Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Adam Weinberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> (12.25.2002 @ 1728 PST): Gary W. Swearingen said, in 2.0K: << > > > > I'm not sure what that means. ... > semantic >adj : of or relating to the study of meaning and changes of > meaning; "semantic analysis" OK, good. Thanks

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Adam Weinberger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> (12.25.2002 @ 1728 PST): Gary W. Swearingen said, in 2.0K: << > > It's just semantics, really. > > I'm not sure what that means. No, seriously, my dictionary says "study > or science of the meaning of language forms", but does that include the

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's just semantics, really. I'm not sure what that means. No, seriously, my dictionary says "study or science of the meaning of language forms", but does that include the meaning of single words or only about the meaning imparted by sentence str

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-25 14:29:44 -0800: > Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well that's an interesting idea. Throw-away subdomains (excuse my > > terminology - maybe I'm supposed to call them host names?) imply a whole > > "host" of email addresses without wasting a domain na

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well that's an interesting idea. Throw-away subdomains (excuse my > terminology - maybe I'm supposed to call them host names?) imply a whole > "host" of email addresses without wasting a domain name. No excuse needed, if my reading is correct. O'Reilly'

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:49:43PM -0800, Ken McGlothlen wrote: > "Jimi Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | That way when I start getting Viagra or penis enlargment offers (and God > | knows I need 'em ;)) addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can voice a loud > | and provable complaint. > >

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Ken McGlothlen
"Jimi Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | That way when I start getting Viagra or penis enlargment offers (and God | knows I need 'em ;)) addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can voice a loud | and provable complaint. Well, unfortunately, you might be falsely accusing Best Buy, since it's li

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> For web use, I use a throw-away free-ISP account (which lets me pop mail >>> from >>> anywhere!) which hands out email addresses in the form >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> - whenever a web sites asks me for an email address, I use their

RE: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Jimi Thompson
r. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Brampton Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:02 PM To: Kurt Bigler; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack] I think the orginal poster didn't

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Andrew Brampton
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:07 PM Subject: Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack] > on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: > >> on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROT

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: >> on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never >>> use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just a

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never > use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just attracks > crackers. I currently create a new email address for every cate

RE: L0phtcrack

2002-12-24 Thread Barry Byrne
arry Byrne, IT Manager, WBT Systems, Block 2, Harcourt Centre Harcourt Street, Dublin 2, Ireland > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kenzo > Sent: 24 December 2002 05:07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: L0phtcra

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread kenzo
disk that comes with them. It happened to one of my friends. He was made his partition bigger erasing that one, and he coudn't use the recovery disk anymore. they had to send him the all the disks , ( 3 I think. ). I finaly found where the l0phtcrack program was located in FBSD, but when I r

RE: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Derrick Ryalls
.* *I claim no responsibility for data, especially if you accidentally repartition the box. Good luck. -Derrick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenzo > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:34 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

RE: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Sean J. Countryman
: 'Kenzo'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: L0phtcrack For L0phtcrack to work, in my experience, you have to have some kind of administrator priv's on the box you're doing it on anyway, making this a rather moot point. You can use the pwdump utility that they suggest to remote

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Nathan Kinkade
nd tried to use john to crack it. > It sais that there's 0 passwords, But when I use a hash retriever, it list > all the accounts. > I noticed that there was a version of l0phtcrack on freebsd > /usr/ports/security/l0phtcrack, and wanted to see if that helped, but I > can't

RE: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Craig M. Luchtefeld
For L0phtcrack to work, in my experience, you have to have some kind of administrator priv's on the box you're doing it on anyway, making this a rather moot point. You can use the pwdump utility that they suggest to remotely hash the SAM, but, again, this requires an administrato

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Pierrick Brossin
Kenzo wrote: I tried the linux boot disk that suppose to reset the admin password, but that didn't work. I think it only works on 2000. I assume that if you altered the password file of Windows XP the wrong way (the way your linux boot disk does it) you crashed 'em ! Since it was created for 2

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-23 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never > use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just attracks > crackers. > I guess it just depends on the person, I just prefer to use different e-mail > accounts for work an

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Kenzo
password, but that didn't work. I think it only works on 2000. then I booted from a win98 boot disk, then use dos ntfs to copy the sam file to a floppy and tried to use john to crack it. It sais that there's 0 passwords, But when I use a hash retriever, it list all the accounts. I noti

RE: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Jimi Thompson
o smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: Kenzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:56 PM To: Jimi Thompson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: L0phtcrack Well sorry for being cheap a

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Stacey Roberts
> > http://www.atstake.com/research/lc/ ): > > > > > Consider that at one of the largest technology companies, where > > > policy required that passwords exceed 8 characters, mix cases, > > > and include numbers or symbols... > > > > > > *

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Stacey Roberts
; > - Original Message - > From: "Stacey Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Kenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 4:30 PM > Subject: Re: L0phtcrack >

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Stephen Hovey
t; > policy required that passwords exceed 8 characters, mix cases, > > and include numbers or symbols... > > > > * L0phtCrack obtained 18% of the passwords in 10 minutes > > * 90% of the passwords were recovered within 48 hours on a Pentium > > II/300 > >

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Kenzo
riginal Message - From: "Jimi Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: L0phtcrack > Especially com

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Kenzo
t. - Original Message - From: "Stacey Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 4:30 PM Subject: Re: L0phtcrack > On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 22:2

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread paul beard
exceed 8 characters, mix cases, and include numbers or symbols... * L0phtCrack obtained 18% of the passwords in 10 minutes * 90% of the passwords were recovered within 48 hours on a Pentium II/300 * The Administrator and most Domain Admin passwords were cracked It doesn't have to be this way.

RE: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Jimi Thompson
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:30 PM To: Kenzo Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: L0phtcrack On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 22:24, Kenzo wrote: > Anyone here use the l0phtcrack version that comes with FBSD 4.7? > Is it capable of cracking SAM files from XP computers? > I installed it, but I c

Re: L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Stacey Roberts
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 22:24, Kenzo wrote: > Anyone here use the l0phtcrack version that comes with FBSD 4.7? > Is it capable of cracking SAM files from XP computers? > I installed it, but I can't seem to find how to use it. > I tried John and that didn't get me anywhere. >

L0phtcrack

2002-12-23 Thread Kenzo
Anyone here use the l0phtcrack version that comes with FBSD 4.7? Is it capable of cracking SAM files from XP computers? I installed it, but I can't seem to find how to use it. I tried John and that didn't get me anywhere. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsu