Re: HEADS UP: gettext
Kirill Ponomarew wrote: Why did you create this *-old *-new versions and not just updated gettext and bumped PORTREVISIONs for depended ports ? The gettext-new idea is Jeremy Messenger's and it hasn't been implemented. I figured that keeping gettext 0.12.1 available and having all ports still use it would be the least disruptive thing, but I was wrong. Sorry. -- Trevor Johnson ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HEADS UP: gettext
Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:46:44AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: Why did you create this *-old *-new versions and not just updated gettext and bumped PORTREVISIONs for depended ports ? The gettext-new idea is Jeremy Messenger's and it hasn't been implemented. I figured that keeping gettext 0.12.1 available and having all ports still use it would be the least disruptive thing, but I was wrong. Sorry. You did really good job, Trevor, by creating ports/61992, it's the most simple way to update depended ports, IMO. -Kirill pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
HEADS UP: gettext
I've tried to update gettext in the ports collection, and a problem has turned up. As described to me by Joe Marcus Clarke, portupgrade will fail because ports/devel/gettext (the new version which no ports use yet) is in conflict with ports/devel/gettext-old (the previous version which I set the ports to depend upon). I believe that a line HOLD_PKGS = ['gettext-*'] in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf may prevent portupgrade (but not necessarily portversion) from trying to upgrade gettext. Alternatively, I've prepared a patch which bumps the libintl version and PORTREVISIONs of ports that use gettext, so they depend on the new version. It needs testing and review. It's at URL:http://people.freebsd.org/~trevor/ports/gettext-dependencies.diff. The updated gettext port may be temporarily moved to gettext-new and ports/devel/gettext returned to version 0.12.1 which we've been using for awhile. Also, the new gettext port ought to be updated to 0.13.1. I've started work on that but I have to leave the computer now. -- Trevor Johnson ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HEADS UP: gettext
Hi, On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:18:02PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: I've tried to update gettext in the ports collection, and a problem has turned up. As described to me by Joe Marcus Clarke, portupgrade will fail because ports/devel/gettext (the new version which no ports use yet) is in conflict with ports/devel/gettext-old (the previous version which I set the ports to depend upon). I believe that a line HOLD_PKGS = ['gettext-*'] in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf may prevent portupgrade (but not necessarily portversion) from trying to upgrade gettext. Alternatively, I've prepared a patch which bumps the libintl version and PORTREVISIONs of ports that use gettext, so they depend on the new version. It needs testing and review. It's at URL:http://people.freebsd.org/~trevor/ports/gettext-dependencies.diff. The updated gettext port may be temporarily moved to gettext-new and ports/devel/gettext returned to version 0.12.1 which we've been using for awhile. Also, the new gettext port ought to be updated to 0.13.1. I've started work on that but I have to leave the computer now. Why did you create this *-old *-new versions and not just updated gettext and bumped PORTREVISIONs for depended ports ? -Kirill pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
