? Does /var/log/messages reveal anything?
> >
> >
> > Yes :
> >
> > casa# kldstat | grep ext
> > 91 0xc8806000 1ext2fs.ko
> > casa#
> >
> >
> >
>
> > > I don't know why !?
> > >
> > > Is ext2fs.ko loaded? Does /var/log/messages reveal anything?
>
>
> Yes :
>
> casa# kldstat | grep ext
> 91 0xc8806000 1ext2fs.ko
> casa#
>
>
> I try:
>
> casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
> mount: /dev/da1a : In
bytes)
> > FreeBSD boot loader (i386 boot2/BTX 1.02 at sector 2)
> > BSD disklabel (at sector 1), 8 partitions
> > Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
> > Type 0 (Unused)
> > DOS/MBR partition map
> > Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (
artition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
> Type 0 (Unused)
> DOS/MBR partition map
> Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
> Type 0x83 (Linux)
> Ext3 file system
> UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:06:44PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi Odhiambo,
> man mount
>
> mount fstype device mount-point
Yes, but look:
> >
> > I try:
> >
> > casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
> > mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
I don't know why
partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
Last mounted at "/"
Volume size 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 929754 blocks of 4 KiB)
Partition 2:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I have some trouble with a microSD card (or with the controler) in my
> Linux based cellphone (Openmoko Freerunner). One of the hints I got is
> to check the microSD card with a Linux tool badblocks(8)
> http://linux.die.net/man/8/badblocks
matthias
- Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz -
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:52:40 +0200
From: Matthias Apitz
To: commun...@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: microSD && ext3 file system
Hello,
After some hours of testing I'm now totally lost with creating an ext3
file sy
On 28/02/2012 02:21, Robert Banfield wrote:
> I have some additional information that I didnt see before actually
> digging into the log file. It is quite interesting. There are 82,206
> subdirectories in one of the folders. Like this:
>
> /zfs_mount/directoryA/token[1-82206]/various_tileset_fi
On 02/27/2012 09:21 PM, Robert Banfield wrote:
ls -R appears to be traversing all subdirectories.
Scratch that... ls -R fails to traverse the same directories that find
does.
Is there a subdirectory limit in ZFS?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 02/27/2012 05:53 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
These are all actual directories -- no symbolic link or anything like
that? I assume permissions are not the problem? All directories have
at least mode r_x for your user id? (Hmmm... but you are logged in as
root -- can't be that then.) How about
27;m logged in as root, and there is no networked
> file system anywhere in the mix. I'm using the version of find
> installed with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64.
>
> cd /zfs_mount_point/mydir
> find . &> ../file_list
>
> I would presume that file_list contains a l
Summary: I am executing the command "find . > ../file_list" and it is
not traversing all the subdirectories it encounters along the way.
There is no separate file system mounted along the path.
Long version: I'm new to FreeBSD and ZFS (many years of linux
experience though
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:25:35AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from darc...@gmail.com (Denise H. G.):
>
> > I strongly advise that /usr and /usr/local reside on different
> > partitions. Furthermore, If you plan to run a desktop environment, your
> > /usr/local should be big enough, say 8G - 1
On 2011/11/20 at 19:25, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
>
> from darc...@gmail.com (Denise H. G.):
>> I strongly advise that /usr and /usr/local reside on different
>> partitions. Furthermore, If you plan to run a desktop environment,
>> your /usr/local should be big enough, say 8G - 10G, to hold all
>>
from darc...@gmail.com (Denise H. G.):
> I strongly advise that /usr and /usr/local reside on different
> partitions. Furthermore, If you plan to run a desktop environment, your
> /usr/local should be big enough, say 8G - 10G, to hold all stuff you
> built from the ports. And putting /var on a sep
nd as I red and if I understood correct
>> > there is also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to the GPT
>> > partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough that I just
>> > choose this option and voila?
>>
>> Yes. I think so. 'options UFS
ow we have a new bsdinstall and as I red and if I understood
>> > correct there is also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to
>> > the GPT partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough
>> > that I just choose this option and voila?
>>
>> Yes. I
rnaling file sistem. I will switch to the GPT
> > partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough that I just
> > choose this option and voila?
>
> Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
> config. If you use GENERIC kernel, it i
is also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to
> > the GPT partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough
> > that I just choose this option and voila?
>
> Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
> config. If you use GENERIC
On 2011/11/19 at 20:09, ajtiM wrote:
>
> Hi!
> One more question before I start installing FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2.
> Now we have a new bsdinstall and as I red and if I understood correct there
> is
> also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to the GPT partion. If I want
>
Hi!
One more question before I start installing FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2.
Now we have a new bsdinstall and as I red and if I understood correct there is
also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to the GPT partion. If I want to
have SU-j file system is it enough that I just choose this option and
g /proc with --one-file-
> system?
>
>
> On Fri, November 18, 2011 10:34 am, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU
> tar.
> > However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with
> > /proc. Amanda r
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted
> > filesystems on your machine.
>
> $ mount | grep proc
> procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
>
> > *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesy
ng to" in this case and - if I'm
right, you're wrong :-)
A mount point has an inode in the parent filesystem, right? Good,
glad we cleared that up.
Unless you set the 'nodump' flag, and tell tar/gtar/tarsnap/dump to
honor the flag, the archive will have an entry for the m
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
> your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
>
> *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely a
> _directory_ with
On 18/11/2011 17:18, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
>> > /proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
>> > the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
>> > mountpoint), so reading it isn't leaving
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 18 09:36:09 2011
> From: Kirk Strauser
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:34:18 -0600
> To: FreeBSD Questions ML
> Subject: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-system?
>
> I use Amanda to make nightly bac
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> /proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
> the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
> mountpoint), so reading it isn't leaving that filesystem. Reading
> anything *in* it would be.
>
On Fri, November 18, 2011 10:34 am, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
> However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with
> /proc. Amanda runs a variation of this command:
>
> # /usr/loc
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with /proc.
Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file - --directory / --one-file-system
--sparse --ignore-f
my syetem is FreeBSD 8.2.
i build a memory disk : mdmfs -s 10G -i 512 -o rw md1 /home/test1
After a period of time，some file in the memory disk lose their inode:
#ls
90020595.o
#ls -l 90020595.o
ls: 90020595.o: No such file or directory
it seem the inode of this file was lost.
how to solve th
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:14:21 +0100
> From: Matthew Seaman
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: Gary Kline
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>
> On 08/07/2011 23:04, Gary Kline wrote:
>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 07:49:43AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:49:43 -0600
> From: Dan Busarow
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gary Kline
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
>
>
On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Gary, add
named_flags="-c /etc/namedb/named.conf"
to /etc/rc.conf. Or change /etc/namedb/named.conf to the /var
version if you like/there is no symlink.
Dan
Dan! I think
On 08/07/2011 23:04, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
>> From: Matthew Seaman
>> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>
&g
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:12 -0600
> From: Dan Busarow
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
> From: Matthew Seaman
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>
> On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
> > On 7 July 20
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:25:34AM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:25:34 -0700
> From: Doug Hardie
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
>
>
> On 7 July 2011,
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/
named.conf: file not found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c /
var/named/
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
> On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
>
>>> >> Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file
>>> >> not found
>>> >> Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
>>> >> /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
>
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
>> Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file not
>> found
>> Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
>> /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
The first one that fails is looking for /etc/named.conf. Th
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:00:42PM +, Gary Kline wrote:
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:00:42 +
> From: Gary Kline
> Subject: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
>
>
> Guys,
>
> I'd be much obliged to learn why /etc/rc.named start
No problem:
I looked up my solution to the problem because I submitted a patch to fix
things. It's here (ports pr #155788):
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/155788
After this you should be able to create an encrypted filesystem with cmkdir and
attach it with cattach and det
1 - 100 of 838 matches
Mail list logo
