HI,
Hi am a Ruby on rails developer. I have done a project in ROR and
currently its hosted in Ubuntu.Now the requires it to be changed to
FreeBSD. As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about
how can configure or install it.
Am using Windows OS in my personal system.How
On 28/02/2012 05:43, shanib.k.k wrote:
Hi am a Ruby on rails developer. I have done a project in ROR and
currently its hosted in Ubuntu.Now the requires it to be changed to
FreeBSD. As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about
how can configure or install it.
The best place
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0530, shanib.k.k wrote:
As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about
how can configure or install it.
The basic documentation on how to install and configure
the system can be found in The FreeBSD Handbook and the
FAQ available from the main web
after receiving lots of support from freebsd-question i completely
(almost) moved home machine/server to freebsd.
and have question:
1) can userland ppp negotiate deflate with NetBSD pppd on other side?
my ppp.conf looks like that:
stalka:
set log Phase Chat tun
set device /dev/cuaa2
I have used a single 256MB mfs on FreeBSD for months without any problem.
I was not doing heavy IO on it, it was used in a /tmp fashion and most of the
time was swapped out, going down to 8MB resident size at times.
softdeps in NetBSD is very buggy. putting very high load like deleting
huge
I have used a single 256MB mfs on FreeBSD for months without any problem.
I was not doing heavy IO on it, it was used in a /tmp fashion and most of the
time was swapped out, going down to 8MB resident size at times.
does FreeBSD deallocate pages that are unused.
NetBSD does not. if you create
does FreeBSD deallocate pages that are unused.
NetBSD does not. if you create 100MB file on mfs and delete it, VM size of
mfs is still over 100MB. while it will get swapped out it's a kind of
nonsense IMHO
FreeBSD tries to swap out idle pages. That means that you'll have more
physical memory
i want to go to FreeBSD instead of NetBSD on my i386 machines because of
all new features :( introduced in NetBSD after 1.5 mostly crashing
softdeps, strange memory/unified disk cache management (large writing to
file almost freezes everything) etc. etc.
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
my questions:
Start here :
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick performance tests, and at least in
disk I/O and fair scheduling it's MUCH better (tested 4.10 and 5.1).
It's nice to be welcomed by higher performance when you switch OSes. :-)
my questions:
1) what is Buf and Cache in top exactly? why
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i want to go to FreeBSD instead of NetBSD on my i386 machines because of
all new features :( introduced in NetBSD after 1.5 mostly crashing
softdeps, strange memory/unified disk cache management (large writing to
file almost
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wojciech Puchar
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD beginner (NetBSD advanced)
[snip]
my questions:
1) what is Buf and Cache in top exactly? why buf on 96MB
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i want to go to FreeBSD instead of NetBSD on my i386 machines because of
all new features :( introduced in NetBSD after 1.5 mostly crashing
softdeps, strange memory/unified disk cache management (large writing
2) can i compile kernel with -march=pentium,pentium[234] -O2
optimization? in NetBSD 2.0 doing -march=pentium produces
kernel that doesn't boot at all, just resets.
2.0 is always under develpoment and not yet released. I don't see the
problem with 1.6.2.
4) is IPv6 working well? (i mean no
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick performance tests, and at least in
disk I/O and fair scheduling it's MUCH better (tested 4.10 and 5.1).
It's nice to be welcomed by higher performance when you switch OSes. :-)
while high performance is always cool, stable performance
15 matches
Mail list logo
