On Feb 25, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Thanks for the answers to both of you.
Szivesen
We just modify the packaging of the file: gzipped tarball instead
of floppy images, so it will be fine to redistribute them with the
pointer to the sources then.
Yes.
As a shameless plug,
Ted Mittelstaedt schrieb:
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kövesdán Gábor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries
[freebsd-em
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kövesdán Gábor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries
> [freebsd-emulation cut from cc]
>
>
[freebsd-emulation cut from cc]
On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:53 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
The question is that can we extract and provide these binaries in a
simple tar.gz file or is that considered a GPL/LGPL violation? The
sources are freely available on slackware.com, but we are not sure
doin
Hi Folks,
we have a shiny new linux_base based on the Slackware distribution in
ports/104680. The only problem is with this, that Slackware people
distribute some binaries in ext2fs floppy images. We would like to avoid
using such, because that would need some kernel module trick in the port
