I've been trying to install the newer release of KDE on my 5.4 system with
no luck. Here are some attempts:
1. Download kdebase-3.5.0 tarball, run ./configure (for starters):
[laptop]/home/laptop/KDE/kdebase/kdebase-3.5.0(40): ./configure
checking build system type... i386-unknown-freebsd5.4
On Sunday 01 January 2006 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to install the newer release of KDE on my 5.4 system with
no luck. Here are some attempts:
1. Download kdebase-3.5.0 tarball, run ./configure (for starters):
[laptop]/home/laptop/KDE/kdebase/kdebase-3.5.0(40):
On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Download the sources, untar them. They are supposed to play like FBSD
ports; cd into some directory and type make install. There is a meta
directory; here's what happens there:
Seems like there's a pretty high probability that KDE
On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:51 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
There is a perfectly good version of KDE in the ports tree, why do this?
In his defense, that's only true if you consider the perfectly good version
to be the one released last March, rather than the one released just over a
month
On Sunday 01 January 2006 11:40 am, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Download the sources, untar them. They are supposed to play like
FBSD ports; cd into some directory and type make install. There is
a meta directory; here's what happens
On Sunday 01 January 2006 11:43, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:51 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
There is a perfectly good version of KDE in the ports tree, why do this?
In his defense, that's only true if you consider the perfectly good
version to be the one released last
On Sunday 01 January 2006 01:57 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
I understand impatience when a new version comes out and it isn't in the
port's tree right away, but in the maintainer's defense: I remember just
over a year ago when KDE used to crash rather regularly, now it is very
stable, he is
On Sunday 01 January 2006 20:09, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 01:57 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
I understand impatience when a new version comes out and it isn't in the
port's tree right away, but in the maintainer's defense: I remember just
over a year ago when KDE used