Hi
Yes i suspected a bug when i first saw this because of what you say.
100% CPU usage should be noticed. I found out by accident looking at
top. I'll see if we can update the system, it's not high priority right
now but thank you all for your help.
Med vänliga hälsningar
Stefan Midjich a
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 13:10, nocturnal wrote:
> Hi
>
> The -m argument exists in 5.3-RELEASE, thank you. I've attached one file
> with -mio and the other without. With -mio it just output some extra
> stuff at the beginning so i don't know how much it matters or maybe i
> did something wrong.
I
Hi
The -m argument exists in 5.3-RELEASE, thank you. I've attached one file
with -mio and the other without. With -mio it just output some extra
stuff at the beginning so i don't know how much it matters or maybe i
did something wrong.
Med vänliga hälsningar
Stefan Midjich aka nocturnal
[
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:40, nocturnal wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is what i get, i'm afraid i'm not good at interpreting the results.
>
> procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
> r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr ad4 ad6 in sy cs us
> sy id
> 1 5
Hi
This is what i get, i'm afraid i'm not good at interpreting the results.
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr ad4 ad6 in sy cs us
sy id
1 5 0 274324 36436 26 0 0 0 50 27 0 0 242 149 33
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 09:57, nocturnal wrote:
> Hi
>
> kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 1, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
>
> I'm going to see if it's possible to disable USB from the BIOS later
> today, if not, can i disable the USB devices in the kernel?
are you sure you have to?
Try vmst
Hi
kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 1, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
I'm going to see if it's possible to disable USB from the BIOS later
today, if not, can i disable the USB devices in the kernel?
Med vänliga hälsningar
Stefan Midjich aka nocturnal
[Swehack] http://swehack.se
Chuc
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 14:06, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
[ ... ]
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk 25130235 99
irq1: atkbd0 4 0
irq6: fdc0 1
On Monday 03 July 2006 14:06, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 12:26, nocturnal wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The clock?
> >
> > interrupt total rate
> > irq0: clk 25130235 99
> > irq1: atkbd0 4
Hi
I'm sorry for the second e-mail but the uname is.
FreeBSD unix.swebase.com 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5
04:19:18 UTC 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
We haven't even recompiled the kernel since the install. It was supposed
to be a temporary mach
Hi
No powerd running and i've never heard of that daemon. It's a pretty
basic noname machine acting as a small scale webserver and a non-public
nameserver. I've asked aroung and nobody can remember how long it's been
like this so it's very possible that it's been acting like this since we
ins
On Monday 03 July 2006 12:26, nocturnal wrote:
> Hi
>
> The clock?
>
> interrupt total rate
> irq0: clk 25130235 99
> irq1: atkbd0 4 0
> irq6: fdc0 1 0
> irq7: ppc0
Hi
The clock?
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk 25130235 99
irq1: atkbd0 4 0
irq6: fdc0 1 0
irq7: ppc0 1 0
irq8: rtc
On Monday 03 July 2006 10:38, nocturnal wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm having a few problems with a webserver. Today the idle was at 0.0
> and it's still like this. It doesn't look like it's affecting web
> services but it looks weird and i'm afraid that the CPU is working it's
> ass off with something. Of co
nocturnal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a few problems with a webserver. Today the idle was at 0.0
> and it's still like this. It doesn't look like it's affecting web
> services but it looks weird and i'm afraid that the CPU is working
> it's ass off with something. Of course nothing s
Hi
I'm having a few problems with a webserver. Today the idle was at 0.0
and it's still like this. It doesn't look like it's affecting web
services but it looks weird and i'm afraid that the CPU is working it's
ass off with something. Of course nothing shows up in top or ps that
could indicat
16 matches
Mail list logo