-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hey all,
I've seen some results and possible solutions about upgrading the gettext
port, but none of them thus far have helped me out. I upgraded gettext the
other night, and ever since, get the error that libintl.so.4 doesn't exist.
Anyone help?
Thanks,
:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I think I messed up with gettext.
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID = 0x24D0C4C5
*** Signed: 01/10/2003 18:42:57
*** Verified: 01/10/2003 18:45:18
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
Hey all,
I've seen some results
You know,
I've also been running into problems. Ever since upgrading
gettext to 0.12.1 from 0.11.5 I'm getting all sorts of
issues when it comes to installing certain things(such as
gnome and kde and the like). Do you happen to know of a
way to downgrade? seems like it will be hard since so
(not recomended but works for me(tm)
-Original Message-
From: Eric F Crist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2003 18:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I think I messed up with gettext.
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID = 0x24D0C4C5
*** Signed
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:49:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know,
I've also been running into problems. Ever since upgrading
gettext to 0.12.1 from 0.11.5 I'm getting all sorts of
issues when it comes to installing certain things(such as
gnome and kde and the like). Do you
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:49:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also been running into problems. Ever since upgrading
gettext to 0.12.1 from 0.11.5 I'm getting all sorts of
issues when it comes to installing certain things(such as
gnome and kde and the like). Do you happen to know
At 2003-10-01T18:43:39Z, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ideally that should occur only when there is an incompatible change to the
ABI (application binary interface) provided by the library, and not as
some sort of parallel to the package version number.
It was my understanding that
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:38:48PM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-10-01T18:43:39Z, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ideally that should occur only when there is an incompatible change to the
ABI (application binary interface) provided by the library, and not as
some sort of